Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern?

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to assess the predictive validity of internal os distance (IOD) in mid-trimester scan for the prediction of third-trimester low-positioned placenta, and to define a cut-off of IOD at which third-trimester low-positioned placenta could be identified, see the association of placental site (anterior/posterior), previous history of cesarean section with abnormal location of placenta in third trimester and see the maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: It was a prospective cohort study of women with low-positioned placenta (IOD < 20 mm) at mid-trimester anomaly scan followed up in third trimester till birth. Relative risks for a low-positioned placenta in the third-trimester were calculated for women with posterior versus anterior, low-lying placenta versus placenta previa and positive versus negative history of cesarean section. Multilevel likelihood ratios and corresponding ROC curves for different ranges of IOD were calculated. RESULTS: Women with posterior placenta had a high risk of low positioned placenta compared to anterior placenta (9.28% vs. 0.74%); RR 1.45, similarly women with placenta previa had high risk compared to low lying placenta (68.57% vs. 1.69%); RR 6.51, so did the women with previous cesarean section (9.41% vs. 5.87%); RR 1.47. CONCLUSIONS: 93.42% placenta which were low positioned in mid trimester were normally situated in third trimester. The cut-off for IOD in anterior placenta was -40 mm and in posterior placenta was 14.3 mm. IOD measurement and interpretation seems promising.

Impact of Pelvic Rest Recommendations on Follow-Up and Resolution of Placenta Previa and Low-Lying Placenta.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of resolution of placenta previa and low-lying placenta (LLP) and the effect of pelvic rest recommendations on the timing of follow-up imaging. METHODS: Retrospective review of pregnancies with previa/LLP detected on mid-trimester exam at our ultrasound unit from 2019 to 2021. LLP was defined as the lower edge of placenta located within 2 cm of the internal cervical os. Previa was defined as any portion of the placenta touching with the internal os. Demographics, placental location, activity restrictions, and delivery outcomes were analyzed. Timing of follow-up imaging was stratified by individuals advised and not advised pelvic rest. RESULTS: Exactly 144 patients had previa and 266 had LLP on the mid-trimester exam with complete records. Previa resolution happened in 51.4% (74/144) of cases. Exactly 62% (46/74) of previa resolutions occurred by the 28-week ultrasound. Exactly 45% (65/144) of previa patients were advised pelvic rest. Most pelvic rest and non-pelvic rest patients had a 28-week scan. Even when clearance occurred, most patients in both groups had a repeat ultrasound at 32 weeks. Exactly 75% of LLP resolved by the 28-week scan, and the remainder by delivery. Exactly 12% (32/259) of LLP patients were advised pelvic rest. CONCLUSION: Most societies recommend follow-up imaging at 32 weeks; however, our results suggest this may be done sooner and closer to 28 weeks. Pelvic rest did not affect timing of repeat imaging or delivery.

Hemorrhagic morbidity in nulliparous patients with placenta previa without placenta accrete spectrum disorders.

Background: Placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) is a disease in which the trophoblast invades the myometrium, and is a well-known high-risk condition associated with placental previa. Aim: The morbidity of nulliparous women with placenta previa without PAS disorders is unknown. Patients and Methods: The data from nulliparous women who underwent cesarean delivery were collected retrospectively. The women were dichotomized into malpresentation (MP) and placenta previa groups. The placenta previa group was categorized into previa (PS) and low-lying (LL) groups. When the placenta covers the internal cervical os, it is called placenta previa, when the placenta is near the cervical os, it is called the low-lying placenta. Their maternal hemorrhagic morbidity and neonatal outcomes were analyzed and adjusted using multivariate analysis based on univariate analysis. Results: A total of 1269 women were enrolled: 781 women in the MP group and 488 women in the PP-LL group. Regarding packed red blood cell transfusion, PP and LL had adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 14.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.6 - 32.5), and 11.3 (95% CI: 4.9 - 26) during admission, and 51.2 (95% CI: 22.1 - 122.7) and 10.3 (95% CI: 3.9 - 26.6) during operation, respectively. For intensive care unit admission, PS and LL had aOR of 15.9 (95% CI: 6.5 - 39.1) and 3.5 (95% CI: 1.1 - 10.9), respectively. No women had cesarean hysterectomy, major surgical complications, or maternal death. Conclusion: Despite placenta previa without PAS disorders, maternal hemorrhagic morbidity was significantly increased. Thus, our results highlight the need for resources for those women with evidence of placenta previa including a low-lying placenta, even if those women do not meet PAS disorder criteria. In addition, placenta previa without PAS disorder was not associated with critical maternal complications.

