Arthroscopic ankle surgery in people with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: People with haemophilia (PWH) not administered primary haematological prophylaxis since childhood, that is, those treated haematologically on demand or not treated at all, often experience the degeneration of the ankles, leading to pain and functional impairment. AIM: To analyse the outcomes and complications of arthroscopic ankle surgery performed on PWH. METHODS: For this narrative review of the literature, a search was conducted in PubMed on 2, December 2023, using the keywords "haemophilia", "ankle" and "arthroscopy". Of the 29 articles identified, 15 specifically related to ankle arthroscopy in PWH were selected (inclusion criterion). The remaining articles did not meet this requirement (exclusion criterion) and were therefore eliminated. RESULTS: Arthroscopic procedures (arthroscopic synovectomy, debridement and arthrodesis of the ankle) are increasingly used in the surgical treatment of haemophilic ankle arthropathy. Although arthroscopic ankle surgery offers good outcomes in patients with haemophilia, the procedure is not free of complications, which range from 7.9% for arthroscopic ankle debridement to 13.1% in arthroscopic ankle synovectomy and 17.8% in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, respectively. The non-union rate of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is 7.1% (2/28). CONCLUSION: Although arthroscopic interventions in the haemophilic ankle (synovectomy, debridement, arthrodesis) offer good functional outcomes, they are associated with a non-negligible rate of complications. Arthroscopic ankle surgery in PWH is major surgery and should be treated as such.

Hip Capsulolabral Complex: Anatomy, Disease, MRI Features, and Postoperative Appearance.

The hip is a uniquely constrained joint with critical static stability provided by the labrum, capsule and capsular ligaments, and ligamentum teres. The labrum is a fibrocartilaginous structure along the acetabular rim that encircles most of the femoral head. Labral tears are localized based on the clock-face method, which determines the extent of the tear while providing consistent terminology for reporting. Normal labral variants can mimic labral disease and can be differentiated by assessment of thickness or width, shape, borders, location, and associated abnormalities. The Lage and Czerny classification systems are currently the most well-known arthroscopic and imaging systems, respectively. Femoroacetabular impingement is a risk factor for development of labral tears and is classified according to bone dysmorphisms of the femur ("cam") or acetabulum ("pincer") or combinations of both (mixed). The capsule consists of longitudinal fibers reinforced by ligaments (iliofemoral, pubofemoral, ischiofemoral) and circular fibers. Capsular injuries occur secondary to hip dislocation or iatrogenically after capsulotomy. Capsular repair improves hip stability at the expense of capsular overtightening and inadvertent chondral injury. The ligamentum teres is situated between the acetabular notch and the fovea of the femoral head. Initially considered to be inconsequential, recent studies have recognized its role in hip rotational stability. Existing classification systems of ligamentum teres tears account for injury mechanism, arthroscopic findings, and treatment options. Injuries to the labrum, capsule, and ligamentum teres are implicated in symptoms of hip instability. The authors discuss the labrum, capsule, and ligamentum teres, highlighting their anatomy, pathologic conditions, MRI features, and postoperative appearance. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteal Cyst Through the Posterior Portal: A Comprehensive Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND A popliteal cyst, often perceived as benign, poses potential harm and symptoms. This study focused on arthroscopic treatment through the posterior knee portal at our medical center, aiming to assess its efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes compared to traditional methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of 20 patients (9 males and 11 females) with symptomatic popliteal cysts (January 2020 to December 2022) undergoing arthroscopic treatment via the posterior knee portal was conducted. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, preoperative imaging, surgical techniques, intraoperative findings, and postoperative Rauschning and Lindgren scores were collected and analyzed. RESULTS With a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (range: 12 to 36 months), all patients had associated intra-articular lesions and were treated. Degenerative cartilage damage was most common (65.0% of cases). The Rauschning and Lindgren score significantly improved after surgery (P<0.05), with no recurrence evident on MRI in any patients. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic treatment through the posterior knee portal has good potential for popliteal cyst management. This minimally invasive approach offers benefits such as direct visualization, precise cyst excision, and concurrent treatment of intra-articular pathologies.

Enhanced Surgical Outcomes of Popliteal Cyst Excision: A Retrospective Study Comparing Arthroscopic Debridement with and without Methylene Blue Injection.

