Coming full circle: The potential utility of real-world evidence to discern predictions from a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Today real word data (RWD) are playing a greater role in informing health care decisions. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) and observed exposure-risk relationship predicted an increased bleeding risk induced by rivaroxaban (RXB) in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) taking concomitant medications that are combined Pgp-CYP3A inhibitors. In this commentary, we explore the potential use of RWD to assess the clinical consequence of this complex drug-drug interaction predicted from PBPK. This is a retrospective, case control, pilot study using a RWD dataset of 896,728 patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and rivaroxaban use that was refined based upon combined Pgp-CYP3A inhibitor exposure and report of drug-induced bleeding (DIB). The odds ratio of patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease taking rivaroxaban with or without concurrent Pgp-CYP3A inhibitor use having a DIB was calculated. The odds ratio for DIB was 2.04 (CI95 1.82, 2.3; p < 0.001) suggesting an approximate doubling of bleeding risk which is consistent with the rivaroxaban exposure changes predicted by the published PBPK model and observed exposure-risk relationship. This exploratory analysis demonstrated the potential utility of RWD to assess model-based predictions as part of a drugs life cycle management.

Application of a Precision-Dosing Model to a Real-World Cohort of Patients on Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: Drug Usage and Cost Analysis.

Precision-dosing models forecast infliximab doses to achieve targeted trough concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These models have shown to reduce nonresponse and improve patient outcomes. We compared infliximab doses determined by iDOSE precision dosing with standard dosing, and the associated drug costs, in patients with IBD. In this retrospective study, patients with IBD treated with infliximab every 8 weeks at 5 mg/kg were included. An infliximab dose was named dose X if 3 previous infliximab doses, laboratory values including trough infliximab concentrations, and the patient's weight were recorded. The actual dose X was compared to an iDOSE-predicted dose X. Net drug use and costs were evaluated. A total of 174 patients-56% men; median age, 36 (interquartile range, 29-47) years; 135 with Crohn disease; and 31 with ulcerative colitis-were included, with 417 dose X recordings. Median prior infliximab therapy was 2 (0-4) years. Comparing actual dose X with predicted dose X, 52% and 32% of doses were subtherapeutic when aiming for trough concentrations of 5-10 and 3-7 µg/mL, respectively. Treatment costs increased by 102% and 29% for the 2 trough ranges, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, subtherapeutic infliximab concentrations were associated with ulcerative colitis compared with Crohn disease (odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-75.40; P = .028) and predose X infliximab trough concentration [odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.15; P < .001]. Over half of maintenance infliximab drug doses were too low to achieve infliximab blood concentrations of 5 µg/mL or greater. While applying precision dosing may improve patient outcomes, drug costs could be considerably greater.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Valemetostat Tablets and the Effect of Food on Valemetostat Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: Two Phase 1 Studies.

Valemetostat is an oral, selective inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog-2 (EZH2) and EZH1. In a first-in-human phase-1 trial, valemetostat capsules were well tolerated and clinically active in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Subsequently, a film-coated tablet formulation was developed for future clinical trials and commercialization. We report outcomes from 2 phase 1 trials in healthy Japanese participants, assessing the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of valemetostat tablets at single ascending doses (50, 100, and 200-mg), the relative bioavailability between capsules and tablets, and the effect of food (high-fat or low-fat meals) on the PK of valemetostat tablets. In the ascending-dose study, valemetostat maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased dose-proportionally. Valemetostat plasma PK parameters were similar between the capsule and tablet formulations following a single 200-mg dose. Administration of valemetostat, 200 mg after a meal, was associated with 50%-60% lower Cmax , 30%-50% lower AUC, and a median Tmax delay of 2.5-3 hours relative to fasted administration. Valemetostat was well tolerated in healthy subjects; treatment-emergent adverse events were mild (grade 1) in severity. Based on these trials, the tablet formulation of valemetostat is suitable for use in subsequent clinical trials and should be administered under fasted conditions to avoid a negative food effect.

