Hyperactivity with Disrupted Attention by Activation of an Astrocyte Synaptogenic Cue.

Hyperactivity and disturbances of attention are common behavioral disorders whose underlying cellular and neural circuit causes are not understood. We report the discovery that striatal astrocytes drive such phenotypes through a hitherto unknown synaptic mechanism. We found that striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) triggered astrocyte signaling via γ-aminobutyric acid B (GABAB) receptors. Selective chemogenetic activation of this pathway in striatal astrocytes in vivo resulted in acute behavioral hyperactivity and disrupted attention. Such responses also resulted in upregulation of the synaptogenic cue thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) in astrocytes, increased excitatory synapses, enhanced corticostriatal synaptic transmission, and increased MSN action potential firing in vivo. All of these changes were reversed by blocking TSP1 effects. Our data identify a form of bidirectional neuron-astrocyte communication and demonstrate that acute reactivation of a single latent astrocyte synaptogenic cue alters striatal circuits controlling behavior, revealing astrocytes and the TSP1 pathway as therapeutic targets in hyperactivity, attention deficit, and related psychiatric disorders.

Amino acid sensor conserved from bacteria to humans.

SignificanceAmino acids are the building blocks of life and important signaling molecules. Despite their common structure, no universal mechanism for amino acid recognition by cellular receptors is currently known. We discovered a simple motif, which binds amino acids in various receptor proteins from all major life-forms. In humans, this motif is found in subunits of calcium channels that are implicated in pain and neurodevelopmental disorders. Our findings suggest that γ-aminobutyric acid-derived drugs bind to the same motif in human proteins that binds natural ligands in bacterial receptors, thus enabling future improvement of important drugs.

Gabapentin for Postoperative Pain Control and Opioid Reduction in Scrotal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of gabapentin in reducing postoperative pain among patients undergoing scrotal surgery for male infertility by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy men undergoing scrotal surgery with a single surgeon were randomized to receive either (1) gabapentin 600 mg given 2 hours preoperatively and 300 mg taken 3 times a day postoperatively for 3 days, or (2) inactive placebo. The primary outcome measure was difference in postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 97 patients screened, 74 enrolled and underwent randomization. Of these, 4 men were lost to follow-up, and 70 were included in the final analysis (35 gabapentin, 35 placebo). Both differences in initial postoperative mean pain score (-1.14, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.08, P = .035) and final mean pain score differences (-1.27, 95% CI -2.23 to -0.32, P = .0097) indicated lower gabapentin pain compared to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that perioperative gabapentin results in a statistically and clinically significant decrease in pain following scrotal surgery. While there was no evidence of an impact on opioid usage or patient satisfaction, given the low risk of adverse events, it may be considered as part of a multimodal pain management strategy.

Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis with Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Medicare Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapies as first-line pain treatment for acute pain. However, little is known about their utilization generally and among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom opioid and other pharmacologic therapies carry greater risk of harm. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between a pre-existing OUD diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain (aLBP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare data. PARTICIPANTS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a new episode of aLBP. MAIN MEASURES: The main independent variable was OUD diagnosis measured prior to the first LBP claim (i.e., index date). Using multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the following outcomes measured within 30 days of the index date: (1) nonpharmacologic therapies (physical therapy and/or chiropractic care), and (2) prescription opioids. Among opioid recipients, we further assessed opioid dose and co-prescription of gabapentin. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by receipt of physical therapy, chiropractic care, opioid fills, or gabapentin fills during the 6 months before the index date. KEY RESULTS: We identified 1,263,188 beneficiaries with aLBP, of whom 3.0% had OUD. Two-thirds (65.8%) did not receive pain treatments of interest at baseline. Overall, nonpharmacologic therapy receipt was less prevalent and opioid and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies were more common among beneficiaries with OUD than those without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD had lower odds of receiving nonpharmacologic therapies (aOR = 0.62, 99%CI = 0.58-0.65) and higher odds of prescription opioid receipt (aOR = 2.24, 99%CI = 2.17-2.32). OUD also was significantly associated with increased odds of opioid doses ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents/day (aOR = 2.43, 99%CI = 2.30-2.56) and co-prescription of gabapentin (aOR = 1.15, 99%CI = 1.09-1.22). Similar associations were observed in stratified groups though magnitudes differed. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with aLBP and OUD underutilized nonpharmacologic pain therapies and commonly received opioids at high doses and with gabapentin. Complementing the promulgation of practice guidelines with implementation science could improve the uptake of evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies for aLBP.

