RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of a service improvement programme improved the occurrence of radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube displacements, post-insertion. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of cancer patients was conducted over a 2-year period divided into two time points. Eighty-two RIG insertions were audited retrospectively; 42 in Time 1 and 40 in Time 2. RESULTS: Some 70% (n = 57) of patients had head and neck (H&N) malignancy, 24% (n = 20) had gastrointestinal cancer and 6% (n = 5) had a variety of other malignancies. Following the implementation of the service improvement programme, the number of RIG tube displacements almost halved from nine (21%) to five (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study offers persuasive evidence indicating that the implemented service improvement programme improved patient care; however, further research incorporating a more robust evaluation is necessary. People with advanced disease are living longer and so there is a need to maintain good nutritional support. This innovation offers the potential to enhance patients' quality of care and minimise complications.
Assuntos
Gastrostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Gastrostomia/métodos , Gastrostomia/normas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Radiografia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Introduction: Gastrostomies can be performed percutaneously by interventional radiology (PRG) or endoscopy (PEG). Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with advanced cancer who underwent a gastrostomy in 2017 in an oncology center. Results: In 2017, 164 patients underwent gastrostomies, and 137 (84%) were male. The median age was 60 years (range: 38-91). The predominant Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status stage was 1, with 73 (45%) patients. Head and neck cancer was the most common diagnosis, with 127 (77%) cases. The most frequent reason for performing a gastrostomy was dysphagia, 132 (81%). Most gastrostomies were PEG, 121 (74%), followed by PRG, 41 (25%), and surgery, 2 (1%). Early complications occurred in 86 (52%) patients, and the most frequent of them were local pain in 69 (80%) patients and minor local bleeding in 13 (15%). Late complications occurred in 90 (55%) patients, and the most frequent was also local pain in 57 (63%) patients, followed by local infection in 8 (9%), tube extrusion in 7 (8%), and stomal leakage in 7 (8%). In the multivariable analysis, the factors associated with survival were lymph node metastases and the ECOG performance status. Until June 30th, 2022, 123 (75%) patients had died, and 41 (25%) were still alive. Conclusion: Gastrostomies were performed predominantly in ECOG performance stage 1 patients with head and neck cancer and symptoms of dysphagia, and PEG was the most common procedure.