Nuclear-penetrating scleroderma autoantibody inhibits topoisomerase 1 cleavage complex formation.

The contributions of anti-Topoisomerase 1 (Top1) autoantibodies to the pathophysiology of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), the most aggressive scleroderma subtype, are unknown. Top1 catalyzes DNA relaxation and unwinding in cell nuclei, a site previously considered inaccessible to antibodies. The discovery of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus that penetrate nuclei and inhibit DNA repair raised the possibility that nuclear-penetrating autoantibodies contribute to mechanisms of autoimmunity. Here we show that an anti-Top1 autoantibody produced by a single B cell clone from a patient with dcSSc penetrates live cells and localizes into nuclei. Functionally, the autoantibody inhibits formation of the Top1 cleavage complex necessary for DNA nicking, which distinguishes it from cytotoxic camptothecin Top1 inhibitors used in cancer therapy that trap the cleavage complex rather than preventing its formation. Discovery of a patient-derived cell-penetrating scleroderma anti-Top1 autoantibody that inhibits Top1 cleavage complex formation supports the hypothesis that anti-Top1 autoantibodies contribute to cellular dysfunction in dcSSc and offers a valuable antibody reagent resource for future studies on anti-Top1 autoantibody contributions to scleroderma pathophysiology.

A data-driven approach finds RNA polymerase III antibody and tendon friction rubs as enrichment tools for early diffuse scleroderma trials.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials in early diffuse SSc have consistently shown a placebo group response with a declining modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), with negative outcomes. Our objective was to identify strategies using clinical characteristics or laboratory values to improve trial design. METHODS: We identified early diffuse SSc patients first seen at the University of Pittsburgh from 1980-2015. Eligible patients had ≥3 visits, with at least two mRSS scores within the first year of follow-up. We performed Kaplan-Meier analyses, group-based trajectory analysis of mRSS scores, followed by multivariable regression analysis and classification tree analysis. We applied the results to the abatacept in early diffuse systemic sclerosis (ASSET) trial outcome data. RESULTS: We identified 403 patients with <18 months, and 514 with <36 months disease duration. The median number of mRSS follow-up scores was 14 (interquartile range 8, 25). All methodologic approaches identified skin thickness progression rate, RNA polymerase III (RNAP3) antibody positivity and presence of tendon friction rubs (TFR) as predictors of mRSS trajectory over 5 years of follow-up, and thereby as potential enrichment variables. When applied to the ASSET data, adjustment for both RNAP3 and TFR demonstrated reduction of the placebo mRSS response, particularly at 6 months. A significant difference in the ACR Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score was found with adjustment by RNAP3 at 6 months, and TFR or RNAP3 at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Adjustment for both RNAP3 and TFR predicts mRSS trajectory and diminished the mRSS decline in ASSET placebo group, and identified significant differences in CRISS. RNAP3, particularly, is a stratification or enrichment approach to improve early diffuse SSc trial design.

A Phase II randomized controlled trial of oral prednisolone in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (PRedSS).

OBJECTIVES: Although the painful and disabling features of early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) have an inflammatory basis and could respond to corticosteroids, corticosteroids are a risk factor for scleroderma renal crisis. Whether or not they should be prescribed is therefore highly contentious. Our aim was to examine safety and efficacy of moderate-dose prednisolone in early dcSSc. METHODS: PRedSS set out as a Phase II, multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial, converted to open-label during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were randomized to receive either prednisolone (∼0.3 mg/kg) or matching placebo (or no treatment during open-label) for 6 months. Co-primary endpoints were the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at 3 months. Over 20 secondary endpoints included patient reported outcome measures reflecting pain, itch, fatigue, anxiety and depression, and helplessness. Target recruitment was 72 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were randomized (17 prednisolone, 18 placebo/control). The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups at 3 months in HAQ-DI score was -0.10 (97.5% CI: -0.29, 0.10), P = 0.254, and in mRSS -3.90 (97.5% CI: -8.83, 1.03), P = 0.070, both favouring prednisolone but not significantly. Patients in the prednisolone group experienced significantly less pain (P = 0.027), anxiety (P = 0.018) and helplessness (P = 0.040) than control patients at 3 months. There were no renal crises, but sample size was small. CONCLUSION: PRedSS was terminated early primarily due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and so was underpowered. Therefore, interpretation must be cautious and results considered inconclusive, indicating the need for a further randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03708718.

