Supraperiosteal fat repositioning with midface lift in lower eyelid blepharoplasty: an 18-year experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcomes of fat repositioning via supraperiosteal dissection with midface lift for correction of tear trough deformity in a large Asian patient population. METHODS: Retrospectively review 1152 Asian patients who underwent fat repositioning to the supraperiosteal plane with a midface lift between 2005 and 2022. Surgical technique, postoperative course, and complications were recorded. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, the degree of patient satisfaction was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2304 eyes from 1152 patients with an average follow-up of 10 months. These procedures were performed using a transforniceal approach in 185 patients (16%) or a transcutaneous skin excision approach in 967 patients (84%). Among the patients who underwent the transcutaneous technique, seven individuals (0.6%) experienced effective treatment of lower lid ectropion through lateral tarsal strip procedures. Nine patients (0.7%) required revision surgery to address the remaining lateral fat pad due to inadequate lateral orbital fat excision during the initial procedure. At the 6-month follow-up, most patients reported a high level of satisfaction, with 800 patients (78%) expressing extreme satisfaction and 196 patients (19.1%) reporting satisfaction with the improvement in their appearance. No one reported facial numbness, lower eyelid or cheek paralysis, newly developed diplopia or granuloma formation. CONCLUSION: The procedure of fat repositioning involving supraperiosteal dissection and a midface lift, whether performed using a transforniceal approach or a transcutaneous skin excision approach, in lower eyelid blepharoplasty proves to be a secure and auspicious surgical technique for rectifying tear trough deformity and attaining a pleasing aesthetic outcome.

Mystery of the Muenke midface: spheno-occipital synchondrosis fusion and craniofacial skeletal patterns.

PURPOSE: The spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) is an important site of endochondral ossification in the cranial base that closes prematurely in Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer syndromes, which contributes to varying degrees of midface hypoplasia. The facial dysmorphology of Muenke syndrome, in contrast, is less severe with low rates of midface hypoplasia. We thus evaluated the timing of SOS fusion and cephalometric landmarks in patients with Muenke syndrome compared to normal controls. METHODS: Patients with Muenke syndrome who had at least one fine-cut head computed tomography scan performed from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A case-control study was performed of patient scans and age- and sex-matched control scans. SOS fusion status was evaluated as open, partially closed, or closed. RESULTS: We included 28 patients and compared 77 patient scans with 77 control scans. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an insignificantly earlier timeline of SOS fusion in Muenke syndrome (p = 0.300). Mean sella-orbitale (SO) distance was shorter (44.0 ± 6.6 vs. 47.7 ± 6.7 mm, p < 0.001) and mean sella-nasion-Frankfort horizontal (SN-FH) angle was greater (12.1° ± 3.8° vs. 10.1° ± 3.2°, p < 0.001) in the Muenke group, whereas mean sella-nasion-A point (SNA) angle was similar and normal (81.1° ± 5.7° vs. 81.4° ± 4.7°, p = 0.762). CONCLUSION: Muenke syndrome is characterized by mild and often absent midfacial hypoplasia, with the exception of slight retropositioning of the infraorbital rim. Interestingly, SOS fusion patterns in these patients are not significantly different from age- and sex-matched controls despite an increased odds of fusion. It is possible that differences in timing of SOS fusion may manifest phenotypically at the infraorbital rim rather than at the maxilla.

