Can GPT-4 revolutionize otolaryngology? Navigating opportunities and ethical considerations.

Otolaryngologists can enhance workflow efficiency, provide better patient care, and advance medical research and education by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into their practices. GPT-4 technology is a revolutionary and contemporary example of AI that may apply to otolaryngology. The knowledge of otolaryngologists should be supplemented, not replaced when using GPT-4 to make critical medical decisions and provide individualized patient care. In our thorough examination, we explore the potential uses of the groundbreaking GPT-4 technology in the field of otolaryngology, covering aspects such as potential outcomes and technical boundaries. Additionally, we delve into the intricate and intellectually challenging dilemmas that emerge when incorporating GPT-4 into otolaryngology, considering the ethical considerations inherent in its implementation. Our stance is that GPT-4 has the potential to be very helpful. Its capabilities, which include aid in clinical decision-making, patient care, and administrative job automation, present exciting possibilities for enhancing patient outcomes, boosting the efficiency of healthcare delivery, and enhancing patient experiences. Even though there are still certain obstacles and limitations, the progress made so far shows that GPT-4 can be a valuable tool for modern medicine. GPT-4 may play a more significant role in clinical practice as technology develops, helping medical professionals deliver high-quality care tailored to every patient's unique needs.

Implementing a formal curriculum on surgical ethics and palliative care for otolaryngology residents.

OBJECTIVE: Residents are faced with ethical issues every day but most residency curriculums do not routinely include formal ethics skills training. In order to address this, a comprehensive curriculum on ethics and surgical palliative care was implemented for otolaryngology residents. METHODS: An 8-h ethics didactics curriculum was designed in collaboration with our institution's Institute of Ethics. Varied strategies were used to cover basic principles and practical skills. Anonymous assessments were completed by learners at 3 points during the curriculum on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Nine residents were surveyed. Prior to the curriculum, a large majority of residents (85 %) expressed little to no familiarity with basic ethical principles. There was statistically significant improvement in understanding of and familiarity with bioethics topics, including the four principles of bioethics (Δ = 2.4, p = 0.004). There was also statistically significant improvement in comfort with the implementation of ethical decision making and palliative care skills, including with difficult conversations with patients (Δ = 1.3, p = 0.03). Participation in sessions was excellent with positive qualitative feedback. CONCLUSION: An interactive curriculum in ethics and palliative care can be engaging and practical for busy surgical residents, with measurable improvement in comfort with challenging cases and ethical, patient-centered care.

[Individualized, personalized and stratified medicine: a challenge for allergology in ENT?]. / Individualisierte, personalisierte, stratifizierte Medizin: eine Herausforderung für die Allergologie in der HNO?

Individualized, personalized or stratified medicine approaches offer emerging opportunities in the field of allergy and ENT. Avoidance of side effects, targeted therapy approaches and stratified prevention promise better outcomes and optimal results for patients. Conceptual incongruencies remain with regard to definitions and perceptions of "personalized medicine". Serious ethical considerations have to be taken into account. The development of pharmacogenomics, molecular phenotyping, genomic sequencing and other -omics opens the door to unique mechanistic therapeutic advances. The molecular allergology and recombinant diagnostics available are tools that offer substantial improved diagnostics for the benefit of allergic patients, e. g. in anaphylaxis and food allergy. For stratified therapeutic approaches, however, regulatory affairs will have to keep pace with medical and scientific discovery.

Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: Topics in Epistemology & Ethics.

To fuel artificial intelligence (AI) potential in clinical practice in otolaryngology, researchers must understand its epistemic limitations, which are tightly linked to ethical dilemmas requiring careful consideration. AI tools are fundamentally opaque systems, though there are methods to increase explainability and transparency. Reproducibility and replicability limitations can be overcomed by sharing computing code, raw data, and data processing methodology. The risk of bias can be mitigated via algorithmic auditing, careful consideration of the training data, and advocating for a diverse AI workforce to promote algorithmic pluralism, reflecting our population's diverse values and preferences.

Navigating the Ethics of COVID-19 in Otolaryngology.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered how otolaryngologists contemplate and assume their roles in health care delivery. The ethical implications of this pandemic upon our practice are formidable and distinct from other surgical fields. The salient ethical issues of public health stewardship and safety, distributive justice, and nonabandonment are distilled for the practicing otolaryngologist.

Corporate-physician relationships: a need for education.

