How have US colorectal cancer mortality trends changed in the past 20 years?

In the last two decades, colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality has been decreasing in the United States. However, the mortality trends for the different subtypes of CRC, including different sides of colon, rectosigmoid, and rectal cancer remain unclear. We analyzed the mortality trends of different subtypes of CRC based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data from 1999 to 2020. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 individuals and examined the trends over time by estimating the average annual percent change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression Program. Our study shows that the overall CRC rates decreased significantly from 26.42 to 15.98 per 100,000 individuals, with an AAPC of -2.41. However, the AAMR of rectosigmoid cancer increased significantly from 0.82 to 1.08 per 100,000 individuals, with the AAPC of +1.10. Men and Black individuals had the highest AAMRs respectively (23.90 vs. 26.93 per 100,000 individuals). The overall AAMR of CRC decreased for those aged ≥50 years but increased significantly from 1.02 to 1.58 per 100,000 individuals for those aged 15-49 years, with an AAPC of +0.75. Rural populations had a higher AAMR than the urban populations (22.40 vs. 19.60 per 100,000 individuals). Although overall CRC mortality declined, rising trends in young-onset CRC and rectosigmoid cancer warrant attention. Disparities persist in terms of sex, race, and geographic region, and urbanization level, emphasizing the need for targeted public health measures.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Though our previous study has demonstrated that the single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) is safe and feasible for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer and has better short-term outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), the long-term outcomes of SILS + 1 remains uncertain and are needed to evaluated by an RCT. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS + 1 (n = 99) or CLS (n = 99). The 3-year DFS, 5-year OS, and recurrence patterns were analyzed. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients were randomly assigned to either the SILS + 1 group (n = 99) or CLS group (n = 99). The median follow-up in the SILS + 1 group was 64.0 months and in CLS group was 65.0 months. The 3-year DFS was 87.8% (95% CI, 81.6-94.8%) in SILS + 1 group and 86.9% (95% CI, 81.3-94.5%) in CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.09 (95% CI, 0.48-2.47; P = 0.84)). The 5-year OS was 86.7% (95% CI,79.6-93.8%) in the SILS + 1 group and 80.5% (95% CI,72.5-88.5%) in the CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.53 (95% CI, 0.74-3.18; P = 0.25)). There were no significant differences in the recurrence patterns between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer treated with SILS + 1 vs. CLS. SILS + 1 is noninferior to CLS when performed by expert surgeons. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02117557 (registered on 21/04/2014).

Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port surgery (SILS + 1) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colonic cancer. BACKGROUND: At present, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy remains technically challenging. The use of SILS + 1 as an alternative has gained increasing attention; however, its safety and efficacy remain controversial. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2 M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS + 1 (n = 99) or CLS (n = 99). The morbidity and mortality within 30 days, operative and pathologic outcomes, postoperative recovery course, inflammation and immune responses, and pain intensity were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall complications between the two groups (17.2 vs. 16.3%, P = 1.000). The total operating time for the SILS + 1 group was significantly shorter (100.8 ± 30.4 vs. 116.6 ± 36.6, P = 0.002). Blood loss was significantly greater in the CLS group (20 vs. 50, P < 0.001). Thirteen patients (14%) in the CLS group required additional postoperative analgesics, which was significantly more than four patients in the SILS + 1 group. Notably, on postoperative day three, the visual analogue scale score of the CLS group was greater than that of the SILS + 1 group (1.3 ± 1.1 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3, P = 0.023). Tumor diameter, pathologic stage, length of the proximal and distal margins, and number of lymph nodes harvested were similar, other values were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that SILS + 1 might be safe and feasible for rectosigmoid cancer when performed by experienced surgeons. It offers minimal invasiveness without compromising oncologic treatment principles. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02117557).

A novel adaptor converts a laparoscope into a high-definition rigid sigmoidoscope.

