Posterior epistaxis management: review of the literature and proposed guidelines of the hellenic rhinological-facial plastic surgery society.

PURPOSE: Posterior epistaxis is a common emergency in ENT practice varying in severity and treatment. Many management guidelines have been proposed, all of which are a product of retrospective analyses due to the nature of this pathology, as large-scale double-blind studies are impossible-even unethical-to conduct. The purpose of this review is to perform a thorough analysis and comparison of every treatment plan available and establish guidelines for the best possible outcome in accordance to every parameter studied. Given the extensive heterogeneity of information and the multitude of studies on this topic, along with the comparison of various treatment options, we opted for a literature review as our research approach. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed using PubMed Database and search terms included "posterior epistaxis", "treatment", "management", "guidelines", "algorithm" "nasal packing", "posterior packing", "surgery", "SPA ligation", "embolization", "risk factors" or a combination of the above. RESULTS: Initial patients' assessment invariably results in most cases in posterior packing. There seems to be a superiority in recent literature of early surgery over nasal packing as a definitive treatment. Embolization is usually used after surgery failure, except for specific occasions. CONCLUSION: Despite the vast heterogeneity of information, there seems to be a need for re-evaluation of the well-established treatment plans according to more recent studies.

Plus moist HS-W®: a new nasal packing material for the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery.

PURPOSE: Removal of the current calcium alginate packing materials to the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is usually accompanied by discomfort or pain owing to the hard and brittle nature of these materials. Plus moist HS-W® is a new calcium alginate packing material released in 2022 developed to overcome this issue by changing the uronic acid component. We aimed to compare the discomfort/pain during the removal of Plus moist HS-W® with Kaltostat®, as well as their suitability as packing materials in ESS. METHODS: Kaltostat® and Plus moist HS-W® were used as packing materials in 22 and 21 patients who underwent ESS in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Patients were asked to rate the pain during the packing removal 10 days after ESS using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The ratio of residual packing materials, number of suctions (insertions/extractions of the suction cannula), and time required to remove packing materials were measured. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, local infection, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and synechia of the middle meatus were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Plus moist HS-W® group exhibited significantly lower NRS pain scores, a lower ratio of residual packing materials, a reduced number of suctions, and a shorter time required to remove the packing. No obvious postoperative complications occurred in both groups except for one suspicious case of a slight infection in the Kaltostat® group. CONCLUSION: Compared with Kaltostat®, Plus moist HS-W®, characterized by better gelatinization than Kaltostat®, benefits patients by minimizing discomfort/pain during removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication Management.

Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison on the Effectiveness and Safety of Transseptal Suturing Versus Intranasal Splints After Septoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The application of transseptal suturing as an alternative to intranasal splints in preventing postoperative complications, such as synechia, and maintaining nasal septal stability following Septoplasty, remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of transseptal suturing with intranasal splints after Septoplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. The review included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) identified through a database search in July 2023, comparing postoperative complications following Septoplasty with the transseptal suturing technique versus intranasal splints. RESULTS: Eight published RCTs involving 570 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed no significant difference between the transseptal suturing and intranasal splint techniques following Septoplasty in postoperative complications, including postoperative hemorrhage, synechia, septal hematoma, septal perforation, local infection, crusting, and residual septal deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Transseptal suturing can be applied following Septoplasty as an alternative to intranasal splints without increasing the rate of postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Submucosal Trans-Septal Suturing Technique After a Septal Extension Graft with Porous High-Density Polyethylene: A Technical Report.