Knowledge is lacking among Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons (ORL-HNS) regarding basic ethical situations in corporate-provider relationships. A pilot educational program demonstrates the need and potential for improvement by structured intervention. "At risk" areas specifically identified regard acceptable gifts, and payments for meetings and travel. Recommendations are made to educate otolaryngologists in standards for compliant behavior in corporate-physician relationships. Further work to formalize and tailor education to the needs of ORL-HNS is warranted, including continued education through the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF). A checklist is provided here as a first step in enabling more compliant behavior as surgeons engage in corporate relationships.

Ethical challenges in geriatric care.

The growth of the elderly population presents numerous challenges to the practicing otolaryngologist. This commentary reviews some of the issues that come up in dealing with geriatric patients, reiterates some classic ethical principles, and looks to some philosophers who have addressed relevant issues over the past centuries. It is based on a presentation "Ethical Challenges in Geriatric Otolaryngology," delivered at the annual meeting of the American Society of Geriatric Otolaryngology on April 30, 2008.

Practical and ethical issues for delivery of advanced ENT services in the Indian subcontinent: efforts to 'Bridge the Gap'.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Indian healthcare industry, one of the largest in the world, caters for 1.3 billion people. The modern middle class addresses its needs by visiting private hospitals, which provide comprehensive services but at a high cost. The low socioeconomic individuals visit government hospitals where all basic services are available, but there is a struggle to provide advanced healthcare. In order to rectify this dichotomous approach, new initiatives are being implemented to provide uniform healthcare across the society. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements have been rapid and modern methods have reached the shores of India at the same pace as in the western world. In otolaryngology, advanced services especially for restoration of hearing loss and multimodality treatments for head and neck cancers have been two areas where practical and ethical dilemmas have existed to provide the most optimal treatment at subsidized costs. This article explores these two areas as examples to understand the specific problems encountered in delivering advanced ENT care in a low-resource setting in a large populous country. SUMMARY: Introduction of government health insurance schemes have helped the poor to make use of advanced healthcare. The highlight of this scheme has been the inclusion of expensive interventions like cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation, whereby cost of the device, surgery and habilitation have all been delivered cost free for eligible children.

Reg-ent within the Learning Health System.

Clinical data registries are perhaps one of the most powerful outcomes of electronic medical records, and their benefits are projected to redound to patients and clinicians across the nation. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's Reg-ent fits within the conceptual framework of a learning health system. Because the data within this system are deidentified, research informed consent is not legally required. But ethical concerns remain regarding whether and how to best notify, and whether to obtain consent from, patients whose data are included. Particularly because data corroborate that a substantial minority of survey respondents believe that consent should be obtained for each research protocol (even for deidentified research) and because data breaches are, unfortunately, a serious risk, we recommend that the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation ensure best practices for patient engagement as it continues to build Reg-ent.

Necesidad de información preoperatoria en pacientes intervenidos en el servicio de otorrinolaringología / Need for preoperative information in patients undergoing surgery in the Otorhinolaryngology Department

Resumen Objetivo: determinar las necesidades de información en el preoperatorio de los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de otorrinolaringología del Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza de Lima, Perú. Métodos: investigación de tipo descriptiva y de corte transversal. Se estudiaron 127 pacientes quirúrgicos del servicio de otorrinolaringología. Se utilizó un cuestionario de demandas de información y conocimiento de los pacientes en cuanto a su derecho de decidir una cirugía; contiene preguntas referentes a la descripción de la técnica quirúrgica, complicaciones y riesgos que conlleva la cirugía. Se utilizó una muestra no probabilística por conveniencia, así como el análisis de los datos, el cual se realizó con el paquete estadístico SPSS en versión 25. Para evaluar la correlación entre variables se empleó la prueba chi-cuadrado. Resultados: participaron 127 pacientes, más de 75% de ellos deseaban conocer más información sobre su enfermedad y el tratamiento quirúrgico, 90% manifestaron el deseo de tener una explicación de cómo se realizará la cirugía, 85% necesitaban conocer las complicaciones frecuentes, 20% deseaba ignorar la información sobre posibilidad de muerte. Los adultos jóvenes y el grupo con educación superior demandaban más información (p<0.05), no presentaron diferencias respecto al sexo, salvo en la necesidad de conocer el riesgo de muerte a causa de la cirugía, a favor del sexo femenino (p<0,05). Conclusiones: la mayoría de los pacientes necesitan una información detallada durante la evaluación preoperatoria, principalmente en los grupos de adultos jóvenes y con educación superior. Los médicos debemos brindar información suficiente, clara y con expectativas reales, respetando la autonomía del paciente en la toma de decisiones.

