Characterization of postintensive care syndrome in a prospective cohort of survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: a 12-month follow-up study.

PURPOSE: Studies integrating an exhaustive longitudinal long-term follow-up of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors are scarce. We aimed to 1) describe PICS-related sequelae over a 12-month period after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, 2) identify relevant demographic and clinical factors related to PICS, and 3) explore how PICS-related sequelae may influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult critically ill survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection that did or did not need invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain (March 2020 to January 2021). We performed a telemedicine follow-up of PICS-related sequelae (physical/functional, cognitive, and mental health) and HRQoL with five data collection points. We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data. We used multivariable mixed-effects models for data analysis. RESULTS: We included 142 study participants in the final analysis, with a median [interquartile range] age of 61 [53-68] yr; 35% were female and 59% needed IMV. Fatigue/dyspnea, pain, impaired muscle function, psychiatric symptomatology and reduced physical HRQoL were prominent sequelae early after ICU discharge. Over the 12-month follow-up, functionality and fatigue/dyspnea improved progressively, while pain remained stable. We observed slight fluctuations in anxiety symptoms and perception of cognitive deficit, whereas posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms improved, with a mild rebound at the end of the follow-up. Female sex, younger age, and the need for IMV were risk factors for PICS, while having higher cognitive reserve was a potential protective factor. Physical HRQoL scores showed a general improvement over time, whereas mental HRQoL remained stable. Shorter ICU stay, better functionality, and lower scores for fatigue/dyspnea and pain were associated with better physical HRQoL, while lower scores for anxiety, depression, and PTSD were associated with better mental HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Postintensive care syndrome was common in COVID-19 critical illness survivors and persisted in a significant proportion of patients one year after ICU discharge, impacting HRQoL. The presence of risk factors for PICS may identify patients who are more likely to develop the condition and who would benefit from more specific and closer follow-up after ICU admission. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04422444 ); first submitted 9 June 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les études intégrant un suivi longitudinal exhaustif à long terme des syndromes post-soins intensifs (SPSI) chez les survivant·es gravement malades de la COVID-19 sont rares. Notre objectif était 1) de décrire les séquelles liées au SPSI sur une période de 12 mois après la sortie de l'unité de soins intensifs (USI), 2) d'identifier les facteurs démographiques et cliniques pertinents liés au SPSI, et 3) d'explorer comment les séquelles liées au SPSI peuvent influencer la qualité de vie liée à la santé (QVLS) chez les survivant·es gravement malades de la COVID-19. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte prospective chez des adultes gravement malades survivant·es d'une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 qui ont eu ou non besoin d'une ventilation mécanique invasive (VMI) pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 en Espagne (mars 2020 à janvier 2021). Nous avons effectué un suivi par télémédecine des séquelles liées au SPSI (santé physique/fonctionnelle, cognitive et mentale) et à la QVLS avec cinq points de collecte de données. Nous avons rétrospectivement colligé des données démographiques et cliniques. Des modèles multivariés à effets mixtes ont été utilisés pour l'analyse des données. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 142 participant·es à l'étude dans l'analyse finale, avec un âge médian [intervalle interquartile] de 61 [53-68] ans; 35 % étaient des femmes et 59 % avaient besoin de VMI. La fatigue/dyspnée, la douleur, l'altération de la fonction musculaire, la symptomatologie psychiatrique et la réduction de la QVLS physique étaient des séquelles importantes peu après la sortie de l'USI. Au cours du suivi de 12 mois, la fonctionnalité et la fatigue/dyspnée se sont améliorées progressivement, tandis que la douleur est restée stable. Nous avons observé de légères fluctuations des symptômes d'anxiété et de perception du déficit cognitif, tandis que le trouble de stress post-traumatique (ESPT) et les symptômes dépressifs se sont améliorés, avec un léger rebond à la fin du suivi. Le sexe féminin, un jeune âge et le besoin de VMI étaient des facteurs de risque de SPSI, tandis qu'une réserve cognitive plus élevée était un facteur potentiel de protection. Les scores physiques de la QVLS ont montré une amélioration générale au fil du temps, tandis que la QVLS mentale est restée stable. Un séjour plus court aux soins intensifs, une meilleure fonctionnalité et des scores plus faibles pour la fatigue/dyspnée et la douleur étaient associés à une meilleure QVLS physique, tandis que des scores plus faibles pour l'anxiété, la dépression et le ESPT étaient associés à une meilleure QVLS mentale. CONCLUSION: Le syndrome post-soins intensifs était fréquent chez les survivant·es d'une maladie grave de la COVID-19 et a persisté chez une proportion importante de patient·es un an après leur sortie de l'unité de soins intensifs, ce qui a eu un impact sur la QVLS. La présence de facteurs de risque de SPSI peut identifier les patient·es qui sont plus susceptibles de développer la maladie et qui bénéficieraient d'un suivi plus spécifique et plus étroit après leur admission aux soins intensifs. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04422444 ); première soumission le 9 juin 2020.

