Evaluation of the Homogenous Mobility Shift Assay for Infliximab and Adalimumab Anti-drug Antibody Detection in the Clinical Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Detecting antidrug antibodies (ADAs) against infliximab or adalimumab is useful for therapeutic drug monitoring. Various ADA detection methods exist, and antibody titer is an output in some algorithms. Homogenous mobility shift assay (HMSA) measures relative ADA concentration and determines drug-ADA complex size in vitro. However, the relevance of complex size determination in drug monitoring remains unclear. Hence, the association between complex size, ADA concentration, and sample detectable neutralizing activity was evaluated. METHODS: Sera from infliximab-treated and adalimumab-treated patients who tested positive for ADA in the National Screening Service were analyzed using 3 ADA assays. HMSA determined the relative ADA concentrations and complex sizes, competitive ligand-binding assay evaluated the sample neutralizing capacity, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detected immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 ADA. RESULTS: Most ADA-positive samples (>80%) formed drug-ADA dimer complexes, whereas 17% had dimer and multimer complexes, and 3% had multimeric complexes. Multimer presence had 100% positive predictive value for detectable neutralizing activity. ADA concentration and detectable neutralizing activity were moderately correlated (r = 0.65) in adalimumab-treated patients and strongly correlated (r = 0.81) in infliximab-treated patients. In adalimumab-treated patients, multimer presence was a stronger predictor of neutralizing activity than ADA concentration was, but not in infliximab-treated patients. However, in infliximab-treated patient samples, multimer presence revealed a distinct subset with high ADA concentrations, neutralizing activity, and IgG4 ADA. CONCLUSIONS: Multimers detected using HMSA had a strong positive predictive value for competitive ligand-binding assay detectable neutralizing activity. Multimeric IgG4-containing ADA-drug complexes revealed a distinct subset of infliximab-treated patient samples, whose clinical relevance merits further investigation.

Infliximab desensitization in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a safe therapeutic alternative.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the administration of infliximab (IFX) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) patients are not rare and usually lead to drug discontinuation. We report data on safety and effectiveness of desensitization to IFX in patients with previous HSR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study. Patients for whom a desensitization protocol to IFX was realized after a previous HSR were included. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and IFX trough levels at both inclusion and six months after desensitization were collected. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence of HSR were evaluated. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2020, 27 patients (Crohn's Disease: 26 (96%) were included). Desensitization after HSR was performed after a median time of 10.4 months (2.9-33.1). Nineteen (70%) patients received immunosuppressants at time of desensitization. Eight (30%) patients presented HSR at first (n = 2), second (n = 4) or third (n = 2) IFX perfusion after desensitization. None led to intensive care unit transfer or death. Thirteen (48%) had clinical response at 6 months and 8 (29%) were still under IFX treatment two years after desensitization. IFX trough levels and ADA were available for 14 patients at time of desensitization. Most patients (12 out of 14) had ADA at a high level. At 6 months, among the 7 patients with long term response to IFX, 4 presented a decrease of ADA titers and 2 had a significant trough level of IFX. CONCLUSION: IFX desensitization in patients with IBD is a safe therapeutic alternative and represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics.What is already known? Hypersensitivity reactions to the administration of infliximab is frequent. Occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction, either immediate or delayed, usually leads to permanent drug discontinuation.What is new here? Infliximab desensitization is well tolerated with no hypersensitivity reaction recurrence in 70% of patients. Clinical success at 6 months was of 48% and around a third of patients remained under infliximab therapy two years after desensitization. Antidrug antibodies decreased and infliximab trough levels increased in these patients showing the impact of desensitization on immunogenicity.How can this study help patient care? Infliximab desensitization represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics who presented hypersensitivity reaction to the drug.