Impact of Innovative Treatment Using Biological Drugs for the Modulation of Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease affecting the connective tissue, characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is currently no curative treatment available, so therapeutic action is aimed at a symptomatic treatment of the affected organs. The development of biotechnology has made it possible to implement certain biological drugs that could represent a window of opportunity to modulate the evolution and symptomatology of scleroderma with greater efficacy and less toxicity than conventional treatments. This study aimed to review the current evidence critically and systematically on the effects of biological drugs on the pulmonary function, skin disease, and health status of patients afflicted by diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Dialnet, and Cochrane Library Plus) were systematically searched until the cut-off date of October 2022. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included original articles in English and Spanish with a controlled trial design, comparing biological drug treatments (tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab) with a control group. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the McMaster quantitative form and the PEDro scale. A total of 383 studies were identified, 6 of them met the established criteria and were included in the present systematic review. A total of 426 patients treated with tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab were included. The results showed substantial non-significant (p < 0.05) improvement trends after treatment with the biological drugs included in this review for the modified Rodnan Scale Value, Forced Vital Capacity, and Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Test; however, no benefits were shown on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index when compared to the control group. Biological drugs, therefore, maybe a new therapeutic strategy for dcSSc and could be recommended as an additional and/or adjunctive treatment that promotes anti-fibrotic activity. This review could further define the clinical rationale for the use of biologics in the treatment of dcSSc and could provide key details on the study protocol, design, and outcome reporting.

Predictors of rituximab effect on modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis: a machine-learning analysis of the DesiReS trial.

OBJECTIVES: The double-blind, parallel-group comparison, investigators initiated phase II clinical trial of IDEC-C2B8 (Rituximab) in patients with Systemic sclerosis (DesiReS) trial showed that rituximab is effective in treating skin sclerosis in SSc. However, which patient groups are likely to benefit from rituximab is unknown. METHODS: We performed post-hoc analysis of prospective data from 54 patients who received rituximab or placebo in the DesiReS trial. Twenty-seven baseline factors were used to investigate subpopulations with different magnitudes of rituximab effect on modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) change at 24 weeks. Based on a machine-learning algorithm called the causal tree, we explored the combination of predictors needed to identify subpopulations that would respond to rituximab and have good treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Three factors were identified as branches of the decision tree: peripheral blood CD19-positive cell counts', 'mRSS', and 'serum surfactant protein D (SP-D) levels'. It was only in the subpopulation of patients with CD19-positive cell counts of <57/µl that rituximab did not show a significant improvement in mRSS vs placebo. In the subpopulation of patients with CD19-positive cell counts of ≥57/µl and mRSS ≥ 17, mRSS was most improved with rituximab [difference -17.06 (95% CI: -24.22, -9.89)]. The second greatest improvement in mRSS with rituximab was in the subpopulation with CD19-positive cell counts of ≥57/µl, mRSS < 17, and serum SP-D levels of ≥151 ng/ml [difference -10.35 (95% CI: -14.77, -5.93)]. CONCLUSION: SSc patients who have high CD19-positive cell counts and high mRSS are expected to have greater improvement in mRSS with rituximab. When the patients with high CD19-positive cell counts show low mRSS, serum SP-D levels may modify the treatment effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04274257 and UMIN-CTR; https://center6.umin.ac.jp, UMIN000030139.

