Prehospital Tranexamic Acid for Severe Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Whether prehospital administration of tranexamic acid increases the likelihood of survival with a favorable functional outcome among patients with major trauma and suspected trauma-induced coagulopathy who are being treated in advanced trauma systems is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults with major trauma who were at risk for trauma-induced coagulopathy to receive tranexamic acid (administered intravenously as a bolus dose of 1 g before hospital admission, followed by a 1-g infusion over a period of 8 hours after arrival at the hospital) or matched placebo. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months after injury, as assessed with the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). Levels on the GOS-E range from 1 (death) to 8 ("upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]). We defined survival with a favorable functional outcome as a GOS-E level of 5 ("lower moderate disability") or higher. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause within 28 days and within 6 months after injury. RESULTS: A total of 1310 patients were recruited by 15 emergency medical services in Australia, New Zealand, and Germany. Of these patients, 661 were assigned to receive tranexamic acid, and 646 were assigned to receive placebo; the trial-group assignment was unknown for 3 patients. Survival with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months occurred in 307 of 572 patients (53.7%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 299 of 559 (53.5%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.12; P = 0.95). At 28 days after injury, 113 of 653 patients (17.3%) in the tranexamic acid group and 139 of 637 (21.8%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). By 6 months, 123 of 648 patients (19.0%) in the tranexamic acid group and 144 of 629 (22.9%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.03). The number of serious adverse events, including vascular occlusive events, did not differ meaningfully between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with major trauma and suspected trauma-induced coagulopathy who were being treated in advanced trauma systems, prehospital administration of tranexamic acid followed by an infusion over 8 hours did not result in a greater number of patients surviving with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months than placebo. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; PATCH-Trauma ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02187120.).

Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid at the time of cesarean delivery has been shown to decrease the calculated blood loss, but the effect on the need for blood transfusions is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery at 31 U.S. hospitals to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo after umbilical-cord clamping. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days post partum, whichever came first. Key secondary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter (prespecified as a major secondary outcome), interventions for bleeding and related complications, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in the hemoglobin level, and postpartum infectious complications. Adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11,000 participants underwent randomization (5529 to the tranexamic acid group and 5471 to the placebo group); scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the deliveries in the respective groups. A primary-outcome event occurred in 201 of 5525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 233 of 5470 (4.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; 95.26% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.07; P = 0.19). Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter occurred in 7.3% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 8.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.05). Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 18.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97); the change in the hemoglobin level was -1.8 g per deciliter and -1.9 g per deciliter, respectively (mean difference, -0.1 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1); and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61). The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during cesarean delivery did not lead to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome of maternal death or blood transfusion than placebo. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03364491.).

Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative bleeding is common in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic drug that may safely decrease such bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a trial involving patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tranexamic acid (1-g intravenous bolus) or placebo at the start and end of surgery (reported here) and, with the use of a partial factorial design, a hypotension-avoidance or hypertension-avoidance strategy (not reported here). The primary efficacy outcome was life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ (composite bleeding outcome) at 30 days. The primary safety outcome was myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism (composite cardiovascular outcome) at 30 days. To establish the noninferiority of tranexamic acid to placebo for the composite cardiovascular outcome, the upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio had to be below 1.125, and the one-sided P value had to be less than 0.025. RESULTS: A total of 9535 patients underwent randomization. A composite bleeding outcome event occurred in 433 of 4757 patients (9.1%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 561 of 4778 patients (11.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.87; absolute difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.4; two-sided P<0.001 for superiority). A composite cardiovascular outcome event occurred in 649 of 4581 patients (14.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 639 of 4601 patients (13.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.14; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 1.14; absolute difference, 0.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 1.7; one-sided P = 0.04 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the incidence of the composite bleeding outcome was significantly lower with tranexamic acid than with placebo. Although the between-group difference in the composite cardiovascular outcome was small, the noninferiority of tranexamic acid was not established. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; POISE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03505723.).