The Effect of BI 730357 (Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor Gamma t Antagonist, Bevurogant) on the Pharmacokinetics of a Transporter Probe Cocktail, Including Digoxin, Furosemide, Metformin, and Rosuvastatin: An Open-Label, Non-randomized, 2-Period Fixed-Sequence Trial in Healthy Subjects.

Evaluating Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) for new investigational compounds requires several trials evaluating different drugs with different transporter specificities. By using a cocktail of drugs with different transporter specificities, a single trial could evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of each cocktail drug simultaneously, reducing the number of clinical DDI trials required for clinical development. We aimed to investigate the effect of steady-state Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) 730357 (bevurogant) on the PKs of a validated and optimized 4-component transporter cocktail. This open-label, non-randomized, 2-period fixed-sequence phase I trial compared transporter cocktail (0.25 mg digoxin/1 mg furosemide/10 mg metformin hydrochloride/10 mg rosuvastatin) with and without BI 730357 in healthy subjects aged 18-55 years with body mass index 18.5-29.9 kg/m2 . During reference treatment/period 1, transporter cocktail was administered 90 minutes after breakfast. After a washout period, during test treatment/period 2, BI 730357 was dosed twice daily for 13 days, with transporter cocktail administered on day 1. The primary endpoints were the area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and the maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma (Cmax ), and the secondary endpoint was the area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz ). Steady-state BI 730357 increased digoxin (+48% to +94%), minimally affected metformin (-2% to -9%), furosemide (+12% to +18%), and rosuvastatin (+19% to +39%) exposure. Therefore, no clinically relevant inhibition of transporters OCT2/MATE-1/MATE-2K, OAT1/OAT3, OATP1B1/OATP1B3 was observed. Potential inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein noted as PK parameters of coproporphyrin I/III (OATP1B1/OATP1B3 biomarkers) remained within bioequivalence boundaries while rosuvastatin PK parameters (AUC0-∞ /Cmax /AUC0-tz ) exceeded the bioequivalence boundary. BI 730357 was safe and well tolerated. This trial confirms the usefulness and tolerability of the transporter cocktail consisting of digoxin, furosemide, metformin, and rosuvastatin in assessing drug-transporter interactions in vivo.

Statin Drug-Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Basis of FDA Labeling Recommendations and Comparison Across Common Tertiary Clinical Resources.

Statins are widely prescribed and highly susceptible to pharmacokinetic (PK)-based drug-drug interactions (DDIs). To date, there has not been a comprehensive analysis of the basis upon which statin DDI recommendations in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information (PI) are derived. We have conducted such an analysis. We also assessed the degree of concordance of statin DDI recommendations in FDA PI and those provided in common tertiary clinical resources. We catalogued statin DDI information, including PK data and management recommendations, for statin precipitant drugs approved from 2010 to 2021, available from FDA PI and tertiary clinical resource databases. Recommendations were categorized and mapped with associated PK data to assess consistency in the PK basis for labeling recommendations. From the 80 precipitant drugs evaluated, 180 statin DDIs were identified in FDA PI. Dedicated clinical DDI studies were conducted for 54% (n = 97) of these DDIs and 34% (n = 61) of DDI recommendations were extrapolated from clinical data with other statins. Overall, we found that PK-based statin recommendations were consistent across PI. These findings highlight regulatory precedence for translating information across statins without conducting dedicated clinical DDI studies, which may support future efforts toward streamlining the approach to investigation and labeling of statin DDIs. In addition, with the exception of some notable discrepancies, general concordance was observed between FDA and tertiary resources regarding "Dose Adjustment" and "Avoid Coadministration" recommendations. However, further analyses are warranted across other DDI pairs to determine whether discordance can routinely lead to different clinical recommendations depending on the drug information resource.

Evaluation of the Effects of Meal Type and Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Cilofexor, a Selective Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist.

