Faricimab Treat-and-Extend for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from the Randomized Phase 3 YOSEMITE and RHINE Trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of dual angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A pathway inhibition with intravitreal faricimab according to a personalized treat-and-extend (T&E)-based regimen with up to every-16-week dosing in the YOSEMITE and RHINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03622580 and NCT03622593, respectively) phase 3 trials of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority phase 3 trials. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with visual acuity loss (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 25-73 letters) due to center-involving DME. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6.0 mg T&E (previously referred to as personalized treatment interval), or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks. The T&E up to every-16-week dosing regimen was based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Included changes from baseline in BCVA and CST, number of injections, durability, absence of fluid, and safety through week 100. RESULTS: In YOSEMITE and RHINE (n = 940 and 951, respectively), noninferior year 1 visual acuity gains were maintained through year 2; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2 years (weeks 92, 96, and 100 average) with faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE and RHINE, +10.7 letters and +10.9 letters, respectively) or T&E (+10.7 letters and +10.1 letters, respectively) were comparable with aflibercept every 8 weeks (+11.4 letters and +9.4 letters, respectively). The median number of study drug injections was lower with faricimab T&E (YOSEMITE and RHINE, 10 and 11 injections, respectively) versus faricimab every 8 weeks (15 injections) and aflibercept every 8 weeks (14 injections) across both trials during the entire study. In the faricimab T&E arms, durability was improved further during year 2, with > 60% of patients receiving every-16-week dosing and approximately 80% receiving every-12-week or longer dosing at week 96. Almost 80% of patients who achieved every-16-week dosing at week 52 maintained every-16-week dosing without an interval reduction through week 96. Mean CST reductions were greater (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92/96/100 average: faricimab every 8 weeks -216.0/-202.6 µm, faricimab T&E -204.5/-197.1 µm, aflibercept every 8 weeks -196.3/-185.6 µm), and more patients achieved absence of DME (CST < 325 µm; YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 87%-92%/88%-93%, faricimab T&E 78%-86%/85%-88%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 77%-81%/80%-84%) and absence of intraretinal fluid (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 59%-63%/56%-62%, faricimab T&E 43%-48%/45%-52%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 33%-38%/39%-45%) with faricimab every 8 weeks or T&E versus aflibercept every 8 weeks through year 2. Overall, faricimab was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful visual acuity gains from baseline, anatomic improvements, and extended durability with intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks were maintained through year 2. Faricimab given as a personalized T&E-based dosing regimen supports the role of dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A inhibition to promote vascular stability and to provide durable efficacy for patients with DME. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Risk Factors for Meeting Criteria for Switching from Bevacizumab to Aflibercept When Treating Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Visual Acuity of < 20/40.