Tranexamic acid in upper gastrointestinal bleed in patients with cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B and C cirrhosis with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) have systemic as well as localized (in the mucosa of the esophagus and stomach) fibrinolysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the treatment of acute UGIB in patients with cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A total of 600 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B or C) presenting with UGIB were randomly allocated to either the tranexamic acid (n=300) or the placebo group (n=300). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients developing 5-day treatment failure. Failure to control bleeding by day 5 was seen in 19/300 (6.3%) patients in the tranexamic acid group and 40/300 (13.3%) patients in the placebo group ( p =0.006). Esophageal endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) site as a source of failure to control bleeding by day 5 among patients undergoing first-time esophageal EVL (excluding patients with a previous post-EVL ulcer as a source of bleed) was seen in 11/222 (4.9%) patients in the tranexamic acid group and 27/225 (1212.0%) patients in the placebo group ( p =0.005). However, 5-day and 6-week mortality was similar in the tranexamic acid and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid significantly reduces the failure to control bleeding by day 5 and failure to prevent rebleeding after day 5 to 6 weeks in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B or C) presenting with UGIB, by preventing bleeding from the EVL site.

Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Blood Loss after Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid has been associated with reduced postpartum blood loss after cesarean delivery in several small trials, but evidence of its benefit in this clinical context remains inconclusive. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned women undergoing cesarean delivery before or during labor at 34 or more gestational weeks to receive an intravenously administered prophylactic uterotonic agent and either tranexamic acid (1 g) or placebo. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as a calculated estimated blood loss greater than 1000 ml or receipt of a red-cell transfusion within 2 days after delivery. Secondary outcomes included gravimetrically estimated blood loss, provider-assessed clinically significant postpartum hemorrhage, use of additional uterotonic agents, and postpartum blood transfusion. RESULTS: Of the 4551 women who underwent randomization, 4431 underwent cesarean delivery, 4153 (93.7%) of whom had primary outcome data available. The primary outcome occurred in 556 of 2086 women (26.7%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 653 of 2067 (31.6%) in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.94; P = 0.003). There were no significant between-group differences in mean gravimetrically estimated blood loss or in the percentage of women with provider-assessed clinically significant postpartum hemorrhage, use of additional uterotonic agents, or postpartum blood transfusion. Thromboembolic events in the 3 months after delivery occurred in 0.4% of women (8 of 2049) who received tranexamic acid and in 0.1% of women (2 of 2056) who received placebo (adjusted risk ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 0.85 to 18.92; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Among women who underwent cesarean delivery and received prophylactic uterotonic agents, tranexamic acid treatment resulted in a significantly lower incidence of calculated estimated blood loss greater than 1000 ml or red-cell transfusion by day 2 than placebo, but it did not result in a lower incidence of hemorrhage-related secondary clinical outcomes. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; TRAAP2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03431805.).

Tranexamic Acid: An Evergreen Hemostatic Agent.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an important antifibrinolytic agent, which inhibits plasminogen activation and fibrinolysis. Several controlled randomized trials have investigated the role of TXA in preventing or decreasing blood loss across different surgical interventions or medical conditions characterized by excessive bleeding, consistently documenting its effectiveness and safety. Although the first clinical use of TXA dates back to more than 60 years ago, TXA remains the focus of intense research. This narrative review summarizes the more recent results and indications on the clinical use of TXA.