BACKGROUND This retrospective study of 42 patients with popliteal cysts (or Baker cysts) aimed to compare the effects on duration and outcomes of arthroscopic surgical debridement with and without the use of cyst injection with methylene blue (MB). MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of patients who underwent conventional arthroscopic surgery (n=20) or arthroscopic surgery after MB injection (n=22) for popliteal cysts between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed. The MB group underwent arthroscopic popliteal cystectomy with MB as the marker, and the control group underwent conventional arthroscopic popliteal cystectomy. Surgical time of cyst resection, postoperative bruising extent, complication rate, and cyst recurrence rate of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS The MB group had a faster surgical cyst removal time (16.5±1.5 min) than the control group (24.5±1.6 min; P<0.05). The MB group had less postoperative bruising (1 case, 4.5%) than the control group (5 cases, 25%; P<0.05). The surgical results were similar in both groups, with a Lysholm score of 87.23±1.80 in the MB group and 87.23±1.62 (P>0.05) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that preoperative injection of MB for popliteal cysts before arthroscopic debridement improved cyst localization and ease and accuracy of surgery and reduced operative time, adjacent tissue damage, postoperative complications, and recurrence rate.

Enhanced Postoperative Pain Management and Mobility Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Comparative Study of Adductor Canal Block with and without IPACK Block.

BACKGROUND Arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS) is minimally invasive, reducing hospital stay compared to traditional surgery, but postoperative pain remains a significant issue. This study compared the analgesic and functional outcomes following AKS following anesthesia using adductor canal block (ACB) with and without anesthesia using the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) block under spinal anesthesia (SA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly allocated 120 patients into 3 groups: IPACK+ACB+SA for Group A (n=40), ACB+SA for Group B (n=40), and SA for Group C (n=40). The outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score evaluated at rest and during activity at 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, the frequency of administration of postoperative rescue analgesic, and the maximal walking distance at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS Compared with Group C, the VAS scores in Group A were significantly lower at 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the frequency of postoperative rescue analgesia use among the 3 groups (P=0.001). In a subgroup analysis of meniscus shaping under arthroscopy, the resting VAS score in Group A was lower than that in Group B and Group C at 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05). The maximum walking distance of Group A was longer than that of Group B and Group C at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The effect of postoperative analgesia in the group receiving IPACK combined with ACB after AKS was obviously superior. In arthroscopic meniscus repair surgery, the duration of analgesia was longer, and the maximum walking distance at 48 h postoperatively was longer.

Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability.

BACKGROUND The shoulder is a complex joint that has the most extensive range of motion among all joints, resulting in more susceptibility to dislocation. The treatment for acute shoulder dislocation is closed reduction, which should be performed immediately. Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is a procedure for treating anterior shoulder instability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published literature on ABR for anterior shoulder instability. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and PubMed, to find literature about our topic published between 2018 and 2023. Different keywords were searched, including "ABR, shoulder, instability, dislocation, treatment, management, recurrence, outcomes, and complications". The inclusion criteria were English original articles with available full text. RESULTS Only 8 articles were included; the articles included a total of 398 patients with an age range of 15 to 55 years old. One study was conducted on male patients, and another was conducted on female patients, whereas the remaining studies were conducted on both sexes. Among the 8 studies, 4 studies conducted ABR alone, and all reported significant change with ABR. Four studies compared ABR with Latarjet, concomitant remplissage, and immobilization and reported that ABR is equivalent or better than these interventions. CONCLUSIONS ABR was effective in the management of shoulder instability, as it resulted in a lower rate of recurrence, low rate of complications, and high rate of return to sport, regardless of the suture type. However, it is superior or similar to other interventions, like Latarjet and concomitant remplissage.

Arthroscopic Repair of Extruded Meniscus Tears: Impact on Symptom Relief and Functional Improvement - A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to evaluate 2-year outcomes of 21 patients undergoing knee arthroscopic repair of extruded meniscus tears without root tear. MATERIAL AND METHODS The retrospective study comprised 21 individuals who underwent arthroscopic extruded meniscus repair and were followed up for at least 2 years. The study analyzed the meniscus extrusion amounts in preoperative and postoperative MRI scans, the Kellgren-Lawrence stages in knee radiographs, and the Lsyhom and The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores of the included patients. RESULTS In this study, the repair operation extrusion levels were 3.30 mm from 4.01 mm preoperatively (P<0.001). After the repair, there was a significant increase in the Lsyhom and IKDC scores (P<0.001). According to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, 12 patients were evaluated as stage 0, 6 patients as stage 1, and 3 patients as stage 2. According to the radiographs taken at the last follow-up, 2 patients progressed from stage 0 to stage 1, 2 patients progressed from stage 1 to stage 2, and 1 patient progressed from stage 2 to stage 3. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic treatment of extruded meniscus tears can enhance functional status and increase patients' functional status. Nevertheless, the absence of successful centralization extruded meniscus tears. This study discovered that radiological extrusion did not diminish beyond the critical threshold of 3 mm, which is associated with the development of osteoarthritis. This highlights the necessity of taking these elements into account when devising a treatment plan.