Third-trimester ultrasound for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: results from the ADoPAD study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with low-lying placenta (< 20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the internal cervical os) on ultrasound at ≥ 26 + 0 weeks' gestation, between October 2014 and January 2019. Ultrasound suspicion of PAS was raised in the presence of at least one of these signs on grayscale ultrasound: (1) obliteration of the hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta; (2) interruption of the hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and the bladder wall; (3) abnormal placental lacunae. Histopathological examinations were performed according to a predefined protocol, with pathologists blinded to the ultrasound findings. To assess the ability of ultrasound to detect clinically significant PAS, a composite outcome comprising the need for active management at delivery and histopathological confirmation of PAS was considered the reference standard. PAS was considered to be clinically significant if, in addition to histological confirmation, at least one of these procedures was carried out after delivery: use of hemostatic intrauterine balloon, compressive uterine suture, peripartum hysterectomy, uterine/hypogastric artery ligation or uterine artery embolization. The diagnostic performance of each ultrasound sign for clinically significant PAS was evaluated in all women and in the subgroup who had at least one previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. Post-test probability was assessed using Fagan nomograms. RESULTS: A total of 568 women underwent transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound examinations during the study period. Of these, 95 delivered in local hospitals, and placental pathology according to the study protocol was therefore not available. Among the 473 women for whom placental pathology was available, clinically significant PAS was diagnosed in 99 (21%), comprising 36 cases of placenta accreta, 19 of placenta increta and 44 of placenta percreta. The median gestational age at the time of ultrasound assessment was 31.4 (interquartile range, 28.6-34.4) weeks. A normal hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 5% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 9% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. The absence of placental lacunae reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 9% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 36% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When abnormal placental lacunae were seen on ultrasound, the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 59% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 78% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. An interrupted hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and bladder wall increased the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS from 21% to 85% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa and from 62% to 88% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When all three sonographic markers were present, the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 89% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 92% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. CONCLUSIONS: Grayscale ultrasound has good diagnostic performance to identify pregnancies at low risk of PAS in a high-risk population of women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa. Ultrasound may be safely used to guide management decisions and concentrate resources on patients with higher risk of clinically significant PAS. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Patients with resolution of low-lying placenta and placenta previa remain at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women who experience resolution of low placentation (low-lying placenta or placenta previa) are at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage compared to those with normal placentation throughout pregnancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2015 and 2019, and who were diagnosed with low-lying placenta or placenta previa on transvaginal ultrasound at the time of the second-trimester anatomical survey, with resolution of low placentation on subsequent ultrasound examination. Women undergoing second-trimester anatomical survey who had normal placentation on transvaginal ultrasound 3 days before or after the cases were randomly identified for comparison. The primary outcome was the rate of postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included the need for a blood transfusion, use of additional uterotonic medication, the need for additional procedures to control bleeding, and maternal admission to the intensive care unit. Outcomes were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1256 women were identified for analysis, of whom 628 had resolved low placentation and 628 had normal placentation. Women with resolved low placentation, compared to those with normal placentation throughout pregnancy, had significantly higher mean age (33.0 ± 5.4 years vs 31.9 ± 5.5 years; P < 0.01) and lower mean body mass index at delivery (27.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2 vs 30.2 ± 5.7 kg/m2 ; P < 0.01), and were more likely to have undergone in-vitro fertilization, be of non-Hispanic white race, have posterior placental location (all P < 0.01) and have private/commercial health insurance (P = 0.04). Patients with resolved low placentation vs normal placentation had greater odds of postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.5 (95% CI, 2.0-6.0); P < 0.01), use of additional uterotonic medication (aOR, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.1); P < 0.01) and increased rates of additional procedures to control bleeding (aOR, 4.0 (95% CI, 1.3-11.9); P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite high rates of resolution of low-lying placenta and placenta previa by term, women with resolved low placentation remain at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage compared to those with normal placentation throughout pregnancy. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Pregnancy and Delivery Outcomes in Women With Persistent Versus Resolved Low-Lying Placenta in the Late Third Trimester.