Opinions and priorities for an e-health platform: A member consultation from an intensive care patient organisation.

BACKGROUND: To prevent deterioration after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and to improve rehabilitation, the ICU team should use digital technologies to provide comprehensive and practical information alongside personalised support for survivors and their family members. However, a knowledge gap exists on the users' preferences for such an e-health platform in ICU follow-up services. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the opinions and priorities for an e-health platform, including choices in digital elements, according to survivors of critical illness and their family members. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was used among members and other interested individuals of the Dutch volunteer organisation 'Foundation Family- and Patient-Centred Intensive Care'. An investigator-developed questionnaire was disseminated through the newsletter and social media channels of the Foundation Family- and Patient-Centred Intensive Care. The results of this member consultation were analysed and reported as descriptive statistics on demographic variables and outcome measures in opinions and priorities of the participants. RESULTS: Most of the 227 participants were female (76%), aged 46-55 years (33%), and completed higher education (70%). The participants reported high confidence in advice delivered through an e-health platform (72%). They prioritised the provision of a guide including relevant professionals who may support them during their recovery when using an e-health platform. CONCLUSIONS: ICU survivors prioritised the provision of relevant professionals who may support them during their recovery when using an e-health platform; however, selection bias means the population studied is likely to be more digitally connected than the general ICU population. Digital solutions could cater to their information and support needs. For family members, the highest priority reported was receiving help in managing their emotional distress. The development of an e-health platform considering the opinions and priorities of this target group could contribute to a personalised recovery trajectory promoting self-management while including digital elements addressing relevant ICU follow-up services.

Measuring Social Health Following Pediatric Critical Illness: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework.

OBJECTIVE: Social health is an important component of recovery following critical illness as modeled in the pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome framework. We conducted a scoping review of studies measuring social outcomes (measurable components of social health) following pediatric critical illness and propose a conceptual framework of the social outcomes measured in these studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Registry. STUDY SELECTION: We identified studies evaluating social outcomes in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors or their families from 1970-2017 as part of a broader scoping review of outcomes after pediatric critical illness. DATA EXTRACTION: We identified articles by dual review and dual-extracted study characteristics, instruments, and instrument validation and administration information. For instruments used in studies evaluating a social outcome, we collected instrument content and described it using qualitative methods adapted to a scoping review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 407 articles identified in the scoping review, 223 (55%) evaluated a social outcome. The majority were conducted in North America and the United Kingdom, with wide variation in methodology and population. Among these studies, 38 unique instruments were used to evaluate a social outcome. Specific social outcomes measured included individual (independence, attachment, empathy, social behaviors, social cognition, and social interest), environmental (community perceptions and environment), and network (activities and relationships) characteristics, together with school and family outcomes. While many instruments assessed more than one social outcome, no instrument evaluated all areas of social outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The full range of social outcomes reported following pediatric critical illness were not captured by any single instrument. The lack of a comprehensive instrument focused on social outcomes may contribute to under-appreciation of the importance of social outcomes and their under-representation in PICU outcomes research. A more comprehensive evaluation of social outcomes will improve understanding of overall recovery following pediatric critical illness.

Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression and physical recovery after critical illness - A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critical illness is often followed by mental and physical impairments. We aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms of anxiety and depression, and physical function in critically ill patients after discharge from the intensive care unit. METHODS: For this prospective cohort study we included all available adult patients admitted to the ICU for >24 h during a 12-month period. Home visits took place at 3 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital and included Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Chelsea Critical Care Assessment Too (CPAx). RESULTS: We visited 79 patients at 3 and 53 at 12 months. In patients with data from both visits the mental components SF-36 scores (median (IQR)) were 55 (43-63) at 3, and 58.5 (49.5-64) at 12 months; physical component SF-36 scores were 35 (28-45) at 3, and 36 (28-42) at 12 months. SF-36 subdomains of mental health, social functioning, and role emotional were close to normal. Vitality, bodily pain, general health, physical functioning, and role physical were severely affected. Incidences of anxiety and depression symptoms were 16%/8% at 3 and 13%/8% at 12 months) and physical function (CPAx) was 47 at both time points). CONCLUSION: We found no change in HRQoL, anxiety, and depression, or physical function from 3 months to 1 year. Physical health-related quality of life was impaired at both time points. Subdomain scores for physical health-related quality of life were affected more than mental domains at both time points.

Changes in Maximum Tongue Pressure and Postoperative Dysphagia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients after Cardiovascular Surgery.

Background: There is no objective quantitative parameter for dysphagia, and the relationship between changes in maximum tongue pressure values and dysphagia is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in the change in maximal tongue pressure after extubating patients who were ventilated after cardiovascular surgery, with or without dysphagia. Materials and methods: Adult patients who underwent mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation following cardiovascular surgery were included. Tongue pressure was measured before cardiovascular surgery and at 6 hours; 3 and 7 days after extubation. Dysphagia was confirmed by the functional oral intake scale (FOIS) on day 7 after extubation; an FOIS level above or equal to 6 was considered "dysphagia-negative." Results: Of 68 patients, 15 (22.1%) were in the dysphagia-positive group, which significantly showed a history of diabetes mellitus, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and postextubation hospitalization. Additionally, the postoperative C-reactive protein level was significantly higher in the dysphagia-positive group than in the dysphagia-negative group. Maximum tongue pressure was significantly lower in the dysphagia-positive group at 3 and 7 days postextubation. Using a cutoff value of 27.6 kPa in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for maximum tongue pressure at 3 days after extubation, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82, sensitivity was 84.9%, and specificity was 84.2%. Conclusion: Tongue pressure at 3 days after extubation is significantly lower in patients with dysphagia after cardiovascular surgery than in patients without dysphagia. If the maximum tongue pressure value is below 27.6 kPa on the third day following extubation, oral intake should be performed with caution. How to cite this article: Yamada T, Ochiai R, Kotake Y. Changes in Maximum Tongue Pressure and Postoperative Dysphagia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients after Cardiovascular Surgery. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(12):1253-1258.