Cilofexor is a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist being developed in combination with firsocostat/semaglutide for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This phase 1 study evaluated the effects of food and acid-reducing agents (ARAs) on the pharmacokinetics of cilofexor (100- or 30-mg fixed-dose combination with firsocostat) in healthy participants. Cohorts 1 (n = 20, 100 mg) and 2 (n = 30, 30 mg) followed a 3-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated effects of light-fat and high-fat meals. Cohort 3 (n = 30, 100 mg fasting) followed a 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated the effects of a 40-mg single dose of famotidine. Cohort 4 (n = 18, 100 mg) followed a 3-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated the effects of a 40-mg once-daily regimen of omeprazole administered under fasting conditions or following a light-fat meal. Administration with light-fat or high-fat meals resulted in no change and an ∼35% reduction in cilofexor AUC, respectively, relative to the fasting conditions. Under fasting conditions, famotidine increased cilofexor AUC by 3.2-fold and Cmax by 6.1-fold, while omeprazole increased cilofexor AUC by 3.1-fold and Cmax by 4.8-fold. With a low-fat meal, omeprazole increased cilofexor exposure to a lesser extent (Cmax 2.5-fold, AUC 2.1-fold) than fasting conditions. This study suggests that caution should be exercised when cilofexor is administered with ARAs under fed conditions; coadministration of cilofexor (100 or 30 mg) with ARAs under fasting conditions is not recommended with the current clinical trial formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of the Akt Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase Inhibitor, Capivasertib, Administered to Healthy Volunteers in the Presence and Absence of the CYP3A4 Inhibitor Itraconazole.

Capivasertib is a potent, selective inhibitor of all 3 Akt isoforms (Akt1/2/3), and it is currently being tested in Phase III trials for the treatment of prostate and breast cancer. To investigate the effect of a cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of capivasertib, a Phase I drug-drug interaction study of capivasertib and itraconazole was conducted in 11 healthy volunteers (median age, 54 years). The 8-day study had 3 stages: Participants received a single dose of capivasertib 80 mg in Stage 1, 4 doses of itraconazole 200 mg over 3 days in Stage 2, and a final dose of capivasertib 80 mg coadministered with itraconazole 200 mg in Stage 3. Capivasertib pharmacokinetics were examined in Stages 1 and 3. Itraconazole coadministration increased the maximum plasma concentration of capivasertib and total capivasertib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time of administration to infinity) by 1.70-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.56-1.86) and 1.95-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.82-2.10), respectively.

Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anticancer Agents.

An objective of the Precision Medicine Initiative, launched in 2015 by the US Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health, is to optimize and individualize dosing of drugs, especially anticancer agents, with high pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recently reported that 40% of obese patients receive insufficient chemotherapy doses and exposures, which may lead to reduced efficacy, and recommended pharmacokinetic studies to guide appropriate dosing in these patients. These issues will only increase in importance as the incidence of obesity in the population increases. This publication reviews the effects of obesity on (1) tumor biology, development of cancer, and antitumor response; (2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of small-molecule anticancer drugs; and (3) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of complex anticancer drugs, such as carrier-mediated agents and biologics. These topics are not only important from a scientific research perspective but also from a drug development and regulator perspective. Thus, it is important to evaluate the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents in all categories of body habitus and especially in patients who are obese and morbidly obese. As the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents may be highly variable across drug types, the optimal dosing metric and algorithm for difference classes of drugs may be widely different. Thus, studies are needed to evaluate current and novel metrics and methods for measuring body habitus as related to optimizing the dose and reducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of anticancer agents in patients who are obese and morbidly obese.

Maribavir Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Participants With Moderate Hepatic Impairment: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel Group Study.