A phase Ib/II randomized, open-label drug repurposing trial of glutamate signaling inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: the GLUGLIO trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Glioblastoma cells synthesize and secrete large quantities of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, driving epilepsy, neuronal death, tumor growth and invasion. Moreover, neuronal networks interconnect with glioblastoma cell networks through glutamatergic neuroglial synapses, activation of which induces oncogenic calcium oscillations that are propagated via gap junctions between tumor cells. The primary objective of this study is to explore the efficacy of brain-penetrating anti-glutamatergic drugs to standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. METHODS/DESIGN: GLUGLIO is a 1:1 randomized phase Ib/II, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter trial of gabapentin, sulfasalazine, memantine and chemoradiotherapy (Arm A) versus chemoradiotherapy alone (Arm B) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Planned accrual is 120 patients. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include overall and seizure-free survival, quality of life of patients and caregivers, symptom burden and cognitive functioning. Glutamate levels will be assessed longitudinally by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Other outcomes of interest include imaging response rate, neuronal hyperexcitability determined by longitudinal electroencephalography, Karnofsky performance status as a global measure of overall performance, anticonvulsant drug use and steroid use. Tumor tissue and blood will be collected for translational research. Subgroup survival analyses by baseline parameters include segregation by age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance status, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status, steroid intake, presence or absence of seizures, tumor volume and glutamate levels determined by MR spectroscopy. The trial is currently recruiting in seven centers in Switzerland. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05664464. Registered 23 December 2022.

Attenuation of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Neuropathic Allodynia by Flavone Derivative Through Modulation of GABA-ergic Mechanisms and Endogenous Biomarkers.

Diabetic neuropathic pain is one of the most devasting disorders of peripheral nervous system. The loss of GABAergic inhibition is associated with the development of painful diabetic neuropathy. The current study evaluated the potential of 3-Hydroxy-2-methoxy-6-methyl flavone (3-OH-2'MeO6MF), to ameliorate peripheral neuropathic pain using an STZ-induced hyperglycemia rat model. The pain threshold was assessed by tail flick, cold, mechanical allodynia, and formalin test on days 0, 14, 21, and 28 after STZ administration accompanied by evaluation of several biochemical parameters. Administration of 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF (1,10, 30, and 100 mg/kg, i.p) significantly enhanced the tail withdrawal threshold in tail-flick and tail cold allodynia tests. 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF also increased the paw withdrawal threshold in mechanical allodynia and decreased paw licking time in the formalin test. Additionally, 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF also attenuated the increase in concentrations of myeloperoxidase (MPO), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), nitrite, TNF-α, and IL 6 along with increases in glutathione (GSH). Pretreatment of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) (40 mg/kg, i.p.) abolished the antinociceptive effect of 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF in mechanical allodynia. Besides, the STZ-induced alterations in the GABA concentration and GABA transaminase activity attenuated by 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF treatment suggest GABAergic mechanisms. Molecular docking also authenticates the involvement of α2ß2γ2L GABA-A receptors and GABA-T enzyme in the antinociceptive activities of 3-OH-2'-MeO6MF.

Gabapentinoids in Ireland 2010 to 2020: An observational study of trends in gabapentinoid prescribing, law enforcement drug seizures and postmortem toxicology.

