Surgical management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children: advantages of MesoRex shunt compared with distal splenorenal shunt.

PURPOSE: To review surgical management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and compare MesoRex shunt (MRS) with distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS). METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review documenting pre- and post-operative data in 21 children. Twenty-two shunts were performed, 15 MRS and 7 DSRS, over an 18-year period. Patients were followed up for a mean of 11 years (range 2-18). Data analysis included demographics, albumin, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), International normalised ratio (INR), fibrinogen, total bilirubin, liver enzymes and platelets before the operation and 2 years after shunt surgery. RESULTS: One MRS thrombosed immediately post-surgery and the child was salvaged with DSRS. Variceal bleeding was controlled in both groups. Significant improvements were seen amongst MRS cohort in serum albumin, PT, PTT, and platelets and there was a mild improvement in serum fibrinogen. The DSRS cohort showed only a significant improvement in the platelet count. Neonatal umbilic vein catheterization (UVC) was a major risk for Rex vein obliteration. CONCLUSION: In EHPVO, MRS is superior to DSRS and improves liver synthetic function. DSRS does control variceal bleeding but should only be considered when MRS is not technically feasible or as a salvage procedure when MRS fails.

[Reconstruction of total portosystemic shunt into selective portosystemic shunt in a child]. / Rekonstruktsiya total'nogo portosistemnogo shunta v selektivnyi portosistemnyi shunt u rebenka.

To date, side-to-side splenorenal shunt (SRS) and its analogues (splenosuprarenal shunts (SSRS)) are mainly used for portal hypertension. These are total portosystemic shunts characterized by total blood shunt from portal vein into inferior vena cava. The latter is fraught with a significant risk of complications such as pulmonary hypertension, decreased portal liver perfusion, liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy. Prevention of these complications is still an urgent problem in modern surgery. However, we proposed a new method of treatment, i.e. reconstruction of SRS and SSRS into selective shunt. This procedure was performed in 37 patients after 2020. We present laparoscopic reconstruction in an 11-year-old girl with portal hypertension and signs of hepatic encephalopathy identified after previous SSRS.

Application of Proximal Splenic Vein Embolization to Interrupt Complicated Large Splenorenal Shunts in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of proximal splenic vein embolization (PSVE) for liver transplant recipients having complicated large splenorenal shunts (SRS). BACKGROUND: In adult living donor liver transplantation for a patient who has large splenorenal shunts (SRS), their interruption is utmost important to maintain adequate portal flow by avoidance of portal flow steal through the preexisting SRS. We effectively managed most of the recipients with surgical ligation and/or additional radiologic embolization using by intraoperative cine-portogram. However, when complete interruption is not achieved in a few recipients having complicated large SRS, it may leave a chance of lethal portal flow steal in the recipient afterward. METHODS: PSVE was performed in 13 patients between April 2014 and November 2017. We performed a retrospective analysis of preoperative images, postoperative graft and recipient outcomes, and presence of isolated portal hypertension. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent PSVE as an additional secondary method because of portal steal syndrome through the remaining SRS after surgical interruption and/or embolization, and 3 patients underwent PSVE only as a primary method of SRS interruption. In all 13 patients, portal steal on the final intraoperative cine-portogram completely disappeared after PSVE. All patients recovered with satisfactory regeneration of the partial liver graft without the reappearance of portosystemic collaterals, and there were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: PSVE is an effective and safe procedure to secure adequate portal flow without portal steal for patients with complicated large SRS arising from multiple sites of the splenic vein or escaping to multiple terminal ends.

Splenic vein embolization as a feasible treatment for patients with hepatic encephalopathy related to large spontaneous splenorenal shunts.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Although splenic vein embolization (SVE) has been performed for the management of patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) related to large spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRS) in recent years, its role remains poorly defined. In this study, we aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of SVE for HE patients with large SSRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from cirrhotic patients who were confirmed to have recurrent or persistent HE related to large SSRS and underwent SVE from January 2017 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed at our center. The primary endpoints were the change of HE severity at 1 week after embolization and the recurrence of HE during the follow-up period. The secondary endpoints were procedure-related complications and changes in laboratory indicators and hepatic function (Child-Pugh score/grade and model for end-stage liver disease score). RESULTS: Of the eight cirrhotic patients included in the study, six were diagnosed with recurrent HE, and the others were diagnosed with persistent HE. Embolization success was achieved for all patients (100%), and no immediate procedure-related complications, de novo occurrence, or aggravation of symptoms related to portal hypertension were observed during the long-term follow-up. HE status was assessed at 1 week after embolization. The results demonstrated that the symptoms were mitigated in three patients and resolved completely in five patients. During the follow-up period, all patients were free of HE within 1 month after embolization, but one patient experienced the recurrence of HE within 6 months and another one experienced the recurrence of HE within 1 year. Compared with the preoperative parameters, the Child-Pugh score and grade were significantly improved at 1 week and 1 month after embolization (all P<0.05), and the serum ammonia level was significantly lower at 1 month after embolization (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SVE could be considered as a feasible treatment for patients with HE related to large SSRS, but further validation is required.