The Association Between Functional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Discharge from the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Despite one third of children with acquired brain injury (ABI) experiencing new functional impairments following critical care admission, there is limited research investigating the impact of new functional impairments on overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL) or among important HRQOL domains. We aimed to investigate the association between new functional impairments, measured by the Functional Status Scale (FSS), and HRQOL in pediatric patients with ABI after critical care. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of 275 children aged 2 months to 18 years with ABI. The primary exposure evaluated was change in FSS from baseline at hospital discharge, categorized per prior work (no change, 1-2 point increase, and ≥ 3 point increase). The primary outcome was overall HRQOL 6 months after hospital discharge, measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) total score. Secondary outcomes were PedsQL domain scores. PedsQL total and domain scores were transformed into age-standardized z scores for analyses. Multiple linear regression models evaluated the association between FSS change category and HRQOL (overall and domain z scores) when controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics and were reported as ß-coefficients with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Complete data were analyzed for 195 (71%) children, including 127 with traumatic brain injury. New functional impairment was common with 32 (16%) patients experiencing FSS increases ≥ 3, 50 (26%) patients with FSS increases of 1-2 points, and 113 (58%) patients with no change from prehospital baseline. The majority of children (63%) demonstrated HRQOL ratings ≥ 1 standard deviation below healthy age-based standards (z scores ≤ - 1). Regression models demonstrated older age, female sex, presence of comorbidities, and preadmission cardiopulmonary resuscitation were all significantly associated with poorer overall HRQOL (all p < 0.05). FSS increase ≥ 3 at discharge was significantly associated with worse overall HRQOL at follow-up (ß = - 1.07; 95% confidence interval = - 1.63 to - 0.52) when controlling for the aforementioned significant factors, and significantly improved model fit (p value for change = 0.001). Similar findings in secondary analyses were found for physical domain scores, with FSS increase showing a significant association with worse physical HRQOL scores and improvements in model fit. Change in FSS was not significantly associated with other HRQOL domain scores (emotional, social, school, psychosocial). CONCLUSIONS: Many children with ABI after critical care experience new functional impairments (FSS increases) and worse HRQOL than healthy peers. FSS increase at discharge is a significant risk factor for worse HRQOL in the months after hospital discharge and improves HRQOL models beyond illness and demographic variables alone.

Impact of a nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction with intensive care and psychological wellbeing: A mixed-methods evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Families of critically ill persons face uncertainty and experience distress during and after their close other's stay in an intensive care unit (ICU). Proactive nurse engagement and support is recommended to meet families' needs in the ICU, but little is known about its impact on quality of family care. We introduced a family support intervention that consisted of an interprofessional family support pathway and a new role of an advanced practice family nurse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction, wellbeing, and psychological distress. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental before-and-after study with embedded qualitative interviews in a Swiss University Hospital from March 2018 to July 2019 using a questionnaire (Family Satisfaction in the ICU-24 Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale-Revised-6) and qualitative interviews (n = 19) after patient discharge. RESULTS: Families in the intervention group (n = 75) showed a trend for increased overall satisfaction (difference of 5.544, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11 to 11.20), a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with decision-making (7.258, 95% CI: 0.89 to 13.63), and a nonsignificant increase in satisfaction with care (4.178, 95% CI: -1.53 to 9.89). Psychological distress was higher in the intervention group, with depression reaching statistical significance (difference of 1.706, 95% CI: 0.16 to 3.25), which may be explained by longer ICU stays and higher proportion of deaths in the intervention group. Families receiving the intervention reported to be feeling cared for, well informed, and better able to cope. Data integration suggests that early onset, fit to need, and quality of intervention were the most important intervention characteristics impacting family wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that family members experience a nurse-led support intervention as beneficial for their wellbeing. It increased their satisfaction, but was unable to demonstrate a favourable impact on psychological distress.

Effectiveness of cognitive interventions on cognitive outcomes of adult intensive care unit survivors: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments have been identified as significant under-recognised negative sequelae of postintensive care syndrome. No treatment guidelines exist for cognitive interventions addressing the devastating consequences of impairments and their potential impact on outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. AIM: The aim of the study was to identify all available cognitive interventions and measurable outcomes for the cognitive rehabilitation of adult ICU survivors, as reported in published articles. Secondary aims included to critically synthesise existing evidence in improving adult ICU survivors' cognitive outcomes after ICU discharge and to extract implications for future research. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted based on a rigorous literature search (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) using predefined keywords. The protocol was based on current guidelines. Eligibility criteria included published (i) experimental and quasi-experimental studies reporting the effects of cognitive interventions on cognitive outcomes of adult critical illness survivors after hospital discharge and (ii) protocols identifying cognitive interventions with predefined cognitive outcome measures. RESULTS: Seven studies were included: three experimental studies, two quasi-experimental studies, and two published protocols. Significant heterogeneity in the type of interventions, outcome measures, and assessment tools was noted. Interventions included variations of goal management training and an integrated multidisciplinary model. The setting, delivery, and duration of interventions varied. Cognitive outcomes included variations of global cognitive function and executive function. Overall, the evidence on the effects of cognitive interventions, as compared with routine care, in improving global cognitive function is inconclusive. More evidence support exists with respect to improving executive function. CONCLUSION: Although various cognitive intervention approaches have shown some positive effects on outcomes of ICU survivors after hospital discharge, the high risk of bias and high heterogeneity across studies preclude conclusions about the most appropriate post-ICU care to rehabilitate cognitive deficits in critical care survivors. This review highlighted a number of methodological limitations that require further investigation.