Clinical worsening following discontinuation of tocilizumab in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a single-centre experience in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes following the tapering or discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Fifteen patients who were treated with tocilizumab for dcSSc were selected from a single-centre cohort database and were evaluated for serial changes in the modified Rodnan total skin thickness score (mRSS) and predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and the occurrence of clinical worsening events after the introduction of tocilizumab. RESULTS: Over 12 months of treatment with tocilizumab, the mRSS decreased from 20.4 ± 10.7 to 12.3 ± 8.5 (P = 0.003) and FVC increased from 84.3 ± 13.7% to 88.5 ± 16.4% (P = 0.04). Tocilizumab was tapered or discontinued in seven and three patients, respectively, after improvement in skin thickening without occurrence or progression of organ manifestations. One (14%) of seven patients who underwent tocilizumab tapering experienced a worsening of skin thickening, while all three patients who discontinued tocilizumab experienced a worsening of skin thickening and/or new development of pericarditis, arthritis, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. The additional patient who discontinued tocilizumab due to an adverse event experienced subsequent progression of multiple organ manifestations, including skin, lung, lower gastrointestinal and renal involvement, leading to mortality. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest potential benefits of prolonged tocilizumab use in dcSSc patients. The discontinuation of tocilizumab can lead to the progression of skin and visceral manifestations. Tapering rather than the discontinuation of tocilizumab is a viable option in dcSSc patients who experience remarkable clinical improvement.

Outcomes linked to eligibility for stem cell transplantation trials in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore outcomes in a cohort of dcSSc patients fulfilling eligibility criteria for stem cell transplantation (SCT) studies but receiving standard immunosuppression. METHODS: From a large single-centre dcSSc cohort (n = 636), patients were identified using the published SCT trials' inclusion criteria. Patients meeting the trials' exclusion criteria were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 227 eligible patients, 214 met the inclusion criteria for ASTIS (Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma), 82 for SCOT (Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide Or Transplantation) and 185 for the UPSIDE (UPfront autologous haematopoietic Stem cell transplantation vs Immunosuppressive medication in early DiffusE cutaneous systemic sclerosis) trial, and 66 were excluded based on age >65 years, low diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco), pulmonary hypertension or creatinine clearance <40 ml/min. The mean follow-up time was 12 years (s.d. 7). Among the eligible patients, 103 (45.4%) died. Survival was 96% at 2 years, 88% at 5 years, 73% at 10 years and 43% at 20 years. Compared with this 'SCT-eligible' cohort, those patients who would have been excluded from SCT trials had a worse long-term survival (97% at 2 years, 77% at 5 years, 52% at 10 years and 15% at 20 years, log rank P < 0.001). Excluded patients also had a significantly worse long-term event-free survival. Hazard of death was higher in patients with higher age at onset [hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, P < 0.001], higher ESR at baseline (HR 1.01, P = 0.025) and males (HR 2.12, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: SCT inclusion criteria identify patients with poor outcome despite current best practice treatment. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria for SCT but who would have been excluded from the trials because of age, pulmonary hypertension, poor kidney function or DLco <40% had worse outcomes.

New composite endpoint in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: revisiting the provisional American College of Rheumatology Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: American College of Rheumatology Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis (ACR-CRISS) is a composite endpoint to assess the likelihood of improvement in diffuse systemic sclerosis. ACR-CRISS is a weighted score and includes five core set measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, health assessment questionnaire-disability index, and patient and clinician global assessments. METHODS: We analysed core set measures from 354 participants who participated in three placebo-controlled trials. We generated 10 development datasets, randomly selected from 2/3 of the participants, stratified by study and treatment group. The remaining participants (1/3 of the participants) formed the validation sets. Risk differences (RDs) between active and placebo treatments were calculated by averaging over the replicate datasets; bootstrap 95% CIs for the RDs to estimate the magnitude of treatment effects. RESULTS: In the development sets (n=237), the proportion of participants in the active group had statistically higher improvement in >1 of 5 core set measures versus the placebo group. For example, the proportion who improved by ≥20% in ≥3 core set measures was 49.4% in the active versus338.9% in the placebo; RD: 10.5%, 95% CI4.9 % to 16.1%. In the validation sets (n=117), the proportion who improved by ≥20% in ≥3 core set measures was 50.3% in the active versus35.63% in the placebo (RD:114.8%, 95% CI 3.1% to225.7%). Similar trends were seen with larger percentage cut-offs. CONCLUSION: Revised CRISS, as assessed by the proportion of participants who improved by a certain percentage in ≥3 of 5 core set measures, is a potential new composite outcome measure.

