Dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful vertebral metastases: A randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomised study was to determine whether dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for painful vertebral metastases results in increased rates of pain improvement compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) (control) 6 months after treatment. METHODS: This randomized, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted between November 2016 and January 2023, when it was stopped early. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had one or two painful, stable, or potentially unstable vertebral metastases; and had a life expectancy of 1 year or longer according to the investigator's estimates. Patients received 48.5 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions (with epidural involvement) or 40 Gy in five fractions (without epidural involvement) in the SBRT group and 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in five fractions in the cEBRT group, respectively. The primary end point was an improvement in the pain score at the treated site by at least 2 points (on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 points) at 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. RESULTS: Of 214 patients who were screened for eligibility, 63 were randomized 1:1 between SBRT (33 patients with 36 metastases) and cEBRT (30 patients with 31 metastases). The median age of all patients was 66 years, and 40 patients were men (63.5%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 6-month proportion of patients who had metastases with pain reduction by 2 or more points was significantly higher in the SBRT group versus the control group (69.4% vs. 41.9%, respectively; two-sided p = .02). Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline were nonsignificant between the groups. No differences were observed in vertebral compression fracture or adverse event rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-intensified SBRT improved pain score more effectively than cEBRT at 6 months.

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of early breast cancer with low-energy x-rays in breast-conserving surgery : Prospective identification of pre- and intraoperative factors influencing the feasibility of IORT.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify pre- and intraoperative factors indicating the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 128 women undergoing BCS due to early breast cancer were included in this prospective observational study, independent of whether IORT was planned or not. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical parameters that could potentially influence the feasibility of IORT were recorded for the entire collective. In addition, a preoperative senological assessment was performed and analyzed to assess the feasibility of IORT. Logistic regression was then used to identify relevant preoperative parameters and to generate a formula predicting the feasibility of IORT. RESULTS: Of the 128 included women undergoing BCS, 46 were preoperatively rated to be feasible, 20 to be questionably feasible for IORT. Ultimately, IORT was realized in 30 patients. The most frequent reasons for omission of IORT were insufficient tumor-to-skin distance and/or an excessively large tumor cavity. Small clinical tumor size and large tumor-to-skin distance according to preoperative ultrasound were significantly related to accomplishment of IORT. CONCLUSION: We observed that preoperative ultrasound-based tumor-skin distance is a significant factor in addition to already known parameters to predict feasibility of IORT. Based on our findings we developed a formula to optimize IORT planning which might serve as an additional tool to improve patient selection for IORT in early breast cancer.

Six-year outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are the leading respective techniques of prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, almost no study has directly compared their outcomes; none have compared mortality outcomes. METHODS: We compared 6­year outcomes of RARP (n = 500) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, a rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy, n = 360) in patients with cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer. We assessed oncological outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), radiological recurrence-free survival (rRFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), using propensity score matching (PSM). We also assessed treatment-related complication outcomes of prostatectomy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 79 months (> 6 years). PSM generated a matched cohort of 260 patients (130 per treatment group). In the matched cohort, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent results for OS, CSS, and rRFS: both achieved excellent 6­year outcomes for OS (> 96%), CSS (> 98%), and rRFS (> 91%). VMAT had significantly longer bRFS than RARP, albeit based on different definitions of biochemical recurrence. Regarding complication outcomes, patients who underwent RARP had minimal (2.6%) severe perioperative complications and achieved excellent continence recovery (91.6 and 68.8% of the patients achieved ≤ 1 pad/day and pad-free, respectively). Patients who underwent VMAT had an acceptable rate (20.0%) of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary complications and a very low rate (4.4%) of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal complications. CONCLUSION: On the basis of PSM after a 6-year follow-up, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent and excellent oncological outcomes, as well as acceptable complication profiles.

Salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma: clinical outcomes and toxicities.

