Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Accumulation of middle-weight uraemic toxins in haemodialysis (HD) patients results in increased morbidity and mortality. Whether medium cut-off HD (MCO-HD) improves removal of middle-weight uraemic toxins remains to be demonstrated. METHODS: This cross-over prospective study included 40 patients randomly assigned to receive either 3 months of MCO-HD followed by 3 months of high-flux HD (HF-HD), or vice versa. The primary endpoint was myoglobin reduction ratio (RR) after 3 months of MCO-HD. Secondary endpoints were the effect of MCO-HD on other middle-weight toxins and protein-bound toxins, and on parameters of nutrition, inflammation, anaemia and oxidative stress. RESULTS: Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provided higher mean RR of myoglobin (36 ± 8 versus 57 ± 13%, P < 0.0001), beta2-microglobulin (68 ± 6 versus 73 ± 15%, P = 0.04), prolactin (32 ± 13 versus 59 ± 11%, P < 0.0001), fibroblast growth factor 23 (20 ± 21 versus 41 ± 22%, P = 0.0002), homocysteine (43 ± 7 versus 46 ± 9%, P = 0.03) and higher median RR of kappa [54 (48-58) versus 70 (63-74)%, P < 0.0001] and lambda free light chain (FLC) [15 (9-22) versus 44 (38-49)%, P < 0.0001]. Mean ± SD pre-dialysis levels of beta2-microglobulin (28.4 ± 5.6 versus 26.9 ± 5.1 mg/L, P = 0.01) and oxidized low-density lipoprote (6.9 ± 4.4 versus 5.5 ± 2.5 pg/mL, P = 0.04), and median (interquartile range) kappa FLC [145 (104-203) versus 129 (109-190) mg/L, P < 0.03] and lambda FLC [106 (77-132) versus 89 (62-125) mg/L, P = 0.002] were significantly lower. Mean albumin levels decreased significantly (38.2 ± 4.1 versus 36.9 ± 4.3 g/L, P = 0.004), without an effect on nutritional status as suggested by unchanged normalized protein catabolic rate and transthyretin level. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provides higher myoglobin and other middle molecules RR and is associated with moderate hypoalbuminemia. The potential benefits of this strategy on long-term clinical outcomes deserve further evaluation.

Efficacy of enoxaparin in preventing coagulation during high-flux haemodialysis, expanded haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are easily dialysable with high-flow membranes; however, it is not clear whether the LMWH dose should be adjusted according to the membrane type and dialysis technique. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the dialyser on anticoagulation of the extracorporeal dialysis circuit. METHODS: Thirteen patients received the same dose of LMWH through the arterial port via three dialysis techniques: high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD), online haemodiafiltration (HDF) and expanded haemodialysis (HDx). All dialysis was performed under similar conditions: duration, 4 h; blood flow, 400 mL/min; and dialysate flow, 500 mL/min. Antifactor Xa (aXa) activity and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured before and after the dialysis. Clotting time of the vascular access site after haemodialysis, visual clotting score of the dialyser and any complications with the extracorporeal circuit or bleeding were registered. RESULTS: Post-dialysis aXa activity in HF-HD (0.26 ± 0.02 U/mL) was significantly different from that in HDF (0.21 ± 0.02 U/mL, P = 0.024), and there was a trend in HDx (0.22 ± 0.01 U/mL, P = 0.05). APTT post-dialysis in HF-HD (30.5 ± 0.7 s) was significantly different from that in HDx (28.2 ± 0.64 s, P = 0.009) and HDF (28.8 ± 0.73 s, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: AXa activity in HDF was significantly lower than that in HF-HD, possibly because of more losses of LMWH through the dialyser. Given the higher anticoagulant loss in HDF and probably in HDx than in HF-HD, the enoxaparin dose administered may be adjusted according to the dialysis technique.

High-volume online haemodiafiltration treatment and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients: more than one mode.

The reduction of the dismally high mortality of current end-stage renal disease patients maintained on conventional standard haemodialysis (HD) remains an unmet medical need. Online haemodiafiltration (HDF) modes with various sites of fluid substitution (post-, pre-, mixed- and mid-dilution) are increasingly used worldwide as promising alternatives to conventional HD. Large scale cohort studies, post hoc analyses of randomized trials, and individual participant meta-analyses suggest that post-dilution and pre-dilution, especially with high substitution volumes, improve outcomes compared with conventional standard HD. However, there is no definitive proof of a survival advantage of HDF over standard HD. The different modes of high-volume HDF should be considered a therapeutic platform allowing to personalize and tailor routine HDF treatment. The selection of the HDF mode should be made according to individual patient characteristics. Utilizing high retention onset membranes, expanded haemodialysis (HDx) can achieve the same solute removal performance as HDF. Subgroups of high-volume OL-HDF patients could benefit from HDx. Ongoing and future trials should provide definitive proof for the superiority of high-volume OL-HDF over conventional HD or HDx to give guidance for the most favourable mode of dialytic therapy for clinical use.

Middle molecule elimination in expanded haemodialysis: only convective transport?

BACKGROUND: New high-retention onset dialysers have shown improved efficacy in the elimination of uraemic toxins, and their depurative capacity has been compared with high convective volumes of online haemodiafiltration. Haemodialysis (HD) using high-flux membranes leads to convective transport by internal filtration [direct filtration (DF)/backfiltration (BF)] and allows the removal of middle molecules (MMs). The aim of this study was to assess solute transport mechanisms in expanded HD (HDx). METHODS: In 14 4-h HDx sessions with Theranova-500 dialysers under similar dialysis conditions (blood flow 400 mL/min, dialysate flow 700 mL/min, dialysate temperature 35.5°C), pressures at the inlet and outlet of both dialyser compartments (P bi, P bo, P di and P do) were collected hourly to estimate DF/BF volumes by semi-empirical methods. Uraemic toxins with various molecular weights were measured pre-dialysis, at 1 h (pre-filter and post-filter) and post-dialysis to calculate molecules' reduction over time and dialyser in vivo clearances. RESULTS: Ultrafiltration was 1.47 ± 0.9 L and Kt/V 1.74 ± 0.3. Hydrodynamic data (P bi: 259 ± 39, P bo: 155 ± 27, P di: 271 ± 30, P do: 145 ± 29 mmHg and oncotic pressure 22.0 ± 3.5 mmHg) allowed the estimation of DF/BF rates. DF flow ranged from 29.5 ± 4.2 to 31.3 ± 3.9 mL/min and BF flow ranged from 25.1 ± 2.3 to 23.4 ± 2.6 mL/min. The highest calculated DF volume was 7506.8 ± 935.3 mL/session. Diffusive clearances (K d) of all solutes were higher than their convective transport (all P < 0.001) except for prolactin (23 kDa) clearances, which showed no differences. Total clearances of all solutes were correlated with their K d (ρ = 0.899-0.987, all P < 0.001) and Kt/V correlated with all reduction rates (ρ = 0.661-0.941, P = 0.010 to <0.001). DF flow was only associated with urea (ρ = -0.793, P = 0.001), creatinine (ρ = -0.675, P = 0.008) and myoglobin clearance (ρ = 0.653, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that diffusive transport is a main mechanism of MM elimination in HDx. HDx offers an efficient depuration of MM without the need for high convective volumes.