Esketamine use is associated with shortened postoperative hospital stay in patients after knee arthroscopic surgery: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined anesthetics to improve postoperative prognosis after knee arthroscopic surgery. However, it is currently unknown whether perioperative anesthetics can influence postoperative hospital stay. We investigated the impact of esketamine after knee arthroscopic surgery on post-operative length of stay, fever and surgical site infection. METHODS: This study included 455 patients who underwent knee surgery between January2020 and August 2021at a tertiary hospital in China. Patient characteristics, preoperative laboratory values, intra-operative anesthetic data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with or without propensity score matching were performed to identify factors related to post-operative discharge within 3 days(PD3). RESULTS: A total of 297 cases met our inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 42 ± 14 years, mean body mass index, 24.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2, 157(53%) patients were male. Meniscus-related procedures accounted for the most part of all the procedures with a percentage of 40.4%, followed by combined procedures of 35.4%. After we adjusted for demographic and intraoperative characteristics with propensity score matching, esketamine use was significantly associated with PD3 with the highest odds ratio of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.41, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Esketamine use was associated with PD3 in patients underwent knee arthroscopic surgery. The findings of this study will be useful to anesthesiologists in making informed decisions regarding the choice of anesthetics for knee joint diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No.:2023-041-01) of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University and retrospectively registered.

Application of ultrasound-guided single femoral triangle and adductor canal block in arthroscopic knee surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study.

PURPOSE: To compare the difference in analgesic effect between femoral triangle block (FTB) and adductor canal block (ACB) during arthroscopic knee surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery were randomized preoperatively to FTB group or ACB group. For each group, 20 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine was injected. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The numeric rating score (NRS) at 12 h after surgery at rest and during movement. SECONDARY OUTCOME: (1) The NRS at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and 2, 24 h after surgery at rest and during movement; (2) The quadriceps muscle strength at PACU and 2, 12, 24 h after surgery; (3) Consumption of Rescue analgesia; (4) Incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: The NRS at 12 h after surgery at rest and during movement of ACB group were higher than FTB group. Among secondary outcomes, the NRS at PACU at rest and during movement, 2 h after surgery during movement of FTB group lower than ACB group; the quadriceps muscle strength at 2 h after surgery of FTB group stronger than ACB group. After multiple linear regression model analysis, the data showed additional statistically significant reduction NRS at 24 h after surgery at rest (0.757, p = 0.037) in FTB group. Other outcomes were similar between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FTB appears to provide superior pain control after knee arthroscopy than ACB, the FTB is superior to the ACB in quadriceps muscle strength at 2 h after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068765). Registration date: 28/02/2023.

The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided cervical erector spinae block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block technique that can provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic, abdominal and lumbar surgeries. However, the effect of cervical ESPB on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing arthroscopy shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ESPB group (n = 35) or control group (n = 35). Patients in the ESPB group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB at the C7 level with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine 30 min before induction of general anesthesia, whereas patients in the control group received no block. The primary outcome measures were the static visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before anesthesia (t1), 5 min after anesthesia (t2), 10 min after skin incision (t3), and 10 min after extubation (t4); intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score, quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale score and the number of patients who required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery; and adverse events. RESULTS: The static VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group than those in the control group (2.17 ± 0.71 vs. 3.14 ± 1.19, 1.77 ± 0.77 vs. 2.63 ± 0.84, 0.74 ± 0.66 vs. 1.14 ± 0.88, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR or MAP at any time point during the perioperative period between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was significantly less in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of BCS and QoR-15 scale were higher in the ESPB group 24 h after surgery than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the ESPB group required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB can provide effective postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, resulting in a better postoperative recovery with fewer complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2300070731 (Date of registry: 21/04/2023, prospectively registered).

Needle Therapy: A Minimally Invasive Therapeutic Concept as Part of Temporomandibular Single-Portal Arthroscopy.

The transition from a single portal to a double portal can be complex, necessitating time and training to minimize complications that rely on the operator's skill. Needle therapy is a simple method for treating symptoms that has several benefits. Consequently, this innovative strategy aims to introduce an intermediate technique that enables surgeons to perform therapeutic procedures during single-port arthroscopy.

The Contemporary Management of Temporomandibular Joint Intra-Articular Pain and Dysfunction.

The understanding of the causes of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction has evolved over 50 years. Historically, the term internal derangement has been used to describe the abnormal relationship between the articular disc, condyle, and glenoid fossa, which was thought to correlate with patient symptoms. It is now known that the pathophysiology of intra-articular pain and dysfunction (IPD) involves synovitis, capsular impingement, symptomatic disc displacement, or a combination of these. Symptomatic disc displacement should only be considered to be a potential source of IPD after synovitis and capsular impingement have been treated. This philosophy provides the opportunity for most patients with IPD to be initially treated nonsurgically or with minimally invasive procedures such as arthrocentesis or arthroscopy.