Influence of rheumatoid factor on serum drug levels of TNF inhibitors with different structures in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an Fc-free antibody fragment, has shown stable serum levels and steady efficacy in the treatment of RA patients, irrespective of RF levels at baseline. Here, we examine, in clinical practice, the effect of baseline RF and ACPA levels on serum drug levels of IFX, ADL and CZP an Fc-free antibody fragment. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed in real-world patients. We assessed 170 patients with RA: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL and 32 (19%) CZP. Demographic and clinical variables, RF and ACPA levels were obtained at the baseline visit (T0), and patients were stratified based on negative, low, medium, or high levels. After 6 months (T6) serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), were computed. RESULTS: While CZP serum levels did not differ across RF groups at T6, high baseline RF was linked to lower serum drug levels compared to RF negative status in treatment with complete monoclonal antibodies IFX and ADL. No differences in disease activity measured by DAS28 at baseline were observed across RF quartiles in patients treated with IFX or ADL. ADAb was observed in 26 patients with IFX, 3 with ADL and 1 with CZP, following 6 months of treatment. Patients with high baseline RF levels dropped out more frequently by secondary non-response in IFX or ADL than CZP (80% vs. 75% vs. 33%, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this real word data evaluation, CZP serum levels were independent of RF levels in patients however patients with high baseline RF levels who obtained IFX or ADL had lower serum drug levels at 6 months than baseline RF-negative patients. In addition, secondary non-response was more frequent in patients with high RF levels treated with IFX and ADL.

Subcutaneous infliximab in Crohn's disease patients with previous immunogenic failure of intravenous infliximab.

PURPOSE: Immunogenicity is a major reason for secondary loss of response to infliximab (IFX). Recent work suggested potentially lower immunogenicity of subcutaneous (SC) compared to intravenous (IV) IFX. However, it is unknown whether re-exposure to IFX SC after secondary loss of response and immunogenicity to its intravenous formulation is safe and effective. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study conducted at two medical centers, patients with clinically (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 5) and/or biochemically (fecal calprotectin > 250 µg/g) active Crohn's disease (CD) and previous immunogenic failure of IFX IV underwent exposure to IFX SC. Harvey-Bradshaw Index, fecal calprotectin, IFX serum concentration, and anti-drug antibodies were assessed until month 12. RESULTS: Twenty CD patients were included. The majority of patients (90%) had previous treatment with three or more biologics. Fifteen (75%) and ten (50%) of 20 patients continued IFX SC treatment until months 6 and 12, respectively. No immediate hypersensitivity reactions were observed. Two patients discontinued IFX SC treatment because of delayed hypersensitivity at week 2 and week 4. IFX serum concentrations increased from baseline to month 12, while anti-drug antibody levels decreased. Combined clinical and biochemical remission at month 12 was observed in seven of 20 patients (35%). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous infliximab treatment of Crohn's disease patients with previous immunogenic failure of intravenous infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a cohort of patients with refractory Crohn's disease.

Reactive Immunomodulator Addition to Infliximab Monotherapy Restores Clinical Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving infliximab (IFX) commonly experience immunogenic loss of response (LOR) by formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). An immunomodulator (IMM) used in combination with initial IFX induction is known to reduce ADA development and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of reactively adding an IMM to patients on IFX monotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study and systematic review with meta-analysis of patients with IBD demonstrating immunologic LOR, with or without clinical LOR, that had an IMM (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) reactively added (reactive combination therapy; rCT) to combat elevated ADAs and raise IFX level. Data were extracted for pooled effect size estimation using random-effects models, and ADA and IFX trough levels were compared pre- and post-IMM initiation. RESULTS: We identified 6 patients who received rCT due to rising ADA titers and low IFX levels. Median ADA titer decreased from 506 ng/mL (interquartile range (IQR) [416-750]) to 76.5 ng/mL (IQR [25.8-232]), an 85% decrease (p = 0.031). Median IFX trough increased from 0.4 µg/mL (IQR [0.4-0.48]) to 8.25 µg/mL (IQR [3.7-9.6]), a 20.6-fold increase (p = 0.038). Meta-analysis pooled effect size of 7 studies with 89 patients showed an 87% ADA titer reduction [95% confidence interval (CI) = 72-94%], 6.7-fold increased IFX trough (95% CI = 2.4-18.7), and 76% clinical remission rescue rate (95% CI = 59-93%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest rCT is a valid rescue strategy in patients with immunogenic LOR to IFX to reduce ADA titers, restore therapeutic IFX levels, and recapture clinical remission of IBD.

