The extent of anticholinergic burden across an older Welsh population living with frailty: cross-sectional analysis of general practice records.

BACKGROUND: Anticholinergic medicines are associated with adverse outcomes for older people. However, little is known about their use in frailty. The objectives were to (i) investigate the prevalence of anticholinergic prescribing for older patients, and (ii) examine anticholinergic burden according to frailty status. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of Welsh primary care data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank including patients aged ≥65 at their first GP consultation between 1 January and 31 December 2018. Frailty was identified using the electronic Frailty Index and anticholinergic burden using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were conducted to (i) describe the type and frequency of anticholinergics prescribed; and (ii) to estimate the association between frailty and cumulative ACB score (ACB-Sum). RESULTS: In this study of 529,095 patients, 47.4% of patients receiving any prescription medications were prescribed at least one anticholinergic medicine. Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients with increasing frailty had higher odds of having an ACB-Sum of >3 compared with patients who were fit (mild frailty, adj OR 1.062 (95%CI 1.061-1.064), moderate frailty, adj OR 1.134 (95%CI 1.131-1.136), severe frailty, adj OR 1.208 (95%CI 1.203-1.213)). CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic prescribing was high in this older population. Older people with advancing frailty are exposed to the highest anticholinergic burden despite being the most vulnerable to the associated adverse effects. Older people with advancing frailty should be considered for medicines review to prevent overaccumulation of anticholinergic medications, given the risks of functional and cognitive decline that frailty presents.

Effectiveness and Safety of Anticoagulation Therapy in Frail Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are less likely to receive anticoagulation than nonfrail patients with AF despite frailty being associated with poorer clinical outcomes including stroke. Using a population-based cohort, we sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in frail patients with AF. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 83 635 patients aged at least 65 years with AF and frailty (≥5 Hospital Frailty Risk Score) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. To account for the differences between patients receiving OAC or not and across different OAC regimens, propensity score-weighting was used. Net adverse clinical event, defined as the first event of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death, was compared. In addition, each individual outcome was examined separately. RESULTS: In the study population (57.1% women; mean age, 78.5±7.2 years), a total of 14 968 net adverse clinical event, 3718 ischemic stroke, 5536 major bleeding, and 6188 cardiovascular death occurred. In comparison with no OAC use, OAC use was associated with lower risks of net adverse clinical event (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.82]), ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]), and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.49-0.55]), but no difference was observed for major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.10]). Compared with warfarin, all four individual direct OAC were associated with decreased risks of net adverse clinical event, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death. The associations for OAC use (compared to no OAC use) or direct OAC use (compared to warfarin) with favorable outcomes were more prominent in individuals with a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 3. CONCLUSIONS: Among frail patients with AF, OAC treatment was associated with a positive net clinical outcome. Direct OACs provided lower incidences of stroke, bleeding, and mortality, compared with warfarin.

Frailty and checkpoint inhibitor toxicity in older patients with melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that range from mild to life-threatening. Age itself does not seem to be a predictor for the occurrence of irAEs. It is unknown whether frailty plays a role in the occurrence of irAEs. Therefore, the authors assessed whether irAEs and their sequelae occur more often in frail patients than in fit patients according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) assessment. METHODS: Patients with melanoma aged 70 years and older who were about to start ICI therapy and were screened with the G8 assessment were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Patients were classified by the G8 as either fit or frail. The primary outcome was the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs. RESULTS: In total, 92 patients were included for statistical analyses, 26 (29%) of whom were classified as frail. Grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 20% of patients. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs between fit and frail patients (17% vs 27%; P = .26). Frail patients were admitted to the hospital because of irAEs significantly more often than fit patients (29% vs 54%; P = .02) and showed a trend toward increased length of hospitalization (5 vs 8 days; P = .06) and more frequent use of immunosuppressants or ICI discontinuation for irAEs (36% vs 58%; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Although frailty appears to be unrelated to the occurrence of severe irAEs, it is an indicator of irAE-related adverse sequelae, such as hospital admission. Screening for frailty can be of added value in the shared decision-making process for older patients who qualify for ICI treatment.

Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a medical syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Data regarding the relationship between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: We aim to perform a comprehensive evaluation of frailty in a large European cohort of AF patients. METHODS: A 40-item frailty index (FI) was built according to the accumulation of deficits model in the AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Association of baseline characteristics, clinical management, quality of life, healthcare resources use and risk of outcomes with frailty was examined. RESULTS: Among 10,177 patients [mean age (standard deviation) 69.0 (11.4) years, 4,103 (40.3%) females], 6,066 (59.6%) were pre-frail and 2,172 (21.3%) were frail, whereas only 1,939 (19.1%) were considered robust. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were independently associated with increasing FI. Frail patients with AF were less likely to be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89), especially with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs and managed with a rhythm control strategy, compared with robust patients. Increasing frailty was associated with a higher risk for all outcomes examined, with a non-linear exponential relationship. The use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, except in patients with very/extremely high frailty. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of AF patients, there was a high burden of frailty, influencing clinical management and risk of adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of OAC is maintained in patients with high frailty, but not in very high/extremely frail ones.

Medication burden and frailty in older adults with intellectual disability: An observational cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Recently, efforts have been made to quantify frailty among older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Medication exposure is associated with frailty among older adults without ID. However, there is little research on this association among older adults with ID. The aim of this study was to examine specifically in people with ID the association between frailty and medication exposure, including anticholinergic and sedative medication exposure. METHODS: Data were drawn from Wave 2 (2013/2014) of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA), a nationally representative study of older adults with ID in Ireland. A modified version of Fried's frailty phenotype was constructed. Drug burden measures were polypharmacy, Drug Burden Index (DBI), Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) and Sedative Load Model. Multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and identify associations between frailty and drug burden. RESULTS: This study included 570 participants with ID. Excessive polypharmacy (use of ≥10 medications) was significantly associated with being pre-frail (P = .017; OR = 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-5.50) and frail (P < .001; OR 7.13; 95% CI 2.81-18.12), but DBI, ACB or Sedative Load score were not significantly associated with frailty status (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine frailty and its association with medication use including anticholinergic and sedative medication burden among older adults with ID. Further research is required to investigate frailty as measured by other frailty models in relation to medication burden in older adults with ID.

Investigation of a possible association of potentially inappropriate medication for older adults and frailty in a prospective cohort study from Germany.

OBJECTIVE: potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are commonly defined as drugs that should be avoided in older adults because they are considered to have a negative risk-benefit ratio. PIMs are suspected to increase the risk for frailty, but this has yet to be examined. DESIGN: prospective population-based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: a German cohort of community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years) was followed from October 2008 to September 2016. METHODS: in propensity score-adjusted logistic and Cox regression models, associations between baseline PIM use and prevalent/incident frailty were investigated. Frailty was assessed using the definition by Fried and co-workers, PIM were defined with the 2015 BEERS criteria, the BEERS criteria to avoid in cognitively impaired patients (BEERS dementia PIM), the EU(7)-PIM and the PRISCUS list. RESULTS: of 2,865 participants, 261 were frail at baseline and 423 became frail during follow-up. Only BEERS dementia PIM use was statistically significantly associated with prevalent frailty (odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.51 (1.04-2.17)). The strength of the association was comparable for all frailty components. Similarly, in longitudinal analyses, only BEERS dementia PIM use was associated with incident frailty albeit not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 1.19 (0.84-1.68)). CONCLUSIONS: the association of PIM use and frailty seems to be restricted to drug classes, which can induce frailty symptoms (anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, z-substances and antipsychotics). Physicians are advised to perform frailty assessments before and after prescribing these drug classes to older patients and to reconsider treatment decisions in case of negative performance changes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of older adults with depression: questionable benefit and considerations for frailty.