The rigid sigmoidoscope is an important tool in a surgeon's armamentarium, yet it has remained essentially unchanged despite poor imaging and the inability to project or record the images. Herein we report our initial experience with a novel introducer built from readily available operating room supplies and designed to convert any standard laparoscope into a high-definition rigid sigmoidoscope.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical and oncological outcomes of upper rectal, rectosigmoid and sigmoid tumours.

AIM: Management paradigms for tumours from the sigmoid colon to the lower rectum vary significantly. The upper rectum (UR) represents the transition point both anatomically and in treatment protocols. Above the UR is clearly defined and managed as colon cancer and below is managed as rectal cancer. This study compares outcomes between sigmoid, rectosigmoid and UR tumours to establish if differences exist in operative and oncological outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for published studies with comparative data on peri-operative and oncological outcome for upper rectal and sigmoid/rectosigmoid (SRS) tumours treated without neoadjuvant radiation. The search adhered to PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data was combined using random-effects models. RESULTS: Seven comparative series examined outcomes in 4355 patients. There was no difference in ASA grade (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.99-1.67; P = 0.06), T3/T4 tumours (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95-1.63; P = 0.12), or lymph node positivity (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.70-1.36; P = 0.87). UR cancers had higher rates of operative morbidity (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P = 0.01) and anastomotic leak (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.71; P = 0.0004). There was no difference in local recurrence (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37-1.08; P = 0.10). SRS tumours had lower rates of distant recurrence (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68-1.0; P = 0.05). Rectosigmoid operative and cancer outcomes were closer to UR than sigmoid. CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing data, UR and rectosigmoid tumours have higher morbidity, leak rates and distant recurrence than more proximal tumours.

Primary rectal choriocarcinoma associated with rectal adenocarcinoma in a woman with a history of ulcerative colitis: Case report.

INTRODUCTION: Primary rectal choriocarcinoma is an extremely rare malignancy. The association of these neoplasms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been reported. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 34-year-old female with history of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) gave birth to a male fetus. She had postpartum bleeding and high level of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßhCG) was detected. Although initial investigations failed to confirm molar pregnancy, abnormal uterine bleeding and high ßhCG level necessitate chemotherapy administration. She did not respond to chemotherapy sessions accordingly. Meanwhile, the patient experienced rectorrhagia and colonoscopy revealed a firm submucosal polypoid lesion 8-10 cm from the anal verge. The multidisciplinary team candidate the patient for total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Although postoperative course was uneventful and ßhCG level dropped but it showed a rising pattern in follow ups. Chemotherapy was planned but there was not suitable response. Unfortunately, the patient passed away 20 months after the initial diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Pathology report indicated the coexistence of moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and choriocarcinoma. We assume previous history of UC might have put her at higher susceptibility to develop carcinoma and this poorly differentiated carcinoma has led to choriocarcinoma. Considering the fact that in most cases of colorectal choriocarcinoma, choriocarcinomatous differentiation was found alongside colonic adenocarcinoma made dedifferentiation theory to be the most acceptable explanation. CONCLUSION: The adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum in the setting of IBD may become so dedifferentiated that gain some characteristics of germ cell tumors.

Prognostic Impact of the Length of the Distal Resection Margin in Rectosigmoid Cancer: An Analysis of the JSCCR Database between 1995 and 2004.

OBJECTIVES: The necessary and sufficient length of the distal resection margin (l-DRM) for rectosigmoid cancer remains controversial. This study evaluated the validity of the 3-cm l-DRM rule for rectosigmoid cancer in the Japanese classification of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,443 patients with cT3 and cT4 rectosigmoid cancer who underwent R0 resection in Japanese institutions between 1995 and 2004. We identified the optimal cutoff point of the l-DRM affecting overall survival (OS) rate using a multivariate Cox regression analysis model. Using this cutoff point, the patients were divided into two groups after balancing the potential confounding factors of the l-DRM using propensity score matching, and the OS rates of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A multivariate Cox regression analysis model revealed that the l-DRM of 4 cm was the best cutoff point with the greatest impact on OS rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.84; P = 0.0452) and with the lowest Akaike information criterion value. In the matched cohort study, the OS rate of patients who had l-DRM of 4 cm or more was significantly higher than that of patients who had l-DRM < 4 cm (n = 402; 5-year OS rates, 87.6% vs. 80.3%, respectively; HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.09-2.31; P = 0.0136). CONCLUSIONS: For cT3 and cT4 rectosigmoid cancer, l-DRM of 4 cm may be an appropriate landmark for a curative intent surgery, and we were unable to definitively confirm the validity of the Japanese 3-cm l-DRM rule.

