Binding characteristics of the doxepin E/Z-isomers to the histamine H1 receptor revealed by receptor-bound ligand analysis and molecular dynamics study.

Doxepin is an antihistamine and tricyclic antidepressant that binds to the histamine H1 receptor (H1R) with high affinity. Doxepin is an 85:15 mixture of the E- and Z-isomers. The Z-isomer is well known to be more effective than the E-isomer, whereas based on the crystal structure of the H1R/doxepin complex, the hydroxyl group of Thr1123.37 is close enough to form a hydrogen bond with the oxygen atom of the E-isomer. The detailed binding characteristics and reasons for the differences remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed doxepin isomers bound to the receptor following extraction from a purified H1R protein complexed with doxepin. The ratio of the E- and Z-isomers bound to wild-type (WT) H1R was 55:45, indicating that the Z-isomer was bound to WT H1R with an approximately 5.2-fold higher affinity than the E-isomer. For the T1123.37V mutant, the E/Z ratio was 89:11, indicating that both isomers have similar affinities. Free energy calculations using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations also reproduced the experimental results of the relative binding free energy differences between the isomers for WT and T1123.37V. Furthermore, MD simulations revealed that the hydroxyl group of T1123.37 did not form hydrogen bonds with the E-isomer, but with the adjacent residues in the binding pocket. Analysis of the receptor-bound doxepin and MD simulations suggested that the hydroxyl group of T1123.37 contributes to the formation of a chemical environment in the binding pocket, which is slightly more favorable for the Z-isomer without hydrogen bonding with doxepin.

Topical delivery of doxepin using liposome containing cream: An emerging approach in enhancing skin retention.

Conventional formulation of topical doxepin has similar antihistaminic effects as oral doxepin; however, its efficacy is limited due to poor localized effects on the skin. This study was designed to compare the ex vivo permeation and retention of two topical doxepin formulations; liposomal cream and plain cream. Doxepin-containing liposomes were prepared with the thin-film hydration method and assessed for size, size distribution, morphology, entrapment efficiency (EE%) and stability Using rat skin specimens in a Franz diffusion cell. Doxepin concentration in skin and receptor fluid was quantified by a validated HPLC method. The optimized liposomal formulation represented a uniform shape with narrow size distribution and an average diameter of 208.7±5.6nm. EE% of doxepin was 79±1.3 and the liposomes were stable at least for six weeks at 4°C. Ex vivo studies showed that while a significantly higher amount of doxepin has passed through the skin and entered the receptor compartment from conventional dosage form (47.06±2.5µg/cm2vs 11.20±0.6µg/cm2 for liposomal formulation), liposomal doxepin favoured accumulation in dermis and epidermis. These results suggest that the liposomal doxepin cream is an effective and easy-to-use formulation and may improve the cutaneous retention of doxepin, thus decreasing its systemic side effects.

Effect of Ions and Sequence Variants on the Antagonist Binding Properties of the Histamine H1 Receptor.

The histamine H1 receptor (H1R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and represents a main target in the treatment of allergic reactions as well as inflammatory reactions and depressions. Although the overall effect of antagonists on H1 function has been extensively investigated, rather little is known about the potential modulatory effect of ions or sequence variants on antagonist binding. We investigated the dynamics of a phosphate ion present in the crystal structure and of a sodium ion, for which we determined the position in the allosteric pocket by metadynamics simulations. Both types of ions exhibit significant dynamics within their binding site; however, some key contacts remain stable over the simulation time, which might be exploited to develop more potent drugs targeting these sites. The dynamics of the ions is almost unaffected by the presence or absence of doxepin, as also reflected in their small effect (less than 1 kcal·mol-1) on doxepin binding affinity. We also examined the effect of four H1R sequence variants observed in the human population on doxepin binding. These variants cause a reduction in doxepin affinity of up to 2.5 kcal·mol-1, indicating that personalized medical treatments that take into account individual mutation patterns could increase precision in the dosage of GPCR-targeting drugs.

Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin.

