Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Patients with Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND This study was designed to predict prognosis of patients with primary duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (D-NENs) by developing nomograms. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with D-NENs between 1988 and 2015 were queried from the SEER database and a total of 965 appropriate cases were randomly separated into the training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generated survival curves, and the difference among the groups was assessed by the log-rank test. Independent prognostic indicators were acquired by Cox regression analysis, and were used to develop predictive overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms. Harrell's concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the efficacy of nomograms. Tumor stage was regarded as a benchmark in predicting prognostic compared with the nomograms built in this study. RESULTS The C-index was 0.739 (0.690-0.788) and 0.859 (0.802-0.916) for OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. Calibration curves exhibited obvious consistency between the nomograms and the actual observations. In addition, C-index, AUC, and DCA were better than tumor stage in the evaluative performance of nomograms. CONCLUSIONS The nomograms were able to predict the 1-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS for D-NENs patients. The good performance of these nomograms suggest that they can be used for evaluating the prognosis of patients with D-NENs and can facilitate individualized treatment in clinical practice.

Supportive therapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Often forgotten but important.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of rare and heterogeneous malignancies that can develop in various organs. A significant number of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) is functionally active and presents with symptoms related to the secretion of biologically active substances, leading to the development of distinct clinical syndromes. There are various therapeutic approaches for GEP-NETs, including curative surgery, palliative surgery, local-ablative and loco-regional therapies as well as systemic therapeutic options including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, cytotoxic therapy, and molecularly targeted therapies. Specific supportive therapy of patients with NETs includes management or prevention of hormone-related clinical syndromes and paraneoplastic states. Supportive therapy plays a key role in NET treatment. Supportive therapy includes debulking surgery and interventional radiologic techniques to reduce tumour bulk or load, as well as systemic medical treatment options to manage or prevent hypersecretion syndromes and treatment-related side effects. Supportive therapies are a type of of comprehensive treatment addressing the patient as a whole person throughout the process of NET treatment. Therefore, supportive therapy also encompasses psychosocial support, expert nursing, nutritional support and management of cancer related pain.

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a still poorly recognized clinical entity.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) are rare tumors, which usually show good prognosis. The optimal management of these tumors is still far from being clearly understood because of their rarity and the poor level of knowledge about their natural history. Herein, we have reviewed the literature on dNENs to collect and analyze the current data on epidemiology, diagnosis and management of these rare tumors. METHODS: Bibliographical searches were performed in PubMed, using the following keywords: duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasm; duodenum; gastrinoma; diagnosis; therapy; guidelines. We searched for all relevant articles published over the last 15 years. Non-English language papers were excluded. RESULTS: We reviewed the pertinent articles about dNENs. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy is the cornerstone of the dNENs diagnostic process. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration/biopsy should be performed in order to locally stage the disease and in all cases of non-diagnostic endoscopy. Endoscopic or complete surgical removal of the primary lesion is the recommended treatment and is generally achievable for the majority of the patients. A less aggressive approach may be suggested for well-differentiated low-stage tumors. After NEN removal, patients should be closely followed-up especially during the first 3 years by endoscopic examination, imaging tests and CgA measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-disciplinary approach and the preservation of the quality of life of the patients play a key role in the therapeutic process for dNENs. Further studies are needed to better define standardized guidelines specific to dNENs, including optimal management approaches and follow-up intervals.

A tale of two tumors: treating pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Despite their perceived rarity, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rising in incidence and prevalence. The biology, natural history, and therapeutic options for GEP-NETs are heterogeneous: NETs arising in the pancreas can be distinguished from those arising elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract, and therapy is dichotomized between these two groups. Somatostatin analogues are the mainstay of oncologic management of bowel NETs; everolimus, streptozocin, and sunitinib are approved to treat pancreatic NETs. There are significant differences in molecular genetics between pancreatic and extrapancreatic NETs, and studies are evaluating whether additional NET patients may benefit from targeted agents. We discuss the distinguishing features of these two groups of tumors, as well as the therapeutic implications of the distinction. We also examine the evolving therapeutic landscape and discuss the likelihood that treatment will be developed independently for pancreatic and extrapancreatic gastrointestinal NETs, with novel therapeutics effective for newly identified pathologically or molecularly defined subgroups.

[Neuroendocrine well-differentiated pancreatic tumors]. / Tumeurs neuro-endocrines bien différenciées du pancreas.

Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors are rare tumors which require specific diagnosis and management. They are characterized by complex histopathologic criteria, large differences in secretory profile and évolutivity, and be associated to hereditary endocrine disease as NEM1 or VHL. Therapeutic strategy is currently discussed throught the regional or national pluridisciplinary workups organized by the 17 experts centers of the French RENATEN network. Treatment of these tumors requires the optimal control of hormonal secretory features for functioning neuroendocrine tumors while antiproliferative treatments are indicated for metastatic large or/and progressive tumors. Their optimal treatment may include locoregional procedures as chemoembolization, radiopeptidé therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies and clinical trials.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: classical considerations and current controversies.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is an endocrinopathy characterized by gastrin-secreting tumors, responsible for causing the formation of multiple, refractory, and recurrent peptic ulcers in the distal duodenum and proximal jejunum. Two main variants have been described, sporadic and those found in association with parathyroid and pituitary tumors, a genetic disorder known as multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 (MEN-1). Biochemical serum evaluation for elevated gastrin, followed by radiological or nuclear localization of the primary lesion, is mandated for establishing diagnosis. The mainstays of treatment include management of hypersecretory state with medical suppression of gastric acid production and surgical resection of primary tumor for the prevention of malignant transformation and metastatic complications. Medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors has virtually eliminated the need for acid-reducing surgical procedures. Surgical approach to sporadic and MEN-1-associated ZES varies based on our understanding of the natural history of the condition and the probability of cure; however, resection to a negative microscopic margin is indicated in both cases. Postoperative surveillance involves measurement of gastrin level, followed by imaging if elevation is detected. Re-excision of recurrent or resection of metastatic disease is a subject of controversy; however, at the present time aggressive cytoreductive approach is favored.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: biology, diagnosis,and treatment.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), a group of endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas, are among the most common neuroendocrine tumors. The genetic causes of familial and sporadic PNETs are somewhat understood, but their molecular pathogenesis remains unknown. Most PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential. The biological behavior of an individual PNET is unpredictable; higher tumor grade, lymph node and liver metastasis, and larger tumor size generally indicate a less favorable prognosis. Endocrine testing, imaging, and histological evidence are necessary to accurately diagnose PNETs. A 4-pronged aggressive treatment approach consisting of surgery, locoregional therapy, systemic therapy, and complication control has become popular in academic centers around the world. The optimal application of the multiple systemic therapeutic modalities is under development; efficacy, safety, availability, and cost should be considered when treating a specific patient. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of specific types of PNETs and familial PNET syndromes, including the novel Mahvash disease, are summarized.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2023 guidance paper for functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour syndromes.

This ENETS guidance paper aims to provide practical advice to clinicians for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of functioning syndromes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). A NET-associated functioning syndrome is defined by the presence of a clinical syndrome combined with biochemical evidence of inappropriately elevated hormonal levels. Different hormonal syndromes can be encountered in pancreatic NET patients, including insulinoma, gastrinoma as well as the rare glucagonoma, VIPoma, ACTHoma, PTHrPoma, carcinoid syndrome, calcitoninoma, GHRHoma and somatostatinoma. The recommendations provided in this paper focus on the biochemical, genetic and imaging work-up as well as therapeutic management of the individual hormonal syndromes in well-differentiated, grade 1-3, functioning NET with the primary tumour originating in the pancreas, and for specific subtypes also in the duodenum.

Management of gastric carcinoids (neuroendocrine neoplasms).

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach can be divided into the usually well-differentiated, hypergastrinemia-dependent type I and II lesions and the more aggressively behaving gastrin-independent type III lesions. Mainly due to better diagnostics and awareness of this tumor, the observed incidence has increased more than tenfold over the last 30 years. Small (<15-20 mm) localized type I and II lesions that are slowly proliferating (Ki67<2%) can usually be managed conservatively with endoscopic surveillance. Reducing hypergastrinemia by surgical removal of an underlying gastrinoma is important in inhibiting growth and induce reduction of type II lesions, while the specific gastrin receptor antagonist YF476 or gastrin antibodies may become useful for both type I and II lesions. Infiltrating and metastasized tumors and type III lesions require a more aggressive approach with surgical resection and consideration of modalities such as somatostatin analogs, cytotoxics, and peptide receptor targeted treatment.

Gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms including gastrinoma - update of the diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours) [Nowotwory neuroendokrynne zoladka i dwunastnicy z uwzglednieniem gastrinoma - uaktualnione zasady postepowania (rekomendowane przez Polska Siec Guzów Neuroendokrynnych)].

After another meeting of experts of the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours, updated recommendations for the management of patients with gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms, including gastrinoma, have been issued. As before, the epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical symptoms of these neoplasms have been discussed, as well as the principles of diagnostic procedures, including biochemical and histopathological diagnostics and tumour localisation, highlighting the changes introduced in the recommendations. Updated principles of therapeutic management have also been presented, including endoscopic and surgical treatment, and the options of pharmacological and radioisotope treatment. The importance of monitoring patients with gastric and duodenal NENs, including gastrinoma, has also been emphasised.