Synchronous mucinous adenocarcinoma of the recto sigmoid revealed by and seeding an anal fistula. (A case report and review of the literature).

INTRODUCTION: There are few cases of synchronous rectal adenocarcinoma revealed by an anal fistula. The diagnosis of synchronous mucinous adenocarcinoma of the recto sigmoid and anal canal remains difficult. The chronic anal fistula can be mistaken as the common manifestation of a benign perianal abscess or fistula. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a rare case of a Greek Caucasian 79year old male patient with anal fistula and a recurrent perianal abscess who subsequently was found to have developed synchronous rectosigmoid and perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma on biopsy. The histological exam revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma in two sites, representing two tumors, cells were immunopositive for cytokeratin 20 and negative in cytokeratin 7. The patient underwent "laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision " with both lesions being resected. There is no recurrence after four years of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the importance of high suspicion, further investigation and the need of biopsy in all anal fistulae.

Circulating tumor cells in different stages of colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Liquid biopsies are noninvasive tests using blood or body fluids to detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or the products of tumor cells, such as fragments of nucleic acids or proteins that are shed into biological fluids from primary tumor or its metastates. The analysis of published clinical studies provides coherent evidence that the presence of CTCs detected in peripheral blood is a strong prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the study was to implement size-based separation protocol of CTCs in CRC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with different stages of CRC (n = 98) were included in the study. All patients have been diagnosed for colorectal adenocarcinoma by pathology examination, 45 patients with colon carcinoma and 53 with rectosigmoid cancer. A size-based separation method (MetaCell®) for viable CTC enrichment from peripheral blood was used to assess the presence of CTCs by cytomorphological evaluation using vital fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Cytomorphological analysis revealed that 81 (83%) tested samples were CTC-positive and 17 (17%) were CTC-negative. We report a successful isolation of CTCs with proliferation potential in patients with CRC. The CTCs were cultured in vitro for further downstream applications. Some of the isolated CTCs were able to grow in vitro for 6 months as a standard cell culture. CONCLUSIONS: We established a reliable, inexpensive and relatively fast protocol for CTCs enrichment in CRC patients by means of vital fluorescence staining which enables their further analysis in vitro.

Comparison of non-schistosomal rectosigmoid cancer and schistosomal rectosigmoid cancer.

AIM: To compare the clinicopathological features of patients with non-schistosomal rectosigmoid cancer and schistosomal rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS: All the patients with rectosigmoid carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic radical surgical resection in the Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgical Center at Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao-Tong University between October 2009 and October 2013 were included in this study. Twenty-six cases of colonic schistosomiasis diagnosed through colonoscopy and pathological examinations were collected. Symptoms, endoscopic findings and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with and without schistosomiasis in gender, age, CEA, CA19-9, preoperative biopsy findings or postoperative pathology. Patients with rectosigmoid schistosomiasis had a significantly higher CA-125 level and a larger proportion of these patients were at an early tumor stage (P = 0.003). Various morphological characteristics of schistosomiasis combined with rectosigmoid cancer could be found by colonoscopic examination: 46% were fungating mass polyps, 23% were congestive and ulcerative polyps, 23% were cauliflower-like masses, 8% were annular masses. Only 27% of the patients were diagnosed with rectal carcinoma preoperatively after the biopsy. Computed tomography (CT) scans showed thickened intestinal walls combined with linear and tram-track calcifications in 26 patients. CONCLUSION: Rectosigmoid carcinoma combined with schistosomiasis is associated with higher CA-125 values and early tumor stages. CA-125 and CT scans have a reasonable sensitivity for the accurate diagnosis.