OBJECTIVES: The safest mode of delivery in low-lying placenta is debatable. Little is known about outcomes in low-lying placenta resolved during the late third trimester. We compare outcomes of women with persistent versus resolved low-lying placenta. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on a prospective cohort of women with low-lying placenta confirmed at 28-30 weeks sonography (01/2009 to 03/2018). Women were followed up serially every 2 to 3 weeks until delivery to assess the placental edge-to-internal os distance (IOD), and included if scan was performed within 28 days before delivery. RESULTS: There were 86 women: in 21 the low-lying placenta resolved, whereas in 65 persisted (n = 15 IOD 1-10 mm, n = 50 IOD 11-20 mm). Antepartum bleeding associated with higher rates of urgent cesarean delivery in 1-10 mm (P = .041) but not in 11-20 mm (P = 1.000) and >20 mm (P = .333). Among women with IOD >10 mm allowed to labor, vaginal delivery occurred in 76.7% (11-20 mm) and 94.1% (>20 mm) (P = .155), with no difference according to parity (70% and 80% in multiparas, P = .696; 60% and 72.7% in nulliparas, P = .698). Severe PPH (P = .922) and hemoglobin drop (P = .109) were similar among groups. Women with IOD 11-20 mm and >20 mm and vaginal delivery bled less than women with similarly located placenta and cesarean delivery (P = .009 and P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Women with IOD >10 mm have high chances of deliver vaginally with no further increase of their hemorrhagic risk. Success of vaginal delivery is independent of parity and antepartum bleeding. Labor should be managed in an adequate hospital setting.