BACKGROUND: The management of locally recurrent gynecological carcinoma remains a challenge due to the limited availability of data. This study aims to share our institutional experience in using definitive radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients in our hospital completing salvage 3D image-based HDR brachytherapy, with or without EBRT, for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The toxicities were assessed by CTCAEv5. RESULTS: During a median observation period of 21 months, the study reported a tumor objective response rate of 95%. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 89.4% and 90.9%, respectively. The EBRT combined with brachytherapy achieved a median cumulative dose of 88 Gy to CTV D90. 14 patients received concurrent and/or systemic chemotherapy. Two patients suffered locoregional recurrence after salvage treatment, one of whom only received salvage brachytherapy for prior RT history. The analysis identified significant predictors for DFS, including tumor histology and FIGO stage. 5 patients observed acute grade 1-2 rectal (15%) or genitourinary (10%) toxicities. Late toxicities including grade 1-2 rectal bleeding (10%) and grade 2 pelvic fracture (5%) were seen in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: 3D image-guided brachytherapy combined with EBRT shows effective tumor control and acceptable toxicity profile for women with locally recurrent gynecologic cancer. The success in managing vaginal recurrence is notably influenced by histologic subtype and FIGO staging.

A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multi-institutional phase II study was to confirm the safety and the potential efficacy of moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prostate-based image-guidance for Japanese patients. METHODS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer were eligible. Patients with a part of high risk (having only one of the following factors, cT3a, 20 < PSA ≤ 30, or GS = 8 or 9) were also included. Hypofractionated IMRT using daily image-guided technique with prostate matching was performed with a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 4-8 months was mandatory for patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS: From 20 institutions, 134 patients enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.16 years (range, 1.43-6.47 years). The number of patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer was 20, 80, and 34, respectively. The 5-year overall, biochemical failure-free, and clinical failure-free survival was 94.5%, 96.0%, and 99.2%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 94.1%, 97.4%, and 93.9%, respectively. The incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) late toxicities at 5 years were 5.3% and 5.3%, respectively. There are no acute or late toxicities ≥ grade 3. Of 124 patients who were followed for up to 5 years, the grade 2 late GU or GI toxicities were 10.5% (90% confidence intervals, 6.3-16.2%, p = 0.0958). CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of moderately hypofractionated IMRT with prostate-based image-guidance was confirmed among Japanese patients with prostate cancer.

Outcomes of intraventricular 131-I-omburtamab and external beam radiotherapy in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma and ependymoma.

PURPOSE: Intraventricular compartmental radioimmunotherapy (cRIT) with 131-I-omburtamab is a potential therapy for recurrent primary brain tumors that can seed the thecal space. These patients often previously received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to a portion or full craniospinal axis (CSI) as part of upfront therapy. Little is known regarding outcomes after re-irradiation as part of multimodality therapy including cRIT. This study evaluates predictors of response, patterns of failure, and radiologic events after cRIT. METHODS: Patients with recurrent medulloblastoma or ependymoma who received 131-I-omburtamab on a prospective clinical trial were included. Extent of disease at cRIT initiation (no evidence of disease [NED] vs measurable disease [MD]) was assessed as associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: All 27 patients (20 medulloblastoma, 7 ependymoma) had EBRT preceding cRIT: most (22, 81%) included CSI (median dose 2340 cGy, boost to 5400 cGy). Twelve (44%) also received EBRT at relapse as bridging to cRIT. There were no cases of radionecrosis. At cRIT initiation, 11 (55%) medulloblastoma and 3 (43%) ependymoma patients were NED, associated with improved PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.048) in medulloblastoma. Most relapses were multifocal. With medium follow-up of 3.0 years (95% confidence interval, 1.8-7.4), 6 patients remain alive with NED. CONCLUSION: For patients with medulloblastoma, remission at time of cRIT was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes. Relapses are often multifocal, particularly in the setting of measurable disease at cRIT initiation. EBRT is a promising tool to achieve NED status at cRIT initiation, with no cases of radiation necrosis.

External beam radiotherapy combination is a risk factor for bladder cancer in patients with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk of bladder cancer (BCa) in patients treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 583 patients with PCa who underwent brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We analyzed the disease-free survival (DFS) of BCa in patients with PCa who underwent brachytherapy with or without EBRT. We performed multivariate Cox regression analyses of DFS using age, EBRT, and Brinkman index (BI) score (number of cigarettes smoked per day × number of years smoking) ≥ 200 as variables for BCa after brachytherapy. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (2.4%) developed BCa after brachytherapy with or without EBRT. The percentage of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (UC) was 63.6%. A total of 85.7% of patients had non-muscle invasive BCa, and 14.3% of patients had muscle invasive BCa. DFS was longer in brachytherapy monotherapy than in combination therapy (brachytherapy + EBRT). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that a BI score ≥ 200 (Hazard Ratio (HR 8.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.12-65.98) and EBRT combination (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.03-10.52) were significantly associated with BCa development in patients with PCa treated with brachytherapy. Furthermore, patients with BI score ≥ 200 and EBRT combination had a significantly higher risk of BCa compared with patients with BI score < 200 (HR Log-rank test P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Most cases of BCa after brachytherapy with or without EBRT are high grade and invasive. We hypothesized that the EBRT combination might be a risk factor for BCa in patients with PCa who underwent brachytherapy.