Abstract Aim: To determine the informational needs of preoperative patients being attended at the Otorhinolaryngology Service of the Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza of Lima, Peru. Methods: Using cross-sectional descriptive research, 127 surgical patients from the Otorhinolaryngology Service were studied. A questionnaire asked what information and knowledge the patients had when exercising their right to decide surgery. It contained questions concerning the description of the surgical technique, complications, and risks involved in the surgery. A non probability sample by convenience was used and the data analysis was performed with the SPSS statistical package in version 25 and the chisquare test was used to evaluate the correlation between variables. Results: 127 patients participated, more than 75% of patients wanted to know more information about their disease and the surgical treatment, 90% stated that they needed an explanation of how the surgery would be performed, 85% wanted to know the common complications, and 20% wanted to ignore the possibility of death. Young adults and the group with higher education demanded more information (p<0.05). Concerning sex, there were no differences between the men and women in their answers other than the females needing to know the risk of death due to surgery (p<0.05). Conclusions: Most patients need detailed information during the preoperative evaluation, especially young adults and those with higher education. Physicians should provide sufficient, clear information with realistic expectations, respecting the patient's autonomy in decision-making.

Expert witness testimony guidelines: identifying areas for improvement.

Expert witnesses play an invaluable, if controversial, role by deciphering medical events for juries in cases of alleged negligence. We review expert witness guidelines among major surgical societies and identify gaps within these standards, as our hope is that this spurs discussion addressing areas for improvement. Of 8 surgical societies with accessible guidelines, none included specific compensation guidelines or limits, detailed reporting mechanisms regarding unethical behavior by legal professionals, or addressed the appropriateness of testifying frequently and exclusively for one side. Several processes possibly deterring grossly inaccurate testimony have been adopted by other surgical societies and should potentially be addressed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. These include offering an expert witness testimony certification path, strengthening the formalized grievance process, and encouraging members to sign an affirmation statement.

Staff attitudes to a daily otolaryngology ward round.

This survey investigates the attitudes of medical and nursing staff towards the daily otolaryngology ward rounds in a teaching hospital. Initial, open-ended questionnaires generated themes from which a structured questionnaire was constructed. Respondents indicated on a Likert scale the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements concerning their attitudes towards the ward round. Thirty-five members of staff were surveyed. The overall response rate was 74.3 per cent (n = 26). The majority of staff agreed that the ward round was a constructive use of their time and served to promote team spirit. It allowed for adequate communication between medical and nursing staff but there was uncertainty about the provision of adequate patient communication. The nursing staff agreed that the ward round provided a valuable learning experience. There was uncertainty about this among the medical staff. There was agreement in both groups that patients find the ward round to be reassuring. A significant majority of staff expressed concerns over maintenance of patient confidentiality. These findings could be used to inform changes in the departmental ward round structure. Specific attention should be directed to discussing sensitive issues in a more private setting and maximizing educational opportunities for junior medical staff.

[Bioethical issues in pediatric cochlear implants]. / Aspectos bioéticos en implantes cocleares pediátricos.

The use of cochlear implants can modify significantly the way in which deaf children relate with the outside world through psychological, linguistic and cognitive changes. The main question about this subject is the ethical controversy with regards to who has the right to make such a decision for a young child. We present the children evaluated at our hospital in order to assess the cochlear implant option. That population was of 37 implanted children, 10 children waiting for surgery and 21 rejected children. We describe and analyze from the bioethical bases and methodology the problems found: decision of no implant in children of hearing parents, the deaf culture point of view, the mature minor doctrine, teenagers, social and cultural problems, multihandicapped children and responsibility of the implants team.

Ethical issues in laryngology: tracheal stenting as palliative care.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To improve understanding of aspects of end-of-life care that may not be intuitive to the otolaryngology community. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed by searching Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Primary manuscripts' bibliographies were reviewed to identify any nonindexed references. Prospective consultation by means of one-on-one interviews was sought from nonotolaryngology key stakeholders in the areas of hospice nursing care and patient advocacy in order to identify pertinent issues. RESULTS: We identified over 1,000 articles published from 1965 to 2013 on the topic of tracheal stents, as well as over 40,000 on hospice/end-of-life care. Three articles focusing specifically on palliative care and airway stenting were identified, of which three were case reports and none were definitive reviews. There are a number of significant issues and concepts unique to hospice care. These are likely unfamiliar to all except for head and neck oncology-specialized otolaryngologists. An example is that hospice care focuses on quality of life rather than prolongation of life (such as curative surgery). Patients with nonoperable tracheal obstruction from malignancy face an unpleasant demise from suffocation. For those patients, stenting can relieve suffering by restoring airway patency. CONCLUSIONS: Airway stenting can be a valid palliative care option, even for terminal patients receiving hospice care, when performed to relieve airway obstruction and improve quality of life. End-of-life ethics is an underdeveloped area of otolaryngology that should be explored.