The choice for colostomy following spinal cord injury: A grounded theory study.

AIM: Explore experiences and choices related to bowel management following spinal cord injury. BACKGROUND: In one UK spinal centre, more are choosing a colostomy soon after injury in contravention of professional guidelines. Reasons for this were unknown. METHODS: Grounded theory study using semi-structured interviews with 12 individuals living with spinal cord injury. RESULTS: All 'Experienced Loss' related to bowel function. Those who chose colostomy later 'Progressed into Suffering'. Colostomy transformed lives and was likened to 'Being Alive Again'. 'Failures of Care' contributed to experiences and decision-making. CONCLUSION: Possessing information and choice emerge as key in transforming lives following spinal cord injury. They allow individuals to make choices from a lifeworld perspective, which may differ from those professionals assume. Present neurogenic bowel management guidelines fail to account for the wider lifeworlds of those they are designed for. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: An imperative emerges to make information and choice available and involve patients in the reconstruction of guidelines. IMPACT: Unique knowledge emerges about patient experiences and motivations, and points to a patient-led revolution in how bowel management following spinal cord injury is understood and managed. The imperative for adequate access to information and choice is demonstrated. REPORTING METHOD: EQUATOR Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) were adhered to. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The methodology facilitated discussion of areas important to patients and made them co-constructors of theory.

Content, face, and construct validity of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) as a measure of bowel-related quality of life in spinal cord injury.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction is commonly encountered after a spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a tremendous impact on quality of life (QOL). The neurogenic bowel dysfunction score (NBDS) is commonly used to measure the severity of bowel dysfunction and predict QOL. However, there is no comprehensive instrument to assess bowel-specific QOL for SCI patients. Instead, the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire evaluates the impact of bowel dysfunction on several aspects of QOL, although this questionnaire has not been validated for the SCI population. Motivated by the compelling need of instruments to accurately evaluate the QOL in patients who develope NBD after SCI, we aimed to assess the construct, content, and face validity of IBS-QOL in this population. METHODS: Adult SCI patients with at least 3 months after their injury were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a national rehabilitation hospital. Patients completed the NBDS and IBS-QOL via telephone interview or paper survey in the clinic. Content and face validity were assessed via interviews with professionals with expertise in providing chronic care for SCI, as well as a subgroup of patients. Construct validity was assessed using the hypotheses testing method. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's ⍺. Factor analysis was performed to assess the dimensionality of the IBS-QOL in the SCI population. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with a median age of 45.5 years (interquartile range: 21-79) participated in the study. The majority of the sample were men (n = 82, 77%) and had endured thoracolumbar injuries (n = 74, 71.2%). Twelve patients (seven English- and five Spanish speakers) and six professionals took part in content/face validation interviews. The median IBS-QOL total score was 15.91/100 (interquartile range: 4.55-33.14). IBS-QOL differentiated the subgroups of patients with severe bowel symptoms in terms of uneasiness, sweating, or headaches during bowel emptying (p = 0.0003), time spent on bowel emptying (p = 0.0065), flatus incontinence (p = 0.0076), and overall satisfaction with bowel function (p < 0.001), demonstrating its adequate construct validity. Interviews with the patients and professionals supported the comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance of IBS-QOL for assessment of bowel-related QOL in the SCI population. Item-level analysis of professional responses showed that 97% of questions were relevant to the construct and population of interest. Internal consistency analysis yielded a Cronbach's ⍺ of 0.9684. Exploratory factor analysis yielded six underlying factors which cumulatively accounted for 72.21% of the total variance, reflecting the dimensionality of bowel-related QOL in SCI population. DISCUSSION: IBS-QOL questionnaire is a comprehensive measure of bowel-related QOL which encompasses the concerns of SCI patients. Our findings support the content, face and construct validity of IBS-QOL as a measure of bowel-related QOL in SCI. Further studies are warranted to assess the reliability and responsiveness of IBS-QOL, and to evaluate its performance across different patient populations.

Gut microbiota and pediatric patients with spina bifida and neurogenic bowel dysfunction.

PURPOSE: Gut microbiota has recently been recognized to be influenced by a broad range of pathologies. Alterations of gut microbiota are known as dysbiosis and have found to be related to chronic constipation, a condition which affects also pediatric patients with spina bifida (SB). METHODS: In this study, gut microbiota richness and composition were investigated by 16S rRNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis in 48 SB patients (mean age, 11.9 ± 4.8 years) with secondary neurogenic constipation and 32 healthy controls (mean age, 18.0 ± 9.6 years). The study also aimed at exploring eventual effects of laxatives and transanal irrigation (TAI) adopted by SB subjects to get relief from the symptoms of neurogenic constipation. RESULTS: Collected data demonstrated that the microbiota richness of SB patients was significantly increased compared to healthy controls, with a higher number of dominant bacteria rather than rare species. The absence of SB condition was associated with taxa Coprococcus 2, with the species C. eutactus and Roseburia, Dialister, and the [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group. On the other hand, the SB patients displayed a different group of positively associated taxa, namely, Blautia, Collinsella, Intestinibacter, and Romboutsia genera, the [Clostridium] innocuum group, and Clostridium sensu stricto 1. Bifidobacterium and the [Eubacterium] hallii group were also found to be positively associated with SB gut microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: Among SB patients, the administration of laxatives and TAI did not negatively affect gut microbiota diversity and composition, even considering long-term use (up to 5 years) of TAI device.

Nursing Interventions for Patients With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Arising From Complete Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: We mapped key concepts and identified 4 fundamental nursing interventions for patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction due to complete spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were performed in PubMed, LILACS, CINAHL, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS electronic databases. We use searched the gray literature using the Google Scholar search engine. We formulated a question to guide the search, based on the participants, concept, and context format: "What are the key manual nursing interventions performed in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction resulting from complete spinal cord injury?" We included nursing intervention strategies that may be performed by health professionals, patients, or caregivers. Two reviewers independently participated in the selection; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer and 5 experts. FINDINGS: Thirteen studies conducted between 1998 and 2019 were selected; 5 were randomized clinical trials. Four main interventions were identified for conservative management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in patients with complete SCI. They were digital-anal stimulation, manual extraction of feces, abdominal massage, and strategies used to stimulate the gastrocolic reflex. CONCLUSIONS: Research suggests that each of these interventions, administered alone or in combination, supports bowel evacuation in patients with a complete SCI. Each of these interventions may be performed by a nurse, and taught to the patient and/or lay caregiver. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An individualized bowel management program for patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction due to SCI is necessary to ensure regular bowel evacuation, preserve fecal continence, and support dignity and health-related quality of life. The conservative interventions identified in this scoping review should be incorporated in protocols or guidelines for management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in this vulnerable population.

Neurophysiological Effects of Electrical Stimulation on a Patient with Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction and Cauda Equina Syndrome after Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report.

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common in patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). Previous studies have reported that electrical stimulation (ES) improves NBD but more neurophysiologic evidence is required. This case report describes a patient who experienced difficulty with defecation as a result of cauda equina syndrome (CES) that developed after a cesarean section performed 12 years ago under spinal anesthesia. The neurophysiological effects were assessed using the bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and electromyography (EMG). Two ES treatments, interferential current therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation, were used to stimulate the intestine and the external anal sphincter, respectively. The BCR results showed right-side delayed latency and no response on the left side. Needle EMG revealed abnormal spontaneous activities of the bilateral bulbocavernosus (BC) muscles. Electrodiagnostic testing revealed chronic bilateral sacral polyradiculopathy, compatible with CES. After treatment, the patient reported an improved perianal sensation, less strain and time for defecation than before, and satisfaction with her bowel condition. At the follow-up electrodiagnosis, the BCR latency was normal on the right side-needle EMG revealed reductions in the abnormal spontaneous activities of both BC muscles and re-innervation of the right BC muscle. Electrodiagnostic testing can offer insight into the neurophysiological effects of ES, which can help in understanding the mechanism of action and optimizing the therapy for patients with NBD.