Effectiveness of contingent screening for placenta accreta spectrum disorders based on persistent low-lying placenta and previous uterine surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Maternal mortality related to placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders remains substantial when diagnosed unexpectedly at delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a routine contingent ultrasound screening program for PAS. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of data obtained between 2009 and 2019, involving two groups: a screening cohort of unselected women attending for routine mid-trimester ultrasound assessment and a diagnostic cohort consisting of women referred to the PAS diagnostic service with a suspected diagnosis of PAS. In the screening cohort, women with a low-lying placenta at the mid-trimester assessment were followed up in the third trimester, and those with a persistent low-lying placenta (i.e. placenta previa) and previous uterine surgery were referred to the PAS diagnostic service. Ultrasound assessment by the PAS diagnostic service consisted of two-dimensional grayscale and color Doppler ultrasonography, and women with a diagnosis of PAS were usually managed with conservative myometrial resection. The final diagnosis of PAS was based on a combination of intraoperative clinical findings and histopathological examination of the surgical specimen. RESULTS: In total, 57 179 women underwent routine mid-trimester fetal anatomy assessment, of whom 220 (0.4%) had a third-trimester diagnosis of placenta previa. Seventy-five of these women were referred to the PAS diagnostic service because of a history of uterine surgery, and 21 of 22 cases of PAS were diagnosed correctly (sensitivity, 95.45% (95% CI, 77.16-99.88%) and specificity, 100% (95% CI, 99.07-100%)). Univariate analysis demonstrated that parity ≥ 2 (odds ratio (OR), 35.50 (95% CI, 6.90-649.00)), two or more previous Cesarean sections (OR, 94.20 (95% CI, 22.00-656.00)) and placenta previa (OR, 20.50 (95% CI, 4.22-369.00)) were the strongest risk factors for PAS. In the diagnostic cohort, there were 173 referrals, with one false-positive and three false-negative diagnoses, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.63% (95% CI, 90.46-99.30%) and a specificity of 98.81% (95% CI, 93.54-99.97%). CONCLUSIONS: A contingent screening strategy for PAS is both feasible and effective in a routine healthcare setting. When linked to a PAS diagnostic and surgical management service, adoption of such a screening strategy has the potential to reduce the maternal morbidity and mortality associated with this condition. However, larger prospective studies are necessary before implementing this screening strategy into routine clinical practice. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Eficacia de la detección contingente para los trastornos del espectro de la placenta acreta a partir de la placenta baja persistente y en la cirugía uterina previa OBJETIVOS: La mortalidad materna relacionada con los trastornos de la gama espectral de la placenta acreta (EPA) sigue siendo considerable cuando se diagnostica de forma inesperada en el momento del parto. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de un programa rutinario de detección contingente mediante ecografía para el EPA. MÉTODOS: Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de datos obtenidos entre 2009 y 2019, en el que participaron dos grupos: una cohorte de detección de mujeres no seleccionadas que acudieron a la evaluación ecográfica rutinaria de mitad de trimestre y una cohorte de diagnóstico, integrada por mujeres remitidas al servicio de diagnóstico del EPA con un presunto diagnóstico del EPA. En la cohorte de detección, a las mujeres con una placenta baja en la evaluación de mitad de trimestre se les hizo un seguimiento en el tercer trimestre, y a aquellas con una placenta baja persistente (es decir, placenta previa) que habían tenido cirugía uterina previa se las remitió al servicio de diagnóstico del EPA. La evaluación ecográfica por el servicio de diagnóstico del EPA consistió en una ecografía Doppler bidimensional en escala de grises y en color, y a las mujeres con diagnóstico del EPA se las trató habitualmente con una resección conservadora del miometrio. El diagnóstico final del EPA se basó en una combinación de indicadores clínicos intraoperatorios y el examen histopatológico de la muestra quirúrgica. RESULTADOS: En total, 57179 mujeres se sometieron a una evaluación rutinaria de la anatomía fetal a mitad del trimestre, de las cuales a 220 (0,4%) se les diagnosticó con placenta previa en el tercer trimestre. Setenta y cinco de estas mujeres fueron remitidas al servicio de diagnóstico del EPA, debido a su historial de cirugía uterina, y 21 de los 22 casos de EPA fueron diagnosticados correctamente (sensibilidad, 95,45% (IC 95%, 77,16-99,88%) y especificidad, 100% (IC 95%, 99,07-100%)). El análisis univariante demostró que la paridad ≥2 (razón de momios (RM), 35,50 (IC 95%, 6,90-649,00)), dos o más cesáreas previas (RM, 94,20 (IC 95%, 22,00-656,00)) y la placenta previa (RM, 20,50 (IC 95%, 4,22-369,00)) fueron los factores de riesgo más fuertes para el EPA. En la cohorte de diagnóstico, se remitió a 173 mujeres, entre las cuáles hubo un diagnóstico de falso-positivo y tres diagnósticos de falsos-negativos, lo que dio como resultado una sensibilidad del 96,63% (IC 95%, 90,46-99,30%) y una especificidad del 98,81% (IC 95%, 93,54-99,97%). CONCLUSIONES: La adopción de una estrategia de detección contingente para el EPA es tanto factible como eficaz en un entorno de atención sanitaria rutinaria. Cuando se asocia a un servicio de diagnóstico y gestión quirúrgica del EPA, la adopción de esa estrategia de detección podría reducir la morbilidad y la mortalidad maternas asociadas a esta afección. Sin embargo, se necesitan estudios prospectivos más amplios antes de aplicar esta estrategia de detección en la práctica clínica habitual. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Follow-up ultrasound in second-trimester low-positioned anterior and posterior placentae: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of cases of placenta previa or a low-lying placenta in the second trimester will have a normal placental position in the third trimester. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the distance between the placenta and the internal os of the cervix (IOD) in the second trimester for the prediction of third-trimester low-positioned placenta, and to define a cut-off value at which all cases of third-trimester low-positioned placenta are identified. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including women undergoing a transvaginal ultrasound examination between 18 and 24 weeks' gestation who had a low-positioned placenta, defined as an IOD of < 20 mm. Low-positioned placenta included placenta previa, defined as a placenta covering the internal os of the cervix, and a low-lying placenta, defined as a placenta lying near to (within 20 mm) but not overlying the internal os. All women were re-evaluated in the third trimester. Relative risks for a low-positioned placenta in the third trimester were calculated for women with placenta previa vs a low-lying placenta, posterior vs anterior placenta and positive vs negative history of Cesarean section. Multilevel likelihood ratios for ranges of IOD in the prediction of a low-positioned placenta in the third trimester were calculated separately for anteriorly and posteriorly located placentae. Corresponding receiver-operating-characteristics curves were constructed. RESULTS: In total, 958 women were included in the study. In the second trimester, placentae were more frequently located on the posterior side (62.0%) than on the anterior side (38.0%). In the third trimester, 48/958 (5.0%) placentae persisted as a low-positioned placenta. Women with placenta previa in the second trimester had a higher risk of a low-positioned placenta in the third trimester than did those with a low-lying placenta in the second trimester (37/181 (20.4%) vs 11/777 (1.4%); relative risk (RR), 17.9 (95% CI, 8.9-36.0)). Women with a posterior placenta had a higher risk of a low-positioned placenta in the third trimester than did those with an anterior placenta (38/594 (6.4%) vs 10/364 (2.7%); RR, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-4.9)), as did women with a history of Cesarean section compared with those without such a history (14/105 (13.3%) vs 34/853 (4.0%); RR, 3.7 (95% CI, 1.9-7.2)). The cut-off value of IOD in the second trimester to identify all cases of an abnormally located placenta in the third trimester was 15.5 mm for posteriorly located placentae, while for anteriorly located placentae the IOD cut-off was lower, namely -4.5 mm, representing a 4.5-mm overlap of the placental edge over the internal os of the cervix. CONCLUSIONS: With incorporation of a safety margin of 5 mm and ensuring that all women with placenta previa undergo a follow-up scan, we recommend lowering the IOD cut-off value for follow-up in cases of an anterior low-positioned placenta from 20 to 5 mm, which would decrease the number of unnecessary follow-up ultrasound examinations without missing any high-risk women. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Development of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy.