Early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis changes the syndromic craniosynostosis treatment paradigm: long-term outcomes of a 23-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Early surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis varies widely between centers, with patients typically undergoing multiple intracranial procedures through childhood. This study evaluates the long-term impact of early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) versus conventional treatment paradigms on the number and timing of subsequent craniofacial procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinal operative patterns of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated from 2000 to 2023 with greater than five years of follow-up. Outcomes of patients who underwent early PVDO and conventional vault reconstruction were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria (30 PVDO and 25 conventional). Age at initial vault surgery was similar between the PVDO and conventional cohorts (7.6 vs. 8.8 months), as were baseline craniometrics (p > 0.05). Multiple fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) procedures were performed in only 1/30 (3%) PVDO-treated patient versus 12/25 (48%) conventionally-treated patients (p < 0.001). Twelve (40%) PVDO-treated patients did not undergo FOA at all. Among patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes, fewer PVDO-treated patients required FOA prior to midface surgery (33% vs. 92%, p = 0.004) or repeat FOA (6% vs. 50%, p = 0.005) compared to conventionally-treated patients. Among patients with Muenke and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes, a similar proportion of patients required FOA in the PVDO and conventional cohorts (91% vs. 100%, p = 0.353), though no PVDO-treated patients required repeat FOA (0% vs. 44%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Early PVDO is associated with a reduction in the high burden of both FOA and, critically, revisionary frontal procedures which are commonly seen in conventionally-treated patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Advanced Facial Rejuvenation: Synergistic Effects of Lower Blepharoplasty and Ultrasound Guided Mid-Face Lift Using Polydioxanone (PDO) Threads.

BACKGROUND: Traditional facial aging surgeries have risks and extended recovery times, leading to a demand for minimally invasive alternatives. PDO (polydioxanone) threads, which are absorbable sutures that stimulate collagen production and tissue contraction, offer improved aesthetic outcomes. This paper evaluates the combined use of PDO thread mid-cheek lift and lower blepharoplasty for facial rejuvenation. METHODS: This retrospective study compared outcomes in patients undergoing lower blepharoplasty combined with a mid-face lift using PDO threads versus those undergoing only lower blepharoplasty. Focused on individuals with baggy lower eyelids and pronounced nasolabial folds, outcome measures included the Modified Fitzpatrick wrinkle scale, Allergan® midface volume deficit scale, Width of inter zygomatic distance, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaires, assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The combined procedure demonstrated superior aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to lower blepharoplasty alone. Improvements were more significant in wrinkle reduction, midface volume, and inter-zygomatic distance in the combined procedure group. Although the combined procedure had a longer mean operation time, scar assessment scores were similar between both groups, with no complications reported. CONCLUSION: The combination of lower blepharoplasty and mid-face lift using PDO threads is a comprehensive and effective approach for facial rejuvenation. It significantly enhances wrinkle reduction, mid-face lifting, and patient satisfaction. Ultrasound-guided thread lifting, a method of assessing and performing mid-face lifting, proves to be safe and efficient. This approach holds promise as a future option in cosmetic anti-aging surgery, presenting a minimally invasive alternative with natural-looking results and reduced downtime. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Three Key Submuscular Points for Nonsurgical Rejuvenation of the Midface in Caucasian Patients: A Methodological Approach Using Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.

INTRODUCTION: Since aesthetic medical treatments providing natural results are becoming increasingly popular, we developed an innovative hyaluronic acid infiltration technique for midface rejuvenation. METHODS: In this prospective study, only patients with a negative or neutral lower eyelid vector were included. Treatment consisted in injecting three hyaluronic acid boluses at the cutaneous projections of the levator labii superioris, zygomatic major and minor muscles insertions. All patients were administered before treatment the FACE-Q questionnaire, whereas after treatment, they were administered the FACE-Q questionnaire and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). All treatments were documented with standardized photographs. A plastic surgeon from another Institution reviewed the photos and scored the treatments according to the GAIS scale. RESULTS: We included 567 patients (101 males and 466 females) who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 41 years, and mean follow-up time was four months. The FACE-Q scores after treatment were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in every domain investigated. The GAIS scores demonstrated significant improvement posttreatment in 89.8% of patients. An average of 1.5 ml of hyaluronic acid (VYC-20) was used for each zygomatic region. No major complications were reported; only 27 patients reported bruising, which resolved spontaneously. In all patients, there was an inversion of the lower eyelid vector, which had transitioned from neutral or negative to positive. CONCLUSION: Lifting the insertions of three selected muscles with hyaluronic acid allows a midface upward repositioning. This technique provides a reproducible and safe approach for midface rejuvenation through tissue repositioning rather than augmenting facial volume. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Lower Blepharoplasty with Mid-Face Elevation: A Polydioxanone (PDO) Barbed Suture Loop for Lid-Cheek Junction Blending.