Molecular basis for clinical diversity between autoantibody subsets in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical heterogeneity is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Hallmark SSc autoantibodies are central to diagnosis and associate with distinct patterns of skin-based and organ-based complications. Understanding molecular differences between patients will benefit clinical practice and research and give insight into pathogenesis of the disease. We aimed to improve understanding of the molecular differences between key diffuse cutaneous SSc subgroups as defined by their SSc-specific autoantibodies METHODS: We have used high-dimensional transcriptional and proteomic analysis of blood and the skin in a well-characterised cohort of SSc (n=52) and healthy controls (n=16) to understand the molecular basis of clinical diversity in SSc and explore differences between the hallmark antinuclear autoantibody (ANA) reactivities. RESULTS: Our data define a molecular spectrum of SSc based on skin gene expression and serum protein analysis, reflecting recognised clinical subgroups. Moreover, we show that antitopoisomerase-1 antibodies and anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies specificities associate with remarkably different longitudinal change in serum protein markers of fibrosis and divergent gene expression profiles. Overlapping and distinct disease processes are defined using individual patient pathway analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide insight into clinical diversity and imply pathogenetic differences between ANA-based subgroups. This supports stratification of SSc cases by ANA antibody subtype in clinical trials and may explain different outcomes across ANA subgroups in trials targeting specific pathogenic mechanisms.

Tofacitinib as a possible treatment for skin thickening in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of refractory skin thickening in dcSSc. METHODS: Data from 10 patients with dcSSc treated with tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) were analysed. A total of 12 dcSSc patients treated with intensive conventional immunosuppressants were selected as the historical comparator group. A clinically relevant response was defined as a decrease in the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) of >5 points and ≥25% from baseline. Clinical indicators were compared between the two groups to evaluate the effect of tofacitinib. RESULTS: The mRSS significantly improved the first month after tofacitinib treatment, with a mean change in the mRSS of -3.7 (95% CI -5.52, -1.88; P = 0.001) and greater than the comparators at 6 months [-10.0 (95% CI -14.74, -5.26) vs -4.1 (95% CI -7.49, -0.73), P = 0.026]. Tofacitinib-treated patients had a significantly shorter response time than the comparators (P = 0.015 by log-rank test), with overall response rates of 20% (2/10) vs 0% (0/12) and 60% (6/10) vs 16.7% (2/12) at 1 and 3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that tofacitinib may be as effective as or even better than intensive conventional immunosuppressants, with a quicker and higher response rate in refractory dcSSc patients with progressive skin thickness.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of lenabasum in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: RESOLVE-1 design and rationale.

OBJECTIVES: The multi-systemic, heterogenous nature of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) presents challenges in designing clinical studies that can demonstrate a treatment effect on overall disease burden. We describe the design of the first Phase 3 study in dcSSc patients where the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score was chosen prospectively as the primary outcome. The CRISS measures key clinical disease parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: RESOLVE-1 is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dcSSc patients evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenabasum. Patients ≥18 years of age with dc-SSc and disease duration ≤6 years were eligible. Patients could continue stable background therapy for dcSSc, including stable immunosuppressive therapies. They were randomised to lenabasum 5 or 20 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change from baseline to 52 weeks in the ACR CRISS score. RESULTS: The study enrolled 365 patients over 1.5 years at 77 sites in 13 countries in North America, Europe, Israel, and Asia-Pacific, with the last patient first visit on May 1, 2019. CONCLUSIONS: RESOLVE-1 is the first Phase 3 interventional study to date in dcSSc to prospectively use the ACR CRISS as the primary efficacy outcome. Eligibility criteria allowed background therapy as might occur in clinical practice. This approach also facilitated timely patient enrolment. RESOLVE-1 provides a novel study design that may be used for future Phase 3 dcSSc studies to assess the holistic efficacy of therapy.

