Telomere integrated scoring system of myelodysplastic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, multigene target sequencing is widely performed for the purpose of prognostic prediction and application of targeted therapy. Here, we proposed a new scoring system that encompasses gene variations, telomere length, and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) together in Asian myelodysplastic syndrome. METHODS: We developed a new scoring model of these variables: age ≥ 65 years + IPSS-R score + ASXL1 mutation + TP53 mutation + Telomere length (<5.37). According to this new scoring system, patients were divided into four groups: very good score cutoff (≤3.0), good (3.0-4.5), poor (4.5-7.0), and very poor (>7.0). RESULTS: The median OS was 170.1, 100.4, 46.0, and 12.0 months for very good, good, poor, and very poor, retrospectively (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, according to the conventional IPSS-R scoring system, the median OS was 141.3, 50.2, 93.0, 36.0, and 16.2 months for very low, low, intermediate, high, and very high, retrospectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed model incorporating molecular variations and TL yielded more clear separations of the survival curves. By adding the presence of gene mutation and telomere length to the existing IPSS-R, its predictive ability can be further improved in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Impact of marrow blasts percentage on high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome assessed using revised international prognostic scoring system.

Clinical trials and treatment guidelines for myelodysplastic syndrome depend on several prognostic scoring systems to stratify patients by risk. These include different variables: the degree of cytopenia, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and cytogenetics. Little is known about the impact of bone marrow blasts in patients with adverse cytogenetics. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 536 patients with high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome to examine the differences in survival for patients with different percentages of bone marrow blasts. The median overall survival in patients with ≥ 5% marrow blasts was not statistically different from that for patients with < 5% marrow blasts; however, the former group had a higher risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (p < 0.001). Therefore, cytogenetics is the most important factor in our prognostic tools to determine survival outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, and patients with high-risk disease have poor prognosis irrespective of their marrow blasts percentage.

Improving Revised International Prognostic Scoring System Pre-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Does Not Translate Into Better Post-Transplantation Outcomes for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Single-Center Experience.

The natural history of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is variable. The Revised International Prognostic Score (IPSS-R) is commonly used in practice to predict outcomes in patients with MDS at both diagnosis and before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the effect of change in the IPSS-R before allogeneic HSCT with chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents on post-transplantation outcomes is currently unknown. We assessed whether improvement in IPSS-R prognostic score pre-HSCT would result in improvement in clinical outcomes post-HSCT. Secondary goals included studying the effect of prognostic factors on post-transplantation survival. All patients with MDS who underwent allogeneic HSCT at the Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia between February 1997 and April 2013 were included. Pertinent information was reviewed from the program database. IPSS-R was calculated based on data from the time of MDS diagnosis and before HSCT. Outcomes of patients who had improved IPSS-R pre-HSCT were compared with those with stable or worse IPSS-R. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with P values determined using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to study the effects of the prognostic variables on OS and EFS. A total of 138 consecutive patients were included. IPSS-R improved in 62 of these patients (45%), worsened in 23 (17%), remained stable in 41 (30%), and was unknown in 12 (9%). OS was not statistically different across the improved, worsened, and stable groups (30% versus 22% versus 40%, respectively; P = .63). The cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality at 5 years were 28.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1 to 36.1) and 31.6% (95% CI, 23.8 to 39.7), respectively. The rate of relapse was 23% in patients with <5% blasts at the time of HSCT, 69% in those with 5% to 20% blasts, and 66% in those with >20% blasts (P = .0004). In the entire cohort OS was 34% and EFS was 33%. There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients who received myeloablative conditioning and those who received nonmyeloablative conditioning before HSCT (OS, 34% and 39%, respectively; P = .63 and EFS, 34% and 32%, respectively; P = .86). OS was not statistically different among patients with improved, worsened, or stable IPSS-R. On multivariate analysis, only 3 factors were associated with OS: cytogenetic risk group at diagnosis, blast count at transplantation, and the presence or absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Improving IPSS-R before HSCT does not translate into better survival outcomes. Blast count pretransplantation was highly predictive of post-transplantation outcomes.

Prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in a population-based setting: a report from the Swedish MDS register.

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have highly variable outcomes and prognostic scoring systems are important tools for risk assessment and to guide therapeutic decisions. However, few population-based studies have compared the value of the different scoring systems. With data from the nationwide Swedish population-based MDS register we validated the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised IPSS (IPSS-R) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS). We also present population-based data on incidence, clinical characteristics including detailed cytogenetics and outcome from the register. The study encompassed 1329 patients reported to the register between 2009 and 2013, 14% of these had therapy-related MDS (t-MDS). Based on the MDS register, the yearly crude incidence of MDS in Sweden was 2·9 per 100 000 inhabitants. IPSS-R had a significantly better prognostic power than IPSS (P < 0·001). There was a trend for better prognostic power of IPSS-R compared to WPSS (P = 0·05) and for WPSS compared to IPSS (P = 0·07). IPSS-R was superior to both IPSS and WPSS for patients aged ≤70 years. Patients with t-MDS had a worse outcome compared to de novo MDS (d-MDS), however, the validity of the prognostic scoring systems was comparable for d-MDS and t-MDS. In conclusion, population-based studies are important to validate prognostic scores in a 'real-world' setting. In our nationwide cohort, the IPSS-R showed the best predictive power.

Iron-chelating therapy with deferasirox in transfusion-dependent, higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective, multicentre study.

Iron chelation is controversial in higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS), outside the allogeneic transplant setting. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 51 patients with transfusion-dependent, intermediate-to-very high risk MDS, according to the revised international prognostic scoring system, treated with the oral iron chelating agent deferasirox (DFX). Thirty-six patients (71%) received azacitidine concomitantly. DFX was given at a median dose of 1000 mg/day (range 375-2500 mg) for a median of 11 months (range 0·4-75). Eight patients (16%) showed grade 2-3 toxicities (renal or gastrointestinal), 4 of whom (8%) required drug interruption. Median ferritin levels decreased from 1709 µg/l at baseline to 1100 µg/l after 12 months of treatment (P = 0·02). Seventeen patients showed abnormal transaminase levels at baseline, which improved or normalized under DFX treatment in eight cases. One patient showed a remarkable haematological improvement. At a median follow up of 35·3 months, median overall survival was 37·5 months. The results of this first survey of DFX in HR-MDS are comparable, in terms of safety and efficacy, with those observed in lower-risk MDS. Though larger, prospective studies are required to demonstrate real clinical benefits, our data suggest that DFX is feasible and might be considered in a selected cohort of HR-MDS patients.

Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry.

Baseline characteristics, disease-management and outcome of 1000 lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients within the European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) Registry are described in conjunction with the validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). The EUMDS registry confirmed established prognostic factors, such as age, gender and World Health Organization 2001 classification. Low quality of life (EQ-5D visual analogue scale score) was significantly associated with reduced survival. A high co-morbidity index predicted poor outcome in univariate analyses. The IPSS-R identified a large group of 247 patients with Low (43%) and Very low (23%) risk score within the IPSS intermediate-1 patients. The IPSS-R also identified 32 High or Very high risk patients within the IPSS intermediate-1 patients. IPSS-R was superior to the IPSS for predicting both disease progression and survival. Seventy percent of patients received MDS-specific treatment or supportive care, including red blood cell transfusions (51%), haematopoietic growth factors (58%) and iron chelation therapy (8%), within 2 years of diagnosis; while 30% of the patients only required active monitoring. The IPSS-R proved its utility as a more refined risk stratification tool for the identification of patients with a very good or poor prognosis and in this lower-risk MDS population.

Comparison of the prognostic utility of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and the French Prognostic Scoring System in azacitidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

The revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) was developed in a cohort of untreated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients. A French Prognostic Scoring System (FPSS) was recently reported to identify differential survival among azacitidine-treated patients with high-risk MDS. We applied the FPSS and IPSS-R to 150 patients previously randomized to azacitidine monotherapy or a combination of azacitidine with entinostat (a histone deacetylase inhibitor). Neither score predicted response but both discriminated patients with different overall survival (OS; median OS, FPSS: 9·7, 14·7, and 25·3 months, P = 0·018; IPSS-R: 12·5, 11·3, 20·8, and 36 months, P = 0·005). Statistical analysis suggested no improvement in OS prediction for the FPSS over the IPSS-R in azacitidine-treated patients.

Platelet count doubling after the first cycle of azacitidine therapy predicts eventual response and survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia but does not add to prognostic utility of the revised IPSS.

Reliable clinical or molecular predictors of benefit from azacitidine therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are not defined. Doubling of platelet count at start of second cycle of azacitidine therapy compared to baseline was associated with achieving response and survival advantage in a Dutch cohort. To validate this observation, we analysed a larger cohort of North American patients, whose data was collected in a prospective clinical trial with a longer median follow-up. We found a significant association between platelet count doubling after first cycle of azacitidine therapy and probability of achieving objective response. Among patients with MDS or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia (<30% bone marrow blasts, n = 102), there was a statistically significant reduction in risk of death for patients who achieved platelet count doubling (n = 23, median OS, 21·0 months) compared to those who did not (n = 79, median OS, 16·7 months, adjusted hazard ratio (no/yes)=1·88, 95% confidence interval, 1·03-3·40, P = 0·04). Nonetheless, the addition of this platelet count doubling variable did not improve the survival prediction provided by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System or the French Prognostic Scoring System. Identification of reliable and consistent predictors for clinical benefit for azacitidine therapy remains an unmet medical need and a top research priority.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and absolute monocyte count have prognostic potential in primary myelodysplastic neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), peripheral blood absolute monocyte count (AMC), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are considered biomarkers of systemic immune and inflammation response. However, their prognostic potential in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the predictive impact of PLR, MLR, and AMC on MDS outcomes. METHODS: In total, 334 patients with primary MDS were included between January 2016 and December 2021 and were retrospectively followed up until December 31, 2022. The prognostic significance of PLR, MLR, and AMC was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses, and predictive models were generated to estimate MDS outcomes. The area under their receiver operating curves was computed to compare the predictive power of these models. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had disease progression, and 103 patients died during follow-up. In multivariate analyses, a higher PLR was an adverse independent factor for overall survival (OS) (p = 0.011), whereas a higher AMC indicated shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.003). The prognostic model incorporating PLR, MLR, and AMC with the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risk categorization showed higher performance in predicting OS than the model that only utilized the IPSS-R category. CONCLUSION: Elevated PLR and increased AMC had independent prognostic value for adverse outcomes in patients with MDS. PLR, MLR, and AMC enhanced the IPSS-R risk categorization for OS prediction in MDS.

The Absolute Monocyte Count at Diagnosis Affects Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Independently of the IPSS-R Risk Score.

The absolute monocyte count (AMC) is associated with mortality in a variety of medical conditions. Its prognostic impact in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) is less well studied. Therefore, we investigated its potential prognostic value in a cohort from the Düsseldorf MDS registry in relationship to the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R). An AMC below the population's median (<0.2 × 109/L) was associated with several adverse disease features such as lower haemoglobin levels, lower count of neutrophils and platelets, and a higher percentage of blasts in the bone marrow. MDS patients with an AMC < 0.2 × 109/L had a significantly higher risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a univariate, proportional hazards model the effect of the AMC as a continuous variable was modelled via p-splines. We found a U-shaped effect with the lowest hazard around 0.3 × 109/L. Accordingly, an AMC within the last quartile of the population (0.4 × 109/L) was associated with a reduced overall survival independently of IPSS-R, but not with the risk of secondary AML. Considering monocytopenia as a risk factor for AML progression in MDS may provide an additional argument for allogeneic transplantation or the use of hypomethylating agents in patients who are not clear candidates for those treatments according to current prognostic scoring systems and/or recommendations. Further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of the AMC in the context of prognostic scoring systems, considering the molecular risk profile, and to identify the mechanisms responsible for the higher mortality in MDS patients with a subtle monocytosis.

Real-world practice-based prognostic model for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine monotherapy: The Kyoto prognostic scoring system.

The prognostic impact of patient-related factors, including age, nutritional parameters, and inflammation status, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) has been largely unexplored. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to establish a real-world practice-based prognostic model for HR-MDS by considering both disease- and patient-related parameters in 233 patients treated with AZA monotherapy at seven institutions. We found that anemia, presence of circulating blasts in peripheral blood, low absolute lymphocyte count, low total cholesterol (T-cho) and albumin serum levels, complex karyotype, and del(7q) or - 7 were poor prognostic factors. Therefore, we developed a new prognostic model called the Kyoto Prognostic Scoring System (KPSS) by incorporating the two variables with the highest C-indexes (complex karyotype and serum T-cho level). The KPSS classified patients into the following three groups: good (0 risk factors), intermediate (1), and poor (2). Median overall survival for these groups was 24.4, 11.3, and 6.9, respectively (p < 0.001). The discriminatory power of the KPSS was higher than that of the traditional International Prognostic Scoring System. In conclusion, we identified several nutritional parameters with prognostic relevance in patients with HR-MDS and generated a prognostic model consisting of complex karyotype and serum T-cho level that enabled excellent risk stratification.

BMT for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: When and Where and How.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a diverse group of hematological malignancies distinguished by a combination of dysplasia in the bone marrow, cytopenias and the risk of leukemic transformation. The hallmark of MDS is bone marrow failure which occurs due to selective growth of somatically mutated clonal hematopoietic stem cells. Multiple prognostic models have been developed to help predict survival and leukemic transformation, including the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS), revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R), WHO prognostic scoring system (WPSS) and MD Anderson prognostic scoring system (MDAPSS). This risk stratification informs management as low risk (LR)-MDS treatment focuses on improving quality of life and cytopenias, while the treatment of high risk (HR)-MDS focuses on delaying disease progression and improving survival. While therapies such as erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), erythroid maturation agents (EMAs), immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMIDs), and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) may provide benefit, allogeneic blood or marrow transplant (alloBMT) is the only treatment that can offer cure for MDS. However, this therapy is marred, historically, by high rates of toxicity and transplant related mortality (TRM). Because of this, alloBMT is considered in a minority of MDS patients. With modern techniques, alloBMT has become a suitable option even for patients of advanced age or with significant comorbidities, many of whom who would not have been considered for transplant in prior years. Hence, a formal transplant evaluation to weigh the complex balance of patient and disease related factors and determine the potential benefit of transplant should be considered early in the disease course for most MDS patients. Once alloBMT is recommended, timing is a crucial consideration since delaying transplant can lead to disease progression and development of other comorbidities that may preclude transplant. Despite the success of alloBMT, relapse remains a major barrier to success and novel approaches are necessary to mitigate this risk and improve long term cure rates. This review describes various factors that should be considered when choosing patients with MDS who should pursue transplant, approaches and timing of transplant, and future directions of the field.

Evaluation of azacitidine in patients with transplant-ineligible myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes in a Japanese clinical setting.

Patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with azacitidine (AZA) have exhibited improved overall survival. However, information on AZA in real-world settings is limited. The present study retrospectively analyzed 85 patients with MDS treated with AZA. Complete response was achieved in 24% of cases and hematologic improvement in 29%. Severe adverse events (grade ≥3) included neutropenia and infection. Multivariate analysis identified higher revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) and male sex as significant factors affecting survival. However, the present study did not identify any significant associations between patient characteristics and response to AZA. In conclusion, AZA could produce a hematologic response in ~53% of patients with MDS. Furthermore, IPSS-R may reflect MDS prognosis. Further studies are required to establish the criteria for identifying patients likely to obtain maximum benefit from AZA treatment.