BACKGROUND: Frail older adults are commonly prescribed antidepressants. Yet, there is little evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of antidepressants to treat depression with concomitant frailty. To better understand this issue, we examined the efficacy and safety of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of older adults with depression and then considered implications for frailty. METHODS: Due to the absence of therapeutic studies of frail older adults with depression, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized controlled trials that compared antidepressants versus placebo for adults with depression, age 65 years or older. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, reference lists from meta-analyses/studies, hand searches of publication lists, and related articles on PubMed. Outcomes included rates of response, remission, and adverse events. After evaluating the data, we applied a frailty-informed framework to consider how the evidence could be applied to frailty. RESULTS: Nine trials were included in the meta-analysis (n = 2704). Subjects had moderate to severe depression. For older adults with depression, there was no statistically significant difference in response or remission to second-generation antidepressants compared to placebo. Response occurred in 45.3% of subjects receiving an antidepressant compared to 40.5% receiving placebo (RR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.96 - 1.37, p = 0.12, I2 = 71%). Remission occurred in 33.1% with antidepressant versus 31.3% with placebo (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.31, p = 0.30, I2 = 56%) (Figure 2 and 3). There were more withdrawals due to adverse events with antidepressants, 13% versus 5.8% (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.45-3.63; p < 0.001; I2 = 61%; NNH 14, 95% CI:10-28). IMPLICATIONS FOR FRAILTY: Subjects in the meta-analysis did not have obvious characteristics of frailty. Using framework questions to consider the implications of frailty, we hypothesize that, like older adults, frail individuals with depression may not respond to antidepressants. Further, observational studies suggest that those who are frail may be less responsive to antidepressants compared to the non-frail. Given the vulnerability of frailty, adverse events may be more burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation antidepressants have uncertain benefit for older adults with depression and cause more adverse events compared to placebo. Until further research clarifies benefit, careful consideration of antidepressant prescribing with frailty is warranted.

Potentially inappropriate medication use and frailty phenotype among community-dwelling older adults: A population-based study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between potentially inappropriate medication use and frailty phenotype among community-dwelling older adults and to identify factors associated with the use of these drugs according to frailty condition. BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence about the association between inappropriate medication use and the condition of frailty, particularly among community-dwelling older adults. Therefore, data obtained from population surveys should be made available in order to support the development of clinical guidelines about the prevention of frailty. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study conducted according to the STROBE Checklist. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted on 1,607 older adults. Potentially inappropriate medication use was assessed according to Beers criteria and frailty syndrome was determined according to the phenotype proposed by Fried and colleagues. Data were analysed statistically using multinomial or binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: About 13.6% of the subjects were frail, and 36.8% used at least one inappropriate medication. The adjusted model indicated that, the more potentially inappropriate medication use, the higher the prevalence of frailty, prefrailty and the walking slowness component. Female gender, one or more years of schooling, five or more reported morbidities, and instrumental dependence regarding daily life activities were factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication use in the nonfrail group. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate medication use was prevalent among community-living older adults, and its presence was associated with the occurrence of frailty. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Primary care nurses are the professionals with the greatest contact with the older adults in the community. Thus, the results support the inclusion of the assessment of potentially inappropriate medication use in the routine of nursing consultation. In case of a positive screening, the older person should be referred to geriatric evaluation in order to optimise drug treatment for the prevention of frailty.

Does Statin Use in Frail Patients Provide Survival Benefits? Insights From a Meta-Analysis.

Frailty is a complex syndrome that increases with age and predisposes older adults to adverse outcomes, including mortality. Statins are proven to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but there is limited data on their survival benefit in frail older people. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether statins can lower mortality in frail persons. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was conducted until September 2022 to identify studies reporting mortality outcomes with statin therapy in adults aged 75 with a validated frailty assessment. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause mortality was calculated using a random effects model. Leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. Of 5 studies (2013-2022) included (Total = 14,324, 3 prospective and 2 retrospectives, Males: 49%, Mean follow-up duration: 4.7 years), 41.6% (5971/14,324) were frail. 52.7% of patients were on a moderate-dose/no-statin, while 47.2% took a high-dose statin. Nonstatin users were older (83.35 vs 81.5) than users. Frail patients often had diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, a history of Stroke/MI, and dementia. High-dose atorvastatin was the most used statin. Pooled analysis revealed that statins lower all-cause mortality in elderly adults, however, the association was not significant (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.18; P = 0.17). The meta-analysis demonstrated that using statins to reduce mortality in frail patients does not appear justifiable. Further prospective studies are needed to guide statin use among frail older adults for survival benefits.

Long-term impact of PM2.5 exposure on frailty, chronic diseases, and multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults: insights from a national population-based longitudinal study.

Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5) is a significant risk factor for frailty and chronic diseases. Studies on the associations between PM2.5 and frailty, chronic diseases, and multimorbidity are scarce, especially from large cohort studies. We aimed to explore the potential association between PM2.5 exposure and the risk of frailty, chronic diseases, and multimorbidity. We collected data from a national cohort (CHARLS) with a follow-up period of 11-18 years, totaling 13,366 participants. We obtained PM2.5 concentration data from the Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group at Dalhousie University. PM2.5 exposure is based on the average annual concentration in the prefecture-level city where residents live. We define frailty as the comprehensive manifestation of declining various body functions, characterized by a frailty index of 0.25 or greater, and multimorbidity as the presence of at least two or more chronic conditions. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI). A 10-µg/m3 increase for PM2.5 was significantly associated with an increased risk of frailty (HR = 1.289, 95%CI = 1.257-1.322, P < 0.001). A 10-µg/m3 increase for PM2.5 was significantly associated with the elevated risk for most chronic diseases. Compared to those with no morbidity or only single morbidity, a 10-µg/m3 increase for PM2.5 was significantly associated with the elevated risk for multimorbidity (HR = 1.220, 95%CI = 1.181-1.260, P < 0.001). Ambient PM2.5 exposure is a significant risk factor for frailty, chronic diseases, and multimorbidity, and some measures need to be taken to reduce PM2.5 concentration and prevent frailty and chronic diseases.

Effects of androgen deprivation therapy on elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer: PROSARC observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic carcinoma (PC) is a frequent neoplasm in elderly patients. Although androgen deprivation is associated with survival benefits, it is also related to adverse effects such as osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia, which can negatively affect the patient's quality of life. This study aims to quantify and evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia in elderly PC patients before and after androgen deprivation. We present data from an interim analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PROSARC is a national (Spain) prospective observational study (May-2022-May-2025) still in progress in 2 hospitals. It includes patients with high-risk PC, aged ≥70 years, non-candidates for local treatment and scheduled to start androgen deprivation therapy. The following variables are analyzed: comorbidity, frailty (Fried frailty phenotype criteria), osteoporosis, sarcopenia (EWGSOP2), fat mass and muscle mass, before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A 6-month follow-up was completed by 12/25 included patients (mean age, 84 years), with a high baseline prevalence of pre-frailty/frailty (67.7%), sarcopenia (66.7%) and osteoporosis (25%). Treatment did not significantly alter these variables or comorbidity. We observed changes in body mass index (p=0.666), decreased mean value of appendicular muscle mass (p=0.01) and increased percentage of fat mass (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk PC, advanced age and a considerable prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty and sarcopenia, androgen deprivation (ADT; 6 months) produces decreased muscle mass without impact on the incidence of the known adverse effects of androgen deprivation.

Management of cancer-associated thromboembolism in vulnerable population.

Although all patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high morbidity and mortality risk, certain groups of patients are particularly vulnerable. This may expose the patient to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence or bleeding (or both), as the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment may be modified. Treatment thus needs to be chosen with care. Such vulnerable groups include older patients, patients with renal impairment or thrombocytopenia, and underweight and obese patients. However, these patient groups are poorly represented in clinical trials, limiting the available data, on which treatment decisions can be based. Meta-analysis of data from randomised clinical trials suggests that the relative treatment effect of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (DXIs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with respect to major bleeding could be affected by advanced age. No evidence was obtained for a change in the relative risk-benefit profile of DXIs compared to LMWH in patients with renal impairment or of low body weight. The available, albeit limited, data do not support restricting the use of DXIs in patients with CAT on the basis of renal impairment or low body weight. In older patients, age is not itself a critical factor for choice of treatment, but frailty is such a factor. Patients over 70 years of age with CAT should undergo a systematic frailty evaluation before choosing treatment and modifiable bleeding risk factors should be addressed. In patients with renal impairment, creatine clearance should be assessed and monitored regularly thereafter. In patients with an eGFR<30mL/min/1.72m2, the anticoagulant treatment may need to be adapted. Similarly, platelet count should be assessed prior to treatment and monitored regularly. In patients with grade 3-4, thrombocytopenia (<50,000 platelets/µL) treatment with a LMWH at a reduced dose should be considered. For patients with CAT and low body weight, standard anticoagulant treatment recommendations are appropriate, whereas in obese patients, apixaban may be preferred.