AIMS: We explored trends in gabapentinoid prescribing, drug seizures and postmortem toxicology using a national pharmacy claims database, law enforcement drug seizures data and a population-based postmortem toxicology database. METHODS: Gabapentinoid prescribing rates per 100 000 eligible population (2010-2020), annual number of drug seizures involving gabapentinoids (2012-2020) and gabapentinoid detection (positive) rates per 100 postmortem toxicology case (2013-2020) were calculated. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate longitudinal trends for gabapentin and pregabalin separately. RESULTS: Gabapentin (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.06, P < .001) and pregabalin (adjusted RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.08-1.09, P < .001) prescribing increased annually, with higher rates of pregabalin (vs. gabapentin) observed every year. Drug seizures involving pregabalin also increased over time (RR 1.54 95% CI 1.25-1.90, P < .0001). Of the 26 317 postmortem toxicology cases, 0.92% tested positive for gabapentin, and 6.37% for pregabalin. Detection rates increased for both gabapentin (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48, P < .001) and pregabalin (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.48, P < .001) between 2013 and 2020. A total of 1901 cases (7.2%) tested positive for heroin/methadone; this sub-group had a higher detection rate for pregabalin (n = 528, 27.8%) and gabapentin (n = 41, 2.2%) over the study period, with a high burden of codetections for pregabalin with benzodiazepines (peaking at 37.3% in 2018), and pregabalin with prescription opioids (peaking at 28.9% in 2020). CONCLUSION: This study raises concerns regarding the wide availability of pregabalin in Ireland, including a growing illicit supply, and the potential for serious harm arising from poly drug use involving pregabalin among people who use heroin or methadone.

Risks of congenital malformations and neonatal intensive care unit admissions with gabapentin use in pregnancy: A cohort study and scoping review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The increasing and prevalent use of gabapentin among pregnant people highlights the necessity to assess its neonatal safety. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the foetal safety of gabapentin during pregnancy using a cohort study and scoping review with a meta-analysis of published evidence. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Manitoba health databases between 1995 and 2019. We examined the association between gabapentin use during pregnancy and the prevalence of major congenital malformations, cardiac and orofacial malformations, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions using multivariate regression models. We searched the literature in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 2022 to identify relevant observational studies and conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects models, including our cohort study results. RESULTS: Of the 289,227 included pregnancies, 870 pregnant people were exposed to gabapentin. Gabapentin exposure during the First trimester was not associated with an increased risk of any malformations (adjusted relative risk [aRR]) 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.46), cardiac malformations (aRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72, 2.29), orofacial malformations (aRR 1.37, 95% CI 0.50, 3.75), and major congenital malformations (aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73, 1.36). whereas exposure during any trimester was associated with an increased NICU admission risk (aRR, 1.99, 95% CI 1.70, 2.32). The meta-analysis of unadjusted results revealed an increased risk of major congenital malformations (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28, 1.61, I2 = 0%), cardiac malformations (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11, 2.47, I2 = 68%), and NICU admissions (RR 3.15, 95% CI 2.90, 3.41, I2 = 10%), and increased trend of orofacial malformations (RR 1.98, 95% CI 0.79, 5.00, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin use was associated with an increased risk of NICU admissions in the cohort study and pooled meta-analysis. Clinicians should prescribe gabapentin with caution during pregnancy and further studies are warranted.

Reductions in World Health Organization risk drinking level are associated with improvements in sleep problems among individuals with alcohol use disorder.