BACKGROUND: Anti-aging in the lower eyelid-cheek junction area has always been the most widely sought cosmetic surgery. However, orbital fat removal or a midcheek fat pad lift alone does not achieve the best results. This study describes a new technique of lower blepharoplasty combined with a midcheek lift performed using a polydioxanone barbed suture loop based on the entire anatomy of the lower eyelid-cheek junction area. METHODS: We report our experience with lower blepharoplasty combined with a midcheek lift, covering 38 procedures performed over the past 3 years. We reviewed the technique and results and described the various indications for which the new technique is suitable. The efficacy of the surgeries was delineated using both 3D volume calculation and graphic pictures. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated significant rejuvenation of the lower eyelid with the elimination of the eyebags, elevation of the lid-cheek junction, and improvement of the nasolabial folds. All the patients were satisfied with the procedure. Complication rates were low, and lower lid retraction temporarily occurred in 3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This new method of lower blepharoplasty with midcheek elevation is safe, effective, convenient, and long-lasting. The technique is more doctor-friendly, recovery is quick, and complications are minimized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Dual-Plane Midface Lift Through Transoral and Transtemporal Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The surge in the popularity of midface and temporal lifting procedures can be attributed to evolving social media trends and heightened patient expectations, particularly among younger individuals seeking "beautification" rather than traditional rejuvenation. Scarless techniques, such as transtemporal/transoral approaches, are increasingly preferred. This study aimed to combine the advantages of both superficial and deep dissection planes in midface and temporal lifting procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study included 184 patients who underwent surgery using a dual-plane midface and temporal lift technique. Preoperative and postoperative assessments, including P1/P2 ratio calculations, were performed to evaluate volumetric distribution in the midface. RESULTS: The study cohort exhibited a significant improvement in the P1/P2 ratio postoperatively (p < 0.05), indicating successful volume redistribution. Complications, including hypoesthesia, bruising, and infection, were managed effectively. Minor asymmetries were observed, with revisions offered, but declined by the patient. DISCUSSION: This technique offers hidden incisions and reduces the risk of scar-related complications, making it suitable for patients seeking facial enhancement. Addressing the tear trough area and the lateral canthus provides comprehensive facial rejuvenation. The dual-plane approach facilitates both skin mobilization and volume shift, yielding favorable aesthetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The dual-plane midface and temporal lift technique presented in this study offers a bi-vectoral approach to midfacial lifting, suitable for both beautification and rejuvenation goals. Despite the potential limitations, including infection risk, this method is an effective option for facial enhancement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

Orthognathic Surgery Rates in Furlow Double-Opposing Z-Plasty Versus Straight-Line Repair: A Review of Three Decades of Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of different surgical techniques on maxillary growth remains unclear. This study investigates the long-term impact of Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty versus straight-line repair (SLR) techniques on midface growth and subsequent orthognathic surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: This study evaluated patients who underwent primary palatoplasty with Furlow or SLR techniques from 1994-2023. Patients were >14 years old at their most recent follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were orthognathic surgery and orthognathic surgery recommendation rates to correct midface hypoplasia (MFH). Cephalometrics at the time of orthognathic surgery recommendation were traced to validate MFH. RESULTS: In total, 1857 patients underwent palatoplasty, of which 335 met inclusion criteria (49 SLR, 286 Furlow). Average age at last follow-up was 18.5±2.6 years. Patients who underwent Furlow versus SLR showed no significant difference in orthognathic surgery rates (p=0.428) or recommendation for orthognathic surgery rates (p=0.900). Patients recommended to undergo orthognathic surgery had more negative ANB angles (p<0.001) and smaller SNA angles (p<0.001) than patients not recommended for orthognathic surgery, demonstrating maxillary hypoplasia. Upon multivariate regression, patients with Veau III and IV clefts had an increased need for orthognathic surgery, p=0.047 and p=0.008, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that higher cleft severity contributes to future orthognathic surgery. However, palatoplasty technique did not influence orthognathic surgery rates. Our results provide valuable data when surgeons are considering the impact of palatoplasty technique on sagittal growth restriction.