Hip Arthroscopy Improves Sexual Function in Receptive Partners with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hip pain due to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is thought to adversely impact sexual satisfaction because of exacerbation of symptoms with hip ROM. However, the effect of FAI on sexual satisfaction and improvement after surgery to treat FAI is largely absent from published studies, despite patients' apparent interest in it as registered by the frequent appearance of these topics on online anonymous discussion platforms. In addition, details regarding its impact on the decision to pursue surgery and the success of hip arthroscopy in alleviating FAI-related sexual dysfunction based on the specific role assumed during intercourse (penetrative versus receptive) remains unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Given that sexual intercourse involves different amounts of hip ROM depending on whether patients assume the penetrative or receptive role, this study evaluated the effect of FAI and hip arthroscopy on sexual activity based on role. Compared with patients who participate in the penetrative role during sexual intercourse, do patients who participate in the receptive role (1) experience greater difficulty with sexual function because of FAI symptoms, (2) take longer to return to sexual intercourse after hip arthroscopy, and (3) experience greater improvements in reported sexual function after hip arthroscopy for FAI? METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. Between January 2017 and December 2021, 293 patients were treated with hip arthroscopy for FAI and enrolled in our longitudinally maintained database. Among all patients treated surgically, 184 patients were determined to be potentially eligible for study inclusion based on a minimum follow-up of 6 months postoperatively. The 6-month timepoint was chosen based on published data suggesting that at this timepoint, nearly 100% of patients resumed sexual intercourse with minimal pain after hip arthroscopy. Of the potentially eligible patients, 33% (61 patients) could not be contacted by telephone to obtain verbal consent for participation and 9% (17 patients) declined participation, leaving 106 eligible patients. Electronic questionnaires were sent to all eligible patients and were returned by 58% (61 patients). Forty-two percent of eligible patients (45) did not respond to the questionnaire and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Two percent (2) completed most survey questions but did not specify their role during intercourse and were therefore excluded. The mean age of included patients was 34 ± 9 years, and 56% were women The mean follow-up time was 2 ± 1 years. In total, 63% of included patients reported participating in the receptive role during sexual intercourse (49% receptive only and 14% both receptive and penetrative). Hip symptoms during sexual intercourse preoperatively and postoperatively were evaluated using a questionnaire created by our team to answer our study questions, drawing from one of the only published studies on the matter and combining the questionnaire with sexual position-specific questions garnered from arthroplasty research. Patients who reported participating in the receptive role during intercourse (either exclusively or in addition to the penetrative role) were compared with those who participated exclusively in the penetrative role. There were no specific postoperative recommendations in terms of the timing of return to sexual intercourse, other than to resume when comfortable. RESULTS: Overall, 61% of patients (36 of 59) reported that hip pain somewhat or greatly interfered with sexual intercourse preoperatively. Patients who participated in receptive intercourse were more likely to experience preoperative hip pain that interfered with intercourse than patients who participated exclusively in penetrative intercourse (odds ratio 5 [95% confidence interval 2 to 15]; p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there was no difference in time until return to sexual activity between those in the penetrative group (median 6 weeks [range 2 to 14 weeks]) and those in the receptive group (median 6 weeks [range 4 to 14 weeks]; p = 0.28). Postoperatively, a greater number of patients participating in the penetrative role reported no or very little pain, compared with patients participating in the receptive role (67% [14 of 21] versus 49% [17 of 35]). However, with regard to preoperative to postoperative improvement, patients who participated in the receptive role had greater pain with positions involving more hip flexion and abduction and experienced a greater improvement than their penetrative counterparts in these positions postoperatively. Despite this improvement, however, 33% of patients (7 of 21) participating in the penetrative role and 51% of patients (18 of 35) participating in the receptive role continued to report either some or a great amount of pain at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hip pain secondary to FAI interferes with sexual relations, particularly for partners who participate in the receptive role. Postoperatively, both patients participating in receptive and penetrative intercourse resumed sexual intercourse at a median of 6 weeks. After hip arthroscopy, the greatest improvement in pain was seen in receptive partners during sexual positions that involved more hip flexion and abduction. Despite this improvement, most patients, regardless of sexual role assumed, reported some degree of residual pain. Patients planning to undergo arthroscopic surgery for FAI, particularly those who participate in receptive intercourse, should be appropriately counseled about reasonable postoperative expectations based on our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparing Open and Arthroscopic Grafting for Scaphoid Nonunion: Is There Truly a Noticeable Difference?