Splenorenal shunt for reconstruction of the gastric and splenic venous drainage during pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of the portal venous confluence.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the portal venous confluence is frequently necessary for radical resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. However, ligation of the splenic vein can cause serious postoperative complications such as gastric/splenic venous congestion and left-sided portal hypertension. A splenorenal shunt (SRS) can maintain gastric and splenic venous drainage and mitigate these complications. PURPOSE: This study describes the surgical technique, postoperative course, and surgical outcomes of SRS after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and SRS between September 2017 and April 2019 were evaluated. After resection an end-to-side anastomosis between the splenic vein and the left renal vein was performed. Postoperative shunt patency, splenic volume, and any SRS-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: The rates of short- and long-term shunt patency were 100% and 60%, respectively. No procedure-associated complications were observed. No signs of left-sided portal hypertension, such as gastrointestinal bleeding or splenomegaly, and no gastric/splenic ischemia were observed in patients after SRS. CONCLUSION: SRS is a safe and effective measure to mitigate gastric congestion and left-sided portal hypertension after pancreatoduodenectomy with compromised gastric venous drainage after resection of the portal venous confluence.

Percutaneous treatment of a splenorenal shunt with an atrial septal closure device.

We present the case of a 70-year-old female who underwent liver transplantation in 2011 due to enolic cirrhosis with a normofunction graft and no portal hypertension. During the last months, recurrent hospitalization was needed due to hepatic encephalopathy, in spite of treatment with lactulose and rifaximin. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a large varicose dilatation of the splenic vein up to 14-16 mm, descending by the left abdominal side, communicating with the renal vein with direct drainage into inferior cava vein (ICV).

An analysis on the use of Warren's distal splenorenal shunt surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension at the University Hospitals Leuven.

INTRODUCTION: Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most common cause of portal hypertension (PH), particularly in children. PH-related manifestations include refractory variceal bleeding, splenomegaly and ascites. Albeit more rarely performed, the distal splenorenal shunt (Warren's shunt) has proven to be effective in selectively decompressing the collateral circulation. The aim of our study was to describe our experience with the distal splenorenal shunt and to determine the long-term effect on PH-related side-effects. METHODS: Distal splenorenal shunt operations performed at our institution between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed for: age, male/female ratio, children/adults ratio, body mass index, indications, grade of PVT (Yerdel classification), maximal shunt-flow velocity, shunt patency and thrombosis, re-intervention for variceal bleeding and survival. Complications of PH (esophageal variceal bleeding and ascites) were compared pre- versus post-operatively (last follow-up). Paired student t-test and fisher's exact were applied for pre- versus post-operative comparison. Results are reported as median [range]. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with PVT and refractory complications of PH underwent distal splenorenal shunt surgery. Age was 15 years [4.5-66]. Male/female ratio was 7/7. PVT -grade was 2 [1-4]. Follow-up was 3 [0.5-14]. All shunts were patent (100%) with no shunt thrombosis (0%) at last follow-up. There was no re-intervention for variceal bleeding (0%) and survival at last follow-up was 100%. Occurrence of esophageal variceal bleeding was higher pre-operatively (57%) than postoperatively (0%) (p = .0032) and also the incidence of ascites was higher pre-operatively (79%) than postoperatively (0%) (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, the distal splenorenal shunt can be considered a valuable surgical technique for PVT-induced PH, with excellent post-operative prevention of complications of PH.