Analyzing the Burden of Midface Fractures Due to Road Traffic Accidents in Vietnam: An Epidemiological Approach.

BACKGROUND: Road traffic accidents have significantly impacted public health in Vietnam. This study investigated the patterns of midface fractures in Vietnam and their correlation with road traffic accidents in the country. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed 2187 medical records of patients with midface fractures in Ho Chi Minh City. After applying exclusion criteria, the fractures were categorized. Statistical analyses, including chi-squared and logistic regression, were conducted to identify associations and relationships among the types and causes of fractures. RESULTS: The study found that 89.3% of midface fractures stemmed from road traffic accidents, with 55.2% and 14.4% zygomatic complex fractures and Le Fort type II fractures, respectively. Adults aged 19-39 accounted for 65.1% of patients, with males at 80.5%. Traffic accidents were significantly associated with an 18.7 times higher risk of concomitant mandibular fractures and a 10.5 times higher risk of Le Fort type II fractures, irrespective of age and gender. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the need for targeted prevention strategies to decrease the incidence of maxillofacial injuries resulting from road traffic accidents in Vietnam, particularly among high-risk groups such as males and young adults.

Frem1 activity is regulated by Sonic hedgehog signaling in the cranial neural crest mesenchyme during midfacial morphogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Frem1 has been linked to human face shape variation, dysmorphology, and malformation, but little is known about its regulation and biological role in facial development. RESULTS: During midfacial morphogenesis in mice, we observed Frem1 expression in the embryonic growth centers that form the median upper lip, nose, and palate. Expansive spatial gradients of Frem1 expression in the cranial neural crest cell (cNCC) mesenchyme of these tissues suggested transcriptional regulation by a secreted morphogen. Accordingly, Frem1 expression paralleled that of the conserved Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) target gene Gli1 in the cNCC mesenchyme. Suggesting direct transcriptional regulation by Shh signaling, we found that Frem1 expression is induced by SHH ligand stimulation or downstream pathway activation in cNCCs and observed GLI transcription factor binding at the Frem1 transcriptional start site during midfacial morphogenesis. Finally, we found that FREM1 is sufficient to induce cNCC proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner and that Shh pathway antagonism reduces Frem1 expression during pathogenesis of midfacial hypoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating that the Shh signaling pathway regulates Frem1 expression in cNCCs, these findings provide novel insight into the mechanisms underlying variation in midfacial morphogenesis.

Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with joint laxity type 2: Aggregating the literature and reporting on the life of a 66-year-old man.

Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with joint laxity, leptodactylic type (SEMDJL2), is a rare bone dysplasia that results from hotspot (amino acids148/149) mutations in KIF22. Clinically, affected individuals present with generalized joint laxity, limb malalignment, midface hypoplasia, gracile digits, postnatal short stature, and occasionally, tracheolaryngomalacia; additionally, radiological features include severe epi-metaphyseal abnormalities and slender metacarpals. This report evaluates the progression of SEMDJL2 throughout the life of the oldest individual reported in the literature-a 66-year-old man with a pathogenic KIF22 variant (c.443C > T, p.Pro148Leu). The proband developed many of the clinical and radiological alterations consistent with the presentation of other individuals in the literature. Interestingly, throughout his life, joint limitation progressed, beginning with knee and elbow stricture (year 20), and later, limitation of the shoulders, hips, ankles, and wrists (year 40). This differs from previous case reports, where joint limitation is identified in 1-to-2 joints. Cumulatively, the progressive body-wide joint limitation resulted in early retirement (year 45) and difficulty completing daily tasks and managing personal hygiene culminating in the need for assisted living (year 65). In conclusion, we report on the clinical and radiological developments of a 66-year-old man with SEMDJL2, that developed significant joint limitation in adulthood.