Antibiotic use differentially affects the risk of anti-drug antibody formation during anti-TNFα therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a report from the epi-IIRN.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy drive treatment loss of response. An association between intestinal microbial composition and response to anti-TNF therapy was noted. We therefore aimed to assess the implications of antibiotic treatments on ADA formation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). DESIGN: We analysed data from the epi-IIRN (epidemiology group of the Israeli IBD research nucleus), a nationwide registry of all patients with IBD in Israel. We included all patients treated with anti-TNF who had available ADA levels. Survival analysis with drug use as time varying covariates were used to assess the association between antibiotic use and ADA development. Next, specific pathogen and germ-free C57BL mice were treated with respective antibiotics and challenged with infliximab. ADA were assessed after 14 days. RESULTS: Among 1946 eligible patients, with a median follow-up of 651 days from initiation of therapy, 363 had positive ADA. Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated an increased risk of ADA development in patients who used cephalosporins (HR=1.97, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.44), or penicillins with ß-lactamase inhibitors (penicillin-BLI, HR=1.4, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.74), whereas a reduced risk was noted in patients treated with macrolides (HR=0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.86) or fluoroquinolones (HR=0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35). In mice exposed to infliximab, significantly increased ADA production was observed in cephalosporin as compared with macrolide pretreated mice. Germ-free mice produced no ADA. CONCLUSION: ADA production is associated with the microbial composition. The risk of ADA development during anti-TNF therapy can possibly be reduced by avoidance of cephalosporins and penicillin-BLIs, or by treatment with fluoroquinolones or macrolides.

Immunomodulatory agents for COVID-19 treatment: possible mechanism of action and immunopathology features.

The novel coronavirus pandemic has emerged as one of the significant medical-health challenges of the current century. The World Health Organization has named this new virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first detection of SARS-CoV-2 in November 2019 in Wuhan, China, physicians, researchers, and others have made it their top priority to find drugs and cures that can effectively treat patients and reduce mortality rates. The symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) include fever, dry cough, body aches, and anosmia. Various therapeutic compounds have been investigated and applied to mitigate the symptoms in COVID-19 patients and cure the disease. Degenerative virus analyses of the infection incidence and COVID-19 have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 penetrates the pulmonary alveoli's endothelial cells through Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on the membrane, stimulates various signaling pathways and causes excessive secretion of cytokines. The continuous triggering of the innate and acquired immune system, as well as the overproduction of pro-inflammatory factors, cause a severe condition in the COVID-19 patients, which is called "cytokine storm". It can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critical patients. Severe and critical COVID-19 cases demand oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilator support. Various drugs, including immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and interleukin antagonists) have been utilized in clinical trials. However, the studies and clinical trials have documented diverging findings, which seem to be due to the differences in these drugs' possible mechanisms of action. These drugs' mechanism of action generally includes suppressing or modulating the immune system, preventing the development of cytokine storm via various signaling pathways, and enhancing the blood vessels' diameter in the lungs. In this review article, multiple medications from different drug families are discussed, and their possible mechanisms of action are also described.

The FcγRIIa-Syk Axis Controls Human Dendritic Cell Activation and T Cell Response Induced by Infliximab Aggregates.