Implementation of post-intensive care outpatient clinic (I-POINT) for critically ill COVID-19 survivors

Although we have enough and cumulative information about acute effects of COVID-19, our knowledge is extremely limited about long-term consequences of COVID-19, in terms of its impacts and burdens on patients, families, and the health system. Considering the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms affecting all of the organ systems in critically ill COVID-19 patients who are admitted to intensive care units, the development of post-intensive care syndrome is inevitable. This situation brings along the development of long-COVID. These patients should be followed regarding cognitive, physical, and psychiatric aspects and necessary specialist referrals should be carried out. In this article, we are presenting the experience and recommendations of our center, as a guide for the establishment process of post-intensive care outpatient clinics for the critically ill patients who required intensive care admission due to COVID-19 and could be discharged.

Application of Telemedicine Technology to Facilitate Diagnosis of Pediatric Postintensive Care Syndrome.

Background: Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) is well-defined in the adult literature but has not received much attention in pediatrics. Introduction: We sought to use a telemedicine platform for the characterization of PICS by creating a convenient and effective virtual follow-up clinic. Materials and Methods: Prospective single-center study in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) of patients aged 4-17 years who underwent any invasive procedures while admitted to the ICU. Parents completed the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS) based on baseline behaviors before ICU admission, with the scale readministered at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postdischarge via secure telehealth platform. Patients with a WFIRS baseline raw score of 10 or an interval increase of 2 were referred to psychiatry for evaluation and treatment. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. Risk factors for PICS included number of procedural interventions, length of pediatric ICU stay, number of specialty consults, sex, race, and duration of sedation/airway instrumentation. In univariate analysis, age appeared to be the only statistically significant factor associated with the development of PICS. Variables associated with a higher change in WFIRS score showed a statistically significant correlation with the number of procedures completed, the number of specialists involved, and the need for a psychiatric referral. Only 34% of total telemedicine follow-ups were completed. Discussion: There is an association between age and the development of PICS and between change in WFIRS score and number of procedures, specialist involved, and psychiatric referral. Conclusions: The use of telemedicine did not result in an improved follow-up rate when compared to outpatient clinic studies.

Postintensive care syndrome family: A comprehensive review.

Families of critically ill patients are predisposed to tremendous burdens when their relatives are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Postintensive care syndrome family (PICS-F) can be described as a devastated life, encompassing psychological, physical, and socioeconomical burdens that begin with the emotional impact experienced by the family when the patient is admitted to the ICU. PICS-F was primarily proposed as a clinically significant psychological impairment, but it needs to be extended beyond the psychological impairment of the family to include physical and socioeconomical impairments in the future. The prevalence of physiological problems including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic syndrome is 20-40%, and that of non-physiological problems including fatigue is 15% at 6 months after the ICU stay. Assessment of PICS-F was frequently conducted at 3- or 6-month points, although the beginning of the evaluation was based on different assessment points among each of the studies. Families of ICU patients need to be given and understand accurate information, such as the patient's diagnosis, planned care, and prognosis. Prevention of PICS-F requires a continuous bundle of multifaceted and/or multidisciplinary interventions including providing a family information leaflet, ICU diary, communication facilitators, supportive grief care, and follow-up, for the patient and families from during the ICU stay to after discharge from the ICU. This is the first comprehensive review of PICS-F to address the concept, risk factors, assessment tools, prevalence, and management to prevent PICS-F to facilitate acute care physicians' understanding of PICS-F.

Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent PICS in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) is common in critically ill adults who were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although comparative analyses between types of non-pharmacological measures and usual care to prevent PICS have been performed, it remains unclear which of these potential treatments is the most effective for prevention. METHODS: To obtain the best evidence for non-pharmaceutical interventions in preventing PICS, a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) will be conducted by searching nine electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers will carefully screen the titles, abstracts, and full-text papers to identify and extract relevant data. Furthermore, the research team will meticulously check the bibliographic references of the selected studies and related reviews to discover any articles pertinent to this research. The primary focus of the study is to examine the prevalence and severity of PICS among critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. The additional outcomes encompass patient satisfaction and adverse effects related to the preventive intervention. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias assessment tool will be utilized to evaluate the risk of bias in the included RCTs. To assess the efficacy of various preventative measures, traditional pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA will be used. To gauge the confidence in the evidence supporting the results, we will utilize the Confidence in NMA tool. DISCUSSION: There are multiple non-pharmacological interventions available for preventing the occurrence and development of PICS. However, most approaches have only been directly compared to standard care, lacking comprehensive evidence and clinical balance. Although the most effective care methods are still unknown, our research will provide valuable evidence for further non-pharmacological interventions and clinical practices aimed at preventing PICS. The research is expected to offer useful data to help healthcare workers and those creating guidelines decide on the most effective path of action for preventing PICS in adult ICU patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023439343.

Postintensive care syndrome: Development and psychometric validation of a knowledge test.

INTRODUCTION: Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) is a combination of short-, medium- and long-term morbidities that occur in patients discharged from the Intensive care unit (ICU). ICU professionals have a crucial role in managing and understanding the PICS. This study aimed to develop the PICS Knowledge Test (PICS-KT), which measures ICU professionals' awareness and knowledge levels regarding PICS, and to determine its validity and reliability. METHODS: The databases were searched in detail, scientific research related to PICS was analyzed, and the draft scale was created accordingly. A total of 117 doctors and nurses who had been working in the ICU for at least 6 months were included in the study. For the validity and reliability analysis of the test, content validity ratio, item difficulty index, item discrimination index values and Cronbach α were examined. RESULTS: The Cronbach's α reliability coefficient for the 46-item PICS-KT is 0.93, indicating high reliability. Scores range from 0 to 46, with 32 or higher considered successful, suggesting adequate knowledge of PICS among ICU professionals. Scores of 14 or less indicate minimal knowledge. Those with scores between 14 and 32 possess some knowledge but need improvement. PICS-KT assesses knowledge in four main areas: general information, risk factors/causes, symptoms and findings and interventions. ICU professionals show high awareness of interventions for preventing and treating PICS, as indicated by a high mean score in the interventions subdimension. CONCLUSION: The PICS-KT is crucial in assessing healthcare professionals' understanding of the various short-, medium- and long-term morbidities associated with PICS. The study ensures that the test is a robust and dependable instrument for evaluating ICU professionals' knowledge about PICS.

Beyond survival: understanding post-intensive care syndrome.

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) refers to persistent or new onset physical, mental, and neurocognitive complications that can occur following a stay in the intensive care unit. PICS encompasses muscle weakness; neuropathy; cognitive deficits including memory, executive, and attention impairments; post-traumatic stress disorder; and other mood disorders. PICS can last long after hospital admission and can cause significant physical, emotional, and financial stress for patients and their families. Several modifiable risk factors, such as duration of sepsis, delirium, and mechanical ventilation, are associated with PICS. However, due to limited awareness about PICS, these factors are often overlooked. The objective of this paper is to highlight the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnostic methods, and available preventive and treatment options for PICS.