Maribavir, an orally bioavailable antiviral, has shown superior activity against posttransplant cytomegalovirus infection compared with conventional antivirals. It is primarily metabolized in the liver. This open-label, single-center study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir in nontransplant participants. A single 200-mg dose of maribavir was administered orally under fasting conditions to participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) (n = 10) and healthy controls (n = 10) matched for age, weight, sex, and smoking status. Compared with participants with normal hepatic function, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity values for maribavir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment were 1.346-fold (90%CI of geometric mean ratio, 1.091-1.660) and 1.261-fold (0.889-1.787) higher, respectively. However, Cmax and AUC values for unbound maribavir were comparable. For VP 44469, the main metabolite of maribavir, the Cmax and AUC from time 0 to infinity values were 1.190-fold (0.836-1.693) and 1.309-fold (1.007-1.702) higher, respectively, in participants with moderate hepatic impairment. In total, 7 mild treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, all in the moderate hepatic impairment group. Dysgeusia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event, at a frequency of 50%. These results indicated that total maribavir concentrations were mildly increased in participants with moderate hepatic impairment, while unbound concentrations were unaffected. Similar maribavir pharmacokinetics in participants with moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function suggest that dose adjustment may not be required for patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Use of Real-World Evidence in a Virtual Bridging Analysis for a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Gastric Cancer.

This study bridged pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety clinical trial data from Japan to a Western population using real-world evidence (RWE) to investigate the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. Using population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response (efficacy/safety) models, exposure-efficacy data from 117 patients and exposure-safety data from 158 patients in Japan who received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg as second-line or later treatment were bridged to RWE including covariate information from 25 Western patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer who received second-line or later T-DXd treatment. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated that intact T-DXd and released drug (DXd) steady-state exposures were comparable between Western patients and patients from Japan; the Western/Japan ratio of exposure medians ranged from 0.82 (T-DXd steady-state minimum concentration) to 1.18 (DXd steady-state maximum concentration). Exposure-efficacy simulations estimated a confirmed objective response rate of 28.6% (90% confidence interval, 20.8-38.4) in real-world Western patients versus 40.1% (90% confidence interval, 33.5-47.0) in patients from Japan, possibly because of checkpoint inhibitor use in 4% versus 30% of patients, respectively. Western patients had a higher estimated rate of serious adverse events than patients from Japan (42.2% vs 34.6%); however, the rate of interstitial lung disease was lower (less than 10%) in Western patients. Overall, T-DXd was predicted to have meaningful clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in Western patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Using RWE, bridging analysis supported US approval of T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg in advanced gastric cancer before a clinical trial was completed in Western patients.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Dosing in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Gastric Cancer: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Analysis.

This study evaluated the benefit/risk of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer using pharmacometrics. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using data from patients with gastric cancer, breast cancer, or other tumors in T-DXd clinical trials, primarily conducted in Asia. Post hoc model-estimated pharmacokinetic metrics were used in exposure-efficacy (objective response rates, ORRs) and exposure-safety analyses. The PopPK analysis included 808 patients (217 with gastric cancer, 512 with breast cancer, and 79 with other cancers). In gastric cancer, the T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg steady-state exposure metrics were lower compared with 6.4 mg/kg in breast cancer, but were similar to 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. Tumor type was selected as a significant covariate on T-DXd clearance. In exposure-efficacy analysis among 160 patients with gastric cancer, the T-DXd steady-state minimum concentration was associated with a confirmed ORR in univariate logistic regression analysis (P = .023). The model-predicted confirmed ORRs in gastric cancer were 36.0% (90%CI 29.3% to 43.7%) with 5.4 mg/kg and 40.0% (90%CI 33.1% to 47.6%) with 6.4 mg/kg. Among 808 patients in the exposure-safety analyses, the model-predicted estimates for the rates of any-grade interstitial lung disease (ILD) over a period of 180 days were 10.2% (90%CI 8.7% to 12.8%) with 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 9.7% (90%CI 8.2% to 11.8%) with 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. In gastric cancer, the efficacy of T-DXd was higher at 6.4 mg/kg than at 5.4 mg/kg. Exposure and ILD rates were comparable between 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. This study identified T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg as the recommended dose in HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Extrapolation of Adult Efficacy Data to Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Evaluating Similarities in Exposure-Response.