AIMS: Among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), sleep disturbances are pervasive and contribute to the etiology and maintenance of AUD. However, despite increased attention toward the relationship between alcohol use and sleep, limited empirical research has systematically examined whether reductions in drinking during treatment for AUD are associated with improvements in sleep problems. METHODS: We used data from a multisite, randomized, controlled trial that compared 6 months of treatment with gabapentin enacarbil extended-release with placebo for adults with moderate-to-severe AUD (N = 346). The Timeline Follow-back was used to assess WHO risk drinking level reductions and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to assess sleep quality over the prior month at baseline and the end of treatment. RESULTS: Sleep problem scores in the active medication and placebo groups improved equally. Fewer sleep problems were noted among individuals who achieved at least a 1-level reduction (B = -0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-1.77, -0.20], P = .014) or at least a 2-level reduction (B = -0.80, 95% CI [-1.47, -0.14], P = .018) in WHO risk drinking levels at the end of treatment. Reductions in drinking, with abstainers excluded from the analysis, also predicted fewer sleep problems at the end of treatment (1-level: B = -1.01, 95% CI [-1.83, -0.20], P = .015; 2-level: B = -0.90, 95% CI [-1.59, -0.22], P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Drinking reductions, including those short of abstinence, are associated with improvements in sleep problems during treatment for AUD. Additional assessment of the causal relationships between harm-reduction approaches to AUD and improvements in sleep is warranted.

Neuropsychiatric Effects Associated with Opioid-Based Management for Palliative Care Patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The abundance of opioids administered in the palliative care setting that was once considered a standard of care is at present necessitating that providers evaluate patients for unintentional and deleterious symptomology related to aberrant opioid use and addiction. Polypharmacy with opioids is dynamic in affecting patients neurologically, and increased amounts of prescriptions have had inimical effects, not only for the individual, but also for their families and healthcare providers. The purpose of this review is to widen the perspective of opioid consequences and bring awareness to the numerous neuropsychiatric effects associated with the most commonly prescribed opioids for patients receiving palliative care. RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous clinical and research studies have found evidence in support for increased incidence of opioid usage and abuse as well as undesirable neurological outcomes. The most common and concerning effects of opioid usage in this setting are delirium and problematic drug-related behavioral changes such as deceitful behavior towards family and physicians, anger outbursts, overtaking of medications, and early prescription refill requests. Other neuropsychiatric effects detailed by recent studies include drug-seeking behavior, tolerance, dependence, addictive disorder, anxiety, substance use disorder, emotional distress, continuation of opioids to avoid opioid withdrawal syndrome, depression, and suicidal ideation. Opioid usage has detrimental and confounding effects that have been overlooked for many years by palliative care providers and patients receiving palliative care. It is necessary, even lifesaving, to be cognizant of potential neuropsychiatric effects that opioids can have on an individual, especially for those under palliative care. By having an increased understanding and awareness of potential opioid neuropsychiatric effects, patient quality of life can be improved, healthcare system costs can be decreased, and patient outcomes can be met and exceeded.

Gabapentinoid prescribing patterns and predictors utilizing neural networks: An analysis across emergency departments Nationwide between 2012 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids increasingly utilized for neuropathic pain, possibly to curb opioid prescribing. At the same time, data suggest subsequent increases in misuse and overdose of gabapentinoids, often in mixed overdoses. We sought to determine national trends and characteristics of gabapentinoid prescribing, including co-use with opioids, from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2012 to 2021. Our primary outcome was the trend in ED visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed at discharge. Secondarily, we identified trends in gabapentinoid and opioid co-prescribing and gabapentin and pregabalin prescribing at ED discharge. We examined demographic data and used descriptive statistics, Shapiro Wilke's test, Pearson's Spearman's rho (SR) or Pearson's correlation coefficient (PC) as applicable. Neural networks were used to identify the most important predictors of opioid utilization during the same visit. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, there were an estimated 7,242,694 (0.53% of all ED visits) visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed at ED discharge. Prescriptions increased from a total of 138,479 (0.1%) in 2012 to 893,495 (0.63%) in 2021 (PC: 0.85, p < 0.001). Opioids were co-prescribed in 27.2% of all visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed, with no change over time (PC: -0.47, p = 0.09). Pregabalin prescription increased linearly over time (PC: 0.64, p = 0.02). The most important predictors of opioid administration or co-prescribing were whether an alternative provider (e.g., consult or nurse practitioner) saw the patient (100%), insurance (94.4%), age (75.9%), and region (75.2%). CONCLUSION: Despite an association of misuse and overdose, often associated with opioids, gabapentinoids were increasingly prescribed at ED discharge. While these agents may be safer alternatives to opioids, misuse may be an associated consequence of increased prescribing, which warrants further investigation.