Low-lying placentas, placenta previa and abnormally invasive placentas are the most frequently occurring placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. These conditions can have serious consequences for mother and fetus mainly due to excessive blood loss before, during or after delivery. The incidence of such abnormalities is increasing, but treatment options and preventive strategies are limited. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the etiology of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. Placental formation already starts at implantation and therefore disorders during implantation may cause these abnormalities. Understanding of the normal placental structure and development is essential to comprehend the etiology of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy, to diagnose the affected women and to guide future research for treatment and preventive strategies. We reviewed the literature on the structure and development of the normal placenta and the placental development resulting in low-lying placentas, placenta previa and abnormally invasive placentas.

Risk factors for severe postpartum haemorrhage during caesarean section for placenta praevia.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical and ultrasound risk factors in predicting severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (≥1.5 L) in pregnancies undergoing caesarean section for placenta praevia. This cohort consists of all cases of placenta praevia undergoing caesarean delivery over a period of 5 years in a service unit. Patients and their delivery data were retrieved from an obstetric database. Ultrasound features were prospectively recorded before caesarean section. The incidence of caesarean section for placenta praevia was 0.98% (n = 215). Of these, 12.1% (n = 26) had severe PPH. A logistic regression model showed that major praevia, antepartum haemorrhage before delivery and anterior placenta remained significant factors associated with severe PPH. The sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive value of the model are 96.2%, 59.8%, 24.8% and 99.1%, respectively. Our model had high sensitivity and negative predictive value for severe PPH during caesarean section for placenta praevia.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Placenta praevia is known to be one of the leading causes of severe PPH. Many risk factors have been associated with severe bleeding during caesarean section for placenta praevia. However, the importance of individual factors in predicting pregnancy outcome remains controversial.What the results of this study add? Our model includes only three simple parameters, namely the presence of significant antepartum haemorrhage (APH) from the history, and anterior or posterior placenta and major or minor praevia from ultrasound findings, but could predict up to 96.2% of all severe PPH. More importantly, the absence of APH, a posterior minor praevia, was associated with a negative predictive value of 99.1% of severe PPH, implying that such cases could be treated as 'normal' low risk caesarean sections.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This simple model would allow differential pre-operative counselling of patients on risks and complications, planning and preparation of operation, allocation of staff as well as in contingency measures to be taken during operation. The establishment of a differential protocol for placenta praevia based on these simple risks factors and a prospective trial of such a protocol is suggested.

Vaginal delivery in women with a low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low-lying placentas are positioned close to the internal os of the cervix. The preferred way of delivery within this group is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on the success of a vaginal delivery with a low-lying placenta. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched OVID EMBASE and MEDLINE for studies on vaginal delivery with a low-lying placenta. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSES: Data was extracted on successful vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean section due to haemorrhage. We distinguished between different distances between the cervical os and the placenta (internal os distance, IOD); 0-10, 11-20, and >20 mm. A meta-analysis of proportions was made for successful vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean section at every cut-off value. Maternal morbidity (i.e. antepartum blood loss, postpartum haemorrhage and blood transfusion) at different cut-off values was evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 999 articles retrieved, 10 articles met our inclusion criteria. A vaginal delivery was successful at an IOD of 0-10 mm in 43%, at an IOD of 11-20 mm in 85%, and at an IOD of >20 mm in 82%. A shorter IOD had a higher chance of antepartum haemorrhage, whereas a larger IOD needed postpartum blood transfusion more often. Postpartum haemorrhage did not depend on IOD. CONCLUSION: A low-lying placenta is not a contraindication for a trial of labour, and the morbidity in these women is not increased. However, women with a low-lying placenta have a higher chance of an emergency caesarean section compared with women with a placenta outside the lower uterine segment. Therefore, shared decision-making is mandatory in case of a trial of labour. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This systematic review demonstrates the possibility of a vaginal delivery in women with a low-lying placenta within 20 mm of the cervix.

Assessment of the Placental Cord Insertion Using 3-Dimensional Ultrasound at the Time of the Structural Fetal Survey.