Prehospital transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for ultra-acute ischaemic stroke: data from the RIGHT-2 randomised sham-controlled ambulance trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, a nitrovasodilator) on clinical outcome when administered before hospital admission in suspected stroke patients is unclear. Here, we assess the safety and efficacy of GTN in the prespecified subgroup of patients who had an ischaemic stroke within the Rapid Intervention with Glyceryl trinitrate in Hypertensive stroke Trial-2 (RIGHT-2). METHODS: RIGHT-2 was an ambulance-based multicentre sham-controlled blinded-endpoint study with patients randomised within 4 hours of onset. The primary outcome was a shift in scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at day 90. Secondary outcomes included death; a global analysis (Wei-Lachin test) containing Barthel Index, EuroQol-5D, mRS, telephone interview for cognitive status-modified and Zung depression scale; and neuroimaging-determined 'brain frailty' markers. Data were reported as n (%), mean (SD), median [IQR], adjusted common OR (acOR), mean difference or Mann-Whitney difference (MWD) with 95% CI. RESULTS: 597 of 1149 (52%) patients had a final diagnosis of ischaemic stroke; age 75 (12) years, premorbid mRS>2 107 (18%), Glasgow Coma Scale 14 (2) and time from onset to randomisation 67 [45, 108] min. Neuroimaging 'brain frailty' was common: median score 2 [2, 3] (range 0-3). At day 90, GTN did not influence the primary outcome (acOR for increased disability 1.15, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.54), death or global analysis (MWD 0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.09). In subgroup analyses, there were non-significant interactions suggesting GTN may be associated with more death and dependency in participants randomised within 1 hour of symptom onset and in those with more severe stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had an ischaemic stroke, ultra-acute administration of transdermal GTN in the ambulance did not improve clinical outcomes in a population with more clinical and radiological frailty than seen in previous in-hospital trials.

Low-Income Older Adults' Vulnerability to Anticholinergic Medication-Associated Frailty.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research supports the negative impact of anticholinergic drug burden on physical frailty. However, prior research has been limited to homogeneous white European populations, and few studies have evaluated how anticholinergic burden tools compare in their measurement function and reliability with minority community-dwelling adult populations. This study investigated the association between anticholinergic drug exposure and frailty by conducting a sensitivity analysis using multiple anticholinergic burden tools in a diverse cohort. METHODS: A comprehensive psychometric approach was used to assess the performance of five clinical Anticholinergic Burden Tools: Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), average daily dose, total standardized daily doses (TSDD), and Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden scale (CAB). Spearman correlation matrix and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the association among the variables. Ordinal logistic regression is used to evaluate the anticholinergic burden measured by each scale to determine the prediction of frailty. Model performance is determined by the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The cohort included 80 individuals (mean age 69 years; 55.7% female, 71% African American). All anticholinergic burden tools were highly correlated (p < 0.001), ICC3 0.66 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.73). Among individuals prescribed anticholinergics, 33% were robust, 44% were prefrail, and 23% were frail. All five tools predicted prefrail and frail status (p < 0.05) with low model misclassification rates for frail individuals (AUC range 0.78-0.85). CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic burden tools evaluated in this cohort of low-income African American older adults were highly correlated and predicted prefrail and frail status. Findings indicate that clinicians can select the appropriate instrument for the clinic setting and research question while maintaining confidence that all five tools will produce reliable results. Future anticholinergic research is needed to unravel the association between interventions such as deprescribing on incident frailty in longitudinal data.

Risks associated with intensive blood pressure control in older patients.

Hypertension management forms a cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention. Strong evidence is available supporting the benefits of blood pressure (BP) lowering in older adults, and recent studies indicate that intensive BP control may provide additional advantages concerning cardiovascular and mortality risk, also at older ages. Yet, in older adults, the cardiovascular benefit of intensive treatment may come at the expense of an increase in adverse events. Indeed, advanced age and frailty may modify the risk/benefit ratio of BP lowering due to a greater predisposition to hypotension and more severe consequences deriving from treatment-related adverse effects. This mostly applies to individuals with poor health status and limited life expectancy, in whom aggressive BP lowering may not lead to cardiovascular benefits but rather increase the risk of short-term treatment-related complications. Furthermore, potential harms of intensive BP control might be underestimated in clinical trials due to exclusion criteria that preclude patients with frailty and multimorbidity from being eligible. Syncope and falls are the most frequently mentioned safety concerns related to antihypertensive treatment, but aggressive BP lowering may affect negatively also renal function, cognitive performance, quality of life, and survival. With the growing emphasis on intensive treatment strategies, raising the awareness of potential harms associated with aggressive BP lowering might help improve hypertension management in older adults and encourage implementation of clinical research on safety. Given these premises, we present a narrative review illustrating the most relevant risks associated with intensive BP control in older patients.