BACKGROUND: Scaphoid nonunion remains a challenging injury with no clear consensus on treatment. Surgical options, such as bone grafting procedures, are available for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. While open grafting provides direct visualization, it is theoretically believed to lead to several problems due to the complex ligamentous structure responsible for wrist stability and challenges in the vascular supply of the scaphoid. On the other hand, despite its technical challenges, arthroscopic grafting is thought to avoid complications by preserving surrounding tissues. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion report better function than patients undergoing an open procedure? (2) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion demonstrate better objective outcomes, such as ROM, extremity strength, and bony union? METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2022, we operated on 141 patients with scaphoid nonunion. The following patients were excluded from this study: 33 patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and arthritis, 18 patients with proximal pole fractures, 5 patients with previous surgeries, 16 patients with avascular necrosis, and 8 patients with the radius used as a graft source. In total, 28 patients underwent open grafting, and 33 patients underwent arthroscopic grafting; for both groups, the iliac crest was used as the graft source. Two patients with nonunion were observed in each treatment group, and they were excluded from the study. Results from the remaining 26 patients treated with open grafting and 31 patients treated with arthroscopic grafting (totaling 57 patients) were analyzed. The decision to treat patients with open or arthroscopic methods was not based on a particular reason. In our clinic, we initially preferred open grafting for treating nonunion of the scaphoid. Subsequently, we began to prefer arthroscopic methods for the treatment of these injuries. Twenty patients in the arthroscopic group had additional ligamentous injuries, which were simultaneously treated arthroscopically. All patients in both groups had at least 1 year of follow-up, but 48% of patients treated arthroscopically and 42% of those treated with open approaches were lost before 2 years of follow-up. The remaining patients had follow-up periods longer than 24 months. Our primary analysis was performed at 1 year, and we did a secondary analysis at 2 years. We compared the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), QuickDASH, and VAS scores of the patients. We also compared ROM and grip and pinch strength in patients' contralateral wrists. We used predefined, evidence-based thresholds for the minimum clinically important differences for these outcome measures. RESULTS: According to the 1-year functional analysis, we found no clinically important difference between the open surgery group and the arthroscopic surgery group in terms of PRWE score (median [IQR] 19 [25] versus 8 [9], difference of medians 11; p = 0.001), QuickDASH (median 14 [23] versus 7 [11], difference of medians 7; p = 0.004), and VAS scores (median 2 [2] versus 1 [1], difference of medians 1; p = 0.02). At 1 year, there were no differences in objective measurements, including grip strength (median 81 [16] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 4; p = 0.60), pinch strength (median 82 [18] versus 81 [15], difference of medians 1; p = 0.85), and ROM (flexion-extension median 83 [22] versus 85 [13], difference of medians 2; p = 0.74; radial deviation-ulnar deviation median 80 [36] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 5; p = 0.61). In the 2-year analysis, no clinically important difference was observed in terms of PRWE score, and no differences were found in terms of QuickDASH, VAS, strength tests, and ROM between the open and arthroscopic groups. No difference was observed in the union rates between the open group and the arthroscopic group (93% [26 of 28] versus 94% [31 of 33], OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.16 to 9.06]; p = 0.86). CONCLUSION: In comparing open surgical procedures with arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions, the present study revealed no differences in functional outcomes and objective measures such as ROM and strength tests at both the 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits. Although technically more challenging, arthroscopy provides a potential advantage, such as addressing concomitant ligament injuries simultaneously. However, patients did not perceive a difference between the two surgical methods. In future studies, investigating long-term outcomes in a larger population will contribute to better elucidating this issue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (D-TGCT), formerly known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a rare, locally aggressive, invasive soft tissue tumor that primarily occurs in the knee. Surgical excision is the main treatment option, but there is a high recurrence rate. Arthroscopic surgical techniques are emphasized because they are less traumatic and offer faster postoperative recovery, but detailed reports on arthroscopic techniques and outcomes of D-TGCT in large cohorts are still lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the recurrence rate of knee D-TGCT after multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy? (2) What are the complications, knee ROM, pain score, and patient-reported outcomes for patients, and do they differ between patients with and without recurrence? (3) What factors are associated with recurrence after arthroscopic treatment in patients with D-TGCT? METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and April 2021, we treated 295 patients with knee D-TGCTs. We considered patients undergoing initial surgical treatment with multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 27% (81 of 295) of patients were excluded because of recurrence after synovectomy performed at another institution. Of the 214 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17% (36 of 214) were lost to follow-up, leaving 83% (178 of 214) of patients in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (50 of 178) of patients were men and 72% (128 of 178) were women, with a median (range) age of 36 years (7 to 69). The median follow-up duration was 80 months (26 to 149). All patients underwent multiportal (anterior and posterior approaches) arthroscopic synovectomy, and all surgical protocols were determined by discussion among four surgeons after preoperative MRI. A combined open posterior incision was used for patients with lesions that invaded or surrounded the blood vessels and nerves or invaded the muscle space extraarticularly. Standard postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended for all patients with D-TGCT who had extraarticular and posterior compartment invasion; for patients with only anterior compartment invasion, radiotherapy was recommended for severe cases as assessed by the surgeons and radiologists based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative descriptions. Postoperative recurrence at 5 years was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. The WOMAC score (0 to 96, with higher scores representing a worse outcome; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 8.5), the Lysholm knee score (0 to 100, with higher scores being better knee function; MCID 25.4), the VAS for pain (0 to 10, with higher scores representing more pain; MCID 2.46), and knee ROM were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Because we did not have preoperative patient-reported outcomes scores, we present data on the proportion of patients who achieved the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each of those outcome metrics, which were 14.6 of 96 points on the WOMAC, 52.5 of 100 points on the Lysholm, and 2.32 of 10 points on the VAS. RESULTS: The symptomatic or radiographically documented recurrence at 5 years was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 17%) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with a mean recurrence time of 33 ± 19 months. Of these, three were asymptomatic recurrences found during regular MRI reviews, and the remaining 19 underwent repeat surgery. There was one intraoperative complication (vascular injury) with no effect on postoperative limb function and eight patients