BACKGROUND: Porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE) is an alternative material for a septal extension graft (SEG) in oriental rhinoplasty when autologous cartilage is limited. Although nasal packing (NP) and trans-septal suturing (TSS) techniques are routine procedures to obviate the dead space after septoplasty, they are associated with certain discomforts and complications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application of a submucosal trans-septal suturing (STSS) technique after SEG with pHDPE. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 60 female participants who underwent SEG with pHDPE. The participants were randomly divided into the NP group and STSS group. The extra surgical duration of NP and STSS, pain, nasal obstruction, and sleeping disturbance as well as postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between group NP and group STSS in terms of mean age. The mean extra surgical duration of group STSS was significantly longer than group NP. There were significant higher pains of group NP at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, compared with group STSS. The NP group also experienced significantly more nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance within 48h postoperatively compared to the STSS group. There was one infection in each group, minor bleeding in two NP patients, and one STSS patient. There was no major bleeding, hematoma, graft exposure, or septal perforation in both groups. CONCLUSION: Although STSS needs a longer extra surgical duration than NP, it significantly improves the patient's postoperative comfort with a faster return to normal respiration compared to NP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nasal septal abscess in adult patients - A single center study.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to present and analyze the etiologic factors, clinical manifestations, bacteriology, and treatment outcomes of nasal septal abscess in a large cohort of adult patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis. RESULTS: 36 adult patients, age from 19 to 85 (mean age, 51.83), with nasal septal abscesses were treated at Ear Nose Throat Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City from January 2020 to August 2022. The most common symptoms were nasal obstruction (75 %), headache/facial pain (58.33 %). Etiologic factors were found in 83.33 % of cases with the most common were diabetes mellitus (47.22 %), nose-picking (44.44 %). 75 % of cases had positive bacterial culture, of which 70.37 % were Staphylococcus aureus. Septal abscess was successfully treated in all cases using our treatment protocol, which involved an extended modified Killian's incision, irrigation with 1 % poviodine, placement of gauze in the abscess pocket, and nasal packing with Merocels. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and nose-picking were the most common etiologic factors; Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism of nasal septal abscess in our study. Our treatment protocol is safe and effective.

Effect of recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor on nasal mucosal healing after endoscopic sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nasal treatment is an important factor affecting the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This study aimed to determine the effect of recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor (rh-aFGF) on nasal mucosal healing after ESS. METHODS: This study is a prospective, single-blind, and randomized controlled clinical study. Fifty-eight CRS patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with bilateral ESS were enrolled and randomly given 1 mL of budesonide nasal spray and 2 mL of rh-aFGF solution (rh-aFGF group) or 1 mL of budesonide nasal spray and 2 mL of rh-aFGF solvent (budesonide group)-infiltrated Nasopore nasal packing after ESS. Preoperative and postoperative scores for Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Lund-Kennedy were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients completed the 12-week follow-up. Postoperative SNOT-22 scores and VAS scores showed no significant differences between the two groups. In terms of the Lund-Kennedy scores, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at the 2-, 4-, 8-, and 12-week postoperative visits, but not at the 1-week visit. Twelve weeks after surgery, the nasal mucosa had completely epithelialized in 18 patients in the rh-aFGF group and in 12 patients in the budesonide group (χ2 = 4.200, P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The combined application of rh-aFGF and budesonide significantly improved postoperative endoscopic appearance in the nasal mucosal healing process.

Wound healing in endoscopic sinus surgery: Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the role of Chitogel with adjuvants.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of Chitogel, with and without Deferiprone (Def) and Gallium Protoporphyrin (GaPP), as a promoter of wound healing to improve surgical outcomes after endoscopic sinus susgery. DESIGN: A double-blinded, randomised control human clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing ESS as a treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis. Participants underwent functional ESS or FESS with drill out as required and were randomised to receive test product Chitogel, Chitogel in combination with Def or Def-GaPP versus no packing (control). SETTING: Ostial stenosis and persistent inflammation are the main reasons for revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Post-operative (PO) dressings can improve PO wound healing and patient outcomes after ESS. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty two patients were included in this study with 79 patients completing the study with 40 undergoing full house FESS and 39 FESS plus frontal drillout. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were followed up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks PO, and outcome scores such as SNOT-22, VAS and LKS, pre and post-surgery (12 weeks) were compared. RESULTS: Seventy nine patients completed the study, there was a significant reduction in SNOT-22 score and improvement of VAS at 12 weeks in patients treated with Chitogel compared to control (p < .05). In those patients, the mean ostium area for the Chitogel and the Chitogel + Def + GaPP groups was higher across all three sinuses compared to the no-treatment control group, without statistical significance. Sphenoid sinus ostium was significantly more patent in patients treated with Chitogel compared to the control at the 12-week time point (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Chitogel as a PO dressing after ESS results in the best patient-reported symptom scores and objective measurements. The combination of Def and GaPP to Chitogel though proving safe, had no effect on the ostium patency or mucosal healing.

Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways.

Objective: To compare the effects of nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with and without an airway tube on postoperative pain, SpO2, nasal obstruction, and difficulty in breathing complaints. Methods: This comparative study was conducted at Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), DMC Civil Hospital Karachi between September 18, 2021, to May 19, 2022. A total of 70 patients who underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis were equally divided into two groups. Group-A patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with an airway tube, and Group-B patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing without an airway tube. Post-operation Nasal pain sensations were measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2 and 12 hours. SpO2 was measured at 30 minutes pre-operatively with an O2 saturation monitor and 12 hours post-operatively during sleep. Results: The postoperative pain at two hours and 12 hours was compared between the two groups, and a significant difference was observed. In Group-A, the average SpO2 decreased > 4% from baseline in 5.7% patients, and 37% in Group-B. A significant difference was observed in the severity of nasal obstruction and difficulty breathing, P-value < 0.05. Conclusion: It is concluded that septoplasty followed by applying nasal packing with integrated airway reduces postoperative pain and improves oxygen saturation compared to nasal packing without integrated airways.

[The effect of increased secretory activity of the nasal mucosa on the duration of the recovery period after anterior tamponade with gauze tampons during surgery of the nasal septum]. / Vliyanie kombinirovannoi sekretoliticheskoi i protivovospalitel'noi terapii na techenie vosstanovitel'nogo perioda posle rinoseptoplastiki.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on the duration and course of the nasal mucosa function recovery after anterior nasal packing during surgery involving the nasal septum and inferior nasal conchae combined with concomitant therapy with the herbal medicinal product Sinupret extract (Bionorica SE, Germany). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 25 males aged 18-50 (the main group), permanent residents of the Novosibirsk region diagnosed with deviated nasal septum at least 2 years ago. All patients underwent rhinoseptoplasty with nasal packing with gauze tampons for 24 hours at the clinical base of the Otorhinolaryngology Department of the Novosibirsk State Medical University.Patients of the main group received Sinupret extract 1 tablet BID for 10 days before the planned rhinoseptoplasty and 7 days after the rhinoseptoplasty. Patients in control group 1 (n=16) received Sinupret 2 coated tablets TID for 10 days before the surgery and 7 days after the surgery. Patients in control group 2 (n=16) did not receive secretory therapy in the preoperative and postoperative periods of rhinoseptoplasty. RESULTS: The herbal medicinal product improved nasal breathing. All studied parameters demonstrated the benefit of the treatment including Sinupret extract (p<0.05). On day 5 in patients of the main study group, nasal breathing was normal, and nasal crusting was reduced due to activation of the mucous membrane secretory function. Nasal mucosa ciliary clearance was better in patients in the main group than in patients in the control groups at all stages of the study. Sinupret extract for 10 days before and 5 days after the surgery helps reduce nasal crusting and restore nasal breathing by day 2 and normalizes ciliary clearance by day 5 after nasal packing. CONCLUSION: Due to the wide use of nasal packing with gauze tampons, otorhinolaryngologists commonly administer herbal medicinal products as a means of drug protection of the nasal mucous membrane.

Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide-impregnated Gelfoam nasal pack in management of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps following endoscopic sinus surgery: a perfectly matched, placebo-controlled trial study.