A nationwide analysis of reperfusion therapies for pulmonary embolism in older patients with frailty.

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapy is challenging in the elderly. Catheter-directed therapies are an alternative for higher-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients if systemic thrombolysis (ST) is contraindicated or has failed. Their safety has not been evaluated in specific vulnerable populations. AIMS: We aimed to assess the safety of reperfusion therapies in elderly and frail patients in the real world. METHODS: In the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, we identified hospitalisations of patients ≥65 years with PE and defined a frailty subgroup using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator. We investigated reperfusion therapies (ST, catheter-directed thrombolysis [CDT], catheter-based thrombectomy [CBT], surgical embolectomy [SE]) and their associated safety outcomes (overall and major bleeding). RESULTS: Among 980,245 hospitalisations of patients ≥65 years with PE (28.0% frail), reperfusion therapies were used in 4.9% (17.6% among high-risk PE). ST utilisation remained stable, while the use of catheter-directed therapies increased from 1.7% in 2016 to 3.2% in 2020. Among all hospitalisations with reperfusion, CDT, compared to ST, was associated with reduced major bleeding (5.8% vs 12.2%, odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.70); these results also applied to frail patients. CBT, compared to SE, was also associated with reduced major bleeding (11.0% vs 22.4%, OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91), but not among frail patients. These differences were particularly significant in patients with non-high-risk PE. Differences persisted for overall bleeding as well. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-directed therapies may be a safer alternative to classical reperfusion therapies for elderly and frail patients with PE requiring reperfusion treatment.

Inflammation and Clinical Decline After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Adults With Breast Cancer: Results From the Hurria Older Patients Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Older breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of clinical decline after adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether inflammatory markers assessed before adjuvant chemotherapy are associated with chemotherapy-induced clinical decline in a population of fit older adults with breast cancer. METHODS: In a prospective study of women age ≥ 65 years with stage I-III breast cancer treated with chemotherapy, we measured interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) prechemotherapy (T1). We assessed frailty status, using a Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI; categorized as robust, prefrail, and frail), at T1 and postchemotherapy (T2). The population of interest was robust women at T1. The primary outcome was chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status, defined as decline in DAI from robust (T1) to prefrail or frail (T2). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between inflammatory markers and the primary outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 295 robust women at T1, 76 (26%) experienced chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status, among whom 66% had high IL-6, 63% had high CRP, and 46% had high IL-6 and CRP at T1. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, women with high IL-6 and CRP had a > three-fold (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.55 to 8.01; P = .003) odds of chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status compared with women with low IL-6 and CRP. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of older women with early breast cancer who were clinically fit before chemotherapy initiation, high IL-6 and CRP prechemotherapy were associated with chemotherapy-induced decline in frailty status independent of sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Further research is needed to examine whether inflammatory markers can inform more personalized approaches to treating older breast cancer survivors.

Anti-coagulant Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Frail Patients: Impact of Frailties on the Management of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and anti-Xa direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) are recommended for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) based on well-documented randomised controlled trials. Anti-Xa DOACs are viewed as a first choice for the treatment of patients with CAT. A large number of drug-drug interactions have been reported between DOACs and chemotherapy drugs, modifying circulating levels of DOAC leading to fears of increased bleeding risks or thrombotic recurrence. Progresses in anti-neoplastic therapies have improved the prognosis and the survival, thus increasing the prevalence of frail patients with cancer. However, since frailties tend to be excluded from large trials due to multiple co-morbidities, current guidelines are not fully applicable to this population. The management of these frail patients with CAT is particularly complex and requires a risk assessment on a case-by-case basis with specific focus on cancer, patient-related risk factors and drug-drug interactions. In this brief review we have identified age, co-morbidities and co-medications as key factors of frailty that require careful attention and we have developed a therapeutic decision algorithm to help clinicians optimising the use of anti-coagulants in patients with cancer with CAT, especially in case of anti-Xa DOACs concomitant medications. With the evaluation of the bleeding risk according to the type of cancer, and anticipating drug-drug interactions intensity, taking into account patient frailties allows the optimisation of the anti-coagulant choice. A systematic collaboration between oncologists, vascular pathology specialists and pharmacists is warranted to ensure an optimal patient management. Clinical studies are needed to determine the real impact of these interactions.