PURPOSE: To identify factors for meeting prespecified criteria for switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and moderate vision loss initially treated with bevacizumab in DRCR Retina Network protocol AC. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy participants with one or both eyes harboring CI-DME with visual acuity (VA) letter score of 69 to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/50-20/320). METHODS: Eligible eyes were assigned to receive intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (n = 158) or bevacizumab followed by aflibercept if prespecified criteria for switching were met between 12 weeks and 2 years (n = 154). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Meeting switching criteria: (1) at any time, (2) at 12 weeks, and (3) after 12 weeks. Associations between meeting the criteria for switching and factors measured at baseline and 12 weeks were evaluated in univariable analyses. Stepwise procedures were used to select variables for multivariable models. RESULTS: In the group receiving bevacizumab first, older participants showed a higher risk of meeting the switching criteria at any time, with a hazard ratio (HR) for a 10-year increase in age of 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.58). Male participants or eyes with worse baseline VA were more likely to switch at 12 weeks (for male vs. female: odds ratio [OR], 4.84 [95% CI, 1.32-17.81]; 5-letter lower baseline VA: OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.03-1.63]). Worse 12-week central subfield thickness (CST; 10-µm greater: HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]) was associated with increased risk of switching after 12 weeks. The mean ± standard deviation improvement in visual acuity after completing the switch to aflibercept was 3.7 ± 4.9 letters compared with the day of switching. CONCLUSIONS: The identified factors can be used to refine expectations regarding the likelihood that an eye will meet protocol criteria to switch to aflibercept when treatment is initiated with bevacizumab. Older patients are more likely to be switched. At 12 weeks, thicker CST was predictive of eyes most likely to be switched in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab for Macular Edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Week Results from the BALATON and COMINO Trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 24-week efficacy and safety of the dual angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor faricimab versus aflibercept in patients with vein occlusion. DESIGN: Phase 3, global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled trials: BALATON/COMINO (ClincalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04740905/NCT04740931; sites: 149/192). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with treatment-naïve foveal center-involved macular edema resulting from branch (BALATON) or central or hemiretinal (COMINO) RVO. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point: change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. Efficacy analyses included patients in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received ≥ 1 doses of study drug. RESULTS: Enrollment: BALATON, n = 553; COMINO, n = 729. The BCVA gains from the baseline to week 24 with faricimab were noninferior versus aflibercept in BALATON (adjusted mean change, +16.9 letters [95.03% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-18.1 letters] vs. +17.5 letters [95.03% CI, 16.3-18.6 letters]) and COMINO (+16.9 letters [95.03% CI, 15.4-18.3 letters] vs. +17.3 letters [95.03% CI, 15.9-18.8 letters]). Adjusted mean central subfield thickness reductions from the baseline were comparable for faricimab and aflibercept at week 24 in BALATON (-311.4 µm [95.03% CI, -316.4 to -306.4 µm] and -304.4 µm [95.03% CI, -309.3 to -299.4 µm]) and COMINO (-461.6 µm [95.03% CI, -471.4 to -451.9 µm] and -448.8 µm [95.03% CI, -458.6 to -439.0 µm]). A greater proportion of patients in the faricimab versus aflibercept arm achieved absence of fluorescein angiography-based macular leakage at week 24 in BALATON (33.6% vs. 21.0%; nominal P = 0.0023) and COMINO (44.4% vs. 30.0%; nominal P = 0.0002). Faricimab was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile comparable with aflibercept. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between patients receiving faricimab (16.3% [n = 45] and 23.0% [n = 84] in BALATON and COMINO, respectively) and aflibercept (20.4% [n = 56] and 27.7% [n = 100], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of faricimab, a dual Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibitor, in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacy of Faricimab versus Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema in the 20/50 or Worse Vision Subgroup in Phase III YOSEMITE and RHINE Trials.

PURPOSE: Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T suggests that the response to treatment among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) may vary depending on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We evaluated the efficacy of faricimab 6 mg versus aflibercept 2 mg over 2 years in patients with DME and baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse enrolled in faricimab phase III trials. DESIGN: YOSEMITE and RHINE were identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled, noninferiority trials. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥18 years of age with center-involving macular edema secondary to type 1 or 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients were randomized to faricimab every 8 weeks (Q8W), faricimab personalized treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen, or aflibercept Q8W. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population with baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in ETDRS BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to years 1 and 2 were compared between treatment arms using mixed-model repeated measures analyses. RESULTS: In YOSEMITE and RHINE, respectively, 220 and 217 patients in the faricimab Q8W arm, 220 and 219 patients in the faricimab T&E arm, and 219 and 214 patients in the aflibercept Q8W arm showed baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse. In both trials, mean change in ETDRS BCVA was comparable between treatments across trials at years 1 and 2. In YOSEMITE, adjusted mean change from baseline in CST (µm) at year 1 was greater with faricimab Q8W (-232.8; P < 0.0001) and faricimab T&E (-217.4; P = 0.0004) ) versus aflibercept Q8W (-190.4). In RHINE, this was faricimab Q8W (-214.2; P = 0.0006) and faricimab T&E (-206.6; P = 0.0116) versus aflibercept Q8W (-186.6). In both trials, change from baseline in CST at year 2 was greater with faricimab Q8W versus aflibercept. The median time to first CST of <325 µm and first absence of intraretinal fluid was shorter in the faricimab arms versus the aflibercept arm, with fewer injections on average. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DME and baseline ETDRS BCVA of 20/50 or worse, faricimab treatment resulted in comparable visual acuity, greater reduction in retinal thickness, and fewer injections compared with aflibercept. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Switching to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide does not jeopardize the functional and anatomic outcomes of dexamethasone implant treated eyes with diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Intraocular dexamethasone implant (DEXi) is an efficient treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). However, it may be unavailable or contraindicated. Triamcinolone acetonide is another corticosteroid that has proved to be safe and effective in treating macular edema complicating various diseases including diabetes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of a switch from DEXi to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) and back, in eyes with DME. METHODS: Retrospective study. DME eyes that had been treated with DEXi and switched to STTA between October 2018 and February 2019 (stock shortage of DEXi) were included. The functional and anatomical outcomes of the switch and switch-back were studied. RESULTS: 26 eyes of 17 patients (mean age 67.1 ± 8.2 years) were considered. The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.35 ± 0.17 decimals remaining stable after DEXi, STTA and switch-back to DEXi. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 492.7 ± 32.8 µm initially, decreasing to 294.3 ± 133.4 µm after DEXi, 369.9 ± 182.3 µm after STTA and 297.6 ± 72.0 µm after switching back to DEXi (all p < 0.05 versus baseline). Compared to baseline, the CMT reduction was numerically better after DEXi and switching back to DEXi than after STTA (mean reduction: -200.4 µm, -167.7 µm, and -95.08 µm respectively, p = 0.13). Intraocular pressure was comparable after DEXi and STTA. CONCLUSION: DEXi is the steroid of choice in DME. However, STTA can be a cost-effective alternative when DEXi is unavailable or contraindicated. This study suggests that STTA may be used in the context of a step therapy in DME.