Prior fronto-orbital advancement associated with complications from transcranial midface surgery in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: Our center adopted posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) as a first-line intervention for cranial expansion in syndromic craniosynostosis in 2008, and we have a growing cohort of patients undergoing transcranial midface advancement who have not had prior fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a history of FOA influences the risk profile of transcranial midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. METHODS: Patients undergoing transcranial fronto-facial advancement from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively divided into cohorts based on preceding history of fronto-orbital advancement (FOA- and FOA+). Perioperative outcomes including operative time, length of stay, intraoperative dural injury, and complications (Clavien-Dindo score) were compared between groups with appropriate statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included (15 in FOA- group and 23 in FOA+ group). The overall complication rate was 47% (10% minor, 37% major). Compared to the FOA- group, the FOA+ group had a higher incidence of dural tears (65% v 20%, p = 0.006) and major complications (48% v 13%, p = 0.028). These findings were recapitulated in multivariate logistic regression controlling for other predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Prior FOA is associated with increased rates of major complications and dural tears in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis undergoing fronto-facial surgery. Options for cranial vault expansion that avoid the frontal region, such as PVDO, may favorably alter the risk profile of fronto-facial advancement.

Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Symmetry is essential for computer-aided surgical (CAS) procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). A critical step for successful CAS is mirroring the unaffected side to create a template for the virtual reconstruction of the injured anatomical structure. The aim was to identify specific anatomical landmarks of the midfacial skeleton, to evaluate the symmetry in a group of the real-world Central European population, and to use these landmarks to assess midfacial symmetry in CT scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective cross-sectional study defined landmarks of the midface's bony contour using viscerocranial CT data. The distances of the skeletal landmarks (e.g., the frontozygomatic suture and temporozygomatic suture) of the left and right sides from the midline were measured and statistically compared. Midfacial symmetry for reference points was defined as a difference within 0 mm and their mean difference plus one standard deviation. RESULTS: We examined a total of 101 CT scans. 75% of our population shows symmetrical proportions of the midface. The means of the differences for the left and right sides ranged from 0.8 to 1.3 mm, averaging 1.1 ± 0.2 mm for all skeletal landmarks. The standard deviations ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 mm, with a computed mean of 0.9 ± 0.3 mm. CONCLUSION: We established a methodology to assess the symmetry of the bony midface. If the determined differences were equal to or lower than 2.5 mm in the mentioned midfacial skeletal landmarks, then the symmetry of the bony midface was considered present, and symmetry-based methods for CAS procedures are applicable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many CAS procedures require facial symmetry. We provide an easy-to-apply method to probe for symmetry of the midface. The method may be used for population-based research, to check for proper reduction of fractures after reposition or to screen for symmetry prior to CAS planning.

Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.

OBJECTIVES: Skull morphology and growth patterns are essential for orthodontic treatment, impacting clinical decision making. We aimed to determine the association of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on midface parameters as measured in 3D CT datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After sample size calculation, a total of 240 fully dentulous patients between 20 and 79 years of age (mean age: 42 ± 15), who had received a CT of the skull within the scope of trauma diagnosis or intracranial bleeding, were retrospectively selected. On the basis of cephalometric analysis, using MPR reconstructions, patients were subdivided into three different vertical skull configurations (brachyfacial, mesofacial, dolichofacial) and the respective skeletal Class I, II, and III relationships. Anatomic parameters were measured using a three-dimensional post-processing console: the thickness of the maxillary and palatine bones as well as the alveolar crest, maxillary body and sutural length, width and height of the hard palate, maxillary facial wall thickness, and masseter muscle thickness and length. RESULTS: Individuals with brachyfacial configurations had a significantly increased palatal and alveolar ridge thicknesses compared to those with dolichofacial- or mesofacial configurations. Brachyfacial configurations presented a significantly increased length and thickness of the masseter muscle (4.599 cm; 1.526 cm) than mesofacial (4.431 cm; 1.466 cm) and dolichofacial configurations (4.405 cm; 1.397 cm) (p < 0.001). Individuals with a skeletal Class III had a significantly shorter palatal length (5.313 cm) than those with Class I (5.406 cm) and Class II (5.404 cm) (p < 0.01). Sutural length was also significantly shorter in Class III (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal configurations have an impact on parameters of the bony skull. Also, measurable adaptations of the muscular phenotype could result. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The association between viscerocranial morphology and midface anatomy might be beneficial for tailoring orthodontic appliances to individual anatomy and planning cortically anchored orthodontic appliances.