Prospective Evaluation of Transanal Irrigation With a Validated Pediatric Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Scoring System.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of transanal irrigation (TAI) in pediatric patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) who were treatment naïve to catheter-based TAI using Peristeen device (Coloplast). METHODS: Prospective recruitment of patients with NBD who were unsatisfied with their bowel regimen or had no bowel regimen in place, were assessed using the neurogenic bowel dysfunction score (NBDS) before initiating treatment (Time 0) with Peristeen. NBDS scores were reassessed twice: within the first 6 months (Time 1) of initiation of Peristeen and again after greater than 6 months of usage with Peristeen (Time 2). RESULTS: Over a 26-month period, 104 patients with NBD were enrolled. Mean age was 10.6 years ± 4.7 (range 3-18 years). The NBDS at Time 1 had an average reduction of 14 points from the original score. A similar trajectory was seen at Time 2, with an average reduction of 13 points from original score. There was a statistically significant decrease of 14 points, P < 0.001 at Time 1 and this response was sustained at Time 2 with a statistically significant decrease in scores from initiation by 13 points, P < 0.001. Improved patient satisfaction and quality of life with Peristeen was seen at Time 1 and Time 2. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Peristeen can improve quality of life in pediatric patients with NBD. Significant improvement in NBDS occurred in our pediatric patients with NBD when initiated on Peristeen. Lower scores were seen at both Time 1 and Time 2, which indicated an improvement in their overall NBD.

Guideline for the management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury/disease.

INTRODUCTION: Almost all people with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) suffer from neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), with a considerable impact on quality of life. The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF e.V.) guideline for NBD in SCI/D aims to provide practice-oriented support for the care of patients with NBD resulting from congenital or aquired SCI/D. The guideline describes the diagnosis and bowel management of NBD in people with SCI/D. Thus, treatment processes in acute medical care and rehabilitation as well as for lifelong aftercare are presented. METHODS: The present guideline was developed under the leadership of the German-speaking Medical Society for Paraplegiology in a multiprofessional interdisciplinary guideline team. To exceed the level of expert recommendations, consensus was reached within the framework of a structured nominal group process in defined steps under neutral moderation considering the criteria of the German guideline development instrument (DELBI). RESULTS: Individual bowel management must be developed on the basis of an adequate diagnosis and considering the different lesion types. Due to the multifactorial influenceability of the intestine and the individual neurological deficit, a simple to-do checklist is not effective. Various and complex bowel management programmes are the basis of the treatment of NBD. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines can only be successful in so far as they are applied in everyday life. Of course, the selection and application of the measures described must always take into consideration the individual situation of the person concerned, and the correct application is always a prerequisite for success.

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score in spinal cord-injured patients: translation and validation of the Dutch-language NBD score.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective validation study. OBJECTIVES: The neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) score is a widely used symptom-based questionnaire evaluating bowel dysfunction and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in spinal cord-injured patients. This study aimed to translate and validate a Dutch-language NBD score in patients with SCI. SETTING: Patients with SCI visiting the urology department or general practitioner (GP) in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: Standardized guidelines were followed for the translation and validation process of the NBD score. Adult patients with SCI visiting our urology department were asked to participate by filling in a set of questionnaires: the NBD score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale (FIQL), the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and the European Quality of life 5-Dimension 3-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) at baseline and 1-2 weeks afterward. A control group recruited at a GP office completed the questionnaires once. The following measurement properties were evaluated: content validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, criterion-, and construct validity. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients and 50 references were included. Content validity was adequate, internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha 0.56 and 0.30) and reproducibility was adequate (ICC 0.87). Criterion validity was confirmed; NBD score correlated significantly with the FIQL, FISI, and EQ-5D-3L. NBD scores in the patient group were significantly higher than in references, demonstrating good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch-language version of the NBD score showed moderate to good measurement properties, and therefore is a reliable tool to measure bowel dysfunction in patients with SCI. We recommend standardized usage of this questionnaire for clinical evaluation and research purposes.

