Development, validation and application of physiologically based biopharmaceutics model to justify the change in dissolution specifications for DRL ABC extended release tablets.

OBJECTIVE: The generic drug product DRL ABC is an Extended Release (ER) Tablet manufactured by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited and have multi point dissolution as part of release specification. A proposal is being made to revise the dissolution specification and the aim of present work was to evaluate if this would still provide bioequivalent product. METHODS: PBBM was developed for DRL ABC using literature reported pharmacokinetic (PK) data. The intravenous PK data and in vitro metabolic rate constants were utilized for developing PBPK model first, followed by that in conjugation with mechanistic ACATTM model, a PBBM is developed for per-oral immediate release formulations. The validated model was applied to predict clinical bioequivalence (BE) study data for the Reference (Innovator ER Tablet) and Test product. For Reference and Test product, in vivo dissolution profiles were mechanistically deconvoluted from plasma concentration (Cp)-time profiles. Further, mechanistic in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR) applied to in vitro release profiles of two hypothetical Test product batches (one with single point low dissolution profile (SPLP) and other with overall low dissolution profile (LP)) in order to calculate their in vivo releases and population simulation was performed with 40 virtual subjects. RESULTS: Results from the cross-over virtual trials showed BE between the Reference and various Test product batches (SPLP and LP), with maximum Cp (Cmax) and area under the Cp-time curve (AUC0-inf) well within 80-125% range. CONCLUSION: PBBM in conjugation with IVIVR and virtual BE was successfully applied for justifying changes in dissolution specification of DRL ABC.

An updated overview with simple and practical approach for developing in vitro-in vivo correlation.

Preclinical Research & Development An in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is as a predictive mathematical model that demonstrates a key role in the development, advancement, evaluation and optimization of extended release, modified release and immediate release pharmaceutical formulations. A validated IVIVC model can serve as a surrogate for bioequivalence studies and subsequently save time, effort and expenditure during pharmaceutical product development. This review discusses about different levels of correlations, general approaches to develop an IVIVC by mathematical modelling, validation, data analysis and various applications. In the current setting, the dearth of success associated with IVIVC is due to complexity of underlying scientific principles as well as the practice of fitting/matching in vivo plasma level-time data with in vitro dissolution profile. Hence, a simple, straightforward practical means to predict plasma drug levels by convolution technique and percentage drug absorbed computed from in vitro dissolution profile based on deconvolution method are illustrated. The bioavailability/bioequivalence assessment and evaluation are frequently validated by the pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration, time to reach maximum concentration, and area under the curve. The implementation of a quality by design manufacturing based on in vivo bioavailability and clinically relevant dissolution specification are recommended because corresponding design safe space will guarantee that all batches from relevant products are met with sufficient quality and bioperformance. Recently, United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have proposed that in silico/physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling can be used in decision making during preclinical experiments as well as to recognize the dissolution profiles that can forecast and ensure the desired clinical performance.

Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling for Gefapixant IR Formulation Development and Defining the Bioequivalence Dissolution Safe Space.

Gefapixant is a weakly basic drug which has been formulated as an immediate release tablet for oral administration. A physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) was developed based on gefapixant physicochemical properties and clinical pharmacokinetics to aid formulation selection, bioequivalence safe space assessment and dissolution specification settings. In vitro dissolution profiles of different free base and citrate salt formulations were used as an input to the model. The model was validated against the results of independent studies, which included a bioequivalence and a relative bioavailability study, as well as a human ADME study, all meeting acceptance criteria of prediction errors ≤ 20% for both Cmax and AUC.  PBBM was also applied to evaluate gastric pH-mediated drug-drug-interaction potential with co-administration of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), omeprazole. Model results showed good agreement with clinical data in which omeprazole lowered gefapixant exposure for the free base formulation but did not significantly alter gefapixant pharmacokinetics for the citrate based commercial drug product. An extended virtual dissolution bioequivalence safe space was established.  Gefapixant drug product batches are anticipated to be bioequivalent with the clinical reference batch when their dissolution is > 80% in 60 minutes. PBBM established a wide dissolution bioequivalence space as part of assuring product quality.

Establishing Virtual Bioequivalence and Clinically Relevant Specifications for Omeprazole Enteric-Coated Capsules by Incorporating Dissolution Data in PBPK Modeling.

