RESUMO
In a post hoc analysis of samples from an intrapartum azithromycin randomized clinical trial, we found that children whose mothers had been treated with the drug had higher prevalence of macrolide-resistance genes msr(A) and ermC at 28 days but not at 12 months. The 2 genes were positively associated in the nasopharynx. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT1800942.
Assuntos
Azitromicina , Macrolídeos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Criança , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Humanos , Lactente , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Nasofaringe , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Herein, 15 phenylpiperazine 3-benzyl-5,5-dimethylhydantoin derivatives (1-15) were screened for modulatory activity towards Msr(A) efflux pump present in S. epidermidis bacteria. Synthesis, crystallographic analysis, biological studies in vitro and structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis were performed. The efflux pump inhibitory (EPI) potency was determined by employing ethidium bromide accumulation assay in both Msr(A) efflux pump overexpressed (K/14/1345) and deficient (ATCC 12228) S. epidermidis strains. The series of compounds was also evaluated for the capacity to reduce the resistance of K/14/1345 strain to erythromycin, a known substrate of Msr(A). The study identified five strong modulators for Msr(A) in S. epidermidis. The 2,4-dichlorobenzyl-hydantoin derivative 9 was found as the most potent EPI, inhibiting the efflux activity in K/14/1345 at a concentration as low as 15.63 µM. Crystallography-supported SAR analysis indicated structural properties that may be responsible for the activity found. This study identified the first synthetic compounds able to inhibit Msr(A) efflux pump transporter in S. epidermidis. Thus, the hydantoin-derived molecules found can be an attractive group in search for antibiotic adjuvants acting via Msr(A) transporter.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias , Hidantoínas , Proteínas de Membrana Transportadoras , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Proteínas de Bactérias/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas de Bactérias/química , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Cristalografia por Raios X , Hidantoínas/química , Hidantoínas/farmacologia , Proteínas de Membrana Transportadoras/química , Proteínas de Membrana Transportadoras/metabolismo , Staphylococcus epidermidis/química , Staphylococcus epidermidis/metabolismoRESUMO
Macrolide resistance in staphylococci is based on the expression of a number of genes which specify four major resistance mechanisms: (i) target site modification by methylation of the ribosomal target site in the 23S rRNA, (ii) ribosome protection via ABC-F proteins, (iii) active efflux via Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporters, and (iv) enzymatic inactivation by phosphotransferases or esterases. So far, 14 different classes of erm genes, which code for 23S rRNA methylases, have been reported to occur in staphylococci from humans, animals and environmental sources. Inducible or constitutive expression of the erm genes depends on the presence and intactness of a regulatory region known as translational attenuator. The erm genes commonly confer resistance not only to macrolides, but also to lincosamides and streptogramin B compounds. In contrast, the msr(A) gene codes for an ABC-F protein which confers macrolide and streptogramin B resistance whereas the mef(A) gene codes for a Major Facilitator Superfamily protein that can export only macrolides. Enzymatic inactivation of macrolides may be due to the macrolide phosphotransferase gene mph(C) or the macrolide esterase genes ere(A) or ere(B). Many of these macrolide resistance genes are part of either plasmids, transposons, genomic islands or prophages and as such, can easily be transferred across strain, species and genus boundaries. The co-location of other antimicrobial or metal resistance genes on the same mobile genetic element facilitates co-selection and persistence of macrolide resistance genes under the selective pressure of metals or other antimicrobial agents.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Plasmídeos/genética , Staphylococcus/genética , Humanos , Macrolídeos/efeitos adversos , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Plasmídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , RNA Ribossômico 23S/efeitos dos fármacos , RNA Ribossômico 23S/genética , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus/patogenicidade , Estreptogramina B/efeitos adversos , Estreptogramina B/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-F protein subfamily collectively mediate resistance to a broader range of clinically important antibiotic classes than any other group of resistance proteins and are widespread in pathogenic bacteria. Following over 25 years' of controversy regarding the mechanism by which these proteins work, it has recently been established that they provide antibiotic resistance through the previously recognized but underappreciated phenomenon of target protection; they bind to the ribosome to effect the release of ribosome-targeted antibiotics, thereby rescuing the translation apparatus from antibiotic-mediated inhibition. Here we review the ABC-F resistance proteins with an emphasis on their mechanism of action, first exploring the history of the debate about how these proteins work and outlining our current state of knowledge and then considering key questions to be addressed in understanding the molecular detail of their function.
Assuntos
Transportadores de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Bactérias/enzimologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Biossíntese de Proteínas , Ribossomos/metabolismo , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Macrolide and lincosamide antibiotics are used for the treatment of staphylococcal infections, especially for penicillin-allergic patients. In the present study, we evaluate the prevalence of resistance to macrolide and lincosamide antibiotics among staphylococci isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 staphylococcal clinical isolates were collected from January 2012 to April 2013. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of erythromycin and clindamycin were determined by agar dilution method. An erythromycin-clindamycin induction test was performed for isolates that were only resistant to erythromycin. Representative erythromycin-resistant isolates were examined for erythromycin resistance genes using PCR. RESULTS: Among staphylococci isolates, resistance frequencies of erythromycin and clindamycin were 65.5% and 20.5%, respectively. Erythromycin resistance was found to be mediated by putative efflux (50.4%) and target site modification (49.6%). Inducible target site modification resistance was detected in 19.1% of erythromycin-resistant isolates. Among the examined 36 staphylococci isolates, msr(A), erm(C), erm(A), and mef(A/E) genes were detected in 55.6%, 30.6%, 25%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of the current study indicate the presence of high rates of macrolide resistance and inducible phenotypes among staphylococcal isolates. It is also essential to keep in mind variations of resistance rates among various age groups and specimen types.