The biogenic amine histamine is an important pharmacological mediator involved in pathophysiological processes such as allergies and inflammations. Histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists are very effective drugs alleviating the symptoms of allergic reactions. Here we show the crystal structure of the H(1)R complex with doxepin, a first-generation H(1)R antagonist. Doxepin sits deep in the ligand-binding pocket and directly interacts with Trp 428(6.48), a highly conserved key residue in G-protein-coupled-receptor activation. This well-conserved pocket with mostly hydrophobic nature contributes to the low selectivity of the first-generation compounds. The pocket is associated with an anion-binding region occupied by a phosphate ion. Docking of various second-generation H(1)R antagonists reveals that the unique carboxyl group present in this class of compounds interacts with Lys 191(5.39) and/or Lys 179(ECL2), both of which form part of the anion-binding region. This region is not conserved in other aminergic receptors, demonstrating how minor differences in receptors lead to pronounced selectivity differences with small molecules. Our study sheds light on the molecular basis of H(1)R antagonist specificity against H(1)R.

Spectroscopic, electrochemical and molecular docking studies of dothiepin and doxepin with bovine serum albumin and DNA base.

The interaction of dothiepin (DOT) and doxepin (DOX) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and a DNA base (adenine) was studied using UV-visible, fluorescence, attenuated total reflection-infra-red (ATR-IR), cyclic voltammetry and molecular docking methods. Strong fluorescence quenching was observed upon interaction of DOT and DOX with BSA/adenine and the mechanism suggested static quenching. Hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions were the predominant intermolecular forces needed to stabilize the copolymer. Upon addition of the drugs: (i) the tautomeric equilibrium structure of the adenine was changed; and (ii) the oxidation and the reduction peaks of the adenine/BSA interaction shifted towards high and low potentials, respectively. In ATR-IR, the band shift of amides I and II indicated a change in secondary structure of BSA upon binding to DOT and DOX drugs. The reduction in voltammetric current in the presence of BSA/adenine was attributed to slow diffusion of BSA/adenine binding with DOX/DOT. The docking method indicated that the drug moiety interacted with the BSA molecule. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Histamine Neuroimaging in Stress-Related Disorders.

Although histamine plays a major role in animal models of stress-related disorders, human neuroimaging data are sparse. Histamine H1 receptors in the human brain were first imaged by Professor Kazuhiko Yanai in 1992 by using 11C-doxepin, a potent ligand of H1 receptors, and positron emission tomography (PET). Subsequent work revealed that H1 receptors are reduced in the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in patients with major depressive disorders. A sex difference in H1 receptor binding in the brain has also been found, with women exhibiting more abundant H1 receptor binding than men. Moreover, female patients with anorexia nervosa show higher H1 receptor binding in the amygdala and lentiform nucleus. These studies also found an inverse correlation of depression scores with H1 receptor binding. Histamine is considered to play a major role in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a representative disorder of brain-gut interactions. Along these lines, hypnotic suggestion dramatically changes the waveforms of viscerosensory cerebral evoked potentials in response to electrical rectal stimulation and these changes are modified by the administration of H1 antagonist. The direction of the H1 antagonist-induced changes in the viscerosensory cerebral evoked potentials differs between IBS patients and healthy controls. Thus, histamine likely plays an important role in stress-related disorders. Further histamine brain imaging studies of humans are warranted.

Cerebral histamine H1 receptor binding potential measured with PET under a test dose of olopatadine, an antihistamine, is reduced after repeated administration of olopatadine.

UNLABELLED: Some antihistamine drugs that are used for rhinitis and pollinosis have a sedative effect as they enter the brain and block the H(1) receptor, potentially causing serious accidents. Receptor occupancy has been measured with PET under single-dose administration in humans to classify antihistamines as more sedating or as less sedating (or nonsedating). In this study, the effect of repeated administration of olopatadine, an antihistamine, on the cerebral H(1) receptor was measured with PET. METHODS: A total of 17 young men with rhinitis underwent dynamic brain PET with (11)C-doxepin at baseline, under an initial single dose of 5 mg of olopatadine (acute scan), and under another 5-mg dose after repeated administration of olopatadine at 10 mg/d for 4 wk (chronic scan). The H(1) receptor binding potential was estimated using Logan graphical analysis with cerebellum as reference region input. RESULTS: The acute scan showed a slight decrease in H(1) receptor binding potential across the cerebral cortex (by 15% in the frontal cortex), but the chronic scan showed a marked decrease (by 45% from the acute scan in the frontal cortex). Behavioral data before and after the PET scans did not reveal any sedative effect. CONCLUSION: The results may be interpreted as either intracerebral accumulation of olopatadine or H(1) receptor downregulation due to repeated administration. The study shows feasibility and potential value for PET in evaluating the pharmacologic effect of a drug not only after a single dose but also after repeated administration.