To streamline drug development, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can consider the extrapolation of adult efficacy data to children when the disease and drug effects are sufficiently similar. This study explored whether the relationship between drug exposure and response for selected drugs in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was sufficiently similar to support a consideration of the extrapolation of adult efficacy data to children of ≥5 years of age. An exposure-response analysis of drugs used to treat SLE was conducted using published exposure versus response and efficacy versus time data. Statistical analyses included noncompartmental analysis of a drug's area under the effect curve and direct Imax pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling. Six drugs were included: azathioprine, belimumab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate/mycophenolic acid, and rituximab. For belimumab, the net change in responders at week 52 (the primary end point) was nearly identical between 1 adult trial and the pediatric trial. For mycophenolate, PD modeling suggested no significant differences in exposure and SLE disease activity between adults and children. For azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, hydroxychloroquine, and rituximab the data were not sufficient to quantitatively characterize the exposure-response relationship, but the clinical or pharmacologic response between children and adults was similar overall. Adult SLE data should be leveraged to guide pediatric drug development programs and identify areas with residual uncertainty regarding the effectiveness or safety of a drug in children. The degree to which efficacy extrapolation can reduce clinical trial requirements in pediatric SLE should be individualized for each new drug product, depending in part on the mechanism of action of the drug and the similarity of disease manifestations in children and adults.

Is There a Need for a Dedicated Pharmacokinetic Trial for a Drug in Obese Populations? A Drug Prioritization Decision Tree Framework.

Obesity is a growing global health concern associated with high comorbidity rates, leading to an increasing number of patients who are obese requiring medication. However, clinical trials often exclude or under-represent individuals who are obese, creating the need for a methodology to adjust labeling to ensure safe and effective dosing for all patients. To address this, we developed a 2-part decision tree framework to prioritize drugs for dedicated pharmacokinetic studies in obese subjects. Leveraging current drug knowledge and modeling techniques, the decision tree system predicts expected exposure changes and recommends labeling strategies, allowing stakeholders to prioritize resources toward the drugs most in need. In a case study evaluating 30 drugs from literature across different therapeutic areas, our first decision tree predicted the expected direction of exposure change accurately in 73% of cases. We conclude that this decision tree system offers a valuable tool to advance research in obesity pharmacology and personalize drug development for patients who are obese, ensuring safe and effective medication.

Population Pharmacokinetics as a Tool to Reevaluate the Complex Disposition of Ethanol in the Fed and Fasted States.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethanol are important in pharmacology and therapeutics because of potential drug-alcohol interactions as well as in forensic science when alcohol-related crimes are investigated. The PK of ethanol have been extensively studied since the 1930s, although some issues remain unresolved, such as the significance of first-pass metabolism, whether zero-order kinetics apply, and the effects of food on bioavailability. We took advantage of nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to describe blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) profiles derived from 3 published clinical studies involving oral, intraduodenal, and intravenous administration of ethanol with and without food. The overall data set included 1510 BACs derived from 72 healthy subjects (60 men, 12 women) aged between 20 and 60 years. Two-compartment models with first-order absorption and Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics adequately described the BAC profiles. Food intake had 2 separate effects: It reduced the absorption rate constant and accelerated the maximum elimination rate. Estimates of the maximum elimination rate (fasted) and the food effect (as a factor) were 6.31 g/h (95%CI, 6.04-6.59 g/h) and 1.39-fold (95%CI, 1.33-1.46-fold), respectively. Simulations showed that the area under the BAC-time curve (AUC) was smaller with lower input rate of ethanol, irrespective of any first-pass metabolism. The AUC from time 0 to 10 hours for a 75-kg subject was 2.34 g â€¢ h/L (fed) and 3.83 g â€¢ h/L (fasted) after an oral dose of 45 g ethanol. This difference was mainly attributable to the food effect on ethanol elimination and depended less on the absorption rate. Our new approach to explain the complex human PK of ethanol may help when BAC predictions are made in clinical pharmacology and forensic medicine.

