Zolpidem-triggered atrial fibrillation in a patient with cardiomyopathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic widely used to manage insomnia. Zolpidem-triggered atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiomyopathy has never been reported before. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old man with Duchenne muscular dystrophy-related cardiomyopathy attempted suicide and developed new-onset AF after zolpidem overdose. One year before admission, the patient visited our clinic due to chest discomfort and fatigue after daily walks for 1 month; both electrocardiography (ECG) and 24-hour Holter ECG results did not detect AF. After administration of cardiac medication (digoxin 0.125 mg/day, spironolactone 40 mg/day, furosemide 20 mg/day, bisoprolol 5 mg/day, sacubitril/valsartan 12/13 mg/day), he felt better. AF had never been observed before this admission via continuous monitoring during follow-up. Sixteen days before admission, the patient saw a sleep specialist and started zolpidem tartrate tablets (10 mg/day) due to insomnia for 6 months; ECG results revealed no significant change. The night before admission, the patient attempted suicide by overdosing on 40 mg of zolpidem after an argument, which resulted in severe lethargy. Upon admission, his ECG revealed new-onset AF, necessitating immediate cessation of zolpidem. Nine hours into admission, AF spontaneously terminated into normal sinus rhythm. Results from the ECG on the following days and the 24-hour Holter ECG at 1-month follow-up showed that AF was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable clinical evidence indicating that zolpidem overdose may induce AF in patients with cardiomyopathy. It serves as a critical warning for clinicians when prescribing zolpidem, particularly for patients with existing heart conditions. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate this finding and to explore the mechanisms between zolpidem and AF.

Differentiating Ischemic Hepatitis from Acetaminophen Overdose in Acute Liver Failure: Role of Acetaminophen Adducts-Ischemic Hepatitis vs Acetaminophen Overdose.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity and ischemic hepatic injury (IH) demonstrate remarkably similar biochemical patterns. Deciding between these two etiologies in the setting of acute liver failure (ALF) can be challenging. We reviewed all cases in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) registry where these diagnoses were considered, to determine reasons for, and frequency of, difficulties making these diagnoses. We hypothesized that the newly developed APAP-CYS adduct assay could help in discerning the correct diagnosis. METHODS: Among 3364 patients with ALF or acute liver injury (ALI: INR ≥ 2.0 but without encephalopathy) between 1998 and 2019, 1952 (58%) received a final diagnosis of either APAP (1681) or IH (271). We utilized a review committee of senior hepatologists as well as the APAP-CYS assay (where sera were available), measuring the presence of toxic by-products of APAP injury to optimize adjudication. RESULTS: With these methods, a total of 575 adduct positive APAP cases included 488 recognized APAP, as well as an additional 87 patients previously diagnosed as other etiologies. Nine cases initially attributed to IH were deemed combination APAP-IH injuries. Conversely, 215 of the 280 IH subjects tested for adducts disclosed 173 confirmed as IH with adduct testing below the toxicity threshold, while 9 cases were revised from APAP to the IH-APAP combination phenotype, where both hypotension and APAP likely played a role. CONCLUSIONS: Discerning APAP from IH can be difficult-in rare cases, combined injury is observed (18/1952). APAP-CYS testing resulted in revising the diagnosis in 14.6% of cases.

Simultaneous multi-targeted forensic toxicological screening in biological matrices by MRM-IDA-EPI mode.

The toxicologist ascertains drug assumptions in case of paediatric intoxications and death for overdose. The analytical approach consists of initially screening and consequently confirming drug positivity. We developed a toxicological screening method and validated its use comparing the results with a LC-MS/MS analysis. The method identifies 751 drugs and metabolites (704 in positive and 47 in negative mode). Chromatographic separation was achieved eluting mobile phase A (10 mM ammonium formate) and B (0.05% formic acid in methanol) in gradient on Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl (50 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 µm) with 0.7 mL/min flow rate for 11 min. Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) was adopted as survey scan and, after an Information-Dependent Analysis (IDA) (threshold of 30,000 for positive and 1000 cps for negative mode), the Enhanced Product Ion (scan range: 50-700 amu) was triggered. The MS/MS spectrum generated was compared with one of the libraries for identification. Data processing was optimised through creation of rules. Sample preparation, mainly consisting of deproteinization and enzymatic hydrolysis, was set up for different matrices (blood, urine, vitreous humor, synovial fluid, cadaveric tissues and larvae). Cut-off for most analytes resulted in the lowest concentration tested. When the results from the screening and LC-MS/MS analysis were compared, an optimal percentage of agreement (100%) was assessed for all matrices. Method applicability was evaluated on real paediatric intoxications and forensic cases. In conclusion, we proposed a multi-targeted, fast, sensitive and specific MRM-IDA-EPI screening having an extensive use in different toxicological fields.

Activated charcoal helps in the diagnosis of dabigatran overdose: A case study.

The direct-acting oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate (DE) targets thrombin and is used widely to prevent thromboembolism. A 79-year-old man was admitted to the Emergency Department due to anuria for 2 days. An urgent laboratory examination revealed a serum creatinine concentration of 888 µmol/L. He was diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic renal insufficiency. During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the coagulation test showed a severe reduction in the fibrinogen level as well as a significantly prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The patient had been taking DE (110 mg twice daily) for a long time and had not suspended the medication or reduced the dose during the worsening of anuria. Therefore, it should be evaluated before considering plasma replacement therapy for the patient, whether the abnormal coagulation parameters were induced by interference of excessive DE. Tentatively, we used activated charcoal to treat the plasma and then retested the fibrinogen, PT, and APTT. Results showed that the coagulation indices nearly returned to normal. The present case indicated that activated charcoal could adsorb DE in plasma effectively and eliminate its interference with coagulation test results, thereby providing support for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Acute Medication Poisoning.