The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score (NBD) is not suitable for patients with multiple sclerosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Bowel and anorectal dysfunctions are common in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The use of validated questionnaires is recommended in the initial assessment and patient's follow-up. The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score is the most used questionnaire but has been developed in spinal cord injured patients and has never been validated in other neurological diseases. We aimed to assess NBD's relevance in pwMS. SETTINGS: Monocentric study in a tertiary neuro-urology department. METHODS: A retrospective study in pwMS consulting for the first time in our department, that fulfilled the NBD questionnaire between 2010 and 2021 was performed. Qualitative and quantitative answers for each question were analyzed. Content validity and internal consistency were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five pwMS (mean age 47.1, 58% of women) fulfilled the NBD questionnaire. Mean NBD score was 6.0 (SD 6.1) and 75% of patients had a score <9. Content validity analysis revealed 4 items not appropriate, 1 item with irrelevant calibration, and omission of some treatment widely used in pwMS. Internal consistency was appreciated with Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 IC 95% [0.31; 0.6]. CONCLUSION: NBD questionnaire lacks content validity and presents a weak internal consistency in pwMS. A specific questionnaire is therefore required in pwMS to optimize bowel management and follow-up.

Transanal Irrigation for People With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction: An Integrative Literature Review.

Transanal irrigation has been introduced as a complement to standard bowel care for people with neurogenic bowel dysfunction. There is no contemporary integrative review of the effectiveness and feasibility of transanal irrigation from a holistic nursing perspective, only fragments of evidence to date. The aim was to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of transanal irrigation for people with neurogenic bowel dysfunction. An integrative literature review was conducted. Nineteen studies were included. According to the results, transanal irrigation can reduce difficulties associated with defecation, episodes of incontinence, and the time needed for evacuation and bowel care. Transanal irrigation can increase general satisfaction with bowel habits and quality of life and decrease level of dependency. However, there are practical problems to overcome and adverse effects to manage. Discontinuation is relatively common. The results support the effectiveness of transanal irrigation, but feasibility is inconclusive. Users, including caregivers, report practical problems, and compliance was not always easy to achieve. It is important that users, including caregivers, are well informed and supported during transanal irrigation treatment, especially during introduction. The quality of the studies found was generally weak; therefore, high-quality quantitative and qualitative studies are needed on the topic.

Current State of Knowledge on Digital Rectal Stimulation in Individuals With Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVES: To map and characterize the nature of the evidence on the use of digital rectal stimulation for bowel management in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DATA SOURCES: Five electronic databases were searched (ie, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Incontinence Group) from 1990 to November 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that provided information on the use of digital rectal stimulation either alone or in combination with treatments were included. Title and abstract screening was split between 2 reviewers after reaching consensus on the first 100 studies screened. Full-texts were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. DATA EXTRACTION: The data extraction form was developed by 2 reviewers and piloted. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 4841 studies were screened, including 425 full text articles; 33 articles were identified. Thirty-two studies focused solely on individuals with SCI and 1 study explored the experiences of caregivers of individuals with SCI. The majority of participants were aged between 30 and 59 years old. Most studies used quantitative methods (n=30, 91%). Fourteen of the studies (42%) were cross-sectional. Within experimental or quasiexperimental designs, digital rectal stimulation was commonly studied as an adjunct to other methods such as suppositories or enemas. Incontinence and defecation time were the most commonly examined outcomes. CONCLUSION: There were few studies found that focus on digital rectal stimulation. Further studies examining experience, effectiveness, complications, and long-term outcomes are warranted.