with postoperative joint stiffness, seven of whom improved with prolonged rehabilitation and one with manipulation under anesthesia. No postradiotherapy complications were found. The proportion of patients who achieved the preestablished PASS was 99% (176 of 178) for the VAS pain score, 97% (173 of 178) for the WOMAC score, and 100% (178 of 178) for the Lysholm score. A lower percentage of patients with recurrence achieved the PASS for WOMAC score than patients without recurrence (86% [19] versus 99% [154], OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.52]; p = 0.01), whereas no difference was found in the percentage of VAS score (95% [21] versus 99% [155], OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.01 to 2.25]; p = 0.23) or Lysholm score (100% [22] versus 100% [156], OR 1 [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.99). Moreover, patients in the recurrence group showed worse knee flexion (median 135° [100° to 135°] versus median 135° [80° to 135°]; difference of medians 0°; p = 0.03), worse WOMAC score (median 3.5 [0 to 19] versus median 1 [0 to 29]; difference of medians 2.5; p = 0.01), and higher VAS pain score (median 1 [0 to 4] versus median 0 [0 to 4]; difference of medians 1; p < 0.01) than those in the nonrecurrence group, although no differences reached the MCID. No factors were associated with D-TGCT recurrence, including the use of postoperative radiotherapy, surgical technique, and invasion extent. CONCLUSION: This single-center, large-cohort retrospective study confirmed that multiportal arthroscopic surgery can be used to treat knee D-TGCTs with a low recurrence rate, few complications, and satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should conduct a thorough preoperative evaluation, meticulous arthroscopic synovectomy, and regular postoperative follow-up when treating patients with D-TGCT to reduce postoperative recurrence. Because the available evidence does not appear to fully support the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients with D-TGCTs and our study design is inadequate to resolve this controversial issue, future studies should look for more appropriate indications for radiotherapy, such as planning based on a more precise classification of lesion invasion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, hip arthroscopy has become more commonly used in the treatment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as well as those with many other intra-articular hip pathologies. As such, the indications for open surgical hip dislocation have narrowed to include complex intra-articular and extra-articular bony morphologies and revision hip preservation. Although surgical hip dislocation has been established as an effective approach, previous research using contemporary indications has been limited primarily to smaller cohorts with short-term follow-up. Furthermore, factors associated with reoperation, conversion arthroplasty, and not achieving clinical improvement remain ambiguous. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in patients treated for FAI with surgical hip dislocation, (1) how much did patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improve, and what percentage of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS)? (2) What was the survivorship free from reoperation of the hip for any reason? (3) What was the survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty (THA or hip resurfacing)? METHODS: Between February 2011 and April 2021, 211 patients were treated at one academic institution with surgical dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction or greater trochanter for FAI. Of these, patients with concomitant diagnoses including Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, osteochondritis dissecans, a benign tumor, or another neurologic or metabolic disorder were excluded. This yielded 74% (156 of 211) of patients as potentially eligible. A further 12% (18 of 156) of patients without postoperative PROMs were excluded, and another 13% (21 of 156) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years, leaving 75% (117) for analysis at a median of 4.9 years (range 2 to 12 years) in this retrospective study. A total of 88% of the patients were women (103 of 117), and 40% (47 patients) underwent the procedure as a revision. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation. Intraoperatively, 66% (77 of 117) of patients demonstrated cam impingement, and the remainder had either pincer impingement or combined cam and pincer; 82% (96 of 117) had some component of extra-articular impingement. To answer our first research question, we obtained PROM scores for the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) before surgery and at the most-recent follow-up from our longitudinally maintained institutional database, and we determined the percentage of patients who achieved the MCID or PASS. To answer our second research question, we calculated Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from any reoperation on the hip at 5.8 years (mean follow-up) after the index procedure. To answer our third research question, we calculated the Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty at 5.8 years. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with meeting these defined endpoints were identified. RESULTS: At a mean of 6 ± 3 years, the mHHS of patients treated with surgical hip dislocation for FAI who had not had previous surgery on the hip improved from 53 ± 15 to 85 ± 13 (mean difference 31 [95% confidence interval 27 to 36]; p < 0.01) and the mean iHOT-12 score improved from 25 ± 14 to 74 ± 24 (mean difference 49 [95% CI 42 to 56]; p < 0.01). At a mean of 5 ± 3 years, for patients with prior hip surgery, mHHS improved from 55 ± 13 to 79 ± 15 (mean difference 24 [95% CI 18 to 30]; p < 0.01) and iHOT-12 scores improved from 25 ± 16 to 66 ± 26 (mean difference 41 [95% CI 31 to 50]; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID for the mHHS was 87% (55 of 63) and 83% (33 of 40), while the proportion who achieved the PASS for the mHHS was 66% (46 of 70) and 51% (24 of 47) for primary and revision surgery, respectively. The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID for the iHOT-12 was 87% (53 of 61) and 83% (33 of 40), while the proportion who achieved the PASS for iHOT-12 was 68% (47 of 69) and 57% (26 of 46) for primary and revision surgery, respectively. Higher lateral center-edge angles (odds ratio 1.2 per 1° [95% CI 1.1 to 1.3]; p < 0.01), a lower acetabular version at 2:00 (OR 0.92 per 1° [95% CI 0.85 to 0.99]; p = 0.05), the absence of a labral tear (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.79]; p = 0.02), a higher preoperative mHHS (OR 1.1 per 1 point [95% CI 1.02 to 1.2]; p < 0.01), and a higher preoperative iHOT-12 score (OR 1.1 per 1 point [95% CI 1.01 to 1.1]; p = 0.01) were associated with not achieving the MCID. In patients without a history of ipsilateral hip surgery, survivorship free from reoperation at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 90% (95% CI 82% to 98%). In the setting of prior ipsilateral hip surgery, survivorship free from reoperation at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 75% (95% CI 60% to 95%). No patients for whom surgical hip dislocation was their primary hip procedure underwent conversion to arthroplasty. Among the revision patient cohort, survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 97% (95% CI 91% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Surgical hip dislocation effectively improves hip pain and function with high survivorship (free of reoperation or conversion to arthroplasty) for complex intra-articular and extra-articular FAI that is deemed less suitable for arthroscopic treatment, but when the procedure is used in patients who have had prior hip surgery, they should be told that revision surgery is a realistic possibility. If insufficient acetabular coverage is anticipated, acetabular reorientation osteotomy should be considered. Future studies should evaluate long-term survivorship and PROMs in larger patient cohorts, as well as identify other factors associated with reoperation and conversion to arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of needle and conventional arthroscopy for visualisation of predefined anatomical structures of the knee joint: a feasibility study in human cadavers and patients.