Currently, Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III are the only biological exemptions of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms eligible for regulatory approval. However, through virtual bioequivalence (VBE) studies, BCS class II drugs may qualify for biological exemptions if reliable and validated modeling is used. Here, we sought to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR), and VBE models for enteric-coated omeprazole capsules, to establish a clinically-relevant dissolution specification (CRDS) for screening BE and non-BE batches, and to ultimately develop evaluation criteria for generic omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. To establish omeprazole's IVIVR based on the PBPK model, we explored its in vitro dissolution conditions and then combined in vitro dissolution profile studies with in vivo clinical trials. The predicted omeprazole pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and parameters closely matched the observed PK data. Based on the VBE results, the bioequivalence study of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules required at least 48 healthy Chinese subjects. Based on the CRDS, the capsules' in vitro dissolution should not be < 28%-54%, < 52%, or < 80% after two, three, and six hours, respectively. Failure to meet these dissolution criteria may result in non-bioequivalence. Here, PBPK modeling and IVIVR methods were used to bridge the in vitro dissolution of the drug with in vivo PK to establish the BE safety space of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. The strategy used in this study can be applied in BE studies of other BCS II generics to obtain biological exemptions and accelerate drug development.

Exploring clinically relevant dissolution specifications for oral solid dosage forms of weak acid drugs using an in silico modeling and simulation approach.

The aim of this study was to explore clinically relevant dissolution specifications for weak acid drugs using an in silico drug absorption model. Loxoprofen sodium and ibuprofen were used as model drugs in this study. An in silico drug absorption model was developed using Stella Professional software and the prediction model accurately represented the plasma concentration profiles of the model drugs following oral administration. Theoretical pharmacokinetic profiles and parameters of the model drugs were predicted using various dissolution rate values in gastrointestinal fluid. This in silico modeling and simulation approach suggests that it is possible to estimate the minimum required dissolution rate for bioequivalence, an example of a clinically relevant dissolution specification. Furthermore, an in vitro dissolution test was conducted for selected drug products of each model drug using paddle apparatus and the results were compared with the clinically relevant dissolution specifications predicted using the in silico simulation.

The use of PBPK/PD to establish clinically relevant dissolution specifications for zolpidem immediate release tablets.

BACKGROUND: Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent which has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining sleep in adults and is one of the most frequently prescribed hypnotics in the world. For drugs that are used to treat sleeping disorders, the time to reach the maximum concentration (Tmax) of the drug in plasma is important to achieving a fast onset of action and this must be maintained when switching from one product to another. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present work was to create a PBPK/PD model for zolpidem and establish a clinically relevant "safe space" for dissolution of zolpidem from the commercial immediate release (IR) formulation. A second objective was to analyze literature pharmacokinetic data to verify the negative food effect ascribed to zolpidem and consider its ramifications in terms of the "safe space" for dissolution. METHODS: Using dissolution, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, an integrated PBPK/PD model for immediate release zolpidem tablets was constructed in Simcyp®. This model was used to identify the clinically relevant dissolution specifications necessary to ensure efficacy. RESULTS: According to the simulations, as long as 85% of the drug is released in 45 minutes or less, the impact on the PK and PD profiles of zolpidem would be minimal. According to the FDA, the drug has to dissolve from the test and reference products at a similar rate and to an extent of 85% in not more than 30 minutes to pass bioequivalence via the BCS-biowaiver test. Thus, the BCS-biowaiver specifications are somewhat more stringent than the "safe space" based on the PBPK/PD model. Published data from fasted and fed state pharmacokinetic studies suggest but do not prove a negative food effect of zolpidem. CONCLUSIONS: A PBPK/PD model indicates that current BCS-biowaiver criteria are more restrictive for immediate release zolpidem tablets than they need to be. In view of the close relationship between PK and PD, it remains advisable to avoid taking zolpidem tablets with or immediately after a meal, as indicated by the Stilnox® labeling.

Dissolution Edge Charts for Immediate Release Products and Their Applications: a Simulation Study to Aid the Setting of Specifications.

One of the most commonly used methods to establish the clinical relevance of dissolution is to align the dissolution specifications with pivotal clinical batches. The objective of the study was to create edge charts for the dissolution of immediate release (IR) drug products to quantitatively establish the bases for setting clinically relevant and discriminating dissolution specifications and to clarify which stage in the US Pharmacopoeia (USP) <711> acceptance tables should be targeted. The simulations of dissolution data were performed on a batch of IR products with 1,000,000 units. The desired acceptance criterion was Q = 80% of the label claim at 30 min. A total of 110 scenarios for IR data were generated, which included various combinations of two determinants: the batch mean and SD (standard deviation). For each scenario, the dissolution data were tested based on USP three-stage procedures to determine the pass/fail at each stage. This process was repeated 10,000 times. The failure rate at each stage for each scenario was calculated as the percentage of failed replicates across 10,000 trials. Contour plots, named edge charts, were created to demonstrate the relationship between the dissolution failure rates and the two determinants (mean and SD). The edge lines represent the failure rates for the given combinations of the mean and SD. The edge charts can provide a quantitative estimate based on the observed dissolution data and provide fundamental support for recommendations on using USP stage 2 as a target for setting the acceptance limit(s).