Changes in wider field swept-source OCT angiography vascular metrics with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on vascular metrics in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using wider field swept-source OCT angiography (WF SS-OCTA). METHODS: We included 23 eyes with macular edema associated with non-ischemic CRVO from 22 patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy (median number of injections: 5 [2-9]). Changes in vessel density (VD), vessel skeletonized density (VSD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters were measured using WF SS-OCTA. Visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were also measured. RESULTS: Median CST decreased significantly from 369 µm (305-531) to 267 µm (243-300, p < 0.001). VD and VSD parameters in 12 × 12 mm images showed significant reductions. For instance, VSD in the whole retina decreased from a median of 13.37 (11.22-13.74) to 11.29 (9.36-12.97, p = 0.013). Additionally, a significant increase in FAZ circularity was found, suggesting improved microvascular integrity. Significant inverse correlations were found between the number of anti-VEGF injections and all VSD and VD parameters on the 12 × 12 mm images (p < 0.05). Notably, the reductions in VSD and VD on 12 × 12 mm angiograms in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) after each injection significantly correlated with increased logMAR VA (worse VA). CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF therapy in CRVO patients not only mitigates macular edema but also alters the overall microvascular morphology and functionality as revealed by WF SS-OCTA.

MACULAR THICKNESS FLUCTUATIONS AND VISUAL ACUITY OUTCOMES AFTER INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.

PURPOSE: To assess macular thickness fluctuations and their association with visual acuity outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema treated with an intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant. METHODS: The SD of all postbaseline central subfield thicknesses (CST) recorded over a 12-month period after the first injection of the DEX implant was used to quantify CST fluctuations. Linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with the visual acuity at 12 months (measured with the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study score) and predictors of CST SD. RESULTS: A retrospective review of 80 eyes of 80 patients treated with the DEX implant for diabetic macular edema revealed a CST SD of 75.3 ± 50.3 µ m. The CST SD was negatively associated with the visual acuity at 12 months (-7.7 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters for each 100- µ m increase in CST SD, P = 0.01), while changes in CST from baseline did not show any significant association. Eyes were stratified into quartiles based on the CST SD, and a difference by -14.2 letters in visual acuity at 12 months was observed between the first and fourth quartiles ( P <0.001). Significant predictors of CST SD included the baseline visual acuity (-12.0 µ m for each 10-letter increase, P = 0.02) and the number of DEX injections received (n = 17.1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Greater fluctuations in retinal thickness were found to be associated with poorer visual outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema treated with the DEX implant. Analyzing the CST SD could be a more predictive indicator of visual prognosis than individual measurements of the CST.

SUPRACHOROIDAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR REFRACTORY POSTOPERATIVE CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA.

PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (XIPERE, Bausch + Lomb) for the treatment of refractory postoperative cystoid macular edema. METHODS: Medical records of patients receiving suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide for postoperative cystoid macular edema were reviewed. Primary outcomes were visual acuity and central foveal thickness. RESULTS: A total of 32 eyes from 32 patients with a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 6 (2-7) months and 1 (1-2) suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injection were included; 19 (59.4%) had a history of vitrectomy. The median (interquartile range) central foveal thickness decreased from 492 (379-629) µm to 267 (187-388) µm at 1 month (P < 0.001), 362 (218-521) µm at 3 months (P = 0.005), and 339 (206-514) µm at the final visit (P < 0.001). The median logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acuity improved from 0.65 (0.48-0.97, 20/89) at baseline to 0.54 (0.35-0.88, 20/69) (P = 0.058) at 1 month, 0.54 (0.33-0.84, 20/69) at 3 months (P = 0.121), and 0.60 (0.33-0.88, 20/80) at the final visit (P = 0.021). Vitrectomized eyes had similar findings. Six eyes (18.8%) developed elevated intraocular pressure (>24 mmHg) (range: 25-49 mmHg) with a median intraocular pressure elevation of 13.5 mmHg compared with baseline, and all had prior glaucoma or ocular hypertension. CONCLUSION: Suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide reduced macular edema and improved vision in refractory postoperative cystoid macular edema, including vitrectomized eyes. Intraocular pressure should be monitored, especially in those with a history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT VERSUS TOPICAL CARBONIC ANHYDRASE INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA-RELATED CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To compare within-subject efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema. METHODS: Patients with bilateral retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant in one eye and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the contralateral eye. The primary endpoint was a change in central macular thickness. Secondary endpoints were changes in best-corrected visual acuity and microperimetric central retinal sensitivity. Intraocular pressure and other ocular complications were evaluated for safety assessment. RESULTS: Nine patients were recruited for this 12-month follow-up study. Central macular thickness was significantly lower in intravitreal dexamethasone implant-treated eyes than in topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors-treated eyes at Months 1 and 7, whereas mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in eyes treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors at Month 12 (borderline significant P = 0.0510). There was no difference in microperimetric sensitivity between the two treatments. Three patients developed ocular hypertension after intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant showed an effect on the contralateral eye in five of nine patients. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant was more effective than topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in reducing retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema 1 month after treatment. Corticosteroids can play a key role in the management of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema; however, their routes, timing, and modes of administration should be further explored.

INTRAVITREAL INJECTION CONBERCEPT IMPROVES THE BEST-CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY IN PATIENTS WITH WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR EDEMA.

The aim of the study was to investigate the value of intravitreal injection conbercept on the best-corrected visual acuity in patients with age-related macular edema. METHODS: In this study, 114 patients (114 eyes) were treated with intravitreal injection of Conbercept in our hospital from August 2020 to January 2022. According to the clinical effect after treatment, they were divided into effective group (78 cases, 78 eyes) and ineffective group (36 cases, 36 eyes). All patients were continuously treated with intravitreal injection of Conbercept. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Before treatment, the BCVA was compared between the effective group and the ineffective group (P>0.05). After 1, 2, and 3 times of treatment, the BCVA values of the effective group were lower than those of the ineffective group, and the BCVA changes of the effective group before and after treatment were greater than those of the ineffective group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The BCVA values of the effective group were lower than those of the ineffective group, and the BCVA changes of the effective group before and after treatment were greater than those of the ineffective group, suggesting that conbercept can improve the visual acuity of patients with macular edema caused by wet age-related macular degeneration.

Intravitreal Pharmacotherapies for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and intravitreal corticosteroid pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Literature searches were last conducted on May 13, 2020, in the PubMed database with no date restrictions and limited to articles published in English. The combined searches yielded 230 citations, of which 108 were reviewed in full text. Of these, 31 were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: Only the 21 articles with level I evidence were included in this assessment. Seventeen articles provided level I evidence for 1 or more anti-VEGF pharmacotherapies, including ranibizumab (14), aflibercept (5), and bevacizumab (2) alone or in combination with other treatments for DME. Level I evidence was identified in 7 articles on intravitreal corticosteroid therapy for treatment of DME: triamcinolone (1), dexamethasone (4), and fluocinolone acetonide (2). CONCLUSIONS: Review of the available literature indicates that intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids are efficacious treatments for DME. Elevated intraocular pressure and cataract progression are important potential complications of corticosteroid therapy. Further evidence is required to assess the comparative efficacy of these therapies. Given the limited high-quality comparative efficacy data, choice of therapy must be individualized for each patient and broad therapeutic access for patients is critical to maximize outcomes.