Assessing the effectiveness of gabapentin in paclitaxel-induced arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain: An observational, cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain are the most common side effects observed due to paclitaxel chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic role, maintenance, remission, and re-occurrence of arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain post-gabapentin therapy. METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted in the Department of Oncology, Dhiraj Hospital, Vadodara with a sample of 51 patients. Newly detected cancer patients who observed arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain due to paclitaxel were taken and a baseline pain assessment was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and painDETECT questionnaire. Gabapentin was given in the first cycle after symptoms appeared and prophylactic treatment was given in the subsequent three cycles and evaluation of pain was done post-gabapentin therapy to assess the symptomatic as well as prophylactic effect. RESULTS: At baseline, neuropathic pain score was 22.7 ± 3.6 which reduced to 0.01 ± 0.14 on subsequent follow-ups. Grade 2 arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain were more observed at baseline which reduces to Grade 0 in the third cycle. The difference in baseline and post-gabapentin therapy was statistically analyzed by conducting t-test which showed p-value <0.00001 and t-value was less than -2 which indicated a statistically significant result. CONCLUSION: This study shows that gabapentin reduces neuropathic pain. Prophylactic usage of gabapentin was highly effective at bringing about quick pain relief when compared to symptomatic treatment. In further follow-ups, it was noted that gabapentin maintained the impact throughout the cycles.

Gabapentin as part of a multimodal pain protocol for selective dorsal rhizotomy does not impact percentage of rootlets transected.

PURPOSE: We aim to determine whether preoperatively initiated gabapentin for pain control impacts the percentage of rootlets cut during monitored, limited laminectomy selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) procedure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes participants with cerebral palsy who had SDR for treatment of spasticity between 2010 and 2019 at a single-institution tertiary care center. One-level laminectomy SDR aimed to evaluate the cauda equina roots from levels L2-S1 with EMG monitoring. Gabapentin titration began 3 weeks prior to SDR. Data was analyzed using simple linear regression. Thirty-one individuals met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 7 years, 4 months. Eighteen participants (58%) identified as male, 12 (39%) female, and one (3%) non-binary. Thirty (97%) had bilateral CP. Sixteen (52%) were GMFCS II, four (13%) GMFCS III, five (16%) GMFCS IV, and six (19%) GMFCS V. RESULTS: Mean percentage of rootlets transected was 50.75% (SD 6.00, range 36.36-60.87). There was no relationship between the dose of gabapentin at time of SDR and percentage of rootlets cut with a linear regression slope of - 0.090 and an R2 of 0.012 (P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that preoperative initiation of gabapentin did not impact the percentage of rootlets transected. Thus, gabapentin can be initiated prior to SDR at moderate dosages without impacting SDR surgical outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic report: Pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of gabapentin in goats (Capra hircus).

Gabapentin is used in goats to treat chronic pain associated with lameness. However, pharmacokinetic data and clinical effectiveness trials are lacking. The objective of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in goats following a single oral dose. Six Spanish-crossbred goats were enrolled. Each goat was administered gabapentin at a target dose of 15 mg/kg per os. Serial blood samples were collected out to 60 h post-gabapentin administration for plasma gabapentin concentration determination. Plasma samples were analyzed for gabapentin concentration using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy. Individual animal pharmacokinetic outcomes were determined using non-compartmental analysis. Gabapentin was detectable in the plasma of all goats at 60 h post-administration. The mean (±SD) Cmax was 2.01 ± 0.62 µg/mL which occurred at 8.47 ± 1.9 h. The mean terminal half-life (T1/2) and mean resident time were determined to be 8.52 ± 1.8 and 18.7 ± 4.0 h, respectively. This study indicates gabapentin is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract of goats. Further research is needed to determine an optimal dose for clinical efficacy in goats.