Laparoscopic splenectomy and proximal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis in a patient with protein S deficiency.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare condition in the general population that develops serious complications if left untreated for long time. We present a case of a 29-year-old woman who developed PVT due to protein S deficiency versus neonatal funiculitis. Over time, the patient developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to esophageal varices and hypersplenism with splenic sequestration that caused minor bleeding episodes. Laparoscopic splenectomy and proximal splenorenal shunt with distal pancreatectomy due to aneurysmal dilatations of the splenic artery were successfully performed to avoid mayor progression of portal hypertension. Patient was discharged with indefinite anticoagulation and after surgery platelets raised up to 200x103/mm3. Laparoscopic splenectomy and proximal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis is an adequate surgery procedure which should be applied in these medical cases.

[Successful Control of Hyperammonemia with BRTO of a Splenorenal Shunt Induced by CAPOX Therapy].

Among portosystemic shunts, splenorenal shunts can cause increased portal pressure, which in turn can bring about hyperammonemia, resulting in hepatic encephalopathy. In recent years, it has been reported that oxaliplatin(OX), a key chemotherapy drug in colorectal cancer, can precipitate splenorenal shunts due to sinusoidal injury. We report a case of hyperammonemia post oxaliplatin therapy. A 72-year-old male patient who had undergone surgical resection for(RS)rectal cancer with hepatic metastasis had been receiving capecitabine plus OX(CAPOX)as adjuvant chemotherapy. During his 7th course of treatment, he visited the outpatient clinic with complaints of weakness, dysarthria, and urinary incontinence. Laboratory findings showed an elevated NH3 level (200 µg/dL), and subsequent abdominal computed tomography revealed a splenorenal shunt, which was attributed to OX. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration(BRTO)was then performed. The patient has been routinely followed up in the outpatient clinic and has had no recurrence of hyperammonemia or cancer 14 months after the procedure. In retrospect, the splenorenal shunt was present on his first visit, therefore, hyperammonemia could have been prevented at the time of commencement of chemotherapy. We report our case, along with the relevant literature.

Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of rebleeding in people with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: People with liver cirrhosis who have had one episode of variceal bleeding are at risk for repeated episodes of bleeding. Endoscopic intervention and portosystemic shunts are used to prevent further bleeding, but there is no consensus as to which approach is preferable. OBJECTIVES: To compare the benefits and harms of shunts (surgical shunts (total shunt (TS), distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS), or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)) versus endoscopic intervention (endoscopic sclerotherapy or banding, or both) with or without medical treatment (non-selective beta blockers or nitrates, or both) for prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with liver cirrhosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the CHBG Controlled Trials Register; CENTRAL, in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; LILACS (Bireme); Science Citation Index - Expanded (Web of Science); and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (Web of Science); as well as conference proceedings and the references of trials identified until 22 June 2020. We contacted study investigators and industry researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing shunts versus endoscopic interventions with or without medical treatment in people with cirrhosis who had recovered from a variceal haemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. When possible, we collected data to allow intention-to-treat analysis. For each outcome, we estimated a meta-analysed estimate of treatment effect across trials (risk ratio for binary outcomes). We used random-effects model meta-analysis as our main analysis and as a means of presenting results. We reported differences in means for continuous outcomes without a meta-analytic estimate due to high variability in their assessment among all trials. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 27 randomised trials with 1828 participants. Three trials assessed TSs, five assessed DSRSs, and 19 trials assessed TIPSs. The endoscopic intervention was sclerotherapy in 16 trials, band ligation in eight trials, and a combination of band ligation and either sclerotherapy or glue injection in three trials. In eight trials, endoscopy was combined with beta blockers (in one trial plus isosorbide mononitrate). We judged all trials to be at high risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence for all the outcome review results as very low (i.e. the true effects of the results are likely to be substantially different from the results of estimated effects). The very low evidence grading is due to the overall high risk of bias for all trials, and to imprecision and publication bias for some outcomes. Therefore, we are very uncertain whether portosystemic shunts versus endoscopy interventions with or without medical treatment have effects on all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.13; 1828 participants; 27 trials), on rebleeding (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.50; 1769 participants; 26 trials), on mortality due to rebleeding (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76; 1779 participants; 26 trials), and on occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, both acute (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.92; 1649 participants; 24 trials) and chronic (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.55; 956 participants; 13 trials). No data were available regarding health-related quality of life. Analysing each modality of portosystemic shunts individually (i.e. TS, DSRS, and TIPS) versus endoscopic interventions with or without medical treatment, we are very uncertain if each type of shunt has effect on all-cause mortality: TS, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.13; 164 participants; 3 trials; DSRS, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.33; 352 participants; 4 trials; and TIPS, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.31; 1312 participants; 19 trial; on rebleeding: TS, RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.56; 127 participants; 2 trials; DSRS, RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.65; 330 participants; 5 trials; and TIPS, RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.55; 1312 participants; 19 trials; on mortality due to rebleeding: TS, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.96; 164 participants; 3 trials; DSRS, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.74; 352 participants; 5 trials; and TIPS, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; 1263 participants; 18 trials; on acute hepatic encephalopathy: TS, RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.92; 115 participants; 2 trials; DSRS, RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.08; 287 participants; 4 trials, TIPS, RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.99; 1247 participants; 18 trials; and chronic hepatic encephalopathy: TS, Fisher's exact test P = 0.11; 69 participants; 1 trial; DSRS, RR 4.87, 95% CI 1.46 to 16.23; 170 participants; 2 trials; and TIPS, RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.93 to 3.80; 717 participants; 10 trials. The proportion of participants with shunt occlusion or dysfunction was overall 37% (95% CI 33% to 40%). It was 3% (95% CI 0.8% to 10%) following TS, 7% (95% CI 3% to 13%) following DSRS, and 47.1% (95% CI 43% to 51%) following TIPS. Shunt dysfunction in trials utilising polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents was 17% (95% CI 11% to 24%). Length of inpatient hospital stay and cost were not comparable across trials. Funding was unclear in 16 trials; 11 trials were funded by government, local hospitals, or universities. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on whether portosystemic shunts versus endoscopy interventions with or without medical treatment in people with cirrhosis and previous hypertensive portal bleeding have little or no effect on all-cause mortality is very uncertain. Evidence on whether portosystemic shunts may reduce bleeding and mortality due to bleeding while increasing hepatic encephalopathy is also very uncertain. We need properly conducted trials to assess effects of these interventions not only on assessed outcomes, but also on quality of life, costs, and length of hospital stay.