Seven-Year Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study Results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of uveitic macular edema (ME). DESIGN: Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of participants in a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 248 eyes of 177 participants with uveitic ME enrolled in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study. METHODS: OCT measurements, taken at baseline and annually, were graded by reading center graders masked to clinical data. Macular edema was defined as a center macular thickness (CMT) ≥240 µm on time-domain OCT or time-domain OCT equivalent. Resolution of ME was defined as normalization of macular thickness on OCT. Relapse of ME was defined as increase in macular thickness to ≥240 µm in an eye that previously had resolution. Visual acuity was measured at each visit with logarithmic visual acuity charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution and relapse of ME. Visual acuity. RESULTS: Among 227 eyes with ME followed ≥1 year, the cumulative percent of eyes with ME resolving at any point during 7 years was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89-97). Epiretinal membranes on OCT were associated with a lower likelihood of ME resolution (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01; P = 0.05). Among 177 eyes with resolved ME, the cumulative percent with relapse within 7 years was 43% (95% CI, 32-51). Eyes in which ME resolved gained a mean of 6.24 letters (95% CI, 4.40-8.09; P < 0.001) compared with eyes that remained free from ME during the 1-year follow-up intervals, whereas eyes in which ME did not resolve experienced no gain in vision (mean change -1.30 letters; 95% CI, -2.70 to 0.09; P = 0.065), and eyes that developed ME during the year (incident or relapsed) experienced a mean loss of -8.65 letters (95% CI, -11.5 to -5.84, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given sufficient time and treatment, nearly all uveitic ME resolves, but episodes of relapse were common. Visual acuity results were better among eyes with resolved ME, suggesting that control of inflammation and resolution of ME might be visually relevant treatment targets.

Refractive Error and Retinopathy Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between refractive error and diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Type I diabetes individuals with serial refractive error and DR stage measurements over 30 years in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) follow-up study. METHODS: Stage of DR was measured every 6 months from standard fundus photographs, and refractive error was measured annually during the 6.5 years of DCCT; then, both were staggered every fourth year during EDIC with the full cohort measured at EDIC years 4 and 10. Outcomes of DR were 2- or 3-step progression, presence of proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), diabetic macular edema (DME), or ocular surgery. Myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent of ≤-0.5, >-0.5 and <0.5, and ≥0.5, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each outcome separately, Cox proportional hazard (PH) models assessed the association between the refractive error status and the subsequent risk of that outcome, both without and with adjustment for potential risk factors. RESULTS: Hyperopia was associated with a higher risk of 2-step progression (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.59), 3-step progression (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73), and PDR (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.92) compared with emmetropia in unadjusted models. These associations remained significant after adjustment for DCCT treatment group, cohort, age, sex, smoking, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pulse, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, albumin excretion rate, and DCCT/EDIC mean updated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (2-step progression: HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.58; 3-step progression: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00-1.68; PDR: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.90). Myopia was not associated with any of the 5 DR outcomes in the unadjusted models and only marginally associated with 2-step progression (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24) in the adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Myopia is not associated with DR progression risk. Hyperopia is an independent risk factor for 2-step and 3-step DR progression and PDR.

Oral administration of NSP-116, a free radical scavenger, suppresses the symptoms of retinal vein occlusion in the murine model.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is an intractable eye disease that results in reduced visual acuity, associated with retinal ischemia, hemorrhage, and edema. RVO results in excessive ROS production in the retina, causing inflammation and retinal edema. A free radical scavenger, 4-(4-acetylpiperazin-1-yl)-2-(1H-imidazole-1-yl) aniline (NSP-116), has been reported to demonstrate antioxidative effects and prevent ROS production in the retina. Therefore, NSP-116 may represent a useful drug for treating the pathological symptoms of RVO, such as retinal edema and ischemic symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the effects of NSP-116 in a murine model of RVO. We evaluated the thickness of the retinal layer and the size of the non-perfused area following the oral administration of NSP-116. Moreover, we used western blot analysis to examine the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, after NSP-116 administration, and examined the localization of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), by immunostaining. The findings indicate that NSP-116 suppressed retinal edema and expansion the non-perfused area by suppressing the increased expression of VEGF, TNF-α, and 8-OHdG in the murine RVO model. In conclusion, the oral administration of NSP-116 may serve as an effective pharmacological treatment for the pathological symptoms of RVO.