Analytical method for simultaneously measuring ex vivo drug receptor occupancy and dissociation rate: application to (R)-dimethindene occupancy of central histamine H1 receptors.

We introduce a novel experimental method to determine both the extent of ex vivo receptor occupancy of administered compound and its dissociation rate constant (k4). [Here, we reference k4 as the rate of offset of unlabeled ligand in convention with Motulsky and Mahan (1)]. We derived a kinetic rate equation based on the dissociation rate constant for an unlabeled compound competing for the same site as a labeled compound and describe a model to simulate fractional occupancy. To validate our model, we performed in vitro kinetics and ex vivo occupancy experiments in rat cortex with varying concentrations of (R)-dimethindene, a sedating antihistamine. Brain tissue was removed at various times post oral administration, and histamine H1 receptor ligand [3H]-doxepin binding to homogenates from drug-treated or vehicle-treated rats was measured at multiple time points at room temperature. Fractional occupancy and k4 for (R)-dimethindene binding to H1 receptors were calculated by using our proposed model. Rats dosed with 30 and 60 mg/kg (R)-dimethindene showed 42% and 67% occupancy of central H1 receptors, respectively. These results were comparable to occupancy data determined by equilibrium radioligand binding. In addition, drug k4 rate determined by using our ex vivo method was equivalent to k4 determined by in vitro competition kinetics (dissociation half-life t(1/2) approximately 30 min). The outlined method can be used to assess, by simulation and experiment, occupancy for compounds based on dissociation rate constants and contributes to current efforts in drug optimization to profile antagonist efficacy in terms of its kinetic drug-target binding parameters. Data described by the method may be analyzed with commercially available software. Suggested fitting procedures are given in the appendix.

Dose dependency of brain histamine H(1) receptor occupancy following oral administration of cetirizine hydrochloride measured using PET with [11C]doxepin.

AIMS: The strength of sedation due to antihistamines can be evaluated using positron emission tomography (PET). The purpose of the present study is to measure histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) occupancy following oral administration of cetirizine (10 and 20 mg) in order to examine dose dependency. METHODS: Fifteen healthy male volunteers (age range, 20-35 years) were divided into 3 subgroups and were studied following single oral administration of cetirizine at 10 mg (n = 5) and 20 mg (n = 5) or hydroxyzine at 30 mg (n = 5) using PET with 11C-doxepin. Each subject was scanned also following the administration of placebo. Binding potential and H(1)RO values were calculated in the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Subjective sleepiness was also measured, and the correlation to H(1)RO was examined for each antihistamine. RESULTS: The averaged H(1)ROs of cetirizine 10 mg, 20 mg, and hydroxyzine 30 mg in the prefrontal and cingulate cortices was 12.6%, 25.2%, and 67.6%, respectively. The H(1)RO of hydroxyzine 30 mg correlated well with subjective sleepiness (p < 0.001); however, those of cetirizine 10 and 20 mg showed no correlation with subjective sleepiness. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that the brain penetration of orally administered cetirizine was dose-dependent. Cetirizine 10 mg, with its low H(1)RO and thus minimal sedation, could be more safely used than cetirizine 20 mg for the treatment of various allergic disorders.

Binding of histamine to the H1 receptor-a molecular dynamics study.

Binding of histamine to the G-protein coupled histamine H1 receptor plays an important role in the context of allergic reactions; however, no crystal structure of the resulting complex is available yet. To deduce the histamine binding site, we performed unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a microsecond time scale, which allowed to monitor one binding event, in which particularly the residues of the extracellular loop 2 were involved in the initial recognition process. The final histamine binding pose in the orthosteric pocket is characterized by interactions with Asp1073.32, Tyr1083.33, Thr1945.43, Asn1985.46, Trp4286.48, Tyr4316.51, Phe4326.52, and Phe4356.55, which is in agreement with existing mutational data. The conformational stability of the obtained complex structure was subsequently confirmed in 2 µs equilibrium MD simulations, and a metadynamics simulation proved that the detected binding site represents an energy minimum. A complementary investigation of a D107A mutant, which has experimentally been shown to abolish ligand binding, revealed that this exchange results in a significantly weaker interaction and enhanced ligand dynamics. This finding underlines the importance of the electrostatic interaction between the histamine ammonium group and the side chain of Asp1073.32 for histamine binding.