BACKGROUND: In terms of the optics used for Knee arthroscopy, a large number of different endoscopes are currently available. However, the use of the 30° optics in knee arthroscopy has been established as the standard procedure for many years. As early as the 1990s, needle arthroscopy was occasionally used as a diagnostic tool. In addition to the development of conventional optics technology in terms of camera and resolution, needle arthroscopes are now available with chip-on-tip image sensor technology. To date, no study has compared the performance of this kind of needle arthroscopy versus standard arthroscopy in the clinical setting in terms of the visibility of anatomical landmarks. In this monocentric prospective feasibility study, our aim was to evaluate predefined anatomical landmarks of the knee joint using needle arthroscopy (0° optics) and conventional knee arthroscopy (30° optics) and compare their performance during knee surgery. METHODS: Examinations were performed on eight cadavers and seven patients who required elective knee arthroscopy. Two surgeons independently performed the examinations on these 15 knee joints, so that we were able to compare a total of 30 examinations. The focus was on the anatomical landmarks that could be visualized during a conventional diagnostic knee arthroscopy procedure. The quality of visibility was evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In summary, the average visibility for all the anatomic landmarks was rated 4.98/ 5 for the arthroscopy using 30° optics. For needle arthroscopy, an average score of 4.89/ 5 was obtained. Comparatively, the needle arthroscope showed slightly limited visibility of the retropatellar gliding surface in eight (4.5/ 5 vs. 5/ 5), medial rim of the patella in four (4.85/ 5 vs. 5/ 5), and suprapatellar recess in four (4.83/ 5 vs. 5/ 5) cases. Needle arthroscopy was slightly better at visualizing the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in four knee joints (4.9/ 5 vs. 4.85/ 5). CONCLUSION: Needle arthroscopy is a promising technology with advantages in terms of minimally invasive access and good visibility of anatomical landmarks. However, it also highlights some limitations, particularly in cases with challenging anatomy or the need for a wide field of view.