Successful use of tofacitinib in the treatment of diffuse systemic sclerosis and axial spondyloarthritis: a case-based review.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease characterised by vasculopathy, inflammation and fibrosis in multiple organs and occasionally coexists with rheumatic conditions, such as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the successful use of tofacitinib in SSc and axial spondylarthritis (axSpa), as a novel therapeutic agent; however, further studies are needed to elucidate the role of JAK inhibition in the treatment of both conditions. In this paper, we report a case of a 58-year-old woman with diffuse SSc who developed axSpA. The patient had a 10-year history of SSc and was treated with tocilizumab before the onset of lower back pain. The diagnostic evaluation included MRI that demonstrated bone marrow oedema in the sacroiliac joints, the HLA-B27 was positive, and given the inflammatory features of her back pain, she was diagnosed with axSpa. The biologic agent was switched into etanercept with an improvement of the back pain; however, the patient had a relapse of her skin manifestations. Given the treatment failure, we aim to treat the 2 coexisting conditions concurrently with tofacitinib, which led to symptom improvement. This case report is noteworthy, given the rarity of the coexistence of both conditions and the therapeutic challenges faced by the clinician. The online database MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus where searched for articles published from inception to June 2020, using the terms "ankylosing spondylitis" AND "systemic sclerosis" OR "axial spondyloarthritis" AND "systemic sclerosis". Also, we searched the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meeting abstracts from 2015 to 2019 using the same terms. As a result, we found 9 similar case reports. 9 case reports of patients with both conditions were identified through a literature review and we highlighted the differences and similarities between them. Also, we emphasise on intracellular signalling inhibitors as novel therapeutic targets in treating both conditions. Tofacitinib might be a novel therapeutic agent in the management of SSc and axSpA.

Clinical course of Japanese patients with early systemic sclerosis: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical course of Japanese patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and early SSc with interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the clinical features of 207 Japanese patients with early dcSSc (n = 150) and limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) with ILD (n = 57) in 10 medical centers every year for 7 consecutive years. RESULTS: Mean modified Rodnan total skin thickness score (mRSS) was 18.3 and 67.4% of the cohort had ILD. Most patients started immunosuppressive therapy and vasodilators during 7 years (83.4% and 87.9%, respectively). Mean value of mRSS of total patients was significantly reduced from the initial registration after the first year. However, other parameters for physical function associated with skin sclerosis including fist closure, hand extension, and oral aperture were not so ameliorated during the study period. Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability index and serum KL-6 levels were constant throughout the course. Percent vital capacity and the presence of ILD, clinically suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension, and digital ulcers were gradually exacerbated during the period. CONCLUSION: In Japanese early dcSSc patients and SSc patients with ILD, mRSS was continuously reduced during 7 years of follow-up, but there was little improvement of physical disability and organ involvement.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week, phase II, proof-of-concept study of romilkimab (SAR156597) in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Recent advances in systemic sclerosis (SSc) show that it involves a T-helper type-2-oriented immune response with interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. Romilkimab is an engineered, humanised, bispecific immunoglobulin-G4 antibody that binds and neutralises IL-4/IL-13 making it ideal for exploration in fibrosis. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and with or without immunosuppressive background therapy, were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous romilkimab 200 mg or placebo one time per week for 24 weeks in this double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase II study. The primary endpoint was change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were randomised to romilkimab (n=48) or placebo (n=49) for 24 weeks. Least-squares mean (SE) change in mRSS was -4.76 (0.86) for romilkimab versus -2.45 (0.85) for placebo yielding a mean (SE) (90% CI) difference of -2.31 (1.21) (-4.32 to -0.31; p=0.0291, one-sided). Treatment-emergent AEs were balanced between placebo (n=41; 84%) and romilkimab (n=40; 80%). Most were mild-to-moderate and discontinuations were low (three overall). There were two deaths (one scleroderma renal crisis (romilkimab) and one cardiomyopathy (placebo)), neither were considered treatment related. Two patients in the placebo group had a cardiovascular treatment-emergent SAE (one cardiac failure, one cardiomyopathy), but there were no cardiac safety signals with romilkimab. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant effects on skin changes with romilkimab in early dcSSc that require confirmation with a longer and more comprehensive phase III study to determine clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02921971.

Riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (RISE-SSc): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: Riociguat is approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension and has antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in animal models of tissue fibrosis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) at high risk of skin fibrosis progression. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial, adults with dcSSc of <18 months' duration and a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) 10-22 units received riociguat 0.5 mg to 2.5 mg orally three times daily (n=60) or placebo (n=61). The primary endpoint was change in mRSS from baseline to week 52. RESULTS: At week 52, change from baseline in mRSS units was -2.09±5.66 (n=57) with riociguat and -0.77±8.24 (n=52) with placebo (difference of least squares means -2.34 (95% CI -4.99 to 0.30; p=0.08)). In patients with interstitial lung disease, forced vital capacity declined by 2.7% with riociguat and 7.6% with placebo. At week 14, average Raynaud's condition score had improved ≥50% in 19 (41.3%)/46 patients with riociguat and 13 (26.0%)/50 patients with placebo. Safety assessments showed no new signals with riociguat and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Riociguat did not significantly benefit mRSS versus placebo at the predefined p<0.05. Secondary and exploratory analyses showed potential efficacy signals that should be tested in further trials. Riociguat was well tolerated.

Skin improvement is a surrogate for favourable changes in other organ systems in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Skin improvement in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), measured with modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), is frequently used as a primary outcome in clinical trials, but it is uncertain whether mRSS changes reflect changes in other organ systems. This aim of this study was to explore if skin changes in early dcSSc over 1 and 2 years are associated with changes in severity of other organ involvement. METHODS: Canadian Scleroderma Research Group database patients with dcSSc, disease duration of ≤5 years, no evidence of initial end-stage organ damage and/or significant comorbidity who had 1 year (n = 154) and 2 years (n = 128) of follow-up data were included. mRSS changes of 25% and/or ≥5 points were considered significant. Organ involvement was assessed by Medsger Disease Severity Score and Canadian Scleroderma Research Group definitions using bivariate, chi-square, ANOVA, adjusted regression and longitudinal mixed effect model analyses. RESULTS: Improvement in mRSS was found in 41% of patients at 1 year and in 50% at 2 years. Improved patients showed less forced vital capacity decline (P = 0.012) and less frequent new cardiac involvement (P = 0.02) over 1 year, as well as better lung (by both Disease Severity Score, P = 0.006, and Δforced vital capacity%, P = 0.026), peripheral vascular (P = 0.006) and joint/tendon (P = 0.002) involvement over 2 years. mRSS worsening was consistently linked to less favourable lung outcomes at both 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, and more severe gastrointestinal disease at 2 years. CONCLUSION: Changes in lung function in early dcSSc closely parallel skin changes. mRSS improvement reflects better prognosis for visceral disease and may be a reliable outcome measure in clinical trials.

Confidence intervals for proportion ratios of stratified correlated bilateral data.

In stratified bilateral studies, responses from two paired body parts are correlated. Confidence intervals (CIs), which reveal various features of the data, should take the correlations into account. In this article, five CI methods (sample-size weighted naïve Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)-based Wald-type CI, complete MLE-based Wald-type CI, profile likelihood CI, MLE-based score CI and pooled MLE-based Wald-type CI) are derived for proportion ratios under the assumption of equal correlation coefficient within each stratum. Monte Carlo simulation shows that the complete MLE-based Wald-type CI approach generally produces the shortest mean interval width and satisfactory empirical coverage probability with close form solution; while the profile likelihood CI and the MLE-based score CI provide preferred ratio of non coverage probability and are more symmetric. Two real examples are used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods.

A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Ciplukan (Physalis angulata Linn) Extract on Skin Fibrosis, Inflammatory, Immunology, and Fibrosis Biomarkers in Scleroderma Patients.