Development of a buccal doxepin platform for pain in oral mucositis derived from head and neck cancer treatment.

This study describes the development of semisolid formulations containing doxepin (DOX) for pain relief in oral mucositis, frequently related to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatments in patients with head and neck cancer. Chemical permeation enhancers were evaluated and selected according to the results obtained from rheological studies, drug release, and drug permeation and retention through buccal mucosa. Finally, the selected formulation was compared in vivo, with a reference DOX mouthwash, whose clinical efficacy had been previously reported. The obtained findings showed that an orabase® platform loading transcutol® (10%) and menthol (5%) for the buccal vehiculization of DOX exhibited a decreased elastic and viscous behavior improving its application. The main drug release mechanism could be considered as diffusion according to Higuchi model. Obtained DOX permeation rates were considered optimal for an analgesic effect and far below to an antidepressant activity. Similar in vivo plasma concentrations were found for the semisolid formulation and the reference mouthwash. However, DOX amounts retained in the mucosa of animals for the semisolid formulation were higher than the reference, which let us hypostatize even stronger potential local therapeutic effect with additional advantages such as, mucoadhesive properties, absence of alcohol, some degree of freshness, as well as, drug palatability improvement.

Histamine H1 receptors in schizophrenic patients measured by positron emission tomography.

Increasing evidence has shown that the histaminergic neuron system is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of histamine H1 receptors between schizophrenics and normal human subjects in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). H1 receptor binding was measured in 10 normal subjects and 10 medicated schizophrenic patients by PET and [11C] doxepin, a radioligand for the H1 receptor. The binding potential (BP=Bmax/K(D)) of [11C] doxepin for available brain H1 receptors was calculated by a graphical analysis on voxel-by-voxel basis and compared between schizophrenics and normal subjects using the regions of interest (ROIs) and the statistical parametrical mapping (SPM99). BP values for H1 receptors in the frontal and prefrontal cortices and the cingulate gyrus were significantly lower among the schizophrenic patients than among the control subjects. On the contrary, there were no areas of the brain where H1 receptors were significantly higher among the schizophrenic patients than the control subjects. The results of our study suggest that the central histaminergic neuron system could be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, although further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Histamine H1 receptor occupancy by the new-generation antipsychotics olanzapine and quetiapine: a positron emission tomography study in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: Histamine H1 antagonists have hypnotic, appetite-promoting, and sedative side effects. Most second-generation antipsychotics have potent antagonistic effects on histamine H1 receptor (H1R). Positron emission tomography (PET) can measure the H1R occupancy (H1RO) in vivo, although there are no reports regarding antipsychotics. OBJECTIVES: We studied the H1RO of olanzapine and quetiapine in vivo with respect to their plasma concentrations and subjective drowsiness by performing human PET imaging studies with [(11)C]doxepin, a potent PET ligand of H1R. METHODS: Six healthy Japanese male volunteers were enrolled. Cross-randomized PET imaging was performed after a single oral administration of olanzapine (2.5 mg), quetiapine (25 mg), or placebo. PET data were analyzed by region of interest and voxel-by-voxel analysis. We concurrently measured plasma drug concentrations by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and evaluated subjective sleepiness. RESULTS: The binding potential ratios of olanzapine and quetiapine in the cerebral cortex were significantly lower than that of the placebo. The H1RO values of olanzapine and quetiapine in the cortex were approximately 61-80 and 56-81%, respectively. The binding potential ratios of the drugs were significantly lower than that of the placebo in the dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral temporal cortices, and anterior and posterior cingulate gyri. The H1RO values in the cortex were significantly correlated with subjective sleepiness but not plasma drug concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine and quetiapine have high H1RO values in the human brain under their clinical minimum doses. This study provides a foundation of the properties by which new-generation antipsychotics block the central histaminergic system in humans.

Multiple-dose doxepin kinetics in depressed patients.

