Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 218: 34-42, 2024 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432336

RESUMO

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a major impediment to reintervention in patients who underwent proximal transradial access (p-TRA) for coronary catheterization. Distal transradial access (d-TRA) at the level of snuffbox distal to the radial artery bifurcation is a novel alternative to p-TRA. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of RAO between p-TRA and d-TRA, along with access site-related complications. PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for RCTs published since 2017 to October 2023 comparing d-TRA and p-TRA for coronary angiography and/or intervention. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model for procedural and clinical outcomes for the 2 approaches. A total of 18 RCTs with 8,205 patients (d-TRA n = 4,096, p-TRA n = 4,109) were included. The risk of RAO (RR 0.31, 0.21 to 0.46, p ≤0.001) and time to hemostasis (minutes) (MD -51.18, -70.62 to -31.73, p <0.001) was significantly lower in the d-TRA group. Crossover rates (RR 2.39, 1.71 to 3.32, p <0.001), access time (minutes) (MD 0.93, 0.50 to 1.37, p <0.001), procedural pain (MD 0.46, 0.13 to 0.79, p = 0.006), and multiple puncture attempts (RR 2.13, 1.10 to 4.11, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the d-TRA group. The use of d-TRA for coronary angiography and/or intervention is associated with a lower risk of RAO at the forearm and may preserve p-TRA site for reintervention in selective patients by reducing the incidence of RAO.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Artéria Radial , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Radiol Case Rep ; 17(7): 2304-2308, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570864

RESUMO

Babesiosis incidence in the United States has been increasing with an 11% rise between 2018 and 2019 based on the latest CDC annual summary, reaching its highest ever reported incidence. This primarily tick-borne disease is particularly prevalent in New England. Despite predominantly nonspecific and at times subtle symptoms, life-threatening complications do occur. One such complication is splenic rupture which has been suggested to be more common in younger and otherwise healthy individuals. This is a report on a successful splenic artery embolization in a 65-year-old male from upstate New York who, unlike most prior studies, showed splenic rupture after he was discharged with negative parasitemia and general improvement following several days of targeted antibiotic therapy. Increased incidence and various presentations of Babesiosis call for an attempt to promote clinical awareness for radiologists among other specialties.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA