A systematic review of cost-effective treatment of postoperative rotator cuff repairs.

OBJECTIVE: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative combines payment of multiple services for episodes of care into 1 bundle. Rotator cuff repair is a likely candidate for future inclusion. The objective of this study was to determine cost-effective, high-quality postoperative rehabilitation dosing and cryotherapy for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair based on systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Systematic review of level I and level II articles was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Databases, and PEDro. Conference references and bibliographies were also reviewed. For postoperative therapy, keywords included rotator cuff, rotator cuff repair, exercise therapy, exercise, unsupervised, self-care, postoperative period, physical therapy, and physiotherapy; for cryotherapy, keywords included rotator cuff repair, shoulder, cryotherapy, and ice. RESULTS: Five studies compared postoperative outcomes in participants assigned to supervised therapy vs. unsupervised therapy. Three found no difference between groups. One found improved outcomes in supervised therapy. Limitations included that therapies were not consistently defined and significant methodologic issues were present, decreasing the applicability and validity of the results. Five articles examined cryotherapy outcomes in the postoperative shoulder. Two studies showed improved patient outcomes with cryotherapy vs. no cryotherapy; 2 studies showed no decrease in joint space temperatures at 90 minutes but decrease in temperature at 4 to 23 hours postoperatively. One study indicated that an ice bag and Ace bandage might be as effective as continuous, compressive cryotherapy units using patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to determine effective dosing of physical therapy after rotator cuff repair. Cryotherapy is favorable and cost-effective using simple methods for delivery.

Progressive Transition From Supervised to Unsupervised Robot-Assisted Therapy After Stroke: Protocol for a Single-Group, Interventional Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the dose of therapy delivered to patients with stroke may improve functional outcomes and quality of life. Unsupervised technology-assisted rehabilitation is a promising way to increase the dose of therapy without dramatically increasing the burden on the health care system. Despite the many existing technologies for unsupervised rehabilitation, active rehabilitation robots have rarely been tested in a fully unsupervised way. Furthermore, the outcomes of unsupervised technology-assisted therapy (eg, feasibility, acceptance, and increase in therapy dose) vary widely. This might be due to the use of different technologies as well as to the broad range of methods applied to teach the patients how to independently train with a technology. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the study design of a clinical study investigating the feasibility of unsupervised therapy with an active robot and of a systematic approach for the progressive transition from supervised to unsupervised use of a rehabilitation technology in a clinical setting. The effect of unsupervised therapy on achievable therapy dose, user experience in this therapy setting, and the usability of the rehabilitation technology are also evaluated. METHODS: Participants of the clinical study are inpatients of a rehabilitation clinic with subacute stroke undergoing a 4-week intervention where they train with a hand rehabilitation robot. The first week of the intervention is supervised by a therapist, who teaches participants how to interact and train with the device. The second week consists of minimally supervised therapy, where the therapist is present but intervenes only if needed as participants exercise with the device. If the participants properly learn how to train with the device, they proceed to the unsupervised phase and train without any supervision during the third and fourth weeks. Throughout the duration of the study, data on feasibility and therapy dose (ie, duration and repetitions) are collected. Usability and user experience are evaluated at the end of the second (ie, minimally supervised) and fourth (ie, unsupervised) weeks, allowing us to investigate the effect of therapist absence. RESULTS: As of April 2023, 13 patients were recruited and completed the protocol, with no reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study will inform on the feasibility of fully unsupervised rehabilitation with an active rehabilitation robot in a clinical setting and its effect on therapy dose. Furthermore, if successful, the proposed systematic approach for a progressive transition from supervised to unsupervised technology-assisted rehabilitation could serve as a benchmark to allow for easier comparisons between different technologies. This approach could also be extended to the application of such technologies in the home environment, as the supervised and minimally supervised sessions could be performed in the clinic, followed by unsupervised therapy at home after discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388891; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04388891. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48485.