CBCT-based deformable dose accumulation of external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer.

Background: Delivered radiotherapy doses do not exactly match those planned for a course of treatment, largely due to inter-fraction changes in anatomy. In this study, accumulated delivered dose was calculated for a sample of cervical cancer patients, by deformably registering daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to the planning computed tomography (CT) scan. Planned and accumulated doses were compared for the clinical target volume (CTV), bladder, and rectum.Material and Methods: For 10 patients receiving 45 Gy in 25 fractions of external beam radiotherapy, daily dose distributions were calculated on CBCT. These images were deformed onto the planning CT and the dose was accumulated using Velocity 4.1 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA). The quality of deformable image registration was evaluated visually and by calculating Dice similarity coefficients and mean distance to agreement.Results: V95%>99% was achieved for the primary CTV in 9/10 patients for the planned dose distribution and 7/10 patients for the accumulated dose distribution. Primary CTV coverage by 95% of the prescription dose was reduced in one patient, due to an increase in anterior-posterior separation. Comparison of planned and accumulated dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the bladder and rectum found agreement within 5% at low and intermediate doses, but differences exceeded 20% at higher doses. Direct addition of CBCT DVHs was seen to be a poor estimate for the accumulated DVH at higher doses.Conclusion: Computation of delivered radiotherapy dose that accounts for inter-fraction anatomical changes is important for establishing dose-effect relationships. Updating delivered dose distributions after each fraction would support informed clinical decision making on any potential treatment interventions.

Adjuvant treatments for locally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: a nationwide survey in Japan.

The role of adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for locally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is controversial because of the lack of prospective data. To prepare for a clinical trial, this study investigated the current clinical practice of adjuvant treatments for locally advanced DTC. A survey on treatment selection criteria for hypothetical locally advanced DTC was administered to representative thyroid surgeons of facilities participating in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Radiation Therapy Study Group. Of the 43 invited facilities, surgeons from 39 (91%) completed the survey. For R1 resection or suspected residual disease, 26 (67%) facilities administered high-dose (100-200 mCi) radioactive iodine (RAI), but none performed EBRT. For R2 resection or unresectable primary disease, 26 (67%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 7 (18%) performed adjuvant treatments, including EBRT. For complete resection with nodal extra-capsular extension, 13 (34%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 1 (3%) performed EBRT. For unresectable mediastinal lymph node metastasis, 31 (79%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 5 (13%) performed adjuvant treatments, including EBRT. Adjuvant EBRT was not routinely performed mainly because of the lack of evidence for efficacy (74%). Approximately 15% of the facilities routinely considered adjuvant EBRT for DTC with R2 resection or unresectable primary or lymph node metastasis disease. Future clinical trials will need to optimize EBRT for these patients.

Radiotherapy for Meningioma.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial brain tumor, and have a heterogeneous biology and an unmet need for targeted treatment options. Existing treatments for meningiomas are limited to surgery, radiotherapy, or a combination of these depending on clinical and histopathological features. Treatment recommendations for meningioma patients take into consideration radiologic features, tumor size and location, and medical comorbidities, all of which may influence the ability to undergo complete resection. Ultimately, outcomes for meningioma patients are dictated by extent of resection and histopathologic factors, such as World Health Organization (WHO) grade and proliferation index. Radiotherapy is a critical component of meningioma treatment as either a definitive intervention using stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam radiotherapy, or in the adjuvant setting for residual disease or for adverse pathologic factors, such as high WHO grade. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive review of radiotherapy treatment modalities, therapeutic considerations, radiation planning, and clinical outcomes for meningioma patients.

Dosimetrically triggered adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Considerations for the implementation of clinical protocols.