PURPOSE: This perfectly matched, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial study was performed to investigate the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA)-impregnated Gelfoam nasal pack in management of different endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: One hundred and four patients with bilateral CRSwNP undergoing ESS were selected and randomized to receive TAA-soaked nasal packing in one nostril and saline-impregnated dressing contra-laterally. Validated Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system was used to assess the participants' condition at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18. RESULTS: The treatment side of eosinophilic CRSwNP (EosCRSwNP) group had significantly better endoscopic scores than the contralateral control side in all follow-up visits (P < 0.05 for all comparisons) except for the first postoperative month. No significant difference was detected between the TAA- and saline-treated nostrils in the non-eosinophilic CRSwNP (nonEosCRSwNP) subgroup during the follow-up period. Intergroup comparisons revealed a borderline better POSE score for the treatment side of the EosCRSwNP group compared with the treatment nostril of the nonEosCRSwNP group at months 12 (P = 0.041) and 18 (P = 0.044). At the end of the study period, the treatment side of the EosCRSwNP group demonstrated better clinical response than the saline-treated side in terms of the total POSE scores (P = 0.019), middle turbinate synechia (P = 0.008), middle meatal narrowing (P = 0.010), ethmoid polypoid changes (P = 0.039), ethmoid polyposis (P = 0.027), ethmoid cavity secretions (P = 0.042), and sphenoid severity (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: TAA-soaked Gelfoam dressing following bilateral ESS was found to be an effective method for treating CRSwNP particularly for the eosinophilic endotype of the disease.

Dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing can reduce pain and improve sleep quality after nasal endoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery is usually associated with pain and sleep disturbance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing on analgesia and improvement of sleep quality in patients undergoing this surgery. METHOD: Eighty patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into 4 groups. At the end of surgery, dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packings were applied to three groups with a dosage of 1 µg kg-1 (D1), 2µg kg-1 (D2), 4 µg kg-1 (D4) and normal saline-soaked nasal packing (NS) was applied to a fourth group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores using a visual analog scale (VAS) recorded at six time points: before the surgery (T1); 2 h (T2), 8 h (T3), 24 h (T4), 48 h (T5) after surgery; and at the moment of nasal packing removal (T6). Secondary outcomes were postoperative sleep status evaluated by the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and subjective sleep quality value (SSQV). Factors affecting sleep, hemodynamic changes, and adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the NS group, dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved sleep quality. The effect was similar between D2 and D4, which was greater than in D1. However, D2 was associated with fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing not only offers effective analgesia but also improves postoperative sleep quality in patients undergoing bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery. Taking effect and adverse events into consideration, a dosage of 2µg kg-1 may be optimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx (ChiCTR1900025692) Retrospectively registered 5 September 2019.

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on wound healing, adhesion, and hemostasis after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with nasal polyposis.

PURPOSE: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common chronic diseases seen worldwide. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has become a widely accepted procedure for medically refractory chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Prevention of revision surgery often depends on good wound healing and less adhesion formation. In recent years, the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on tissue healing have been addressed in many surgical branches, especially for dental implant surgery and plastic surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted with 50 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for the diagnosis of nasal polyposis. While the middle meatus in one nasal cavity was filled with PRF and supported with Nasopore, only Nasopore was used in the other nasal cavity middle meatus. The patients were followed up clinically at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 postoperatively. The assessor determined the presence of adhesion, crusting, bleeding, frontal ostium stenosis, granulation, and infection, and if present, the grades of these complications were scored according to a questionnaire. RESULTS: In our study, adhesion, infection, bleeding, granulation, and frontal ostium stenosis were less common in the PRF group, and a statistically significant difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, better results were obtained in terms of adhesion, infection, bleeding, granulation, and frontal ostium stenosis after ESS as a result of the effects of PRF on wound healing. The application of PRF is an inexpensive and easy procedure. PRF can be a good alternative to other types of tampons after ESS.

Safety of (rhino)septoplasty without nasal packing in routine ENT practice.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study assesses the risks and benefits linked to the non-use of nasal packing after a (rhino)septoplasty, compared with post-operative care with anterior nasal packing such as Merocel®. METHODS: Complication rates observed during the first week after surgery were compared between groups with and without use of classic nasal packing over a large sample of 534 patients, who had undergone either a closed or open procedure, with bilateral turbinoplasty, and with or without osteotomies. Complications listed include epistaxis, haematoma, impetiginization, septal perforation, hyperalgesia, and dyspnoea. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the group with and without packing regarding the immediate post-operative complications of epistaxis (4.4% of the cases with nasal packing versus 3% without, p = 0.918) and impetiginization (3% of the cases with nasal packing versus 4.2% without, p = 0.478). The technique used, as well as any osteotomies performed, had no impact on the results. CONCLUSION: Non-use of nasal packing after a (rhino)septoplasty is a safe alternative to classic post-operative methods. Provided that there is a rigorous surgical technique and strict clinical control, it should be used as a principal technique in any routine practice due to its safety for patients immediately post-surgery.