Prophylactic tranexamic acid in patients with hematologic malignancy: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Evidence of the effectiveness of prophylactic use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in thrombocytopenia is lacking. To determine whether TXA safely reduces bleeding incidence in patients undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted from June 2016 through June 2020. Of 3120 screened adults, 356 patients were eligible and enrolled, and 337 patients (mean age, 53.9; 141 [41.8%] women), randomized to 1300 mg TXA orally or 1000 mg TXA through IV (n = 168) vs placebo (n = 169) thrice daily for maximum 30 days. Three hundred thirty patients were activated when their platelet counts fell below 30 000 per µL; 279 (83%) had complete outcome ascertainment. World Health Organization (WHO) grade ≥2 bleeding was observed in the 30 days following activation in 50.3% (73/145) and 54.2% (78/144) of patients in the TXA and placebo groups, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.34; P = .44). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of platelet transfusions (mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -1.9 to 2.0), mean days alive without grade ≥2 bleeding (mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -0.4 to 2.0), thrombotic events (6/163 [3.7%] TXA, 9/163 [5.5%] placebo), or deaths due to serious bleeding. Most common adverse events were: diarrhea (116/164 [70.7%] TXA and 114/163 [69.9%] placebo); febrile neutropenia (111/164 [67.7%] TXA, 105/163 [64.4%] placebo); fatigue (106/164 [64.6%] TXA, 109/163 [66.9%] placebo); and nausea (104/164 [63.4%] TXA, 97/163 [59.5%] placebo). Among patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prophylactic treatment with TXA compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the risk of WHO grade ≥2 bleeding.

Lack of efficacy of aprotinin over tranexamic acid in type A aortic dissection repair.

BACKGROUND: The role of aprotinin in modern cardiac surgery is not well defined. While licensed for use in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting it is more commonly used for cases deemed to be at an increased risk of bleeding. The relative efficacy, and safety profile, of aprotinin as compared to other antifibrinolytics in these high-risk cases is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study with propensity matching to determine whether aprotinin versus tranexamic acid reduced bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients presenting for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection (TAD). RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2022, 250 patients presented for repair of TAD. A total of 231 patients were included in the final analysis. Bleeding and transfusion were similar between both groups in both propensity matched and unmatched cohorts. Compared to tranexamic acid, aprotinin use did not reduce transfusion requirements for any product. Rates of bleeding in the first 12 h, return to theater and return to intensive care unit with an open packed chest were similar between groups. There was no difference in rates of renal failure, stroke, or death. CONCLUSION: Aprotinin did not reduce the risk of bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients undergoing repair of type A aortic dissections. Efficacy of aprotinin may vary depending on the type of surgery performed and the underlying pathology.

Tranexamic acid in trauma: After 3 hours from injury, when is it safe and effective to use again?

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has proven mortality benefit if used early after traumatic injury, likely related to a combination of bleeding reduction and other non-bleeding effects. If TXA is given more than 3 h after traumatic injury, there is a significant and paradoxical increased risk of death due to bleeding. TXA has level 1 evidence for use as a bleeding reduction agent in isolated orthopedic operations, but in polytrauma patients undergoing orthopedic operations, it is not clear if and when TXA is safe or effective once outside the 3-h window of proven trauma efficacy.

Use of crushed tranexamic acid tablets in water for paediatric patients with bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: Ε-Aminocaproic acid oral solution (EACA OS) is the only commercially available antifibrinolytic for patients who cannot swallow tablets. Insurance denials and high costs remain barriers to its use. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of crushed tranexamic acid tablets in water (cTXAw) for children with bleeding disorders. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of children (<10 years) with bleeding disorders who received cTXAw or EACA OS from 1 December 2018, through 31 July 2022, at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota). Bleeding outcomes were defined according to ISTH criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included (median age, 3 years; male, n = 23). Diagnoses were VWD (n = 17), haemophilia (n = 5), FVII deficiency (n = 3), inherited platelet disorder (n = 4), ITP (n = 2), and combined FV and FVII deficiencies (n = 1). Thirty-two courses of cTXAw (monotherapy 24/32; mean duration 6 days) and fifteen courses of EACA (monotherapy 12/15; mean duration 5 days) were administered. No surgical procedures (n = 28) were complicated by bleeding. Of the 19 bleeding events, 16 had effective haemostasis, two had no reported outcome, and one had no response. cTXAw and EACA were equally effective in preventing and treating bleeding (p value > .1). No patients had adverse effects. Eight of 19 patients (42%) who were initially prescribed EACA OS did not receive it because of cost or insurance denial. The estimated average wholesale price of one treatment was $94 for cTXAw and $905 for EACA OS. CONCLUSIONS: CTXAw appears to be an effective, safe, and low-cost alternative option to EACA OS for young children with bleeding disorders.