Integration Analysis of JAK2 or RUNX1 Mutation With Bone Marrow Blast Can Improve Risk Stratification in the Patients With Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Despite the improvements in prognostication of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), there remain a portion of patients with lower risk (low/intermediate risk, LR) but poor prognostics. This study aimed to evaluate the relative contribution of mutational status when added to the IPSS-R, for estimating overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with LR-MDS. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory variables of 328 patients diagnosed with MDS according to the FAB criteria. Twenty-nine-gene NGS assay was applied to bone marrow samples obtained at diagnosis. 233 (71.04%) patients were classified as LR-MDS. Univariate analysis showed association between inferior outcome (OS and PFS) and presence of JAK2 (p = 0.0177, p = 0.0002), RUNX1 (p = 0.0250, p = 0.0387), and U2AF1 (p = 0.0227, p = 0.7995) mutations. Multivariable survival analysis revealed JAK2 (p < 0.0001) and RUNX1 (p = 0.0215) mutations were independently prognostic for PFS in LR-MDS. Interestingly, bone marrow blast >1.5% could further predict disease progression of patients with LR-MDS (HR 8.06, 95%CI 2.95-22.04, p < 0.0001). Incorporation of JAK2, RUNX1 mutation and bone marrow blast in the IPSS-R can improve risk stratification in patients with LR-MDS. In summary, our result provided new risk factors for LR-MDS prognostics to identify candidates for early therapeutic intervention.

Decision Analysis of Transplantation for Patients with Myelodysplasia: "Who Should We Transplant Today?"

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous hematological disorder characterized by a spectrum of clinical presentation, cytogenetic, and somatic gene mutations and the risk of transformation to acute leukemia. Management options include observation, supportive care, blood transfusion, administration of growth factors and/or hypomethylating agents, and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) either upfront or after disease progression. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, HCT is the only curative therapy available for patients with MDS, with multiple factors such as donor availability, patient, and disease characteristics being involved in making the decision to proceed with transplant. In this article, we summarize (1) overall prognosis and natural history of MDS, (2) currently available non-HCT therapy with a focus on hypomethylating agents (HMA), (3) outcomes after HCT in patients with MDS, (4) factors to be considered to proceed to HCT for treatment of MDS, and (5) more recent/ongoing studies relevant to HCT decision-making processes.

Dichotomization of the new revised international prognostic scoring system for a better clinical stratification of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

In clinical practice, patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are usually classified in low or high-risk groups to take therapeutic decisions, conservative for low-risk, whereas active for high-risk. Nevertheless, in the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) is not well stated which patients are low or high-risk. This study was aimed to ascertain in 364 MDS patients which IPSS-R threshold better dichotomized in low vs. high-risk. The best dichotomization was obtained with an IPSS-R cut-point of 3. Accordingly, 68% patients were classified as low-risk (median OS, 61.3 months) and 32% as high-risk MDS (median OS, 13.9 months) (p < .001). Interestingly, the intermediate IPSS-R risk patients presented an OS more related to the high IPSS-R than to the low IPSS-R risk group. In conclusion, an IPSS-R cut-point of 3 led to a meaningful stratification in low and high-risk that can be helpful for the clinical management of MDS patients.

Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents do not influence post-transplant survival in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Information on the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in MDS is limited. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 172 adult MDS patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2000 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 - pre-transplant blasts <5% with HMA (n = 42), group 2 - pre-transplant blasts ≥5% with HMA (n = 38), group 3 - no HMA (n = 92). With a median follow up of 4.08 years, 1-year survival and relapse rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 75%, 40.2%, and 60.71%, respectively; and 17.6%, 26.6%, and 9.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed adverse relapse (HR 3.54; p = .03) in group 2 compared to groups 1 and 3, while no difference in overall survival was noticed. Our study shows no survival association with pre-transplant HMA; although, higher relapse rate was observed in the non-responding patients indicating possible chemotherapy resistant disease.

Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Pakistan: Clinicohematological Characteristics, Cytogenetic Profile, and Risk Stratification.

OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a group of bone marrow diseases that not only have variable morphological presentation and heterogeneous clinical courses but also have a wide range of cytogenetic abnormalities. Clinicohematological parameters have a significant role in diagnosis and along with identification of cytogenetic abnormalities are important for prognostic scoring and risk stratification of patients to plan management and make treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine the clinicohematological characteristics, cytogenetic abnormalities, and risk stratification of newly diagnosed de novo MDS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Hematology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, from January 2013 to January 2017. Patients were diagnosed on the basis of World Health Organization criteria for MDS, clinicohematological parameters were noted, and cytogenetic analysis was performed. Risk stratification was done using the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. RESULTS: A total of 178 cases of MDS were analyzed, including 119 males (66.9%) and 59 females (33.1%). The median age was 58 years. The most common presenting feature was anemia in 162 (91%) of the patients. MDS with multilineage dysplasia was the most common diagnosis, seen in 103 (57.9%) patients. A normal karyotype was seen in 95 (53.4%), while 83 (46.6%) showed clonal karyotypic abnormalities at diagnosis. Of these, the common abnormalities found were trisomy 8, complex karyotype, and del 5q. Risk stratification revealed low-risk disease in 73 (41%) patients. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic analysis showed the normal karyotype to be the most common while risk stratification revealed a predominance of low-risk disease at the time of presentation.

No benefit of hypomethylating agents compared to supportive care for higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study evaluated the role of hypomethylating agents (HMA) compared to best supportive care (BSC) for patients with high or very-high (H/VH) risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. METHODS: A total of 279 H/VH risk MDS patients registered in the Korean MDS Working Party database were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: HMA therapy was administered to 205 patients (73.5%), including 31 patients (11.1%) who then received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), while 74 patients (26.5%) received BSC or allo-HCT without HMA. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53.1% ± 10.7% for allo-HCT with HMA, 75% ± 21.7% for allo-HCT without HMA, 17.3% ± 3.6% for HMA, and 20.8% ± 6.9% for BSC groups (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only allo-HCT was related with favorable OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.356; p = 0.002), while very poor cytogenetic risk (HR, 5.696; p = 0.042), age ≥ 65 years (HR, 1.578; p = 0.022), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 to 4 (HR, 2.837; p < 0.001), and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (HR, 1.901; p = 0.001) all had an adverse effect on OS. CONCLUSION: For the H/VH risk group, very poor cytogenetic risk, age ≥ 65 years, ECOG PS 2 to 4, and AML transformation were poor prognostic factors. HMA showed no benefit in terms of OS when compared to BSC. Allo-HCT was the only factor predicting a favorable long-term outcome. The use of HMA therapy did not seem to have an adverse effect on the transplantation outcomes. However, the conclusion of this study should be carefully interpreted and proven by large scale research in the future.

PAS positivity of erythroid precursor cells is associated with a poor prognosis in newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a group of clonal stem cell disorders characterized by hematopoietic insufficiency. The accurate risk stratification of patients with MDS is essential for selection of appropriate therapies. We herein conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the prognostic value of periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction-positive erythroblasts in MDS patients. We examined the PAS positivity of the bone marrow erythroblasts of 144 patients newly diagnosed with MDS; 26 (18.1%) of them had PAS-positive erythroblasts, whereas 118 (81.9%) did not. The PAS-positive group showed significantly poorer karyotypes as defined in the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) and higher scores in age-adjusted IPSS-R (IPSS-RA) than the PAS-negative group. Overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were also significantly shorter in the PAS-positive group than in the PAS-negative group. Similar results were obtained when only high- and very high risk groups were analyzed using IPSS-RA. This retrospective study suggested that the PAS positivity of erythroblasts is an additional prognostic factor combined with other risk scores for OS and LFS in MDS, and our results may contribute to improved clinical decision-making and rapid risk stratification.