Topical Nigella sativa L. product: a new candidate for the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of diabetes. The synthetic drugs available in the market have side effects and limitations for diabetic patients, the vast majority of whom are in the upper age group. In this regard, based on Persian medicinal sources, Nigella sativa (N. sativa) has proved to have beneficial effects on neuropathic pain and neurological disorders. In this study, the effect of N. sativa is investigated topically in patients with diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: This study was performed as a double-blind clinical trial on 120 neuropathic patients. The patients were divided into three groups. The first group received a topical N. sativa product as an ointment, the second group was given a topical placebo, and the third received 300 mg gabapentin capsules. The blindness was done in first and second groups. Diabetic neuropathy was assessed before the study using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). In addition, neuropathy symptoms were evaluated after the trial using the MNSI questionnaire. RESULTS: The data were elicited from the patients' answers to a number of questions in the Michigan questionnaire. There were statistically significant differences between the group that received the topical N. sativa product and the other two groups in terms of legs and feet numbness (p value = 0.001), burning pain in feet or legs (p value = 0.001), muscle cramps in feet or legs (p value = 0.001), prickling fleeing in feet or legs (p value = 0.001), hurting of the skin when the bed covers touch it (p value = 0.005), aggravated symptoms at night (p value = 0.001) and hurting feelings in the legs when walking (p value = 0.032). However, the three studied groups were not statistically different in distinguishing hot water from cold water. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, the topical use of N. sativa, compared to the current drugs, has acceptable improving effects on diabetic neuropathic patients.

Pharmacokinetic profile and physiological effects of oral and compounded intravenous gabapentin in goats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and physiological effects following oral and intravenous (IV) administration of gabapentin in goats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover study with a 3 week washout period between treatments. ANIMALS: A total of eight healthy, client-owned, female goats. METHODS: Gabapentin (10 mg kg-1) was administered to goats either orally or IV. Gabapentin concentrations were measured in serum samples collected 0-96 hours post-administration using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and temperature were recorded before and throughout the study. Correlations of the mean serum concentrations of gabapentin to those of each physiological parameter were determined using the Pearson method. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of oral bioavailability for gabapentin was 60.9 ± 11.2%. Maximum serum concentration of gabapentin was lower following oral (1.19 ± 0.29 µg mL-1) than after IV administration (59.76 ± 14.38 µg mL-1, p < 0.0001). Half-lives were longer following PO (8.18 ± 0.57 hours) than after IV administration (1.79 ± 0.06 hours, p < 0.0001). Time to maximum concentration was 6.86 ± 2.27 hours following oral administration. Heart rate was inversely correlated with serum gabapentin concentrations. Slight ataxia was observed in three animals, and one became recumbent following IV gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gabapentin is well-absorbed following oral administration to goats but yielded significantly lower serum concentrations than the IV route. The longer half-life of gabapentin following oral than after IV administration may result from prolonged absorption throughout the caprine gastrointestinal tract. IV gabapentin may cause slight ataxia in some goats.

Gabapentin improves neuropathic pain in Minamata disease model rats.