H-shaped partial splenorenal shunting with the use of a reinforced graft made of porous polytetrafluoroethylene. / N-obraznoe partsial'noe splenorenal'noe shuntirovanie s ispol'zovaniem armirovannogo proteza iz poristogo politetraftorétilena.

AIM: The study was aimed at improving the immediate and remote results of splenorenal bypass grafting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 57 patients presenting with hepatic cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and recurrent haemorrhage from oesophageal varices underwent an H-shaped partial splenorenal shunt procedure using an externally reinforced 1.5-2.0-cm-long synthetic graft with a diameter equalling half of that of the splenic vein in an end-to-side fashion. Assessment of efficacy of shunting was based on intraoperative measurement of venous pressure in the portal system before and after shunting, the findings of Doppler ultrasonography of the linear velocity of blood flow in the portal, splenic, and left renal veins in the early postoperative period, as well as computed tomography, esophagogastroscopy, and assessment of the degree of hepatic encephalopathy in the remote postoperative period. RESULTS: The findings of intraoperative measurement of venous pressure in the portal vein system before and after shunting demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in (normalization of) portal pressure in all patients after bypass grafting (p≤0.05). There were no severe postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, nor events of decompensation of hepatic insufficiency. According to the findings of Doppler ultrasonography of the linear velocity of blood flow and control computed tomography after surgery, the splenic vein, left renal vein and the conduit between them remained patent at all terms of postoperative follow up. The findings of control esophagogastroscopy revealed a statistically significant decrease in the degree of oesophageal varices at 3, 6, and 9 months after shunting (p≤0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the change of the degree of hepatic encephalopathy at 3, 6, and 9 months after shunting (p=0.853, p=0.712, and p=0.581, respectively). At various terms after surgery, nine patients underwent deceased donor liver transplantation, with the splenorenal shunt ligated intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: This method of splenorenal shunting makes it possible to decrease the risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices and venous thromboses in vascular anastomoses, as well as complications resulting from using autovenous conduits, to decrease the risk of decomposition of hepatic insufficiency and the frequency of the development of encephalopathy in the postoperative period. Besides, this method makes it possible to easily dismantle the previously created artificial portocaval shunt in the process of liver transplantation.

[A case of gastric antral vascular ectasia improved by splenorenal shunt embolization].