Doxepin (DOX) and desmethyldoxepin (DMD) kinetics were examined in seven depressed patients receiving single daily doses of 150 mg DOX for 1 to 3 wk. Blood samples were collected at 0, 4, 12, 15, 18, and 24 hr after the first dose, at bedtime before doses 7, 14, and 21, and at 4, 12, 15, 18, and 24 hr after the last dose. Plasma concentrations of DOX and DMD were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Clinical response to DOX treatment was evaluated by the Zung self-rating depression scale and the Hamilton rating scale for depression. Mean DOX t1/2 after the first dose was 17.7 hr, and it rose to 21.8 hr after the last dose. Mean DMD t1/2 was not significantly affected by multiple dosing (34.2 hr after first dose and 37.1 hr after last dose). Mean values for plasma clearance, volume of distribution, and first-pass metabolism were 0.87 l/hr/kg, 23.8 l/kg, and 69.5%. In depressed patients kinetics were in the normal range. Steady-state concentrations of DOX and DMD were reached within 2 wk of beginning DOX dosing. The concentration-response curve indicated strong correlation between total DOX concentration (DOX + DMD) and antidepressant effect (r2 = 0.76).

Cardiovascular effects of doxepin in cardiac patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

The effect of doxepin on ventricular arrhythmias, the ECG, and left ventricular function was evaluated in 10 cardiac patients with symptoms with frequent ventricular premature depolarizations in a dose-ranging protocol. Four patients (40%) had greater than or equal to 80% ventricular premature depolarization suppression; four of eight with pairs and four of six with ventricular tachycardia had greater than or equal to 90% suppression. The mean maximal doxepin dose was 115 +/- 41 mg/day; mean nadir total doxepin concentration was 61 +/- 48 ng/ml and mean nadir total desmethyldoxepin concentration was 51 +/- 42 ng/ml. Doxepin increased the heart rate and the PR, QRS, and QTc intervals of the surface ECG (P not significant). There was no significant change in resting mean left ventricular ejection fraction with doxepin: 41% +/- 15% vs. 43% +/- 19% (P not significant). Complaints of sedation (eight patients) limited dose ranging and tolerance to the drug. Although doxepin suppressed ventricular premature depolarizations in four patients, marked sedation limits its usefulness for primary treatment of arrhythmias in this population.

Histamine H1 receptor occupancy in human brains after single oral doses of histamine H1 antagonists measured by positron emission tomography.

1. Histamine H1 receptor occupancy in the human brain was measured in 20 healthy young men by positron emission tomography (PET) using [11C]-doxepin. 2. (+)-Chlorpheniramine, a selective and classical antihistamine, occupied 76.8 +/- 4.2% of the averaged values of available histamine H1 receptors in the frontal cortex after its administration in a single oral dose of 2 mg. Intravenous administration of 5 mg (+)-chlorpheniramine almost completely abolished the binding of [11C]-doxepin to H1 receptors (H1 receptor occupancy: 98.2 +/- 1.2%). 3. Terfenadine, a nonsedative antihistamine, occupied 17.2 +/- 14.2% of the available H1 receptors in the human frontal cortex after its administration in a single oral dose of 60 mg. 4. There was no correlation between H1 receptor occupancy by terfenadine and the plasma concentration of the active acid metabolite of terfenadine in each subject. 5. PET data on human brain were essentially compatible with those on H1 receptor occupancy in guinea-pig brain determined by in vivo binding techniques, although for the same H1 receptor occupancy the dose was less in human subjects than in guinea-pigs. 6. The PET studies demonstrated the usefulness of measuring H1 receptor occupancy with classical and second-generation antihistamines in human brain to estimate their unwanted side effects such as sedation and drowsiness quantitatively.

The binding of doxepin to histamine H1-receptors in guinea-pig and rat brain.