The development of anti-drug Abs in response to biological products (BP) is a major drawback in the treatment of patients. Factors related to the patient, the treatment, and the product can influence BP immunogenicity. Among these factors, BP aggregates have been suggested to promote immunogenicity by acting as danger signals recognized by dendritic cells (DC) facilitating the establishment of an anti-BP CD4 T cell-dependent adaptive immune response leading to anti-drug Abs production. To date, little is known on the mechanism supporting the effect of aggregates on DCs and consequently on the T cell response. The aim of this work was to identify key signaling pathways involved in BP aggregate DC activation and T cell response. We generated aggregates by submitting infliximab (IFX), an immunogenic anti-TNF-α chimeric Ab, to heat stress. Our results showed that IFX aggregates were able to induce human monocyte-derived DC (moDC) maturation in a concentration-dependent manner. Aggregate-treated moDCs enhanced allogeneic T cell proliferation and IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 production compared with native Ab-treated moDCs. We then investigated the implication of FcγRIIa and spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) in DC activation and showed that they were both strongly implicated in moDC maturation induced by IFX aggregates. Indeed, we found that neutralization of FcγRIIa inhibited DC activation, and consequently, Syk inhibition led to a decrease in T cell proliferation and cytokine production in response to IFX aggregates. Taken together, our results bring new insight, to our knowledge, on how protein aggregates could induce DC and T cell activation via the FcγRIIa-Syk signaling pathway.

De-escalation from Dose-Intensified Anti-TNF Therapy Is Successful in the Majority of IBD Patients at 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate. AIMS: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success. METHODS: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission.

HLA-DQA1*05 Carriage Associated With Development of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Infliximab and Adalimumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies are the most widely used biologic drugs for treating immune-mediated diseases, but repeated administration can induce the formation of anti-drug antibodies. The ability to identify patients at increased risk for development of anti-drug antibodies would facilitate selection of therapy and use of preventative strategies. METHODS: We performed a genome-wide association study to identify variants associated with time to development of anti-drug antibodies in a discovery cohort of 1240 biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease starting infliximab or adalimumab therapy. Immunogenicity was defined as an anti-drug antibody titer ≥10 AU/mL using a drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Significant association signals were confirmed in a replication cohort of 178 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS: The HLA-DQA1*05 allele, carried by approximately 40% of Europeans, significantly increased the rate of immunogenicity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.25; P = 5.88 × 10-13). The highest rates of immunogenicity, 92% at 1 year, were observed in patients treated with infliximab monotherapy who carried HLA-DQA1*05; conversely the lowest rates of immunogenicity, 10% at 1 year, were observed in patients treated with adalimumab combination therapy who did not carry HLA-DQA1*05. We confirmed this finding in the replication cohort (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.35-2.98; P = 6.60 × 10-4). This association was consistent for patients treated with adalimumab (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.70) or infliximab (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.57-2.33), and for patients treated with anti-TNF therapy alone (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.37-2.22) or in combination with an immunomodulator (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.57-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: In an observational study, we found a genome-wide significant association between HLA-DQA1*05 and the development of antibodies against anti-TNF agents. A randomized controlled biomarker trial is required to determine whether pretreatment testing for HLA-DQA1*05 improves patient outcomes by helping physicians select anti-TNF and combination therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03088449.

Optimization of infliximab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease using a dashboard approach-an Indian experience.

PURPOSE: Infliximab (IFX) therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with loss of response in half the patients, due to complex pharmacokinetic and immunological factors. Dashboard's Bayesian algorithms use information from model and individual multivariate determinants of IFX concentration and can predict dose and dosing interval. AIM: To compare measured IFX concentrations in our laboratory with values predicted by iDose dashboard system and report its efficacy in managing patients not responding to conventional dosing schedule. METHOD: Clinical history, demographic details, and laboratory findings such as albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) data of IBD patients (n = 30; median age 23 years (IQR: 14.25 - 33.5)) referred for IFX drug monitoring in our laboratory from November 2017 to November 2019 were entered in iDose software. The IFX concentration predicted by iDose based on this information was compared with that measured in our laboratory. In addition, a prospective dashboard-guided dosing was prescribed in 11 of these 30 patients not responding to conventional dosing and was followed to assess their clinical outcome. RESULT: IFX monitoring in our 30 patients had shown therapeutic concentration in 12, supratherapeutic in 2 and subtherapeutic concentration in 16 patients. The iDose predicted concentration showed concordance in 21 of these 30 patients. Of 11 patients managed with iDose-assisted prospective dosing, 8 achieved clinical remission, 2 showed partial response, and one developed antibodies. CONCLUSION: Retrospective data analysis showed concordance between laboratory measured and iDose-predicted IFX level in 70% of patients. iDose-assisted management achieved clinical remission and cost reduction.