DETECTION OF MORPHOLOGIC PATTERNS OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA USING A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH BASED ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning (DL) model to detect morphologic patterns of diabetic macular edema (DME) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. METHODS: In the training set, 12,365 OCT images were extracted from a public data set and an ophthalmic center. A total of 656 OCT images were extracted from another ophthalmic center for external validation. The presence or absence of three OCT patterns of DME, including diffused retinal thickening, cystoid macular edema, and serous retinal detachment, was labeled with 1 or 0, respectively. A DL model was trained to detect three OCT patterns of DME. The occlusion test was applied for the visualization of the DL model. RESULTS: Applying 5-fold cross-validation method in internal validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of three OCT patterns (i.e., diffused retinal thickening, cystoid macular edema, and serous retinal detachment) was 0.971, 0.974, and 0.994, respectively, with an accuracy of 93.0%, 95.1%, and 98.8%, respectively, a sensitivity of 93.5%, 94.5%, and 96.7%, respectively, and a specificity of 92.3%, 95.6%, and 99.3%, respectively. In external validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.970, 0.997, and 0.997, respectively, with an accuracy of 90.2%, 95.4%, and 95.9%, respectively, a sensitivity of 80.1%, 93.4%, and 94.9%, respectively, and a specificity of 97.6%, 97.2%, and 96.5%, respectively. The occlusion test showed that the DL model could successfully identify the pathologic regions most critical for detection. CONCLUSION: Our DL model demonstrated high accuracy and transparency in the detection of OCT patterns of DME. These results emphasized the potential of artificial intelligence in assisting clinical decision-making processes in patients with DME.

SUSPENDED SCATTERING PARTICLES IN MOTION MAY INFLUENCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY VESSEL DENSITY METRICS IN EYES WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) vessel density metrics in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Thirty-four eyes with DME from 27 patients (16 men and 11 women; 61.4 ± 9.6 years) with DME were included in this retrospective cohort study. Among these eyes, 19 (55.9%) showed the SSPiM artifact on OCTA. All participants received 3-mm and 6-mm optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging. Perfusion density and skeletonized vessel density were calculated for the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP), and these were compared between eyes with and without SSPiM. Additionally, foveal vessel density in a 300-µm-wide region around the foveal avascular zone (FVD) was evaluated on 3-mm OCTA scans. The main outcome measures were vessel density in the SCP and the DCP. RESULTS: Among the 3-mm OCTA images, there was no statistically significant difference in SCP vessel density in eyes with and without SSPiM (P = 0.98). Vessel density in the DCP (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028 for perfusion and skeletonized vessel density, respectively) and FVD (P = 0.03) on 3-mm OCTA scans were significantly higher in DME eyes with SSPiM than in those without SSPiM. There were no statistically significant differences in vessel density in SCP and DCP between eyes with and without SSPiM based on 6-mm OCTA scans. CONCLUSION: The presence of SSPiM may lead to an overestimation of DCP vessel density in eyes with DME when 3-mm OCTA scans are used for analysis.

NATURAL HISTORY AND PREDICTORS OF VISION LOSS IN EYES WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA AND GOOD INITIAL VISUAL ACUITY.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical and anatomic factor-associated vision loss in eyes with treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema and good initial visual acuity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study after long-term history of eyes with untreated center-involving diabetic macular edema and baseline visual acuity ≥ 20/25 seen at the University of California, Davis Eye Center between March 2007 and March 2018. We collected characteristics including diabetes type, hemoglobin A1c, presence of visual symptoms, visual acuity, and diabetic retinopathy severity; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers including central subfield thickness, intraretinal cyst size, intraretinal hyperreflective foci, disorganization of retinal inner layers, and outer layer disruptions to determine factors associated with vision loss as defined by DRCR Protocol V as threshold for initiating aflibercept therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes (48 patients) with untreated diabetic macular edema and mean baseline visual acuity of logMAR 0.05 ± 0.05 (Snellen 20/22) were followed for an average of 5.1 ± 3.3 years, with a median time to vision loss of 465 days (15 months). Older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04/year, P = 0.0195) and eyes with severe NPDR (HR 3.0, P = 0.0353) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR 7.7, P = 0.0008) had a higher risk of a vision loss event. None of the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers were associated with vision loss except central subfield thickness (HR 0.98, P = 0.0470) and cyst diameter (HR 1.0, P = 0.0094). CONCLUSION: In eyes with diabetic macular edema and good initial vision, those with older age and worse diabetic retinopathy severity should be monitored closely for prompt treatment initiation when vision loss occurs.

