Long-term outcome of medically treated epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To review the long-term outcome of epilepsy in population-based studies. METHOD: Analysis of population-based studies. RESULTS: About two of three patients with new-onset epilepsy will, in the long run, enter five-year terminal remission. Chances for remission are best for those with idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy. It is unclear whether the seizure outcome has improved over the last several decades. Social outcome, however, may have become better because of the improved level of knowledge on and public attitudes toward people with epilepsy, and possibly fewer prejudices at home, daycare, school, military and labor market. CONCLUSION: While we still do not have a cure for epilepsy for all patients, relief of the medical and social consequences is available for many and hope is on the horizon for people with epilepsy.

Stopping epilepsy treatment in seizure remission: Good or bad or both?

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of epilepsy after stopping antiepileptic drugs in remission. RESULTS: Stopping antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in remission is routinely done in many patients. Although the consequences of an unexpected relapse seizure in the 2 years after stopping AEDs may cause anguish and social issues, the impact on the long term seizure outlook of the epilepsy is minimal, if any. Discontinuation of drug treatment does not seem to affect the long-term prognosis but exposes patients who were seizure-free for years to a transient two-fold risk of seizures for the first 2 years after stopping AEDs. In addition, 20% of patients who were seizure-free for years, do not become seizure-free immediately after restarting AED treatment after relapse. The list of potential pitfalls is long. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, those with prior withdrawal attempts and late remission have a higher risk of relapse. CONCLUSION: Stopping AEDs in remission does not affect the long-term patterns of epilepsy and some patients report a better general health in a life without AEDs. High-risk patients should not be generally encouraged to stop their AEDs in remission. We need new drugs that combine anti-seizure and antiepileptogenic effects to prevent seizure relapse and flare up of epilepsy after stopping AEDs in remission.

Personalized evaluation based on quantitative proteomics for drug-treated patients with chronic kidney disease.

The patient's response to drug treatment is usually systems-wide based on multi-spots through either direct or indirect targets. Thus, the evaluation of the treatment cannot rely on single targeted biomarker, especially for complex diseases such as chronic kidney disease. In the present study, we performed a systems-wide analysis using proteomic approach to quantify changes in the proteomic profiles of the plasma from IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients before and after treatment. In particular, the patient-to-health distances based on global proteome quantification before and after treatment were calculated and considered as quantitative readouts to measure patient divergences from the healthy condition. We found that the patient-to-health distance nicely correlated with the patient's response to drug treatment and long-term prognosis, which created a self-tracking platform for personalized evaluation. In addition, the steroid treatment plays a role in immunosuppression, while the Chinese Traditional Medicine (TCM) can modulate whole-body systems. Our results indicated that STC therapy normalized the proteomic profile more significantly than SA therapy. This work provides an omics-based and systematic platform for personalized evaluation of disease treatment. This strategy could help us to evaluate treatment outcomes and predict prognosis in patients with IgAN and other complex diseases.