PURPOSE: Defining dosimetric rules to automatically detect patients requiring adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is not straightforward, and most centres perform ad-hoc ART with no specific protocol. This study aims to propose and analyse different steps to design a protocol for dosimetrically triggered ART of head and neck (H&N) cancer. As a proof-of-concept, the designed protocol was applied to patients treated in TomoTherapy units, using their available software for daily MVCT image and dose accumulation. METHODS: An initial protocol was designed by a multidisciplinary team, with a set of flagging criteria based only on dose-volume metrics, including two action levels: (1) surveillance (orange flag), and (2) immediate verification (red flag). This protocol was adapted to the clinical needs following an iterative process. First, the protocol was applied to 38 H&N patients with daily imaging. Automatic software generated the daily contours, recomputed the daily dose and flagged the dosimetric differences with respect to the planning dose. Second, these results were compared, by a sensitivity/specificity test, to the answers of a physician. Third, the physician, supported by the multidisciplinary team, performed a self-analysis of the provided answers and translated them into mathematical rules in order to upgrade the protocol. The upgraded protocol was applied to different definitions of the target volume (i.e. deformed CTV + 0, 2 and 4 mm), in order to quantify how the number of flags decreases when reducing the CTV-to-PTV margin. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the initial protocol was very low, specifically for the orange flags. The best values were 0.84 for red and 0.15 for orange flags. After the review and upgrade process, the sensitivity of the upgraded protocol increased to 0.96 for red and 0.84 for orange flags. The number of patients flagged per week with the final (upgraded) protocol decreased in median by 26% and 18% for red and orange flags, respectively, when reducing the CTV-to-PTV margin from 4 to 2 mm. This resulted in only one patient flagged at the last fraction for both red and orange flags. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the value of iterative protocol design with retrospective data, and shows the feasibility of automatically-triggered ART using simple dosimetric rules to mimic the physician's decisions. Using a proper target volume definition is important and influences the flagging rate, particularly when decreasing the CTV-to-PTV margin.

Recent Advances and Adaptive Strategies in Image Guidance for Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.

The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with simultaneous chemotherapy followed by an internal radiation boost. New imaging methods such as positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been implemented into daily practice for better tumor delineation in radiotherapy planning. The method of delivering radiation has changed with technical advances in qualitative imaging and treatment delivery. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plays an important role in minimizing treatment toxicity of pelvic radiation and provides a superior conformality for sparing the organs at risk (OARs) such as bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder. Similarly, three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (3D-IGABT) with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to improve target coverage and reduce the dose to normal tissues. Brachytherapy is a complementary part of radiotherapy treatment for cervical cancer and, over the past 20 years, 3D-image-based brachytherapy has rapidly evolved and established itself as the gold standard. With new techniques and adaptive treatment in cervical cancer, the concept of personalized medicine is introduced with an enhanced comprehension of the therapeutic index not only in terms of volume (three-dimensional) but during treatment too (four-dimensional). Current data show promising results with integrated IGRT and IGABT in clinical practice and, therefore, better local control and overall survival while reducing treatment-related morbidity. This review gives an overview of the substantial impact that occurred in the progress of image-guided adaptive external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Localized, Low-Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Current and Future Prospectives.

At the time of diagnosis, the vast majority of prostate carcinoma patients have a clinically localized form of the disease, with most of them presenting with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In this setting, various curative-intent alternatives are available, including surgery, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy can be considered as a valid alternative strategy for localized prostate cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy can be administered according to different schedules. Proton beam radiotherapy represents a promising strategy, but further studies are needed to make it more affordable and accessible. At the moment, new technologies such as MRI-guided radiotherapy remain in early stages, but their potential abilities are very promising.

Evaluation of improvements in plan quality with Photon Optimizer v16.1 for single brain lesion SRS treatment.

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the Photon Optimizer (PO) version 16.1 algorithm with its earlier version PO v13.6 and with Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) version 13.6 algorithms. Materials and methods: 20 patients with single brain lesions treated with the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique were retrospectively selected for this study. Initially, for all patients volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SRS plans were generated with the PRO v 13.6 algorithm. Then, all the plans were re-generated with two versions 13.6 and 16.1 of PO algorithm using the same setup and dose-volume optimization objectives as that of PRO with a similar planning approach. The quality of the generated plans was analysed using ICRU 91 plan evaluation parameters and also using dice similarity co-efficient (DSC), centre of mass distance (CMD) between target and prescription isodose line, Monitor units (MU) and brain-gross tumor volume (GTV) 12 Gy volume. Paired Student t-test was used for statistical analysis with 0.05 as a significant value. Results: PO v16.1 improved all the dosimetric parameters studied compared to PO 13.6, the difference is statistically significant for all the parameters (p < 0.05), except for median dose and brain-GTV 12 Gy volume. PO v16.1 also showed statistically significant improvement for all the dosimetric parameters evaluated, except DSC and conformity index (CI), compared to PRO v13.6. Conclusion: The PO v16.1 generated plans are dosimetrically superior to PO v13.6 and PRO v13.6 in terms of target dose coverage and dose gradient with lesser beam modulation and plan complexity for single brain lesion SRS.

Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinical node-positive prostate cancer.

AIM: To compare overall mortality (OM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and other cause mortality (OCM) rates between radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiotherapy (RT) in clinical node-positive (cN1) prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) (2004-2016), we identified 4685 cN1 PCa patients, of whom 3589 (76.6%) versus 1096 (24.4%) were treated with RP versus RT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models tested the effect of RP versus RT on OM, while cumulative incidence plots and competing-risks regression (CRR) models addressed CSM and OCM between RP and RT patients. All analyses were repeated after the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). For CSM and OCM analyses, the propensity score was used as a covariate in the regression model. RESULTS: Overall, RT patients were older, harbored higher prostate-specific antigen values, higher clinical T and higher Gleason grade groups. PSM resulted in two equally sized groups of 894 RP versus 894 RT patients. After PSM, 5-year OM, CSM, and OCM rates were, respectively, 15.4% versus 25%, 9.3% versus 17%, and 6.1% versus 8% for RP versus RT (all p < 0.001) and yielded respective multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.63 (0.52-0.78, p < 0.001), 0.66 (0.52-0.86, p < 0.001), 0.71 (0.5-1.0, p = 0.05), all favoring RP. After IPTW, Cox regression models yielded HR of 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-0.66) for OM, and CRR yielded HRs of 0.49 (0.34-0.70) and 0.54 (0.36-0.79) for, respectively, CSM and OCM, all favoring RP (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RP may hold a CSM advantage over RT in cN1 PCa patients.

Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To test for differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates between radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk African American patients, as well as Johns Hopkins University (JHU) high-risk and very high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2016), we identified 4165 NCCN high-risk patients, of whom 1944 (46.7%) and 2221 (53.3%) patients qualified for JHU high-risk or very high-risk definitions. Of all 4165 patients, 1390 (33.5%) were treated with RP versus 2775 (66.6%) with EBRT. Cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models addressed CSM before and after 1:1 propensity score matching between RP and EBRT NCCN high-risk patients. Subsequently, analyses were repeated separately in JHU high-risk and very high-risk subgroups. Finally, all analyses were repeated after landmark analyses were applied. RESULTS: In the NCCN high-risk cohort, 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 2.4 versus 5.2%, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.84, p = 0.009) favoring RP. In JHU very high-risk patients 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 3.7 versus 8.4%, respectively, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.95, p = 0.03) favoring RP. Conversely, in JHU high-risk patients, no significant CSM difference was recorded between RP vs EBRT (5-year CSM rates: 1.3 vs 1.3%; multivariable hazard ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.16-1.90, p = 0.3). Observations were confirmed in propensity score-matched and landmark analyses adjusted cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In JHU very high-risk African American patients, RP may hold a CSM advantage over EBRT, but not in JHU high-risk African American patients.

Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy is associated with higher other-cause mortality.

PURPOSE: To test the association between external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) vs RP only on rates of other-cause mortality (OCM) in men with prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the 2004-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 181,849 localized PCa patients, of whom 168,041 received RP only vs 13,808 who received RP + EBRT. Cumulative incidence plots displayed OCM between RP vs RP + EBRT after propensity score matching for age, PSA, clinical T- and N-stages, and biopsy Gleason scores. Multivariable competing risks regression models addressed OCM, accounting prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as a competing event. Stratifications were made according to low- vs intermediate- vs high-risk groups and additionally according to age groups of ≤ 60, 61-70, and ≥ 71 years, within each risk group. RESULTS: In low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, RP + EBRT rates were 2.7, 5.4 and 17.0%, respectively. After matching, 10-year OCM rates between RP and RP + EBRT were 7.7 vs 16.2% in low-, 9.4 vs 13.6% in intermediate-, and 11.4 vs 13.5% in high-risk patients (all p < 0.001), which, respectively, resulted in multivariable HR of 2.1, 1.3, and 1.2 (all p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, excess OCM was recorded in low-risk RP + EBRT patients of all age groups (all p ≤ 0.03), but only in the older age group in intermediate-risk patients (61-70 years, p = 0.03) and finally, only in the oldest age group in high-risk patients (≥ 71 years, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Excess OCM was recorded in patients exposed to RT after RP. Its extent was most pronounced in low-risk patients, decreased in intermediate-risk patients, and was lowest in high-risk patients.