An 80-year-old man with chronic renal failure and a splenorenal shunt was admitted because of progressive anemia. Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed bleeding from a gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Despite treatment with argon plasma coagulation and blood transfusions on multiple occasions, anemia caused by GAVE bleeding recurred frequently. The GAVE improved after splenorenal shunt embolization, and the patient did not require further blood transfusions for anemia. In this case, we inferred that some humoral factor (e.g., gastrin) in the portal blood caused the GAVE.

[A preliminary study on predicting anastomotic occlusion in patients with cirrhosis underwent splenectomy combined with splenorenal shunt by ultrasonography].

OBJECTIVE: To predict anastomotic occlusion after splenectomy combined with splenorenal shunt surgery by ultrasound technique.
 Methods: To retrospectively analyze 53 cases of splenectomy combined with splenorenal shunt surgery. We divided these patients into 2 groups: a patency group (n=39) and an occlusion group (n=14), which were based on the results of splenorenal venous anastomotic stoma with spiral CT. The statistical methods were used to analyze the ultrasound detection indicators (the internal diameter, blood flow velocity, blood flow volume, thrombosis and blood flow direction of portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein) for those 2 groups, and then to figure out the predictive factors that affect splenorenal venous anastomotic stoma.
 Results: Compared with the patency group, there are significant broadening of the portal vein diameter, narrowing of the splenic vein diameter, reduction of the splenic vein blood flow velocity, reduction of splenic venous flow volume, splenic vein thrombosis formation and changes of the splenic vein blood flow direction (all P<0.05).
 Conclusion: Ultrasound indicators of portal vein diameter broadening, splenic vein diameter narrowing, splenic vein blood flow velocity reduction, splenic venous flow volume reduction, splenic vein thrombosis formation and change of splenic vein blood flow direction are influential factors for the splenorenal anastomotic occlusion in patients after splenectomy combined with splenorenal shunt surgery.

Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Surgical Splenorenal Shunt Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients.

PURPOSE: Few established criteria exist to prompt angiographic evaluation and intervention for surgically created splenorenal shunts (SRS). Clinical and Doppler ultrasound (DUS) imaging predictors of shunt dysfunction were evaluated in this retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing SRS angiography over a 10-year period were retrospectively identified. Preangiography platelet count and DUS measurements of spleen diameter, maximum splenic vein velocity, and maximum shunt velocity were assessed and compared to findings at subsequent catheter angiography. RESULTS: Twenty-six SRS angiograms were performed in 16 patients. Two of the 26 procedures were excluded from analysis due to insufficient baseline preangiography clinical and DUS data. In the remaining 24 cases, significant stenosis/occlusion was confirmed at angiography in 20, whereas wide patency was seen in 4. For the 20 cases of angiographically confirmed significant stenosis/occlusion, when compared to baseline post-SRS creation to immediate preangiography evaluation there was a greater decrease in platelet count (-51.8% vs -19.4%), a greater increase in spleen diameter (+13.4% vs +3.7%), a greater increase in maximum shunt velocity (+74.7% vs +59.7%), and a greater decrease in splenic vein velocity (-25.0% vs -18.5%). CONCLUSION: Clinical evidence of splenic sequestration and DUS finding of increased maximum shunt velocity correlate with angiographic findings of SRS dysfunction and could be used to help predict the need for shunt intervention.