Effect of Different Forms of Activity-Based Recovery Training on Bladder, Bowel, and Sexual Function After Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the urogenital and bowel functional gains previously demonstrated post-locomotor step training after chronic spinal cord injury could have been derived due to weight-bearing alone or from exercise in general. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study; pilot trial with small sample size. SETTING: Urogenital and bowel scientific core facility at a rehabilitation institute and spinal cord injury research center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women (N=22) with spinal cord injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades of A-D) participated in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Approximately 80 daily 1-hour sessions of either stand training or nonweight-bearing arm crank ergometry. Comparisons were made with previously published locomotor training data (step; N=7). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments at both pre- and post-training timepoints included cystometry for bladder function and International Data Set Questionnaires for bowel and sexual functions. RESULTS: Cystometry measurements revealed a significant decrease in bladder pressure and limited improvement in compliance with nonweight-bearing exercise but not with standing. Although International Data Set questionnaires revealed profound bowel dysfunction and marked deficits in sexual function pretraining, no differences were identified poststand or after nonweight-bearing exercise. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot trial results suggest that, although stand and weight-bearing alone do not benefit pelvic organ functions after spinal cord injury, exercise in general may contribute at least partially to the lowering of bladder pressure and the increase in compliance that was seen previously with locomotor training, potentially through metabolic, humoral, and/or cardiovascular mechanisms. Thus, to maximize activity-based recovery training benefits for functions related to storage and emptying, an appropriate level of sensory input to the spinal cord neural circuitries controlling bladder and bowel requires task-specific stepping.

Factors impacting bowel symptoms in a contemporary spinal cord injury cohort: results from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional. OBJECTIVES: To identify variables associated with severe bowel symptoms in spinal cord injured people. SETTING: National cohort. METHODS: Adult spinal cord injured (SCI) people were recruited for an online registry and 1373 were included for analysis. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between severity of bowel symptoms and variables. Bowel symptoms were assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score and patients scoring ≥14 were categorized as having severe bowel symptoms. Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) severity was measured using a six item questionnaire and reported as total AD score (0-24). Bladder management was categorized as: voiding, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), surgery (augmentation/diversion) or indwelling catheter. RESULTS: Severe bowel symptoms were reported in 570 (42%) On multivariable logistic regression, every point increase of AD total score was associated with 5% increased odds of having more severe bowel symptoms [OR 1.05 95% CI 1.03-1.10]. Type of bladder management was also associated with more severe symptoms (p = 0.0001). SCI people with indwelling catheters (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.40-3.32) or reconstructive surgery (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-3.32) were almost twice as likely to report more severe bowel symptoms than those performing CIC.

Evolving Evidence Supporting Use of Rectal Irrigation in the Management of Bowel Dysfunction: An Integrative Literature Review.

Disorders of bowel function are prevalent, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and other neurological disorders. An individual's bowel control significantly impacts quality of life, as predictable bowel function is necessary to actively and independently participate in everyday activities. For many patients with bowel dysfunction, initial lifestyle adjustments and other conservative therapeutic interventions (eg, digital stimulation, oral laxatives, suppositories) are insufficient to reestablish regular bowel function. In addition to these options, rectal irrigation (RI) is a safe and effective method of standard bowel care that has been used for several decades in adults and children suffering from bowel dysfunction associated with neurogenic or functional bowel etiologies. Rectal irrigation is an appropriate option when conservative bowel treatments are inadequate. Unlike surgical options, RI can be initiated or discontinued at any time. This report summarizes the clinical, humanistic, and economic evidence supporting the use of RI in clinical practice, noting features (eg, practical considerations, patient education) that can improve patients' success with RI treatment.