Pharmacokinetics, Bioavailability, and Swallowing Safety With Riluzole Oral Film.

Dysphagia is highly prevalent in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Riluzole is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for ALS. Riluzole oral film (ROF; Exservan™) contains riluzole in a polymer-based film matrix. The ROF is administered by placing on the tongue, where it dissolves and the drug is ingested with the saliva. Two clinical trials assessed the safety and tolerability of the ROF. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated in an open-label, randomized, single-dose, replicate crossover study of 50 mg of ROF and riluzole 50-mg tablets in 32 healthy volunteers. The second study was a videofluoroscopic swallowing examination conducted with nine patients with ALS before and after receiving a single dose of 50 mg of ROF. The primary outcome was change on penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores from pre- to post-dose. Overall, the PK parameters for ROF and riluzole tablets were comparable between treatments and administrations when administered under fasting conditions. Administration of ROF with food resulted in a 15% reduction in area under the curve and a 45% reduction in maximum serum concentration. A total of 44 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in the study; all were mild in severity. No serious AEs were observed and no subjects discontinued due to AEs. In the swallowing study, very little numerical or categorical change was observed following the dose of ROF. No evidence of deterioration of swallowing function was observed post-dose. The ROF was bioequivalent to riluzole tablets, was well tolerated, and had no detrimental effect on swallowing.

Impact of Obesity on Brexpiprazole Pharmacokinetics: Proposal for Improved Initiation of Treatment.

Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic agent indicated for use in patients with schizophrenia or as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. As obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 ) has the potential to affect drug pharmacokinetics and is a common comorbidity of both schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, it is important to understand changes in brexpiprazole disposition in this population. This study uses a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to compare the pharmacokinetics of brexpiprazole in obese and normal-weight (body mass index 18-25 kg/m2 ) individuals known to be cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs). The physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated significant differences in the time to effective concentrations between obese and normal-weight individuals within metabolizer groups according to the label-recommended titration. Simulations using an alternative dosing strategy of 1 week of twice-daily dosing in obese EMs or 2 weeks of twice-daily dosing in obese poor metabolizers, followed by a return to once-daily dosing, yielded more consistent plasma concentrations between normal-weight and obese patients without exceeding the area under the plasma concentration-time curve observed in the normal-weight EMs. These alternative dosing strategies reduce the time to effective concentrations in obese patients and may improve clinical response to brexpiprazole.

Assessment of the Effect of Filgotinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants.

Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor, is approved in Europe and Japan for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality; thus, it is important to understand potential drug-drug interactions of filgotinib with lipid-lowering agents. This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin with and without filgotinib coadministration. Healthy participants (N = 27) received single doses of atorvastatin (40 mg) and of a pravastatin (40 mg)/rosuvastatin (10 mg) cocktail-alone or with filgotinib (200 mg once daily for 11 days)-on 2 different occasions with washout in between. Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratio of the test treatment (statin coadministration with filgotinib) vs statin alone, with prespecified lack-of-interaction bounds of 0.70 to 1.43. Coadministration of filgotinib did not affect atorvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ; [GLSM ratios (90% CI): 0.91 (0.84-0.99)]), but maximum concentration [Cmax ] was slightly lower [0.82 (0.69-0.99)]. The exposure of 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin was unaffected (GLSM ratios [90% CI], 0.98 [0.81-1.19] for Cmax ; 1.11 [1.02-1.22] for AUCinf ). Pravastatin AUCinf was also unaffected (GLSM ratios, 1.22 [1.05-1.41], but Cmax was slightly higher 1.25 [1.01-1.54]). Rosuvastatin exposure was moderately higher with filgotinib coadministration-GLSM ratios (90% CI), 1.68 (1.43-1.97) for Cmax ; 1.42 (1.30-1.57) for AUCinf -but this was not considered clinically relevant. These results indicate that filgotinib has no clinically meaningful effect on exposure of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin.