Rare bleeding disorders: Advances in management.

Inherited factor coagulation deficiencies and vascular bleeding disorders, associated with bleeding of various severity, are often classified as rare bleeding disorders (RBDs). These include inherited fibrinogen disorders, inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD) and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). In the last decades, there have been large increases in knowledge on the epidemiology, genetics, physiopathology, clinical features, and diagnosis of RBDs, but improvements in management have been more limited and remain challenging. The treatment mainstay of RBDs is based only on replacement of a few available coagulation factor concentrates or cryoprecipitates. There is growing interest in therapeutic agents that enhance coagulation or inhibiting anticoagulant pathways in RBDs. In severe IPFD, the optimal platelet transfusion strategy is not yet established. Moreover, data is scarce on the effectiveness and safety of desmopressin and/or antifibrinolytic drugs often used for milder IPFD treatment. The best fibrinogen replacement strategy (prophylaxis vs. on demand) in afibrinogenemia is still debated. Similarly, the optimal trough fibrinogen target level for treatment of acute bleeding, and the role of fibrinogen replacement during pregnancy in mild hypofibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia, have not been properly evaluated. The therapeutic arsenal in HHT includes antifibrinolytics and a series of antiangiogenic agents whose potential efficacy has been tested in small studies or are under investigation for treatment of bleeding. However, there is need to address several issues, including the optimal dosing strategies, the potential emergent toxicity of longer-term use, and the impact of systemic antiangiogenic treatment on visceral arteriovenous malformations.

Tranexamic acid reduces perioperative blood transfusions following open radical cystectomy - a propensity-score matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy is associated with bleeding and high transfusion rates, presenting challenges in patient management. This study investigated the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during radical cystectomy. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with radical cystectomy at a tertiary care university center were included from a prospectively maintained database. After an institutional change in the cystectomy protocol patients received 1 g of intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid as prophylaxis. To prevent bias, propensity score matching was applied, accounting for differences in preoperative hemoglobin, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor stage, and surgeon experience. Key outcomes included transfusion rates, complications, and occurrence of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: In total, 420 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 35 received tranexamic acid. After propensity score matching, 32 patients and 32 controls were matched with regard to clinicopathologic characteristics. Tranexamic acid significantly reduced the number of patients who received transfusions compared to controls (19% [95%-Confidence interval = 8.3; 37.1] vs. 47% [29.8; 64.8]; p = 0.033). Intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rates were lower with tranexamic acid, though not statistically significant (6% [1.5; 23.2] vs. 19% [8.3; 37.1], and 16% [6.3; 33.7] vs. 38% [21.9; 56.1]; p = 0.257 and p = 0.089, respectively). The occurrence of venous thromboembolism did not differ significantly between the groups (9% [2.9; 26.7] vs. 3% [0.4; 20.9]; p = 0.606). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic tranexamic administration, using a simplified preoperative dosing regimen of 1 g as a bolus, significantly lowered the rate of blood transfusion after cystectomy. This exploratory study indicates the potential of tranexamic acid in enhancing outcomes of open radical cystectomy.