OBJECTIVES: The influence of placental morphologic characteristics on pregnancy outcomes is poorly understood. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship of the distance of the placental cord insertion from the placental edge (PCI-D) with associated placental characteristics as well as birth outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women with singleton gestations undergoing obstetric ultrasound examinations between 14 and 23 weeks' gestation with a cervical length of greater than 3.0 cm who delivered between 24 and 42 weeks. A 3-dimensional volume of the placenta was evaluated. The PCI-D was obtained with Virtual Organ computer-aided analysis software (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). Generalized linear regression and generalized additive models were fitted to explore the associations between the PCI-D in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 216 pregnancies were included in the analysis. The PCI-D did not correlate with maternal age, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, or 5-minute Apgar score. Although not statistically significant, the birth weight z score (P = .09) was associated with a longer PCI-D, and gravidity was associated with a shorter PCI-D (P = .10). A low-lying placenta or placenta previa was associated with a longer PCI-D (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The PCI-D is associated with a low placental position in the second trimester. These data are helpful for understanding placental development. The PCI-D may be associated with pregnancy-related factors such as birth weight and multigravidity. More research is required to evaluate the effects of pregnancy-related factors on the PCI-D and the effect of the PCI-D on pregnancy outcomes.

Association between birth weight and massive haemorrhage in pregnancy with a low-lying placenta: a 9-year single-centre retrospective cohort study in Japan.

A low-lying placenta is a well-known cause of a massive intrapartum haemorrhage. We aimed to evaluate whether neonatal birth weight deviation from the nationwide average could predict a massive haemorrhage during a delivery in the women with a low-lying placenta. This study included 40 women. The main outcomes were a massive haemorrhage and a neonatal birth weight deviation. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal birth weight deviation cut-off for predicting a massive haemorrhage. A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify the variables significantly associated with a massive haemorrhage. The best cut-off for predicting a massive haemorrhage was a birth weight deviation of +0.51 standard deviations (SDs) from the nationwide average. A birth weight deviation of ≥ +0.51 SDs was significantly associated with an increased massive haemorrhage risk. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? A low-lying placenta is a well-known cause of a massive intrapartum haemorrhage. Therefore, when managing pregnancies with a low-lying placenta, the possibility of severe perinatal bleeding should be considered, and it is desirable to determine reliable predictors of a haemorrhage. However, few studies have reported the predictive factors of a massive haemorrhage in patients with a low-lying placenta. What do the results of this study add? We demonstrated that a birth weight deviation from the nationwide average was significantly associated with a massive intrapartum haemorrhage in patients with a low-lying placenta. To our knowledge, this is the first study to clarify the association between a neonatal birth weight and a massive intrapartum haemorrhage incidence and to determine the optimal birth weight deviation cut-off for predicting a massive haemorrhage in patients with a low-lying placenta. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? An accurate risk stratification using the foetal weight as a marker for a predicting massive intrapartum haemorrhage may help in the management of patients with a low-lying placenta. Studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm our findings.

Resolution of a Low-Lying Placenta and Placenta Previa Diagnosed at the Midtrimester Anatomy Scan.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence and resolution rates of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa and to assess the optimal time to perform follow-up ultrasonography (US) to assess for resolution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa at routine anatomic screening. Follow-up US examinations were reviewed to estimate the proportion of women who had resolution. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was generated to estimate the median time to resolution. The distance of the placental edge from the internal cervical os was used to categorize the placenta as previa or low-lying (0.1-10 or ≥ 10-20 mm). A time-to-event analysis was used to estimate predictive factors and the time to resolution by distance from the os. RESULTS: A total of 1663 (8.7%) women had a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa. The cumulative resolution for women who completed 1 or more additional US examinations was 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 90.2%-93.3%). The median time to resolution was 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-13) weeks. The distance from the internal cervical os was known for 658 (51.0%) women. The probability of resolution was inversely proportional to the distance from the internal os: 99.5% (≥10-20 mm), 95.4% (0.1-10 mm), and 72.3% (placenta previa; P < .001). The median times to resolution were 9 (IQR, 7-12) weeks for 10 to 20 mm, 10 (IQR, 7-13) weeks for 0.1 to 10 mm, and 12 (IQR, 9-15) weeks for placenta previa (P = .0003, log rank test). CONCLUSIONS: A low-lying placenta or placenta previa diagnosed at the midtrimester anatomy survey resolves in most patients. Resolution is near universal in patients with an initial distance from the internal os of 10 mm or greater.

Evaluating the safety of labour in women with a placental edge 11 to 20 mm from the internal cervical Os.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of women with a placental edge between 11 and 20 mm from the internal cervical os, and to determine the likelihood of a successful vaginal delivery when trial of labour is attempted in these women. METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study of women with singleton pregnancies and a placental edge between 11 and 20 mm from the internal cervical os (identified by transvaginal sonography) who underwent a trial of labour. RESULTS: Fourteen women with the above characteristics underwent a trial of labour during the study period. The mean interval (± SD) from ultrasound to delivery was 17.2 ± 9.6 days. Thirteen women (92.9%) delivered vaginally with no complications, and only one woman (7.1%) required an emergency Caesarean section for intrapartum bleeding. The risks of antepartum and postpartum hemorrhage were 21.4% and 14.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Having a placental edge more than 10 mm from the internal os, measured by transvaginal sonography near term, justifies allowing a trial of labour and carries a low risk of subsequent obstetrical hemorrhage.