Predictors of Immunogenicity to Infliximab among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Does Ethnicity Matter?

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab develop antibodies to infliximab (ATI), which are associated with low drug levels and loss of response (LOR). Hence, mapping out predictors of immunogenicity toward infliximab is essential for tailoring patient-specific therapy. Jewish Sephardi ethnicity, in addition to monotherapy, has been previously identified as a potential risk factor for ATI formation and infliximab failure. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between Jewish sub-group ethnicity among patients with IBD and the risk of infliximab immunogenicity and therapy failure. To confirm findings of a previous cohort that addressed the same question. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all infliximab-treated patients of Jewish ethnicity with regular prospective measurements of infliximab trough levels and ATI. Drug and ATI levels were prospectively measured, clinical data was retrieved from medical charts. RESULTS: The study comprised 109 Jewish patients (54 Ashkenazi, 55 Sephardi) treated with infliximab. There was no statistically significant difference in proportion of ATI between Sephardi and Ashkenazi patients with IBD (32% Ashkenazi and 33% Sephardi patients developed ATI, odds ratio [OR] 0.944, P = 0.9). Of all variables explored, monotherapy and older age were the only factors associated with ATI formation (OR 0.336, 95% confidence interval 0.145-0.778, P = 0.01, median 34 vs. 28, interquartile range 28-48, 23-35 years, P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous findings, Sephardi Jewish ethnicity was not identified as a risk factor for ATI formation compared with Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity. Other risk factors remained unchanged.

Infliximab-Tumor Necrosis Factor Complexes Elicit Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Some patients develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which reduce the efficacy of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases. ADAs arise inconsistently, and it is not clear what factors determine their formation. We investigated features of the immune system, the infliximab antibody, and its complex with TNF that might contribute to ADA generation. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were given injections of infliximab and recombinant human TNF or infliximab F(ab')2 fragments. Blood samples were collected every 2-3 days for 2 weeks and weekly thereafter for up to 6 weeks; infliximab-TNF complexes and ADAs were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intestinal biopsy and blood samples were obtained from patients having endoscopy who had received infliximab therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases; infliximab-TNF complexes were measured with ELISA. Infliximab-specific plasma cells were detected in patient tissue samples by using mass cytometry. We studied activation of innate immune cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors incubated with infliximab or infliximab-TNF complexes; toll-like receptors (TLRs) were blocked with antibodies, endocytosis was blocked with the inhibitor PitStop2, and cytokine expression was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ELISAs. Uptake of infliximab and infliximab-TNF complexes by THP-1 cells was measured with confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Mice given increasing doses of infliximab produced increasing levels of ADAs. Blood samples from mice given injections of human TNF and infliximab contained infliximab-TNF complexes; complex formation was associated with ADA formation with an area under the curve of 0.944 (95% confidence interval, 0.851-1.000; P = .003). Intestinal tissues from patients, but not blood samples, contained infliximab-TNF complexes and infliximab-specific plasma cells. Incubation of PBMCs with infliximab-TNF complexes resulted in a 4.74-fold increase in level of interleukin (IL) 1ß (IL1B) messenger RNA (P for comparison = .005), increased IL1B protein secretion, and a 2.69-fold increase in the expression of TNF messenger RNA (P for comparison = 0.013) compared with control PBMCs. Infliximab reduced only IL1B and TNF expression. Antibodies against TLR2 or TLR4 did not block the increases in IL1B or TNF expression, but endocytosis was required. THP-1 cells endocytosed higher levels of infliximab-TNF complexes than infliximab alone. CONCLUSIONS: In mice, we found ADA formation to increase with dose of infliximab given and concentration of infliximab-TNF complexes detected in blood. Based on studies of human intestinal tissues and blood samples, we propose that infliximab-TNF complexes formed in the intestine are endocytosed by and activate innate immune cells, which increase expression of IL1B and TNF and production of antibodies against the drug complex. It is therefore important to optimize the infliximab dose to a level that is effective but does not activate an innate immune response against the drug-TNF complex.