KRAS mutation profile differences between rectosigmoid localized adenocarcinomas and colon adenocarcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer has a heterogeneous nature that is influenced by the tumour site. Many improvements have been made in identifying and characterizing the genetic alterations between colon and rectal cancers. However, there is not enough information about KRAS mutational differences between rectosigmoid and colon cancers arising elsewhere in the large bowel. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the frequency of KRAS genetic alterations between rectosigmoid cancers and colon cancers. METHODS: Eighty-four patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were included in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue sections. KRAS mutation analysis which was designed to detect the seven most common KRAS gene mutations (Gly12Ala, Gly12Asp, Gly12Arg, Gly12Cys, Gly12Ser, Gly12Val and Gly13Asp) was performed. Chi-square test was used to test the association between mutation status and other variables. RESULTS: This study represents the first KRAS mutational results from Turkish rectosigmoid cancer patients. The KRAS mutation frequency of rectosigmoid tumours is higher (34.3%, 12/35) than that of colon-localized tumours (30.6%, 15/49). However, there is no significant correlation between the KRAS mutation status and tumour location (rectosigmoid and colon). CONCLUSIONS: KRAS mutation analysis has a predictive and prognostic value in identifying tumours that may be resistant to treatment. Our study shows that differences in the biological behaviour of rectosigmoid and colon cancers should be considered. This finding highlights the importance of personalized cancer management, which could be assisted by cancer genotyping tools.

Implantation metastasis from adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon into a perianal fistula: a case report.

Implantation metastasis from a colorectal cancer into a perianal fistula is very rare. Such lesions are commonly mistaken as benign perianal abscesses or fistulas and diagnosed only after pathological analysis of surgically excised fistulas. Once diagnosed, the management of this condition remains controversial. We report a case of perianal fistula that was unexpectedly found to harbor adenocarcinoma on biopsy. Further investigation by colonoscopy and computed tomography scan revealed a sigmoid adenocarcinoma. Abdominoperineal resection was performed. Histology and immunohistochemical staining was identical in both primary and metastatic tumors. We herein review the literature on the metastasis of colorectal cancer to a benign perianal fistula presumably acquired through implantation of viable malignant cells shed from the primary tumor and discuss the approach to this rare scenario in colorectal cancer surgery.

Hartmann's procedure vs loop colostomy in the treatment of obstructive rectosigmoid cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal carcinoma is the most common malignant gastrointestinal tumour. There is still a considerable controversy when it comes to urgent surgical treatment of obstructive carcinoma of the left colon and rectum. METHODS: Seventy-five patients from the randomized trial were followed up. This study was designed as a stratified randomized trial with four stratums according to age and ASA score (older/younger than 60 years and ASA score <>3). Each of the four groups is then divided into two sub-groups according to the operating technique: loop colostomy or Hartmann's procedure. RESULTS: There were no difference found in hospitalization among the groups (loop colostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure) in the same stratus (P = 0.3192, P = 0.5760, P = 0.9023 respectively), except in the case of doing reconstructive procedure after loop colostomy (P = 0.0049) in the fourth stratum (patients younger than 60 years with ASA score lower than 3). Type of operation had no influence over the blood test values observed on admittance and during hospitalization (P = 0.319, P = 0.871, P = 0.7, P = 0.843, P = 0.52 respectively for the blood values). In terms of surgical and non-surgical complications it has been shown that there is no statistically significant difference between patients treated by two methods. Age, gender, ASA score, type of operation and surgical complications were not singled out as a risk factor for fatal outcome (P = 0.199, P = 0.155, P = 0.764, P = 0.452 and P = 0.724 respectively). The only factors that are singled out as a risk factor for death are the emergence of non-surgical complications and angina pectoris (P = 0.006, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in surgical treatment of large bowel obstruction caused by rectosigmoid carcinoma. Neither of those two methods showed significant advantage in treatment of large bowel obstruction caused by rectosigmoid cancer.