Patterns and Characteristics of Midface Fractures in North-Eastern Romania.

Midface fractures are common injuries that are the result of interpersonal violence, traffic accidents, falls, work-related accidents, sports-related accidents, or animal aggression. In the northeastern part of Romania, these injuries are a significant health concern that, if left untreated, may lead to functional and esthetic sequelae. Background and Objectives: This study aims to update the statistical data available to help promote a different lifestyle, with awareness campaigns to prevent aggression, accidents, and domestic violence. Materials and Methods: This research was conducted over five years and included 651 patients of both sexes, with ages between 3 and 95 years, that addressed our center for midface fracture treatment. Results: The authors of this study found that men are more predisposed to fractures of the middle third of the face, with anterior laterofacial fractures being the most common type of fracture. Interpersonal violence was the most incriminated etiology for all midface fractures. Conclusions: The present study regarding midfacial fractures shows similar results compared to the medical literature. These findings could help promote a different lifestyle, with awareness campaigns to prevent aggression, accidents, and domestic violence.

Evolution of Medical Modeling and 3D Printing in Microvascular Midface Reconstruction: Literature Review and Experience at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Reconstruction of the midface represents a challenge for reconstructive microsurgeons given the formidable task of restoring both aesthetics and functionality. In particular, preservation of proper globe positioning and maintaining normal vision are as important as restoring the proper projection of the midface and enabling a patient to speak and eat as normally as possible. The introduction of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and medical modeling has revolutionized bony reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton; however, the overwhelming majority of studies have focused on mandibular reconstruction. Here, we introduce some novel advances in utilizing VSP for bony reconstruction of the midface. The present review aims (1) to provide a review of the literature on the use of VSP in midface reconstruction and (2) to provide some insights from the authors' early experience.

Robot-assisted frontofacial correction in very young children with craniofacial dysostosis syndromes: a technical note and early functional outcome.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors aimed to 1) retrospectively analyze the early functional outcomes in a cohort of very young children with craniofacial dysostoses who underwent robot-assisted frontofacial advancement (RAFFA) or robot-assisted midface distraction (RAMD), and 2) analyze the utility of robotic assistance in improving the accuracy and safety of performing transfacial pin insertion for RAFFA or RAMD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 18 children (age range 1-42 months at presentation), who underwent RAFFA or RAMD from February 2015 to February 2021 in the craniofacial unit at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre in Kochi, India, was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone RAFFA in a single stage or RAMD where the cranial vault had been addressed earlier, had been addressed on follow-up, or had not been addressed and had follow-up of at least 6 months. RESULTS: Overall, 18 children with syndromic craniosynostosis underwent LeFort level III midface distraction, with or without RAFFA, from February 2015 to February 2021 at a single center in India. The patients' ages ranged from 6 to 47 months at the time of the procedure. All patients had significant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), significant ocular issues, and disturbed sleep as determined by the authors' preoperative protocol. Clinically significant intracranial pressure issues were present in 17 patients. None of the patients had injury due to the transfacial pin trajectory such as globe injury, damage to the tooth buds, or the loss of purchase during the active distraction phase. The mean distraction achieved was 23 mm (range 18-30 mm) (n = 16/18). Of the 18 patients, 10 (56%) had an excellent outcome and 6 (33%) had a satisfactory outcome. In all cases, the degree of OSA had significantly reduced after surgery. Eye closure improved in all patients, and complete closure was seen in 11 patients. On follow-up, the functional gain remained in 14 of 16 patients at the final follow-up visit. The distraction results were stable during the follow-up period (mean 36 months [range 6-72 months]). CONCLUSIONS: The early RAFFA and RAMD protocols investigated in this study gave a significant functional advantage in very young patients with craniofacial dysostoses. The results have demonstrated the accuracy and safety of robotic assistance in performing transfacial pin insertion for RAFFA or RAMD.