Objectif : Cette étude avait pour objectif d'évaluer les issues de grossesse au sein d'une cohorte de femmes qui présentaient un pourtour placentaire se situant à 11-20 mm d'écart par rapport à l'orifice cervical interne; elle cherchait également à déterminer la probabilité d'un accouchement vaginal réussi lorsqu'un essai de travail est tenté chez de telles femmes. Méthodes : Nous avons mené une étude observationnelle prospective portant sur des femmes qui connaissaient une grossesse monofœtale, qui présentaient un pourtour placentaire se situant à 11-20 mm d'écart par rapport à l'orifice cervical interne (identifié par échographie transvaginale) et qui ont tenté un essai de travail. Résultats : Quatorze femmes présentant les caractéristiques susmentionnées ont tenté un essai de travail au cours de la période d'étude. L'intervalle moyen (± σ) entre l'échographie et l'accouchement a été de 17,2 ± 9,6 jours. Treize femmes (92,9 %) ont connu un accouchement vaginal sans complications; une seule femme (7,1 %) a nécessité une césarienne d'urgence en raison de la présence de saignements pendant la période intrapartum. Les risques d'hémorragie antepartum et postpartum étaient de 21,4 % et de 14,3 %, respectivement. Conclusion : La constatation d'un pourtour placentaire se situant à plus de 10 mm d'écart par rapport à l'orifice cervical interne (mesuré par échographie transvaginale peu avant le terme) justifie la tenue d'un essai de travail et ne s'accompagne que d'un faible risque d'hémorragie obstétricale subséquente.

Outcomes of pregnancies with a low-lying placenta diagnosed on second-trimester sonography.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine how often a low-lying placenta, defined as a placenta ending within 2 cm of the internal cervical os but not covering it, diagnosed sonographically in the second trimester resolves before delivery. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, 1416 pregnancies with a sonographically diagnosed low-lying placenta between 16 and 24 weeks' gestation were identified from our ultrasound database over a 5-year period. We reviewed medical records to determine the gestational age at which the low-lying placenta was first diagnosed, the gestational age at which the placenta was no longer sonographically low lying or covering the cervix, and, of those whose placentas that never cleared the internal cervical os sonographically, how many went on to cesarean delivery as a result of placental location. RESULTS: In total, 1220 of 1240 low-lying placentas (98.4%) that had sonographic follow up resolved to no previa before delivery; 89.9% of placentas cleared the cervix by 32 weeks, and 95.9% cleared by 36 weeks. Twenty patients (1.6%) had persistent sonographic placenta previa or a low-lying placenta at or near term, including 5 complete previas, 7 marginal previas, 5 low-lying placentas, and 3 vasa previas; all had cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: A low-lying placenta sonographically diagnosed in the second trimester typically resolves by the mid third trimester. Only rarely (1.6% of the time) does it persist to term or near term. Follow-up sonography is warranted to diagnose persistent placenta previa or vasa previa, a complication of a low-lying placenta.

Is the third trimester repeat ultrasound scan for placental localisation needed if the placenta is low lying but clear of the os at the mid-trimester morphology scan?

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether women with a low-lying placenta (not overlapping the internal cervical os) at the mid-trimester scan need follow-up. The aim of the study was to determine the rate of placenta praevia, vasa praevia and cord prolapse in the third trimester in this cohort of women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women with a documented low-lying placenta (<30 mm from the internal cervical os) at the mid-trimester morphology ultrasound scan was done. A composite outcome of rate of placenta praevia, vasa praevia or cord prolapse at term was evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the variables influencing the composite outcome. In addition, a meta-analysis of methodologically similar studies was performed to investigate the effect of the placenta to os distance at the mid-trimester scan on the rate of placenta praevia at term. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-one women with a low-lying placenta not overlapping the os at mid-trimester scan were identified. The composite outcome was documented in 20 (11.0%) women, including placenta praevia in 15 (8.3%). Based on multivariate analysis, multiparity, distance from os < 10 mm and antenatal bleeding were independently associated with the composite outcome. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant reduction in rate of placenta praevia for every 10-mm increase in placenta-os distance at mid-trimester. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the recommendation to follow up all women with a placenta lying <20 mm from the cervical os at mid-trimester.

Ultrasound diagnosis of placental and umbilical cord anomalies in singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization.