Association between tranexamic acid administration and mortality based on the trauma phenotype: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In trauma systems, criteria for individualised and optimised administration of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, are yet to be established. This study used nationwide cohort data from Japan to evaluate the association between TXA and in-hospital mortality among all patients with blunt trauma based on clinical phenotypes (trauma phenotypes). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) spanning 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: Of 80,463 patients with trauma registered in the JTDB, 53,703 met the inclusion criteria, and 8046 (15.0%) received TXA treatment. The patients were categorised into eight trauma phenotypes. After adjusting with inverse probability treatment weighting, in-hospital mortality of the following trauma phenotypes significantly reduced with TXA administration: trauma phenotype 1 (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81]), trauma phenotype 2 (OR 0.73 [0.66-0.81]), trauma phenotype 6 (OR 0.52 [0.39-0.70]), and trauma phenotype 8 (OR 0.67 [0.60-0.75]). Conversely, trauma phenotypes 3 (OR 2.62 [1.98-3.47]) and 4 (OR 1.39 [1.11-1.74]) exhibited a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between TXA administration and survival outcomes based on clinical phenotypes. We found an association between trauma phenotypes and in-hospital mortality, indicating that treatment with TXA could potentially influence this relationship. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of these phenotypes.

Viscoelastic coagulation monitoring for tranexamic acid: personalised antifibrinolytic dosing?

Ex vivo viscoelastic testing can be used to assess the concentration responses to tranexamic acid in blood samples obtained from pregnant women across the three trimesters and in non-pregnant controls. Minor variations in fibrinolysis across pregnancy suggest a target tranexamic acid blood concentration of 12.5 mg L-1 for complete inhibition of fibrinolysis. Although the data support the potential utility of viscoelastic testing using the ClotPro® TPA test in maintaining therapeutic tranexamic acid concentrations during postpartum haemorrhage, it might obscure potentially crucial endogenous fibrinolysis inhibitor interactions essential to the microcirculation.

Improved outcome with individualised antifibrinolytic therapy: what is the evidence?

Viscoelastic haemostatic testing (VHT) has been used to determine hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinolysis. When modified by addition of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), VHT has been suggested to assess responses to antifibrinolytic therapy and to estimate the concentration of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Despite some evidence that tPA-modified VHT might allow individualisation of antifibrinolytic therapy, further studies are warranted to prove its clinical benefit for postsurgical bleeding, transfusion of blood products, and thromboembolic events.

Point-of-care testing for tranexamic acid efficacy: a proof-of-concept study in cardiac surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) has been recently recommended for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce associated complications. Although point-of-care laboratory tests for TXA concentrations are unavailable, a novel TPA-test on the ClotPro® system can measure TXA-induced inhibition of fibrinolysis. We evaluated the performance of the TPA-test in vitro and in patients undergoing surgery requiring CPB. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from six volunteers for in vitro evaluation of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-triggered fibrinolysis and the effects of TXA. This was followed by an observational study in 20 cardiac surgery patients to assess clinical effects of TXA on the TPA-test. RESULTS: Hyperfibrinolysis induced by tPA was inhibited by TXA ≥2 mg L-1 in a concentration-dependent manner, and was completely inhibited at TXA ≥10 mg L-1. In patients undergoing CPB, antifibrinolytic effect was detectable on TPA-test parameters after a 0.1 g bolus of TXA at the end of CPB, and complete inhibition of fibrinolysis was obtained with TXA ≥0.5 g. The antifibrinolytic effects of 1 g TXA on TPA-test parameters were gradually attenuated over 18 h after surgery. However, the fibrinolytic inhibition continued in four patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤30 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. The eGFR had strong correlations with TPA-test parameters at 18 h after surgery (r=0.86-0.92; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The TPA-test is sensitive to low concentrations of TXA and serves as a practical monitoring tool for postoperative fibrinolytic activity in cardiac surgery patients. This test might be particularly useful in patients with severe renal impairment.

Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors. SUMMARY: TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.