Development of Label-Free Immunoassays as Novel Solutions for the Measurement of Monoclonal Antibody Drugs and Antidrug Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays based on label-free technologies (label-free immunoassay [LFIA]) offer an innovative approach to clinical diagnostics and demonstrate great promise for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs. An LFIA measures immunocomplex formation in real time and allows for quantification on initial binding rate, which facilitates fast measurement within a few minutes. METHODS: Based on thin-film interferometry (TFI) technology, open-access LFIAs were developed for the quantification of the mAb drugs adalimumab (ADL) and infliximab (IFX) and for the detection of the antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to the mAb drugs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs). RESULTS: The LFIAs for active mAb drugs (ADL and IFX) and for ADAs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs) were validated. The analytical measurement range (AMR) for both ADL and IFX was from 2 to 100 µg/mL. The AMR for ADL-ADAs was from 5 to 100 µg/mL and for IFX-ADAs was 10 to 100 µg/mL. In the comparison of LFIAs and reporter gene assays, the correlation coefficient was 0.972 for the quantification of ADL and 0.940 for the quantification of IFX. The concordance rate was 90% for the detection of ADL-ADAs and 76% for the detection of IFX-ADAs. CONCLUSIONS: The LFIAs for active mAb drugs and ADAs were appropriate for the TDM of ADL and IFX. The TFI technology has unique advantages compared with other technologies used for the measurement of mAb drugs. Label-free technologies, especially those allowing for open-access LFIAs, have great potential for clinical diagnostics.

Monitoring of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases: A comparison of three commercially available ELISA kits.

BACKGROUND: There are many studies presenting data of biologics and several ELISA kits commercially available for monitoring infliximab serum trough levels (s-IFXt) and anti-drug antibodies (ADAb). We propose to compare technical characteristics and results of three different assays on a cohort of 35 patients under infliximab (IFX) and suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: s-IFXt and ADAb were systematically measured with three ELISA kits: Lisa-Tracker® Duo infliximab (Theradiag®), Ridascreen® IFX Monitoring (R-Biopharm AG®) and Promonitor® IFX (Progenika Biopharma SA®). RESULTS: The main technical features that differed between kits for measuring s-IFXt were: (i) TNF coating, (ii) immune complexes revelation strategy and/or (iii) interference with other anti-TNFα agents. For kits measuring ADAb, they were revelation steps and unit of results. There was an excellent mathematical correlation of s-IFXt between assays however Bland-Altman analysis denoted (i) s-IFXt were on average 48 to 69% higher in Ridascreen® than in the other two assays, and (ii) elevated s-IFXt were higher with Promonitor® compared to Lisa-Tracker®. As a consequence, there were some substantial discrepancies between assays for classification of s-IFXt into concentration ranges. Despite unstandardized units, pairwise qualitative comparison showed a perfect agreement between the three pairs of ADAb assays. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the evaluated assays are not quantitatively interchangeable due to substantial variations in some results that could lead, for some patients, to divergent therapeutic decisions. We remind to be cautious when comparing study results issued from different kits and recommend using the same assay for the longitudinal follow-up of IBD patients.