Bowel Emptying Methods Used by German Residents Living With Spina Bifida.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze methods of bowel emptying among Germans living with spina bifida. We also analyzed relationships between age, sex, level of spinal bifida anomaly, and methods of bowel elimination. DESIGN: A quantitative, descriptive study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 88 persons (56 women and 32 men) residing anywhere in the Federal Republic of Germany. Their mean age was 17.5 years (SD 13.64 years), range 0 to 55 years. METHODS: Data were collected through an online survey questionnaire developed for the urological follow-up protocol for patients with spina bifida. Parents completed the questionnaire for participants younger than 18 years. RESULTS: Twenty participants (22.7%) reported normal defecation and 68 (77.3%) reported neurogenic bowel dysfunction requiring regular bowel management. Participants requiring bowel management predominately used rectal irrigation (40.9%) and digital rectal stimulation (27.3%) to enhance bowel evacuation. Age emerged as the only factor related to the bowel management techniques. Younger participants (≤20 years) were more likely to use rectal irrigation for bowel evacuation (P = .001, Fisher's exact test), whereas older respondents (≥21 years) were more likely to use digital rectal stimulation (P = .015, Fisher's exact test). Analysis revealed no differences in methods of bowel evacuation based on sex or level of spina bifida anomaly (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal irrigation was the most common method for bowel evacuation. Participants were less likely to employ potentially effective and more conservative measures for intestinal emptying, such as toilet training/timed evacuation associated with Valsalva maneuvers, abdominal press, abdominal massage, and digital rectal stimulation. Additional comparative studies with more participants and other countries with intestinal emptying methods are needed to better understand the needs of individuals with spina bifida and their families and to improve the health-related quality of life of these people.

Factors associated with urinary incontinence in a community sample of young nulligravid women.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with urinary incontinence (UI) in a community sample of young nulligravid women. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis from a cross-sectional survey-based study of cisgender women aged 18 to 25 years recruited through a national registry of research volunteers. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing toileting behaviors, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and bowel symptoms. Women were excluded from analysis if currently pregnant, any prior pregnancy, cystectomy, or any neurologic disease including spinal cord injury, stroke, or multiple sclerosis. Analyses determined the prevalence of symptoms and evaluated candidate risk factors for UI. RESULTS: Final analyses included 964 women (mean age, 22.6 ± 2.0). Monthly UI was identified in 295 (30.6%) subjects, with mixed UI being the most common (56.9%; n = 168). Seventy-two women (7.4%) reported fecal incontinence (FI) and 24 (3.5%) women reported both UI and FI. After multivariable regression modeling, UI was associated with an intermittent urine stream and the delayed voiding toileting behavior subscale. CONCLUSIONS: UI in this cohort of young nulliparous women was highly prevalent and warrants further study as to the cause. Therapeutic guidelines to prevent UI and LUTS may need to be adjusted by targeting populations earlier than traditionally considered.

Leuprolide Acetate, a GnRH Agonist, Improves the Neurogenic Bowel in Ovariectomized Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND: Electromyographic studies have shown that external anal sphincter activity is modified in response to distension in animals with spinal cord injury. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its agonist leuprolide acetate have neurotrophic properties in animals with spinal cord injury. AIM: This study was to determine the effects of leuprolide acetate treatment on electromyographic activity of the external anal sphincter and anorectal manometry in ovariectomized rats with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Adult ovariectomized rats were divided in three groups: (a) sham of spinal cord injury, (b) spinal cord injury treated with saline solution, and (c) spinal cord injury treated with leuprolide acetate. The spinal cord injury was induced by clamping at level T9. Leuprolide acetate dosage of 10 µg/kg was proctored intramuscular for 5 weeks, commencing the day after the lesion. Electromyography of the external anal sphincter, anorectal manometry, and volume of the cecum were evaluated in all groups. RESULTS: The electromyographic study of the external anal sphincter activity showed a significant improvement in injured rats treated with leuprolide acetate. Manometric analysis and cecum volume data obtained in animals with leuprolide acetate were very similar to those found in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that leuprolide acetate treatment improves the neurogenic colon in ovariectomized rats with spinal cord injury.