The affinity constant for doxepin obtained from inhibition of histamine-induced contraction of guinea-pig intestinal smooth muscle at 30 degrees C was 2.6 +/- 0.18 X 10(10)M-1. The slope of a Schild plot was not significantly different from unity. The affinity constant of doxepin did not vary markedly with temperature. At 37 degrees C it was 3.75 +/- 0.02 X 10(10)M-1 and at 25 degrees C 2.1 X 10(10)M-1. Doxepin was a competitive inhibitor of [3H]-mepyramine binding to guinea-pig cerebellar homogenates. The affinity constant derived for doxepin at 30 degrees C was 1.12 +/- 0.45 X 10(10)M-1. Hill coefficients for curves of doxepin or mepyramine inhibition of [3H]-mepyramine binding in guinea-pig cerebellum, cerebral cortex and hippocampus did not differ significantly from unity. The mean affinity of mepyramine for histamine H1-receptors in rat brain homogenates at 30 degrees C was 3.5 X 10(8)M-1. Hill coefficients for curves of doxepin or mepyramine inhibition of [3H]-mepyramine binding to homogenates of rat cerebral cortex or rat whole brain were near unity. These studies provide no evidence that doxepin binds preferentially to a sub-class of histamine H1-receptors in rat brain.

Doxepin up-to-date: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy with particular reference to depression.

Doxepin is closely related in structure and general pharmacological properties to other tricyclic antidepressant drugs such as amitriptyline and imipramine. It combines antidepressant activity with a sedative effect and in this respect resembles amitriptyline, with which it shares a similar profile of clinical action. The mood elevating effect of doxepin appears to be similar to that of amitriptyline but is probably less marked than that of imipramine and in some studies has been slower to take effect than imipramine. At dosages which have achieved a similar overall response rate, doxepin tends to cause fewer or less troublesome side-effects than imipramine, amitriptyline or amitriptyline-prephenazine. The more marked sedative properties of doxepin make it more useful than imipramine in depressed patients with sleep distrubances and in depression associated with anxiety. The benzodiazepines remain the drugs of choice in anxiety states. but when anxiety is accompained by significant depression, doxepin is more effective than chlordiazepoxide or diazepam. Doxepin is usually well tolerated, and in particular by the elderly and those with cardiovascular disease. Side-effects are similar in nature to those of other tricyclic antidepressants, with dry mouth, drowsiness and constipation being the most common. Postural hypotension is uncommon. Although doxepin appears to cause fewer cardiovascular side-effects in usual therapeutic doses, it has an intrinsic cardiotoxicity on overdosage similar to other tricyclics.

Doxepin and its metabolites in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in depressed patients.

Little information exists on the concentrations of antidepressants and their metabolites in CSF. We measured plasma and CSF levels of trans-doxepin (trans-DOX) and DOX metabolites in 12 depressed patients treated with DOX (250 mg/day) for 6 days. Spinal taps and blood samples were taken on day 7, 10 h after drug administration. Trans-DOX, cis-desmethyldoxepin (cis-DM-DOX), trans-desmethyldoxepin (trans-DM-DOX) and di-desmethyldoxepin (DDM-DOX) were analyzed in CSF and plasma samples by HPLC with column-switching. Although DOX was given as a mixture of 85% trans-DOX and 15% of the pharmacologically more active cis-DOX, we found similar amounts of cis-DM-DOX and trans-DM-DOX in plasma (59.8 +/- 45.1 versus 72.0 +/- 60.0 ng/ml; NS), suggesting that isomerization of DOX had taken place. Trans-DOX and DOX metabolites could be detected in CSF of most patients. Relatively low CSF concentrations of the active metabolite cis-DM-DOX were measured. Clinical efficacy, as assessed by HAMD scores, was not significantly related to plasma or CSF concentrations of trans-DOX or its metabolites. Trans-DOX and DOX metabolites were distributed differently between plasma and CSF. It is concluded that isomerization of DOX is not only relevant for neuronal uptake inhibition, but also for the transport of the metabolites.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two doxepin products.

The pharmacokinetics of two marketed formulations of doxepin HCl administered as a single 100-mg oral dose were compared. Sixteen healthy volunteers between the ages of 21 and 50 years participated in this crossover study. A one-week washout period intervened between doses. Blood samples were drawn before drug administration and at various times up to 48 hours after dosing. The concentrations of doxepin (DOX) and desmethyldoxepin (DDOX), the major active metabolite, were determined. Bioequivalence was determined by statistical comparisons of the area under the curve and maximum concentrations of DOX and DDOX. Statistical comparisons indicated no difference between the two formulations with respect to any of the parameters. The results of this study demonstrate that the two formulations of doxepin HCl are bioequivalent and would be expected to have similar clinical efficacy.