Gastrinoma and Zollinger Ellison syndrome: A roadmap for the management between new and old therapies.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) associated with pancreatic or duodenal gastrinoma is characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion, which typically leads to gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent peptic ulcers, and chronic diarrhea. As symptoms of ZES are nonspecific and overlap with other gastrointestinal disorders, the diagnosis is often delayed with an average time between the onset of symptoms and final diagnosis longer than 5 years. The critical step for the diagnosis of ZES is represented by the initial clinical suspicion. Hypergastrinemia is the hallmark of ZES; however, hypergastrinemia might recognize several causes, which should be ruled out in order to make a final diagnosis. Gastrin levels > 1000 pg/mL and a gastric pH below 2 are considered to be diagnostic for gastrinoma; some specific tests, including esophageal pH-recording and secretin test, might be useful in selected cases, although they are not widely available. Endoscopic ultrasound is very useful for the diagnosis and the local staging of the primary tumor in patients with ZES, particularly in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Some controversies about the management of these tumors also exist. For the localized stage, the combination of proton pump inhibitory therapy, which usually resolves symptoms, and surgery, whenever feasible, with curative intent represents the hallmark of gastrinoma treatment. The high expression of somatostatin receptors in gastrinomas makes them highly responsive to somatostatin analogs, supporting their use as anti-proliferative agents in patients not amenable to surgical cure. Other medical options for advanced disease are super-imposable to other neuroendocrine neoplasms, and studies specifically focused on gastrinomas only are scant and often limited to case reports or small retrospective series. The multidisciplinary approach remains the cornerstone for the proper management of this composite disease. Herein, we reviewed available literature about gastrinoma-associated ZES with a specific focus on differential diagnosis, providing potential diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.

Pancreatic Gastrinoma, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST), Pheochromocytoma, and Hürthle Cell Neoplasm in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multi-tumor syndrome in which affected patients develop malignancies that are rare in the overall population, such as tumors of neural or endocrine origin. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old woman with a clinical diagnosis of NF1 presented with abdominal pain and pneumoperitoneum. She underwent small-bowel resections for a perforated jejunal lesion and a second lesion in the ileum; pathology showed a neurofibroma at the site of the perforation and a 1-cm low-grade GIST, respectively. Additional staging with cross-sectional imaging identified a 3.7-cm pancreatic head mass and a 1.7-cm left adrenal mass; biochemical studies revealed elevated serum gastrin and urinary free metanephrines and catecholamines consistent with pheochromocytoma. Initial surgical management was a left posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. Postoperatively, gallium-68-DOTATOC PET/CT showed uptake in the pancreatic head and a 28-mm left thyroid nodule. Months later, she had an open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathology showed pheochromocytoma and a low-grade (G1) gastrinoma involving 2/8 peripancreatic lymph nodes (pT3pN1M0), respectively. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid nodule showed features consistent with a Hürthle cell neoplasm. Genetic testing identified a pathogenic mutation in NF1 and no mutations in BRCA1/2, CDC72, MEN1, or PALB2. The patient continues surveillance, with no evidence of recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS We report the fifth case of gastrinoma associated with NF1 and the first to arise from the pancreas. This case of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was associated with multiple additional neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumors found in NF1 should raise suspicion of other malignancies.

New therapies for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

In 1953, for the first time, Paul Wermer described a family presenting endocrine gland neoplasms over several generations. The transmission was autosomal dominant and the penetrance was high. Forty years later in 1997, the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene was sequenced, thus enabling diagnosis and early optimal treatment. Patients carrying the MEN1 gene present endocrine but also non-endocrine tumors. Parathyroid, pancreatic and pituitary impairment are the three main types of endocrine involvement. The present article details therapeutic management of hyperparathyroidism, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and pituitary adenomas in patients carrying the MEN1 gene. Significant therapeutic progress has in fact been made in the last few years. As concerns the parathyroid glands, screening of family members and regular monitoring of affected subjects now raise the question of early management of parathyroid lesions and optimal timing of parathyroid surgery. As concerns the duodenum-pancreas, proton-pump inhibitors are able to control gastrin-secreting syndrome, reducing mortality in MEN1 patients. Mortality in MEN1 patients is no longer mainly secondary to uncontrolled hormonal secretion but to metastatic (mainly pancreatic) disease progression. Tumor risk requires regular monitoring of morphological assessment, leading to iterative pancreatic surgery in a large number of patients. Finally, pituitary adenomas in MEN1 patients are traditionally described as aggressive, invasive and resistant to medical treatment. However, regular pituitary screening showed them to be in fact infra-centimetric and non-secreting in the majority of patients. Consequently, it is necessary to regularly monitor MEN1 patients, with regular clinical, biological and morphological work-up. Several studies showed that this regular monitoring impairs quality of life. Building a relationship of trust between patients and care provider is therefore essential. It enables the patient to be referred for psychological or psychiatric care in difficult times, providing long-term support and preventing any breakdown in continuity of care.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