Predictors of Infliximab Trough Concentrations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Using a Repeated-Measures Design.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treating patients based on a treat-to-trough approach has been shown to be a cost-effective strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who have become unresponsive to infliximab (IFX). However, the documented evidence for this is limited, and some controversy remains regarding the use of routine proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). To support routine TDM of IFX and regimen optimization in IBD patients, more in-depth knowledge of the covariates that affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of IFX is needed. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of the patient, disease, and treatments that influence IFX PK and exposure in our cohort of IBD patients using a repeated-measures design. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of adult IBD patients who received IFX between July 2013 and March 2017. We obtained repeated IFX trough concentration (Cmin) measurements and implemented a previously described population pharmacokinetic model to estimate individual clearance (CL). From the individual primary parameters, the area under the curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), and central elimination rate constant (K10) were estimated. We performed a repeated-measures analysis to evaluate whether patient characteristics, disease status, concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, and immunogenicity are associated with IFX Cmin and PK parameters. RESULTS: We collected 429 Cmin measurements from 112 patients. The median of the Cmin values was 3.62 mg/L (1.47-6.02). Antibodies to IFX (ATI) were detected in 14 patients. The predicted median AUC was 28,421 mg/h/L (22,336-36,903). The median individual predicted CL, K10, and t1/2 values were 4.77 mL/kg/day (3.88-5.90), 0.09 days (0.08-0.12), and 12.22 days (9.49-14.87), respectively. IFX Cmin, AUC, CL, and K10 were significantly influenced by ATI and serum albumin concentrations. Moreover, body weight was significantly associated with AUC, CL, and K10. Patients receiving concurrent immunosuppressive therapy had higher Cmin and AUC values and lower CL and K10 values than those treated with IFX monotherapy. We also observed high intrapatient variability in Cmin values during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In this repeated-measures study in a population of IBD patients, we observed significant associations between ATI, serum albumin concentration, concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, body weight and gender, and IFX Cmin, and CL. The high PK variability observed in this study supports the need for proactive TDM to optimize the use of IFX as early as possible in IBD patients.

Infliximab levels and antibodies in IBD-related peripheral arthralgia.

BACKGROUND: Extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM) are common in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and may affect up to 40% of the patients during the course of the disease. Peripheral arthralgia (PA) is by far the most common EIM. To date, TNFα inhibitors are the most established treatment for EIMs in IBD. Infliximab (IFX) trough levels (TL) and anti-IFX antibodies (ATI) are correlated with multiple outcomes in IBD such as clinical response and remission, mucosal healing, fistular healing, and more. So far, a correlation between PA and IFX TL\ATI has not been evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study included IBD patients followed by the gastroenterology department of Sheba Medical Center. Patients with active PA at onset of IFX treatment were included. IFX TL and ATI were evaluated at week 6, 14, and 26 and correlated with PA persistence. RESULTS: Forty patients (37 Crohn's and 3 ulcerative colitis) with IBD-related PA were included. The overall prevalence of PA was 55% (22/40), 42.5% (17/40), and 55% (22/40) after 6, 14, and 26 weeks, respectively. IFX trough drug levels were not associated with reported PA at week 6 [median, 11.8 µg/ml (IQR 6.6-15.5) vs 10.05 µg/ml (IQR 7.35-12.87), p = 0.56], week 14 [median, 4.7 µg/ml (IQR 2.3-7) vs 3.1 µg/ml (IQR 1.35-7.35), p = 0.55], and week 26 [median, 3 µg/ml (IQR 1.15-5.17) vs 3.4 µg/ml (IQR 0.13-6.75), p = 0.94]. Detectable ATI were significantly more prevalent in patients with PA than in patients without PA at week 26 [11/22 (50%) vs 3/18 (16.7%), p = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD-related PA, ATI are associated with an increased risk of persistence of PA. No direct correlation was demonstrated between IFX TL and persistence of PA.

Development of anti-drug monoclonal antibody panels against adalimumab and infliximab.

The generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is one of the most serious problems in therapy using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), because ADAs can impact the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mAbs. It is therefore important to detect the generated ADAs in patients. For the appropriate detection of ADAs, methods that detect various types of ADAs (e.g., low- and high-affinity ADAs) are needed, but since there are no adequate reference preparations of ADAs relevant to human ADAs in most cases, it is difficult to determine whether or not the developed methods have enough analytical performance. Here, we developed human-rat chimeric ADA panels against the anti-TNF-α therapeutic antibodies infliximab and adalimumab. The developed ADA panels consist of 7 (for infliximab) and 11 (for adalimumab) ADAs with various binding characters, and most of the ADAs are neutralizing antibodies. Using these ADA panels, we compared the detectability of model methods, i.e., binding assays using SPR, BLI, and ECL, and a cell-based assay to detect neutralization activity. Since we obtained ADAs showing low and high responses with the various methods, the ADA panels we developed were shown to be useful for the development of ADA assays.

Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Switched From Maintenance Therapy With a Biosimilar to Remicade.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is evidence that it is safe and effective for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) to switch from maintenance therapy with an original infliximab drug to a biosimilar, but little is known about outcomes of reverse switches and/or multiple switches. We aimed to evaluate the effects of a reverse switch (from a biosimilar to Remicade) in a real-life cohort. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 174 unselected and consecutive patients with IBD (136 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 38 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) who received maintenance therapy with the biosimilar in Hungary. In September 2017, patients were switched from the biosimilar (CT-P13) to Remicade, due to reimbursement policies. In our cohort, 8% (n = 14) patients had been previously exposed to the originator Remicade. We collected clinical and biochemical information from patients at baseline (time of the switch) and 16 and 24 weeks thereafter. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's disease activity index <150 points or no fistula drainage, or a partial Mayo score <3 points for patients with UC. Serum drug trough levels and anti-drug antibodies were measured at baseline and week 16. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 before the switch (82.5% with CD and 82.9% with UC), at baseline (80.6% with CD and 81.6% with UC), at week 16 (77.5% with CD and 83.7% with UC), or at week 24 (CD 76.3% with CD and 84.9% with UC) (P = .60 among groups for patients with CD and P = .98 among groups for patients with UC). For all patients, mean serum trough levels of infliximab were 5.33 ± 4.70 µg/mL at baseline and 5.69 ± 4.94 µg/mL at week 16 (P = .71); we did not find significant differences in prevalence of anti-drug antibody at baseline (16.2%) compared with week 16 (16.9%) (P = .87). Four infusion reactions occurred, until week 24 of follow up. There was no difference in outcomes or trough or antidrug antibody levels between patients with or without previous exposure to Remicade. CONCLUSIONS: We collected data from a real-life cohort of patients with CD or UC who were switched from maintenance therapy with a biosimilar to Remicade or were treated with only Remicade. No significant changes were observed in remission, trough levels, or antidrug antibodies in patients switched from the biosimilar to Remicade. No new safety signals were detected.

Two-Photon Probe for TNF-α. Assessment of the Transmembrane TNF-α Level in Human Colon Tissue by Two-Photon Microscopy.

We developed Pyr1-infliximab: a two-photon probe for TNF-α. Pyr1-infliximab showed absorption maxima at 280 and 438 nm and an emission maximum at 610 nm in an aqueous buffer and effective two-photon action cross-section values of (520-2830) × 10-50 cm4s/photon in RAW 264.7 cells. After this probe was labeled, it was possible to detect Pyr1-infliximab-transmembrane TNF-α complexes in a live cell and to determine the relative proportion of these complexes in human colon tissues. This proportion among healthy, possibly inflamed, and inflamed tissues of patients with ulcerative colitis was found to be 1.0/4.5/10. This probe may find useful applications for selective detection of transmembrane TNF-α in a live cell or tissue, for quantification of inflammation in human colon tissue or of antidrug antibodies in patients who stop responding to anti-TNF therapy, and for monitoring of the response to this therapy.