BACKGROUND: scleroderma is an autoimmune disease characterized by organ fibrosis, resistant to standard treatment. It is suspected the addition of Physalis angulata Linn. (Ciplukan) extract as adjuvant therapy can improve the scleroderma skin fibrosis. The aim at this study is to evaluate the effect of ciplukan extract as adjuvant on scleroderma skin fibrosis in standard therapy, based on modified Rodnan skin scale (MRSS), inflammatory biomarkers, immunology and serum fibrosis. METHODS: double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed in scleroderma patients with stable disease at Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital and Hasan Sadikin hospital during November 2015-March 2017 who met the selection criteria and continued to receive standard therapy. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: the study group received the ciplukan  extract 3 x 250 mg / day for 12 weeks and the placebo group. Examination of MRSS, ESR, P1NP, BAFF and sCD40L was performed every 4 weeks until the end of the study. RESULTS: fifty-nine subjects completed the study. They consisted of 29 subjects of the treatment group and 30 of the placebo group, with an average age of 41 (SD 9) years, the proportion of women: male = 9 : 1. There was a significant improvement of skin fibrosis in the study group with a highly significant decrease in MRSS (35.9% VS 6.3%, p <0.001) and a relative decrease in P1NP levels (17.8% VS 0.7%, p = 0.002). No decrease in ESR, BAFF and sCD40L levels in both groups. There was a weak but significant positive correlation between MRSS with P1NP levels (r = 0.236, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Ciplukan extract with dose 3 x 250 mg for 12 weeks as adjuvant on scleroderma standard therapy alleviates skin fibrosis significantly based on MRSS and P1NP levels.

Patient acceptable symptom state in scleroderma: results from the tocilizumab compared with placebo trial in active diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Objectives: Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) as an absolute state of well-being has shown promise as an outcome measure in many rheumatologic conditions. We aimed to assess whether PASS may be effective in active diffuse cutaneous SSc differentiating active from placebo. Methods: Data from the phase 2 Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Adults with Systemic Sclerosis (faSScinate) trial were used, which compared tocilizumab (TCZ) vs placebo over 48 weeks followed by an open-label TCZ period to 96 weeks. Three different types of PASS questions were evaluated at weeks 8, 24, 48 and 96, including if a current state would be acceptable over time as a yes vs no response and Likert scales about how acceptable a current state is if remaining over time. Additional outcomes assessed included modified Rodnan skin score, HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI), physician and patient global assessments on a visual analogue scale, CRP and ESR. Results: The placebo group consisted of 44 patients and the TCZ group had 43 patients. At baseline, 33% achieved a PASS for all three PASS questions, with the proportion increasing to 69, 71 and 78%, respectively, at 96 weeks. Changes in PASS scores showed a moderately negative correlation with HAQ-DI and patient and physician global assessments visual analogue scales, which indicates expected improvements as PASS improved. The PASS question, 'Considering all of the ways your scleroderma has affected you, how acceptable would you rate your level of symptoms?' showed significant correlations with patient-reported outcomes and differentiating placebo vs TCZ at 48 weeks (P = 0.023). Conclusion: PASS may be used as a patient-centred outcome in SSc, especially as a 7-point Likert scale. Further validation is required to determine the utility as an outcome measure in trials and clinical practice.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide vs rituximab for the treatment of early diffuse scleroderma lung disease: open label, randomized, controlled trial.

Objectives: SSc is characterized by fibrotic changes in the skin and lung, and the mainstay of treatment has been CYC. B cell involvement suggests that rituximab (RTX) may also be of therapeutic benefit. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RTX compared with CYC in retarding the progression of interstitial lung disease and skin manifestations of primary SSc. Methods: We randomly assigned 60 patients of dcSSc, age 18-60 years with skin and lung involvement, to monthly pulses of CYC 500 mg/m2 or RTX 1000 mg × 2 doses at 0, 15 days. Primary outcomes were forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were: absolute change in litres (FVC-l) at 6 months; modified Rodnan skin scores at 6 months, 6-min walk test, Medsgers score and new onset or worsening of existing pulmonary hypertension by echocardiographic criteria. Results: The FVC [%mean (s.d.)] in the RTX group improved from 61.30 (11.28) to 67.52 (13.59), while in the CYC group it declined from 59.25 (12.96) to 58.06 (11.23) at 6 months (P = 0.003). The change of FVC was 1.51 (0.45) l to 1.65 (0.47) l in the RTX group, compared with 1.42 (0.49) to 1.42 (0.46) l in the CYC group. The mRSS changed from 21.77 (9.86) to 12.10 (10.14) in the RTX group and 23.83 (9.28) to 18.33 (7.69) in the CYC group after 6 months. Serious adverse events were more common in the CYC group. Conclusion: RTX is a safe and effective alternative to CYC in the primary therapy of skin and lung manifestations of scleroderma. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry - India, www.ctri.nic.in, CTRI/2017/07/009152.