This literature review briefly summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and highlights recent advances in PNET research. PNETs are rare neoplasms, compared with carcinomas arising from pancreatic exocrine tissue. They, like other neuroendocrine tumor types, display variable malignant potential, hormone-related syndromes (functionality), localization, and genetic background. Although tumor origin and molecular pathogenesis remain poorly understood, recently established grading and staging systems facilitate patient risk stratification, and thereby directly impact clinical decision making. Although the optimal clinical management of PNETs involves a multidisciplinary approach, surgery remains the only curative treatment for early-stage disease. Surgery may also have a role in patients with advanced-stage disease, including those with hepatic metastases. Alternative therapeutic approaches applied to PNETs, including chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, biotherapy, polypeptide radionuclide receptor therapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and selective internal radiotherapy, have failed to demonstrate a long-term survival benefit. Surgery remains the primary therapeutic option for patients with PNETs. Research on PNETs is desperately needed to improve the therapeutic options for patients with this disease.

Gastrinomas: a historical perspective.

The journey of gastrinomas had its beginnings in 1955 when Zollinger and Ellison published their seminal paper (Zollinger and Ellison, Ann Surg 1955; 142: 709-723). The evolution of the diagnosis and management of this syndrome has paralleled many important advances in medicine, including the development of various diagnostic tools to the major impact of medical treatment on the management of an inherently surgical pathology. There are numerous excellent review articles on the most current developments and treatment options of gastrinomas available in the literature today. The purpose of this paper is to present a historical perspective on this most fascinating condition. This article will illustrate the way in which the discovery of gastrinomas evolved and how its management has developed with it. The evolution of the surgical treatment of gastrinomas has evolved over the last 50 years.

Management of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms that often present as diagnostic dilemmas due to obscure or non-specific symptoms. The ability of carcinoid tumors to cause clinical symptoms by secretion of hormones or biogenic amines is best recognised in the form of the carcinoid syndrome. Although generally slow growing, a significant minority demonstrate aggressive tumor growth. Ten-twenty percent of pancreatic NETs may be associated with hereditary disorders such as multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 (MEN-1) and less frequently, Von Hippel Lindau, which should be considered in the investigation and management of these patients. A small percentage of NETs are associated with co-existing synchronous non-carcinoid neoplasm. The aim of this paper was to review the optimal management in patients with NETs. The therapeutic options which are reviewed, including the use of somatostatin analogues, the role of surgery, the use of chemotherapy, biotherapy using interferon, peptide receptor targeted therapy. In addition, the challenging interventional management of liver metastases is discussed, including the role of hepatic-artery embolization, radiofrequency ablation and the place of orthotoptic liver transplantation in selected patients. Authors have focused on the newest therapeutic modalities, e.g., radionuclide peptide receptor targeted therapy with Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, the newest somatostatin analogues such as pasireotide and angiogenic inhibitors. In conclusion, with the increasing number of investigative procedures and therapeutic options available to diagnose and treat carcinoid tumors, it is vital to have a multidisciplinary approach. Furthermore, additional scientific research and controlled clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the many treatment options, which for these rare tumors can only be achieved by collaboration.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

The neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the pancreas are very rare lesions with frequency of about 3 to 10 per 1 000 000 inhabitants. The neuroendocrine tumors composes a heterogeneous group of tumors. The gastro-entero-pancreatic tumors (GEP) constitute 70% of all NET and 2% of all digestive system tumors. There have been several attempts to classify those lesions and since 2000 exists WHO classification which divides NET according to malignancy and histologic structure. The most often NET of the pancreas are insulinoma, gastrinoma, glucagonoma, somatostatinoma, VIPoma. There is a recommendation to assay hormonal activity, measure concentration of specific peptides, biogenic amines and hormones produced by NET cells to establish diagnosis. Those tests are useful in monitoring treatment and in prognostication course of the disease. Imaging methods especially useful in localization GEP-NET are: ultrasound (US), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) and angiography. The most sensitive method in preoperative diagnosis seems to be EUS or less accessible intra ductal ultrasonography (IDUS). Surgical treatment depends on progression of disease as well as on localization of tumor and consists in both radical methods and palliative operations. The gold standard in pharmacological treatment are somatostatin analogs which can induce long-term remission even in inoperable lesions. Although NET of pancreas are very rare. they are still important diagnostic and therapeutic problem and requires interdisciplinary co-operation. The neuroendocrine tumors should be treated in centers with highest rank of references.