Sedation with inhaled sevoflurane in the intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often develop the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). Current sedation guidelines mainly rely on intravenous agents. Inhaled sedatives are a promising alternative with favorable pharmacokinetics and potential benefits in critical care settings. However, their application in Latin America remains unexplored. METHODS: Case-series study that included adult ICU patients who underwent deep sedation with sevoflurane using the SEDANA anesthetic conserving device. Data on demographics, sedation protocols, adverse events, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis assessed changes over time in laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included, with sevoflurane administered via artificial airways. Inhaled sedation led to the successful cease of intravenous sedatives in 10 of 11 patients, and reduction of at least 30% in opioid dose. No significant adverse effects were observed. Barriers to adherence included device-related issues and challenges in healthcare staff training. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane effectively achieved sedation goals in ICU patients, reducing the need for additional sedatives and opioids. Our findings support the safety and efficacy of inhaled sedatives in ICU settings and highlight the importance of further research in this area. Longer-term studies are needed to fully determine the impact of inhaled sedatives in ICU patients.

Introducción: Los pacientes críticamente enfermos a menudo desarrollan el Síndrome Post-Cuidados Intensivos (PICS). Las pautas actuales de sedación se basan principalmente en agentes intravenosos. Los sedantes inhalados son una alternativa prometedora con farmacocinética favorable y beneficios potenciales en entornos de cuidados críticos. Sin embargo, su aplicación en América Latina sigue sin explorarse. Métodos: Estudio de serie de casos que incluyó a pacientes adultos de UCI que recibieron sedación profunda con sevoflurano utilizando el dispositivo conservador anestésico SEDANA. Se recopilaron datos demográficos, protocolos de sedación, eventos adversos y resultados. El análisis estadístico evaluó los cambios en el tiempo en los parámetros de laboratorio. Resultados: Se incluyeron once pacientes, a quienes se les administró sevoflurano a través de vías respiratorias artificiales. Se incluyeron once pacientes, a quienes se les administró sevoflurano a través de vías respiratorias artificiales. La sedación inhalada llevó a la cesación exitosa de sedantes intravenosos en 10 de los 11 pacientes, con una reducción de al menos 30% la dosis de opioides. No se observaron efectos adversos significativos. Las barreras para la adherencia incluyeron problemas relacionados con el dispositivo y desafíos en la capacitación del personal de salud. Conclusión: El sevoflurano logró de manera efectiva los objetivos de sedación en pacientes de UCI, reduciendo la necesidad de sedantes y opioides adicionales. Nuestros hallazgos respaldan la seguridad y eficacia de los sedantes inhalados en entornos de UCI y resaltan la importancia de una mayor investigación en esta área. Se necesitan estudios a más largo plazo para determinar completamente el impacto de los sedantes inhalados en pacientes de UCI.

Pediatric Critical Care Outcomes: State of the Science.

Children who survive the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are at risk of developing post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-p). PICS-p, defined as new physical, cognitive, emotional, and/or social health dysfunction following critical illness, can affect the child and family. Historically, synthesizing PICU outcomes research has been challenging due to inconsistency in study design and in outcomes measurement. PICS-p risk may be mitigated by implementing intensive care unit best practices that limit iatrogenic injury and by supporting the resiliency of critically ill children and their families.