SYSTEMIC FACTORS AND EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSE TO INTRAVITREAL INJECTION FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: The Role of Renal Function.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of systemic factors on early treatment response to intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVBI) and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IVDI) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 117 treatment naïve DME patients who underwent IVBI. We divided the patients according to their IVBI response. An IVDI was performed in patients with poor response to IVBIs. We investigated the various systemic factors of diabetic patients and examined the relationship between systemic factors and the treatment response to IVBI and IVDI. RESULTS: In a total of 117 treatment naïve DME eyes, 61 eyes (52.14%) were classified as IVBI responders. An IVDI was performed in 23 of 56 eyes with poor response to IVBI, and 17 eyes (73.91%) had a good response. Among various systemic factors of patients with diabetes, renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate) showed a significant negative correlation with central subfield retinal thickness improvement after treatment (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in HbA1C levels regarding the treatment response to IVBI and IVDI. CONCLUSION: Renal function was significantly worse in patients with a poor response to IVBI and IVDI. Renal function could be used as a possible predictor for treatment response in certain patients with DME. Furthermore, for patients with DME with poor responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or steroid treatments, assessment of renal function could help explain the poor treatment response.

OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS RESUMING INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY FOLLOWING TREATMENT DELAY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS-19 PANDEMIC.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of delay in care secondary to the coronavirus pandemic in patients requiring intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed, and subjects were divided into two groups: 1) a study group of patients who experienced a treatment delay of ≥6 weeks from the intended follow-up during the coronavirus pandemic and resumed treatment with ≥2 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections over 6 months following treatment delay, and 2) a control group of patients who received regular care throughout the coronavirus pandemic. RESULTS: Totally, 234 subjects were analyzed. The mean treatment delay from the intended follow-up in the study group was 11.8 (±4.0) weeks. Visual acuity and central macular thickness worsened from baseline to 6 months after resuming anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in the study group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Visual acuity and central macular thickness were better in the control group compared with the study group at the end of the 6-month study period (P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Treatment delay in subjects undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for retina disease during the coronavirus pandemic had worse visual and anatomical outcomes despite reinitiating treatment over 6 months compared with a control group, suggesting irreversibility and permanence of outcomes.

IMPACT OF CORONAVIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ON INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS TREATMENT FOR MACULAR DISEASES: Report From a Referral Hospital in Milan.

PURPOSE: To describe our managing strategy for COVID-19 emergency, to evaluate the adherence to intravitreal treatment (AtT) rate during the outbreak in a referral hospital in Milan, and to correlate it with patients' clinical features. METHODS: The AtT rate of patients with scheduled intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 outbreak from February 23, 2020 to March 31, 2020 was compared with the previous trimester and with March 2019. The impact of age, sex, visual function, and diagnosis on the AtT rate during unlocked/locked weeks (from March 8th) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 650 consecutive patients with scheduled intravitreal injections, the AtT rate during the COVID-19 outbreak was 0.37. This was significantly lower compared with AtT registered in the previous trimester (0.92) and in the same weeks in 2019 (0.90) (both P < 0.001). Patients adherent to treatment were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and had a lower best-corrected visual acuity in the fellow eye (P = 0.046). During the lockdown weeks, the AtT rate was significantly lower than in the two unlocked weeks (0.19 vs. 0.73, P < 0.001). In addition, the AtT rate in patients classified as "emergent" during the lockdown weeks was 0.60. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results can help the retina specialist community to foresee this unique scenario and to develop successful management strategies.