BACKGROUND: Methylmercury (MeHg), the causative agent of Minamata disease, damages the cranial nervous system and causes specific sensory disturbances, especially hypoesthesia, in the extremities. However, recent reports demonstrate that patients with chronic Minamata disease conversely develop neuropathic pain in the lower extremities. Studies on our established Minamata disease model rats showed that MeHg-mediated neurodegeneration might induce neuropathic pain by over time through inducing rewiring with neuronal activation in the somatosensory cortex via microglial activation in the spinal dorsal horn. METHODS: In this study, the effects of gabapentin, a potentially effective treatment for neuropathic pain, was evaluated using this Minamata disease model rats. To further elucidate the mechanism of its medicinal effects, histochemical and biochemical analyses of the nervous system of Minamata disease model rats were conducted. RESULTS: Gabapentin treatment restored the reduction in the pain threshold caused by MeHg exposure in rats. Histochemical and biochemical analyses revealed that gabapentin showed no effect on MeHg-induced neurodegeneration in entire nervous system and microglial activation in the spinal dorsal horn. However, it was shown that gabapentin may reduce excessive synaptogenesis through its antagonist action on the alpha2-delta-1 subunit of calcium channels in the somatosensory cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that gabapentin may alleviated neuropathic pain in MeHg poisoning, as typified by Minamata disease, by reversibly modulation synaptic rewiring in the somatosensory cortex.

Preoperative Gabapentin for Pain Control: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernioplasty.

PURPOSE: The perioperative use of gabapentin has been suggested to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, there is a variation in clinical practice, the type of surgery and the administration time seem to be distinct between the available studies. We assess whether gabapentin administered before surgery reduces postoperative pain in patients who have undergone inguinal hernioplasty. DESIGN: This is a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty were randomized in two groups to receive gabapentin (900 mg) or placebo in the perioperative period. The primary outcome was analgesia measured by visual analog scale up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes such as morphine consumption, nausea, headache, and sedation have been also described. FINDINGS: Patients who received gabapentin had lower postoperative pain scores compared to the control group, P < .001. The postoperative morphine use was significantly lower in the gabapentin (5.3%) versus placebo group (74.4%), P < .001. No significant difference between groups was observed for the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative administration of gabapentin was effective in reducing postoperative pain and had an important effect in decreasing morphine use. Together, our data reveal a long-lasting opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin in patients who underwent inguinal hernioplasty.

Effects of Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Examine the efficacy of gabapentin on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and gray literature was used to search the literature. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes were reported using the risk ratio and mean difference (MD). Risk of bias and the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system was used to the assessed quality of evidence. FINDINGS: Nineteen trials involving 2,068 patients were analyzed. Compared to placebo, gabapentin reduced the cumulative pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery (MD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.39-0.99; P < .00011), opioid consumption (MD, -3.51; 95% CI, -4.67 to -2.35; P < .00001), and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P < .00001) with prolonged time to first analgesic rescue (MD, 210.9; 95% CI, 76.90-344.91; P = .002). However, gabapentin has little to no effect on the incidence of sedation, somnolence, and respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin can be added as part of the multimodal pain management for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Extrapolation of these findings to clinical settings must take into consideration the limitations identified in this review.

Effectiveness of Gabapentin as a Benzodiazepine-Sparing Agent in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

Background and Objectives: Gabapentin has shown promise as a potential agent for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-sparing agent in patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal treatment in all the hospitals of a large tertiary healthcare system. Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients admitted to the hospital for alcohol withdrawal management between 1 January 2020 and 31 August 2022 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts: benzodiazepine-only treatment who received benzodiazepines as the primary pharmacotherapy and gabapentin adjunctive treatment who received gabapentin in addition to benzodiazepines. The outcomes assessed included the total benzodiazepine dosage administered during the treatment and the length of hospital stay. The statistical models were calibrated to account for various factors. Results: A total of 4364 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these, 79 patients (1.8%) received gabapentin in addition to benzodiazepines, and 4285 patients (98.2%) received benzodiazepines only. Patients administered gabapentin required significantly lower average cumulative benzodiazepine dosages, approximately 17.9% less, compared to those not receiving gabapentin (median 2 mg vs. 4 mg of lorazepam equivalent dose (p < 0.01)). However, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that using gabapentin with benzodiazepine was associated with a reduction in the cumulative benzodiazepine dosage for alcohol withdrawal. Considering gabapentin as an adjunctive therapy holds promise for patients with comorbidities who could benefit from reducing benzodiazepine dose. This strategy warrants further investigation.