Patient-Centerdness in the Perioperative Period-A Rapid Review of Current Research.

PURPOSE: The indication of surgery is a critical moment in a person's life implying different needs, feelings, or fears. The aim of the current literature review was to elucidate the prevailing utilization of the concepts 'patient-centerdness' and 'person-centerdness' within the perioperative period. DESIGN: A rapid review design. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus (Elsevier), American Psychological Association PsychInfo (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ovid), and Cochrane Library in December 2022. Rayyan software was used to assess the articles. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the included articles. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across the articles. FINDINGS: The electronic database searches identified 1,967 articles. A total of 12 articles were assessed in full text against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, a total of seven articles were included. The articles originated from six countries, employed disparate methodological approaches, and featured a heterogeneous array of participants representing various health care settings. Patient-centerdness held the mantle as the most prominently used concept across the seven articles, whereas person-centerdness emerged as the least frequently explored concept. One theme was identified across the articles; Preparedness. This was related to shared decision-making and information pre, peri- and postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid review suggests that patient preparedness, particularly through shared decision-making and providing information, is a recurring theme in the limited studies on patient- or person-centerdness in the perioperative context. The fact that only one single study focuses on person-centered care underscores the pressing need for a comprehensive re-evaluation of modern perioperative care.

Perceptions of interdisciplinary bedside rounds by head nurses in Flanders: a cross-sectional exploration.

ObjectivesInterdisciplinary bedside rounds is gaining ground as a method to improve patient centredness and involvement, quality of care and team collaboration. An exploratory study was conducted in Flemish hospitals to (1) map and (2) examine the current form of rounds and the extent to which these were bedside, patient and family participatory and interdisciplinary.MethodsIn February 2020, a quantitative cross-sectional self-reporting web-based survey was conducted in 23 hospitals in Flanders, 213 head nurses of 213 wards completed the survey. A self-reporting 19-item questionnaire was developed in Lime Survey®. The questionnaire contained a mix of closed-ended questions an open-ended questions. The data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.ResultsMost of the wards in Flanders organise a form of daily rounds at the bedside. In only half of the wards these rounds are organised at a fixed time. The rounds most often include a physician and a nurse. Other disciplines are rarely actively involved. Only a minority of wards uses checklists, structures or protocols to standardise the rounds. The majority of the wards reports that patients (and family) get sufficient time to ask questions and say they are actively stimulated to do so.ConclusionIn current practice, most rounds are (partially) bedside, open for patient and family participatory and often include only a physician and a nurse. However, these elements of interdisciplinary rounds are not yet well integrated and vary strongly amongst ward. Most rounds should be considered as an extended form of physician rounds, rather than being interdisciplinary.