INTRODUCTION: placental anomalies can affect fetal and maternal outcome due to severe maternal hemorrhage potentially resulting in hysterectomy and cord accident including abruption that can determine fetal damage or death. The aims of our study are to determine if the rate of placental and umbilical cord anomalies are more common in IVF singleton pregnancies compared to spontaneous pregnancies; to evaluate the role of ultrasound in screening for these anomalies and to investigate if oocyte donor fertilization is an additional risk factor for the development of these anomalies. METHODS: this was a prospective cohort study involving two tertiary centers. Patients with a singleton pregnancy conceived with IVF and patients presenting with a spontaneous conception were recruited between 1st May 2019 to 31st March 2021. A total of 634 pregnancies were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent similar antenatal care, which included ultrasound examinations at 11-14, 19-22 and 33-35 weeks. Ultrasound findings of placental and/or umbilical cord abnormalities were recorded using the same protocol for both groups and confirmed after birth. RESULTS: IVF pregnancies had a significantly higher risk of low-lying placenta, placenta previa, bilobed placenta and velamentous cord insertion (VCI) compared with spontaneous pregnancies. In the heterologous subgroup there was a significant increased incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders than in spontaneous pregnancies. All these anomalies were identified prenatally on ultrasound imaging and confirmed at birth. DISCUSSION: IVF pregnancies in general and those resulting from donor oocyte in particular are at higher risk of placental and umbilical cord abnormalities compared to spontaneous pregnancies. These anomalies can be diagnosed accurately at the mid-trimester detailed fetal anomaly scan and our findings support the need for a targeted ultrasound screening of these anomalies in IVF pregnancies.

Low lying placenta: natural course, clinical data, complications and a new model for early prediction of persistency.

OBJECTIVE: To define the natural course and complications, and develop a model for predicting persistency when low-lying placenta (LLP) is detected early in pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women with LLP detected during an early anatomic scan performed at 13-16 weeks gestation. Additional transvaginal ultrasound exams were assessed for resolution at 22-24 weeks and 36-39 weeks. Patients were categorized as: Group 1-LLP resolved by the second-trimester scan, Group 2-LLP resolved by the third trimester, or Group 3-LLP persisted to delivery. Clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as maternal and neonatal complications, were compared. A linear support vector machine classification was used to define a prediction model for persistent LLP. RESULTS: Among 236 pregnancies with LLP, 189 (80%) resolved by 22-24 weeks, 25 (10.5%) resolved by 36-39 weeks and 22 (9.5%) persisted until delivery. Second trimester hCG levels were higher the longer the LLP persisted (0.8 ± 0.7MoM vs. 1.13 + 0.4 MoM vs. 1.7 ± 1.5 MoM, adjusted p = .03, respectively) and cervical length (mm) was shorter (first trimester: 4.3 ± 0.7 vs. 4.1 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 1; adjusted p = .008; Second trimester: 4.4 ± 0.1 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8; adjusted p = .02). The predictive accuracy of the linear support vector machine classification model, calculated based on these parameters, was 90.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent LLP has unique clinical characteristics and more complications compared to cases that resolved. Persistency can be predicted with 90.3% accuracy, as early as the beginning of the second trimester by using a linear support vector machine classification model.

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade after vaginal delivery in women with low-lying placenta: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Low-lying placenta is a special form of placenta previa and a major cause of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). As an important hemostatic tool, the Bakri balloon is widely used in the prevention and treatment of PPH caused by placenta previa. Few studies have paid attention to the effect of Bakri balloon after vaginal delivery in women with low-lying placenta. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade (BBT) after vaginal delivery in women with low-lying placenta based on a retrospective cohort study. Methods: Singleton pregnant women with low-lying placenta who had vaginal deliveries at our hospital between January 2015 to December 2020 were enrolled. Women who received prophylactic balloon tamponade immediately after vaginal delivery were defined as the BBT group, while women who underwent routine procedures after vaginal delivery except immediate balloon tamponade were defined as the non-BBT group. The maternal clinical characteristics and outcomes of the two groups were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 118 women with low-lying placenta were included in the study, with 47 in the BBT group and 71 in the non-BBT group. The postpartum bleeding amount was 339.19±102.94 mL at 2 hours and 418.11±90.73 mL at 24 hours in the BBT group, while in the non-BBT group the postpartum bleeding amount was 421.55±106.37 mL at 2 hours and 505.11±94.51 mL at 24 hours, with significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the postpartum length of hospital stay (P=0.085) and the incidence of puerperal infection (P=0.244) between the two groups. Conclusions: Routine use of prophylactic BBT after vaginal delivery can significantly reduce the postpartum bleeding amount in women with low-lying placenta and does not increase the incidence of puerperal infection and the postpartum length of hospital stay.