Surgical portosystemic shunts versus devascularisation procedures for prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis is an important cause of variceal bleeding in low-income countries. Randomised clinical trials have evaluated the outcomes of two categories of surgical interventions, shunts and devascularisation procedures, for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. The comparative overall benefits and harms of these two interventions are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of surgical portosystemic shunts versus oesophagogastric devascularisation procedures for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, reference lists of articles, and proceedings of relevant associations for trials that met the inclusion criteria (date of search 11 January 2018). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing surgical portosystemic shunts versus oesophagogastric devascularisation procedures for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the trials and extracted data using methodological standards expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias according to domains and risk of random errors with GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We found two randomised clinical trials including 154 adult participants, aged between 18 years and 65 years, diagnosed with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. One of the trials randomised participants to proximal splenorenal shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt versus oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy, and the other randomised participants to distal splenorenal shunt versus oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy. In both trials the diagnosis of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis was made based on clinical and biochemical assessments. The trials were conducted in Brazil and Egypt. Both trials were at high risk of bias.We are uncertain as to whether surgical portosystemic shunts improved all-cause mortality compared with oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy due to imprecision in the trials (risk ratio (RR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 9.92; participants = 154; studies = 2). We are uncertain whether serious adverse events differed between surgical portosystemic shunts and oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy (RR 2.26, 95% CI 0.44 to 11.70; participants = 154; studies = 2). None of the trials reported on health-related quality of life. We are uncertain whether variceal rebleeding differed between surgical portosystemic shunts and oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.23; participants = 154; studies = 2). We found evidence suggesting an increase in encephalopathy in the shunts group versus the devascularisation with splenectomy group (RR 7.51, 95% CI 1.45 to 38.89; participants = 154; studies = 2). We are uncertain whether ascites and re-interventions differed between surgical portosystemic shunts and oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy. We computed Trial Sequential Analysis for all outcomes, but the trial sequential monitoring boundaries could not be drawn because of insufficient sample size and events. We downgraded the overall certainty of the body of evidence for all outcomes to very low due to risk of bias and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the very low certainty of the available body of evidence and the low number of clinical trials, we could not determine an overall benefit or harm of surgical portosystemic shunts compared with oesophagogastric devascularisation with splenectomy. Future randomised clinical trials should be designed with sufficient statistical power to assess the benefits and harms of surgical portosystemic shunts versus oesophagogastric devascularisations with or without splenectomy and with or without oesophageal transection.

Tips and pitfalls in direct ligation of large spontaneous splenorenal shunt during liver transplantation.

Patients with large spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SRSs) prove challenging during liver transplantation (LT), regardless of organizing portal vein (PV) thrombosis. Here, we detail the clinical outcomes of 26 patients who underwent direct ligation of large SRSs during LT. Direct ligation of large SRS was applied in poor portal flow during LT. We performed temporary test clamping of the SRS before direct ligation and applied PV pressure monitoring in patients who showed signs of portal hypertension, such as bowel edema. We retrospectively reviewed and evaluated their clinical outcomes. Among 843 patients who underwent LT between 2010 and 2015, 26 (3.1%) underwent direct ligation of SRS without any intraoperative event. Mean preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 16.7 ± 9.0. The main PV diameter on preoperative computed tomography was 8.3 ± 3.4 mm (range, 3.0-14.0 mm). SRS was easily identified at just below the distal pancreas and beside the inferior mesenteric vein in all patients. Accompanying PV thrombectomy was done in 42.3% of patients. Among 26 patients, massive and prolonged ascites was evident in 15.4% (n = 4) postoperatively. They were all living donor LT recipients with a small PV diameter (4.0-6.7 mm). Except for 1 patient who underwent splenic artery embolization, ascites was tolerable and well controlled by conservative management. There was a 7.7% rate of major complications related to direct ligation, including reoperation due to combined ligation of SRS along with a left renal vein at the confluence. Except for 1 hospital mortality due to sepsis, 25 patients (96.2%) are alive with no evidence of further PV complications. In conclusion, direct ligation of large SRS during LT is a safe and feasible method to overcome the effects of a large SRS. Liver Transplantation 23 899-906 2017 AASLD.

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Spontaneous Splenorenal Shunt in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans.

BACKGROUND This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the prevalence and clinical characteristics of spontaneous splenorenal shunt in liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included a total of 105 cirrhotic patients who were admitted to our hospital between June 2012 and December 2013 and underwent contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI scans at admissions. Spontaneous splenorenal shunt was identified. Clinical and laboratory data were compared between cirrhotic patients with and without spontaneous splenorenal shunt. RESULTS The prevalence of spontaneous splenorenal shunt was 10.5% (11/105). The prevalence of hepatic encephalopathy was higher in patients with spontaneous splenorenal shunt than in those without spontaneous splenorenal shunt (18.2% vs. 4.3%, p=0.062), but the difference between them was not statistically significant. The prevalence of acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding was lower in patients with spontaneous splenorenal shunt than in those without spontaneous splenorenal shunt (0% vs. 18.1%, p=0.205), but the difference between them was not statistically significant. Patients with spontaneous splenorenal shunt had significantly higher Child-Pugh scores (9.50±1.65 vs. 7.43±2.02, p=0.002) and MELD scores (11.26±7.29 vs. 5.67±6.83, p=0.017) than those without spontaneous splenorenal shunt. In-hospital mortality was similar between them (0% vs. 4.3%, p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS Spontaneous splenorenal shunt might be associated with worse liver function in liver cirrhosis, but not with in-hospital mortality.