The effect of tranexamic acid on blood transfusion in lower gastrointestinal bleeding-A double blind prospective randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency. Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces clot breakdown by inhibiting the action of plasmin and has been shown to reduce the need for blood transfusion in trauma, surgical procedures, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study examined the efficiency of intravenous TXA in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Eighty-one patients aged >18 years with lower GI hemorrhage, presenting as active rectal bleeding and anemia (hemoglobin lower than 11 g/dL or a decrease of 2 gr/dl from the patient's base level), were enrolled in this single center, double blind prospective research. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous TXA or placebo from admission until colonoscopy took place. The need for transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and number of units was recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized in this study, thirty-nine in the TXA arm, and forty-two in the placebo arm. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups. Forty-three out of the 81 patients received blood transfusion; twenty-two were on the placebo arm and twenty-one on the TXA arm (p = 0.89). Twenty-nine patients required 2 or more units, 14 in the TXA arm and 15 in the placebo arm (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous TXA has no significant effect on blood requirement in patients with lower GI bleeding. There was no difference in the consumption of PRBC units among the patients in the placebo and TXA groups. It seems that tranexamic acid has no significant effect on transfusion of PRBC units in lower GI bleeding.

Efficacy of perioperative systemic tranexamic acid along with topical hemocoagulase in decreasing axillary drain output in breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Excess and prolonged axillary drainage is a frequent nuisance following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients. No consensus exists about the best method to prevent this consistently and reliably. Tranexamic acid (TA) has been found to reduce the amount and duration of drainage, but the reduction is not optimal. We hypothesized that systemic administration of TA along with the topical application of hemocoagulase (H) to the axillary dissection bed may decrease the cumulative axillary drain output and shorten the requirement of drainage after ALND as compared to placebo. PATIENT AND METHODS: Seventy women undergoing ALND for breast carcinoma were randomized into two groups, the intervention (TA + H) group and the control (C) group. The cumulative drain output (primary objective), duration of drainage, incidence of seroma formation after drain removal, number of seroma aspirations required, volume of seroma aspirated, and incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) were compared. RESULTS: The mean cumulative output in the TA + H group was significantly lower than the C group (290 ± 200 mL vs. 552 ± 369 mL, p < 0.001). Axillary drains were removed significantly earlier in the TA + H group (6.6 ± 2.2 vs. 11.7 ± 6.0 days, p < 0.001), but the incidence of seroma formation (p = 0.34), number of aspirations required (p = 0.33), volume of seroma aspirated (p = 0.47), and the incidence of SSI (p = 0.07) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative systemic administration of tranexamic acid along with topical application of H to the axillary dissection bed is effective in reducing cumulative axillary drain output after ALND. This strategy may also facilitate earlier removal of suction drains.

Tranexamic Acid Administration During Liver Transplantation Is Not Associated With Lower Blood Loss or With Reduced Utilization of Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines recommend antifibrinolytic treatment for liver transplantation to reduce blood loss and transfusion utilization. However, the clinical relevance of fibrinolysis during liver transplantation is questionable, a benefit of tranexamic acid (TXA) in this context is not supported by sufficient evidence, and adverse effects are also conceivable. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that use of TXA is associated with reduced blood loss. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2004 and 2017 at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to determine the association between TXA administration and the primary end point intraoperative blood loss and the secondary end point intra- and postoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. For further secondary outcome analyses, the time to the first occurrence of a composite end point of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and thrombosis of the inferior vena cava were analyzed using a univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Data from 779 transplantations were included in the final analysis. The median intraoperative blood loss was 3000 mL (1600-5500 mL). Intraoperative TXA administration occurred in 262 patients (33.6%) with an average dose of 1.4 ± 0.7 g and was not associated with intraoperative blood loss (regression coefficient B, -0.020 [-0.051 to 0.012], P = .226) or any of the secondary end points (intraoperative RBC transfusion; regression coefficient B, 0.023 [-0.006 to 0.053], P = .116), postoperative RBC transfusion (regression coefficient B, 0.007 [-0.032 to 0.046], P = .717), and occurrence of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.110 [0.903-1.365], P = .321). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the use of TXA during liver transplantation. Physicians should exercise caution and consider individual factors when deciding whether or not to administer TXA.