Current radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in the modern era: a state-of-the-art review.

BACKGROUND: In the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure. Only a few patients with recurrent HNC (rHNC) are eligible for salvage surgery and the majority of patients receive systemic therapy and radiotherapy. In recent years, with the development of irradiation technology, radiotherapy for rHNC patients has markedly attracted clinicians' attention and its therapeutic effects on patients with end-stage cancer are worthy of investigation as well. METHODS: Several studies have investigated the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rHNC patients. We reviewed retrospective reports and prospective trials published in recent decades that concentrated on the management of rHNC. RESULTS: A growing body of evidence supported the application of irradiation to rHNC patients. According to the results of this review, current radiotherapy could achieve a better efficacy with a lower incidence of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is a promising treatment for rHNC patients.

Influence of hydrogel spacer placement with prostate brachytherapy on rectal and urinary toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of rectal hydrogel spacer placement (HSP) on late rectal toxicity outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 224 patients underwent LDR brachytherapy with HSP, as monotherapy or combined with EBRT, between January 2016 and December 2019. Dosimetric variables reflecting the extent of rectal sparing and late rectal toxicity outcomes were evaluated. This spacer cohort was retrospectively compared to a similar patient group (n = 139) in whom HSP was not used. RESULTS: Hydrogel spacer placement was associated with significantly reduced rectal doses for all dosimetric variables; the median percentage rectal dose to 1 cc of rectum and rectal dose to 2 cc of rectum of the spacer cohort were all significantly lower compared to the non-spacer cohort. The incidence rates of overall (any grade) and grade ≥2 rectal toxicity were lower in patients with HSP compared to patients who did not undergo HSP: 12% and 1.8% vs 31% and 5.8%, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of overall rectal toxicity was significantly lower with HSP than without (15% vs 33%; P < 0.001), corresponding to an overall rectal toxicity reduction on univariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.73; P = 0.001). In this patient cohort treated with prostate brachytherapy, none of the urethral dosimetric variables or the presence or absence of HSP was associated with late urinary toxicity. CONCLUSION: Hydrogel rectal spacer placement is a safe procedure, associated with significantly reduced rectal dose. HSP translates to a decrease in overall late rectal toxicity in patients receiving dose-escalated brachytherapy-based procedures.

Incidence of genitourinary complications following radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Studies of genitourinary toxicity following radiotherapy for prostate cancer are mainly from high volume single institutions and the incidence and burden of treatment remain uncertain. Hence we determine the cumulative incidence of treatment-related genitourinary toxicity in patients with localised prostate cancer treated with primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at a state population level. METHODS: We analysed data from a prospective population-based cohort, including hospital admission and cancer registry data, for men with localised prostate cancer who underwent primary EBRT without nodal irradiation between 1998 and 2019 in South Australia. The 10-year cumulative incidence of genitourinary toxicity requiring hospitalisation or procedures was determined. Clinical predictors of toxicity and the volume of admissions, non-operative, minor operative and major operative procedures were determined. RESULTS: All the included patients (n = 3350) had EBRT, with a median (IQR) of 74 Gy (70-78) in 37 fractions (35-39). The 10-year cumulative incidence of was 28.4% (95% CI 26.3-30.6) with a total of 2545 hospital admissions, including 1040 (41%) emergency and 1893 (74%) readmissions. The 10-year cumulative incidence of patients in this cohort requiring a urological operative procedure was 18% (95% CI 16.1-19.9), with a total of 106 (4.2%) non-operative, 1044 (41%) minor operative and 57 (2.2%) major operative urological procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Genitourinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer is common. Although there continue to be advancements in radiotherapy techniques, patients and physicians should be aware of the risk of late toxicity when considering EBRT.