Association Between Mobilization Level And Activity of Daily Living Independence in Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the mobilization level during intensive care unit (ICU) admission and independence in activity of daily living (ADL), defined as Barthel Index (BI)≥70. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the EMPICS study involving nine hospitals. Consecutive patients who spend >48 hours in the ICU were eligible for inclusion. Mobilization was performed at each hospital according to the shared protocol and the highest ICU mobility score (IMS) during the ICU stay, baseline characteristics, and BI at hospital discharge. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for baseline characteristics, was used to deter-mine the association between the highest IMS (using the receiver operating characteristic [ROC]) and ADL. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients, 143 were assigned to the ADL independence group and 60 to the ADL dependence group. The highest IMS score was significantly higher in the ADL independence group than in the dependence group and was a predictor of ADL independence at hospital discharge (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.38; adjusted p=0.002). The ROC cutoff value for the highest IMS was 6 (specificity, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.70; area under the curve, 0.69). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that, in patients who were in the ICU for more than 48 hours, that patients with good function in the ICU also exhibit good function upon discharge. However, prospective, multicenter trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Psychometric properties of the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report tool in patients discharged from the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Intensive care unit survivors experience new and ongoing physical, psychological, and cognitive complications known as postintensive care syndrome. The study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report tool for assessing postintensive care syndrome in Iranian patients. METHODS: The study is a methodological study investigating the psychometric properties of the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report tool in 153 patients discharged from the intensive care unit. The instrument's psychometric properties were examined to determine content validity, construct validity (factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity), concurrent validity, and internal consistency. FINDINGS: The factor structure of the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report tool was examined in the form of two models: the three-factor model with 27 items and the three-factor model with 19 items. Regarding fit indices and results of the convergent, discriminant validities and the internal consistency the 19-item model is better than the original 27-item model. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the appropriate model for the healthy aging brain care monitor self-report tool in Iranian society is a tool with 19 items with the best conditions in terms of factor structure, internal consistency, and overall psychometric characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The present study led to the introduction of a valid instrument with a 19-item factor structure to assess the postintensive care syndrome by nurses and other healthcare providers in hospitals, clinics, palliative care centers, and home care centers.

Outpatient Mental Health Follow-up and Recurrent Self-harm and Suicide Among Patients Admitted to the ICU for Self-harm: A Population-based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients surviving an ICU admission for deliberate self-harm are at high risk of recurrent self-harm or suicide after discharge. It is unknown whether mental health follow-up after discharge (with either a family physician or psychiatrist) reduces this risk. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the association between mental health follow-up after discharge and recurrent self-harm among patients admitted to the ICU for intentional self-harm? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Population-based cohort study of consecutive adults (≥ 18 years of age) from Ontario, Canada, who were admitted to ICU because of intentional self-harm between 2009 and 2017. We categorized patients according to follow-up, with 'early follow-up' indicating 1 to 21 days after discharge, 'late follow-up' indicating 22 to 60 days after discharge, and 'no follow-up' indicating no follow-up within 60 days of discharge. We conducted analyses using a cause-specific extended Cox regression model to account for varying time for mental health follow-up relative to the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was recurrent ICU admission for self-harm within 1 year of discharge. RESULTS: We included 9,569 consecutive adults admitted to the ICU for deliberate self-harm. Compared with receiving no mental health follow-up, both early follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.75) and late follow-up (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.35) were associated with increased risk in recurrent ICU admission for self-harm. As compared with no follow-up, neither early follow-up (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.73) nor late follow-up (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.84-2.83) were associated with increased risk of death by suicide. INTERPREATION: Among adults admitted to the ICU for deliberate self-harm, mental health follow-up after discharge was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ICU admission for self-harm or death resulting from suicide, and patients seeking outpatient follow-up may be those at highest risk of these outcomes. Future research should focus on additional and novel methods of risk mitigation in this vulnerable population.

[The intensive care diary-a communication tool]. / Schriftliche Begleitung einer existenziellen Erfahrung: Das Intensivtagebuch als kommunikativer Brückenschlag.

Diaries in intensive care units (ICU) are mostly written by families and nurses for patients with impaired consciousness. In the diary, the development of the patients is described in plain language by daily reports. Patients can read the diary later and process their experiences and, if necessary, reframe them differently. ICU diaries reduce the risks of psychosocial sequelae of patients and families and are now used worldwide. Diaries have different purposes and also serve as a communication tool: words are written to a person who will hopefully read them later. This can help families to stay connected and cope better with the situation. However, writing a diary can also be perceived as a burden by some relatives and nurses due to lack of time or because it seems to be too close. ICU diaries can serve as a tool for patientand family-centered care.