Utilization of Prophylactic Antibiotics After Nasal Packing for Epistaxis.

BACKGROUND: There have been few investigations examining the benefits, consequences, and patterns of use for prophylactic antibiotics for nasal packing in the emergency department setting. Given the frequency of epistaxis in the emergency department, it is an ideal setting to study the efficacy and utilization patterns of prophylactic antibiotics in nasal packing. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess both rates of utilization and evidence of benefit for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with nasal packing for epistaxis. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of 275 cases of anterior nasal packing in an urban emergency department between September 2013 and April 2017 was performed. Chi-square statistical analysis was used to evaluate results. RESULTS: Among 275 cases studied, there were no instances of toxic shock syndrome. Roughly 73% of patients with nonabsorbable packing received prophylactic antibiotics. Only one (1.1%) case of sinusitis was noted among the nonabsorbable packing with prophylaxis group, with no such complication in the nonprophylaxis group. In contrast, 95% of patients with absorbable nasal packing were not given prophylactic antibiotics. Analysis of all cases given prophylactic antibiotics vs. no prophylaxis, regardless of packing type, revealed no statistically significant difference in the development of acute sinusitis (1% vs. 0.56%; p = 0.6793). CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed advantage or disadvantage to using prophylactic antibiotics in anterior nasal packing in the emergency department, regardless of whether patients received absorbable or nonabsorbable packing. However, patients who receive nonabsorbable nasal packing were more likely to receive antibiotic prophylaxis.

[Modern views of rehabilitation after septoplasty]. / Sovremennye predstavleniya o reabilitatsii posle septoplastiki.

After septoplasty procedure and removing of nasal packing, numerous symptoms usually appear that result from inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nasal spray Polydexa with phenylephrine on the postoperative period and bacterial contamination in the nasal cavity after septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 40 people observed, who underwent septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy followed by nasal packing. RESULTS: After removing the tampons from the nasal cavity, the growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci was most often observed in 50%, Enterococcus faecalis - 22.5%, Staphylococcus aureus - 20.0%. In patients who received intranasally Polydexa with phenylephrine drug in the postoperative period, we observed decrease in inflammation in the nasal cavity, an improvement in the quality of life, as well as a significant (p<0.05) decrease in bacterial growth (both in the presence of flora and in intensity growth of microorganisms). The absence of intranasal antibacterial drugs in the scheme of postoperative management of patients contributes to the growth of pathogenic flora, in particular S. aureus.

Prophylactic antibiotics for anterior nasal packing in emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinically-significant infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting to emergency departments with spontaneous anterior epistaxis may undergo anterior nasal packing and sometimes receive systemic prophylactic antibiotics. There has not been sufficient evidence to support or refute this practice. The main objective of this study was to compare the likelihood of clinically significant infection (CSI) between patients with or without prophylactic antibiotics for anterior nasal packing due to spontaneous epistaxis. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of the literature to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics prevented CSI among patients with anterior nasal packing by searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for original articles. We also looked at the secondary outcome of non-infectious complications. We reported the outcomes using random effect models. Human studies in English, randomized control trials, quasi-randomized trials, clinical trials, retrospective studies, and case series were included. We excluded studies involving patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgeries. Statistical heterogeneity was examined using the DerSimonian and Laird Q test and I2 statistic. RESULTS: A total of 281 articles were identified. Of these, 5 articles met inclusion criteria, with 383 patients receiving anterior nasal packing. One hundred sixty (42%) patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics while 223 (58%) received antibiotics. The proportion of CSI in the pooled cohort was 0.8% (95% CI 0.2-1.9), resulting in a number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one infection of 571. The rate of non-infectious complications associated with epistaxis was 20% (95% CI 10-32). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for anterior nasal packing may not be necessary due to the low proportion of CSIs across heterogenous patient populations. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to support this finding.