A new, effective method for diagnosing GLAD lesions: the chicken-wing muscle up test.

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop and evaluate a new diagnostic method, the 'chicken-wing muscle up test', to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of glenolabral articular disruption (GLAD) lesions compared to currently used clinical tests for injuries to the labrum. METHODS: Preoperative evaluations were conducted on 85 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery at a single center between July 2021 to July 2022. The diagnostic performance of the preoperative clinical examinations (chicken-wing muscle up test, O'Brien test, crank test, and O'Driscoll test) were validated against the findings of arthroscopic examinations. RESULTS: 12 of the 85 patients in this study had arthroscopically confirmed GLAD lesions. The chicken-wing muscle up test demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (83.33%) for GLAD lesions than the O'Brien test (33.33%), but not the crank test (50.00%) or O'Driscoll test (25.00%), and significantly higher specificity (95.89%) than the O'Brien test (75.34%), crank test (82.19%), and O'Driscoll test (71.23%). The chicken-wing muscle up test had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.896, P < 0.001; O'Driscoll test AUC = 0.543, P > 0.05; crank test AUC = 0.661, P > 0.05; O'Brien test AUC = 0.481, P > 0.05), indicating significantly better diagnostic efficacy for GLAD lesions than the other three tests. CONCLUSIONS: The chicken-wing muscle up test is a reliable diagnostic method that improves the accuracy of diagnosis of GLAD lesions.

Arthroscopic assisted versus open non-vascularized bone grafting in delayed union and nonunion of the scaphoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Delayed union and nonunion of the scaphoid is a common complication often requiring surgical reconstruction and bone grafting. Our goal was to systematically assess the healing time and clinical outcomes following arthroscopic-assisted versus open non-vascularized bone grafting of the scaphoid. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central databases was completed from inception to September 2023. We included randomized trials and observational studies that reported outcomes following scaphoid delayed union/nonunion comparing arthroscopic-assisted vs. open non-vascularized bone grafting. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. One investigator assessed certainty of evidence and a senior investigator confirmed the assessment. We pooled effects using random-effects models, when possible, for all outcomes reported by more than 1 study. RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies and 822 patients were included in the study. Very low certainty evidence demonstrated that arthroscopic-assisted surgery may decrease healing time compared to open surgery (weighted mean difference [WMD] -7.8 weeks; 95%CI -12.8 to -2.8). Arthroscopic bone grafting did not result in an improvement in union rate (relative risk 1.01; 95%CI 0.9 to 1.09). The pooled data in arthroscopic graft group showed mean time to union of 11.4 weeks (95%CI: 10.4 to 12.5) with union rate of 95% (95%CI 91-98%). A single comparative study reported very low certainty evidence that arthroscopy-assisted vs. open surgery may not have an effect on pain relief (MD 0 cm, 95%CI -0.4 to 0.5 on VAS 10 cm for pain) or improving function (MD -1.2, 95% CI -4.8 to 2.3 on 100 points DASH). CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Our results suggest that arthroscopic-assisted non-vascularized bone grafting may be associated with improved average weeks to heal in comparison with open surgery for scaphoid delayed union/nonunion reconstruction with overall comparable union rates. There is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of arthroscopic-assisted reconstruction on union rate, time to union, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with other important nonunion characteristics such as established humpback deformity.

Outcome evaluation of dye-assist arthroscopic inside-out ganglionectomy: a retrospective study of 29 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic inside-out ganglionectomy of dominant dorsal wrist ganglion. METHODS: Patients with dominant wrist ganglion cyst treated in our hospital from January 1, 2014 to June 31, 2023 was enrolled in this retrospective analysis. All patients underwent dye-assist arthroscopic inside-out ganglionectomy. After discharge, the patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. The primary outcomes were to assess patient wrist function using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS). The secondary outcomes were visual analog score (VAS), wrist active range of motion (ROM), grip strength, recurrence rate and complication. RESULTS: All ganglion were successfully resected after dye staining. Patients were followed for an average of 12.17 months. There were no significant changes between preoperative and postoperative wrist active ROM or grip strength, except for wrist flexion (which showed a slightly greater improvement after surgery, P = 0.049), there were notable improvements in VAS, MMWS, and PRWE postoperatively. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients. No major complications observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Dye-assist arthroscopic inside-out ganglionectomy is safe and uncomplicated, worth of clinical promotion.