Frailty and sarcopenia within the earliest national Dutch childhood cancer survivor cohort (DCCSS-LATER): a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors appear to be at increased risk of frailty and sarcopenia, but evidence on the occurrence of and high-risk groups for these aging phenotypes is scarce, especially in European survivors. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence of and explore risk factors for pre-frailty, frailty, and sarcopenia in a national cohort of Dutch childhood cancer survivors diagnosed between 1963 and 2001. METHODS: Eligible individuals (alive at the time of study, living in the Netherlands, age 18-45 years, and had not previously declined to participate in a late-effects study) from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS-LATER) cohort were invited to take part in this cross-sectional study. We defined pre-frailty and frailty according to modified Fried criteria, and sarcopenia according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 definition. Associations between these conditions and demographic and treatment-related as well as endocrine and lifestyle-related factors were estimated with two separate multivariable logistic regression models in survivors with any frailty measurement or complete sarcopenia measurements. FINDINGS: 3996 adult survivors of the DCCSS-LATER cohort were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. 1993 non-participants were excluded due to lack of response or a decline to participate and 2003 (50·1%) childhood cancer survivors aged 18-45 years were included. 1114 (55·6%) participants had complete frailty measurements and 1472 (73·5%) participants had complete sarcopenia measurements. Mean age at participation was 33·1 years (SD  7·2). 1037 (51·8%) participants were male, 966 (48·2%) were female, and none were transgender. In survivors with complete frailty measurements or complete sarcopenia measurements, the percentage of pre-frailty was 20·3% (95% CI 18·0-22·7), frailty was 7·4% (6·0-9·0), and sarcopenia was 4·4% (3·5-5·6). In the models for pre-frailty, underweight (odds ratio [OR] 3·38 [95% CI 1·92-5·95]) and obesity (OR 1·67 [1·14-2·43]), cranial irradiation (OR 2·07 [1·47-2·93]), total body irradiation (OR 3·17 [1·77-5·70]), cisplatin dose of at least 600 mg/m2 (OR 3·75 [1·82-7·74]), growth hormone deficiency (OR 2·25 [1·23-4·09]), hyperthyroidism (OR 3·72 [1·63-8·47]), bone mineral density (Z score ≤-1 and >-2, OR 1·80 [95% CI 1·31-2·47]; Z score ≤-2, OR 3·37 [2·20-5·15]), and folic acid deficiency (OR 1·87 [1·31-2·68]) were considered significant. For frailty, associated factors included age at diagnosis between 10-18 years (OR 1·94 [95% CI 1·19-3·16]), underweight (OR 3·09 [1·42-6·69]), cranial irradiation (OR 2·65 [1·59-4·34]), total body irradiation (OR 3·28 [1·48-7·28]), cisplatin dose of at least 600 mg/m2 (OR 3·93 [1·45-10·67]), higher carboplatin doses (per g/m2; OR 1·15 [1·02-1·31]), cyclophosphamide equivalent dose of at least 20 g/m2 (OR 3·90 [1·65-9·24]), hyperthyroidism (OR 2·87 [1·06-7·76]), bone mineral density Z score ≤-2 (OR 2·85 [1·54-5·29]), and folic acid deficiency (OR 2·04 [1·20-3·46]). Male sex (OR 4·56 [95%CI 2·26-9·17]), lower BMI (continuous, OR 0·52 [0·45-0·60]), cranial irradiation (OR 3·87 [1·80-8·31]), total body irradiation (OR 4·52 [1·67-12·20]), hypogonadism (OR 3·96 [1·40-11·18]), growth hormone deficiency (OR 4·66 [1·44-15·15]), and vitamin B12 deficiency (OR 6·26 [2·17-1·81]) were significantly associated with sarcopenia. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that frailty and sarcopenia occur already at a mean age of 33 years in childhood cancer survivors. Early recognition and interventions for endocrine disorders and dietary deficiencies could be important in minimising the risk of pre-frailty, frailty, and sarcopenia in this population. FUNDING: Children Cancer-free Foundation, KiKaRoW, Dutch Cancer Society, ODAS Foundation.