Evolution of midface microvascular reconstruction: three decades of experience from a single institution.

PURPOSE: Midface reconstruction poses a complex set of challenges for reconstructive surgeons. The optimal midface reconstruction must possess a durable underlying bone construct capable of integrating dental implants. Facial contour is restored by the overlying microvascular soft tissue reconstruction with reestablishment of the oral cavity. A plethora of microvascular flaps used in clinical practice have been described including those harvested from the iliac crest, scapula, fibula, forearm and back (latissimus dorsi). The objective was to share our experiences with each of these treatment options that have continued to evolve over time for the benefit of patients. METHODS: Our institution has over three decades of experience in reconstructing complex midface defects and this article summarizes midface reconstruction from an evolutionary perspective (for type II, III and IV defect; Browns classification, Supplementary Table I). We broadly divide this into (i) flaps supplied by the subscapular system (ii) autologous reconstruction with titanium mesh and (iii) fibula microvascular flaps using 3D planning. RESULTS: The advantages and disadvantages for each approach are discussed (Supplementary Table II). CONCLUSION: In the future, it is expected that 3D planning coupled with rapid prototyping, intraoperative navigation and CT imaging will become standard procedural practice.

Craniofacial morphology and growth in Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial proportions of a Dutch control group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included seventy-four patients (43 patients with Muenke syndrome, 22 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 9 patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis) who were referred between 1990 and 2020 (age range 4.84 to 16.83 years) and were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, Children's Hospital Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The control group consisted of 208 healthy children. RESULTS: Cephalometric values comprising the midface were decreased in Muenke syndrome (ANB: ß = -1.87, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0,001), Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (ANB: ß = -1.76, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0.001), and TCF12-related craniosynostosis (ANB: ß = -1.70, p = 0.015; and PC1: p < 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we showed that the midface is hypoplastic in Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis compared to the Dutch control group. Furthermore, the rotation of the maxilla and the typical craniofacial buildup is significantly different in these three craniosynostosis syndromes compared to the controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The maxillary growth in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is impaired, leading to a deviant dental development. Therefore, timely orthodontic follow-up is recommended. In order to increase expertise and support treatment planning by medical and dental specialists for these patients, and also because of the specific differences between the syndromes, we recommend the management of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis in specialized multidisciplinary teams.

Comparing diagnosis of midfacial fractures by radiologists and plastic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians who manage facial fractures often rely on radiologist interpretations to help with assessment and management. Among treating physicians, facial fractures are categorized into clinically relevant patterns of injury. On the other hand, while radiologists are unsurpassed at identifying individual breaks in the bone, larger fracture patterns are not always conveyed in radiology reports. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the frequency with which the terminology describing midfacial fracture patterns is concordant among radiologists and treating clinicians. METHODS: The authors identified patients with different patterns of midfacial injury including Le Fort I, Le Fort II, Le Fort III, naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE), and zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Plastic surgery consult notes and radiological imaging reports were reviewed for concordance in documentation of injury patterns. Identification of individual fractures consistent with the diagnosed fracture pattern was also recorded. RESULTS: Radiologists were noted to be highly successful in describing individual fractures of the facial bones, identifying at least two defining components of a fracture pattern in 96% of Le Fort, 88% of NOE, and 94% of ZMC injuries. However, when injury patterns were considered, only 32% of Le Fort, 28% of ZMC, and 6% of NOE fractures were explicitly identified in radiology reports. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are highly skilled in discerning individual fractures in facial trauma cases. However, less reliability was seen in the identification of fracture patterns in midfacial injury, with particular weaknesses in descriptions of NOE and ZMC fractures. This data suggests that greater focus on patterns of midfacial injury would improve the clinical applicability of radiological reports.