Effects of glove finger- versus lidocaine-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Nasal packing is a common but unpleasant procedure in patients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The aim of this study was to assess whether a glove-finger pack strategy would reduce pain compared to lidocaine-soaked packs after ESS. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial enrolling 120 consecutive patients affected by chronic rhinosinusitis, who underwent bilateral ESS. At the end of surgery 62 subjects received 10 cm non-absorbable pack soaked with 5 mL of 2%-lidocaine solution and 58 received a 10 cm non-absorbable pack coated with a latex free glove finger soaked with saline solution. Data concerning pain were collected using a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale at post-operative hours 1, 4, 8, and 16 and at pack removal (24 h ± 15 min). All post-operative analgesic rescue doses were registered. Also, bleeding was reported. RESULTS: The mean VAS score during pack-removal was significantly lower in glove-finger group than in the lidocaine group (3.22 ± 2.16 vs 4.89 ± 2.90, p = 0.0012). There was no statistically significant difference between re-soaking lidocaine-soaked-packs with saline solution or lidocaine at pack removal time (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Glove-finger nasal pack seems to provide better pain control after ESS, when compared with lidocaine-soaked pack, especially at pack removal time.

Effect of prilocaine and its combination with tramadol on anxiety and pain during nasal packing removal.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of local usage of prilocaine and its combination with tramadol on the pain and anxiety levels of patients during nasal packing removal. METHODS: A total of 117 patients who were treated with the Merocel nasal packing after septoplasty were included in the study. Patients whose Merocel nasal packings infiltrated with prilocaine (P group), prilocaine combined with tramadol 1 mg/kg (P + T1 group), prilocaine combined with tramadol 2 mg/kg (P + T2 group), or normal saline solution (Control group) before nasal packing removal were compared for their pain, sedation, and anxiety related to this removal procedure. The visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation scale (RSS), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale were assessed to evaluate the pain, sedation, and anxiety levels of the patients. RESULTS: Groups were found similar according to sex, age, and preoperative STAI scores. The VAS score was significantly lower in P, P + T1, and P + T2 than control group during nasal packing removal (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). However, state anxiety inventory (STAI-S) and RSS were found significantly improved only in P + T1 and P + T2 (STAI-S: p = 0.032, RSS: p = 0.002, STAI-S: p = 0.000, RSS: p < 0.001, respectively). In the comparison of P + T1 and P + T2, no significant difference was found in VAS, RSS, and STAI-S (p = 0.604, p = 0.154, and p = 0.264, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combined infiltration of prilocaine and tramadol 1 mg/kg into the nasal packing is effective in reducing the pain and anxiety of patients during nasal packing removal.

Hospitalization for epistaxis: a population-based healthcare research study in Thuringia, Germany.

PURPOSE: Epistaxis is the most common ENT emergency. The aim was to determine population-based data on severe epistaxis needing inpatient treatment. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study in the federal state Thuringia in 2016 performed on all 840 inpatients treated for epistaxis in otolaryngology departments (60.1% male, median age: 73 years; 63.9% under anticoagulation). The association between patients' and treatment characteristics and longer inpatient stay (≥ 4 days) as well as readmission for recurrent epistaxis was analyzed using univariable and multivariable statistics. RESULTS: The overall incidence of epistaxis needing inpatient treatment was higher for men (42 per 100,000) than for women (28 per 100,000). The highest incidence was reached for men > 85 years (222 per 100,000). Most important independent predictors for longer inpatient stay were localization of the bleeding not in the anterior nose (OR = 2.045; CI = 1.534-2.726), recurrent bleeding during inpatient treatment (OR = 2.142; CI = 1.508-3.042), no electrocoagulation (OR = 2.810; CI = 2.047-3.858), and blood transfusion (OR = 2.731; CI = 1.324-5.635). Independent predictors for later readmission because of recurrent epistaxis were male gender (OR = 1.756; CI = 1.155-2.668), oral anticoagulant use (OR = 1.731; CI = 1.046-2.865), and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (OR = 13.216; CI 5.102-34.231). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient treatment of epistaxis seems to be variable in daily routine needing standardization by clinical guidelines and strategies to shorten inpatient treatment and to reduce the risk of readmission.