Development of a novel neurogenic bowel patient reported outcome measure: the Spinal Cord Injury Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Bowel Function & Evacuation (SCI-PROBE).

STUDY DESIGN: Outcome measure item generation and reduction. OBJECTIVES: To develop a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) addressing the impact of neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) on individuals living with traumatic or nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation center in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: A PROM based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework was developed using the following steps: (a) item generation, (b) item refinement through iterative review, (c) completion of items by individuals living with SCI and NBD followed by cognitive interviewing, and (d) further item refinement, item reduction, and construction of the preliminary PROM. RESULTS: Following initial item generation and iterative review, the investigative team agreed on 55 initial items. Cognitive interviewing, additional revisions, and item reduction yielded an instrument comprised of 35 items; while ensuring at least two items were retained for each of the 16 previously identified challenges of living with NBD following the onset of a SCI. Scoring for the preliminary PROM ranges from 0 to 140. CONCLUSIONS: A preliminary PROM informed by the ICF for assessing the impact of NBD post-SCI has been devised, which can be used to inform clinicians and decision-makers on optimal ways to treat this serious secondary health complication. Future work will assess the validity and clinimetric properties of the PROM.

Creation and validation of a new tool for the monitoring efficacy of neurogenic bowel dysfunction treatment on response: the MENTOR tool.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVES: A tool to help decision-making tool for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) in individuals with SCI is needed. We present a project to create and validate a new tool, the Monitoring Efficacy of NBD Treatment On Response (MENTOR), and to determine its level of concordance with decisions made by experienced clinicians in the field. SETTING: UK, Denmark, USA, Italy, The Netherlands, Germany. METHODS: The first phase was creation of the tool through a modified Delphi process. The second phase was the validation, wherein individuals with spinal cord injury with NBD were asked to complete the MENTOR tool immediately prior to clinic consultation. From the responses to the questionnaire of the tool, each participant was allocated into one of three categories reflecting the possible therapeutic recommendations ("recommend change", "further discussion" and "monitoring"). An expert clinician then assessed the participant, blinded to MENTOR results, and made an independent treatment decision. RESULTS: A total of 248 MENTOR forms were completed. Strong agreement was found when the MENTOR tool recommended monitoring (92%) or treatment change (83%); the lowest concordance when the decision was for the "further discussion" option (59%). Patient acceptability was reported by 97% of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: MENTOR is an easy to use tool to monitor the treatment of NBD and determinate progression through the clinical pathway. This validation study shows good correspondence between expert clinician opinion and MENTOR result. The tool has potential to be used in other patient groups, following further studies.

MR defecography detects pelvic floor dysfunction in participants with chronic complete spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single arm study. OBJECTIVES: Previously we have demonstrated that magnetic resonance (MR) defecography is feasible in participants with complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether MR defecography can provide objective parameters correlating with the clinical manifestations of neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) in participants with SCI. SETTING: A monocentric study in a comprehensive care university hospital Spinal Cord Injury Center. METHODS: Previously published MR defecography parameters (anorectal angle (ARA), hiatal descent (M-line) and hiatal width (H-line)) of twenty participants with SCI were now compared to a standardized clinical assessment of NBD. Descriptive statistics, correlations and t-tests for independent samples were calculated. RESULTS: The significantly higher values for the ARA at rest and M-line at rest in participants with SCI correlated with the clinical assessment of bowel incontinence. Furthermore, in nearly half of the investigated SCI cohort the normally positive difference between ARA, M-line and H-line at rest and during defecation became negative suggesting pelvic floor dyssynergia as a potential mechanism underlying constipation in people with complete SCI. In fact, these participants showed a more severe clinical presentation of NBD according to the total NBD score. CONCLUSIONS: MR defecography provides objective parameters correlating with clinical signs of NBD, such as constipation and bowel incontinence. Therefore, MR defecography can support pathophysiology-based decision-making with respect to specific therapeutic interventions, which should help to improve the management of NBD.