Influence of Renal Function on Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of a Single Dose of Romosozumab.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a single subcutaneous dose of romosozumab 210 mg, a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, in an open-label, parallel-group study in participants with severe (stage 4) renal impairment (RI; n = 8) or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (ESRD-RH; n = 8), or healthy participants with normal renal function (n = 8). Compared with the group with normal renal function, the mean romosozumab exposure was 31% and 43% higher as measured by maximum observed serum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve, respectively, in the severe RI group and similar to those in the ESRD-RH group. For all 3 groups, the maximum mean percent increase in procollagen type 1 N terminal propeptide and decrease in serum C-telopeptide levels from baseline were observed on day 15. Changes in procollagen type 1 N terminal propeptide and serum C-telopeptide were of similar patterns in all 3 groups. The single dose of romosozumab 210 mg was well tolerated. Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 13 patients (7 patients with severe RI and 6 with ESRD-RH), with no deaths, AEs, or serious AEs leading to withdrawal. The incidence of subjects with postbaseline transient decreases in serum calcium (severe RI, n = 1; ESRD-RH, n = 5) and increases in intact parathyroid hormone (severe RI, n = 7; ESRD-RH, n = 7; healthy, n = 3) were greater in severe RI and ESRD-RH groups than in the healthy group. All reported events of hypocalcemia (severe RI, n = 1; ESRD-RH, n = 4) were asymptomatic. These results support the use of romosozumab without dose adjustment in patients with severe RI or ESRD-RH.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Drug Disposition and Response: Review of New Molecular Entities Approved Between 2014 and 2019.

Race and ethnicity can contribute to differences in drug exposure and/or response. Here, we report that about 10% of the new molecular entities (NMEs) approved between 2014 and 2019 by the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research showed differences in exposure and/or response based on race/ethnicity or pharmacogenetic factors known to vary in frequency across global populations. Fewer NMEs (10%) reported differences in the labeling in 2014 to 2019 when compared to about 21% of NMEs approved between 2008 and 2013 that had differences in pharmacokinetics, safety, response, and/or pharmacogenetics. Understanding the underlying mechanisms that lead to such differences and adequate enrollment of racial and ethnic subgroups is essential to obtain sufficient information on exposure and response. Though drug development is global, when heterogeneous populations are not adequately enrolled, the risk-benefit assessments can remain incomplete for certain subgroups. Consequently, this can result in regional differences in drug approval, population-specific prescribing recommendations, or need for additional postmarketing studies to address concerns related to exposure, response, or lack of representation that lead to gaps in information.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Vonoprazan: Evaluating the Effects of Race, Disease Status, and Other Covariates on Exposure.

Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is under investigation in the United States and Europe for the treatment of erosive esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis allows the identification of factors that could affect drug exposure in population subgroups. Here, we report a popPK model based on pooled data sets of available pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, including erosive esophagitis, from Asia and Europe. This model was used to evaluate the impact of different covariates, including race and disease status, on vonoprazan exposure. We analyzed PK data from 746 patients and 410 healthy volunteers from 15 clinical trials using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach to develop the popPK model. Model development focused on characterizing and quantifying the effects of clinical covariates of race (Asian vs non-Asian) and disease status (gastroesophageal reflux disease vs healthy volunteers) on vonoprazan exposure. Identified clinical covariates included fed/fasting status, race, sex, disease status, weight, serum creatinine, and age. The impact of variations in these clinical covariates on exposure to vonoprazan was smaller than the effect of halving or doubling the dose. PK parameters were similar in Asian and non-Asian populations. Variations in weight, age, and race are not predicted to have a clinically relevant impact on vonoprazan exposure or safety and require no changes in vonoprazan dosing. The limited impact of race on exposure suggests that efficacy and safety data for vonoprazan in Asian populations are translatable to non-Asian populations.