Poisoning is the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. The highest rates of exposure to poisons occur in children five years and younger, but opioid overdoses in young adults account for most deaths from poisonings in recent years. Intentional or accidental medication poisoning should be considered when evaluating patients with mental status changes, vital sign abnormalities, seizures, and gastrointestinal or cardiovascular problems. For all poisoned patients, a comprehensive history and physical examination are needed. Knowledge of toxidromes may help identify the cause in unknown ingestions; however, their usefulness may be limited when multiple toxins are ingested. Electrocardiography is indicated in patients reporting chest pain and dyspnea and in overdoses of beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, and antidysrhythmics. Measurement of electrolyte, serum creatinine, and serum bicarbonate levels and calculation of the anion gap may be helpful based on the clinical presentation. Treatment of a patient with acute poisoning is based on resuscitation and stabilization with a focus on airway, breathing, and circulation. When poisoning is suspected, the Poison Control provides health care workers and the public with access to a specialist 24 hours a day.

Changes in Urine Drug Screen Sensitivity in Adolescent Opioid Presentations to the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED. METHODS: We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years. RESULTS: Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.

Creating and evaluating the score to assess overdose: the OD score.

BACKGROUND: During disasters (including epidemics such as coronavirus disease 2019), the capacity of emergency departments is exceeded, thereby hindering the administration of appropriate lifesaving measures. Furthermore, the number of overdose patients increases because of the stress overload during emergency situation. The fact that overdose patients are forced to be transported to medical facilities that do not typically treat them is becoming worrisome. Moreover, there is no definitive score for overdose. This study aimed to create a patient-specific scoring system to assess overdose. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study. The evidence-based OD score was evaluated on a scale of 0-15. Further, logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the score. RESULTS: Overall, 262 patients (including 118 overdose patients) receiving care at the intensive care unit of Japan's Teikyo University Hospital in 2021 were targeted. Regarding the total OD score, ROC analysis revealed a cutoff of 8 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.980-0.997, sensitivity: 0.95, specificity: 0.95, p < 0.05), which was considered to indicate an overdose. Of the items evaluated in the OD score, the scenario at the location of the patient's discovery (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 16.8, 95% CI: 5.0-255.9, p = 0.002) and recent experience of mental anxiety (AOR: 55.7, 95% CI: 2.8-5399.5, p = 0.03) significantly predicted an overdose in multivariable logistic regression analysis. External validation revealed that the OD score could also identify overdose in patients treated in a cohort from 2022 (average cutoff: 8.6, average AUC: 1.0, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The OD score could accurately assess overdose patients. Medical facilities that do not frequently address overdose patients will benefit from the use of this score.

Atrial Fibrillation Secondary to Levothyroxine Overdose with Underlying Secondary Infection.

This case report presents the clinical course and management of a 62-year-old female patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) secondary to levothyroxine overdose along with an underlying secondary infection. The patient was admitted with sudden onset dyspnea, altered sensorium, and neurological deficits. Upon examination, she exhibited tachycardia, irregular heart sounds, and extensive crepitations in the respiratory system. Her electrocardiogram (ECG) showed an absent P wave with a varying RR interval. Laboratory investigations revealed abnormal thyroid function tests (TFTs) and raised polymorphonuclear cells, in addition to hyperglycemia. The patient was managed in the intensive care unit (ICU) with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and supplemental oxygen, treated for AF with intravenous (IV) amiodarone, and her blood sugar was controlled with insulin infusion. Discontinuation of levothyroxine therapy was advised. Subsequently, her AF was terminated, and sinus rhythm was restored. Her neurological examination showed right-sided hemiplegia with aphasia. After 1 week of treatment, her TFTs normalized, and she was discharged on appropriate medication.

Progression of ECG in hydroxychloroquine overdose.

Hydroxychloroquine overdose is associated with myocardial toxicity and conduction disorders. We report a case of hydroxychloroquine overdose that demonstrated a rapid progressive intraventricular conduction delay and QT prolongation resulting in significant bradycardia and shock despite aggressive treatment. We describe the rare capture of abrupt abnormalities of this overdose in sequential electrocardiograms in the immediate hours post-ingestion.

An exploratory study of a hands-on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff.

INTRODUCTION: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in fentanyl-combined drugs has led to a surge in opioid overdose deaths in the United States. Higher opioid overdose mortality rates are problematic in rural communities, and there are few prevention, treatment, and recovery resources for individuals experiencing opioid use disorder. METHOD: This exploratory project aimed to investigate a hands-on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff. Rural clinicians and staff at two behavioral health centers were recruited to participate in a 30-min lecture and 30-min hands-on intranasal naloxone training using a low-fidelity mannequin. A pre-post opioid knowledge questionnaire, rubric based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration toolkit, and investigator-generated survey were used to evaluate opioid knowledge and response, demonstration of intranasal naloxone administration, and participants' perceptions of the training. Enrollment characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used to assess mean differences. RESULTS: Of the nine participants in the project, seven (87.5%) were female and six (75.0%) were Black. Four participants assumed a therapist role, attained a MS or MA degree, and had 5 or more years of experience working in healthcare. The total mean rubric score for all participants was 96.0 (SD = 8.8). No significant pre-post mean differences among opioid knowledge, overdose risk, and overdose response categories were found, all p > 0.05. However, post-intervention mean scores were slightly higher in all categories except overdose risk. Most participants (77.8%) responded that they felt comfortable handling an opioid situation and teaching the training to community members. Open-ended responses indicated that participants liked the demonstrations, examples used, hands-on nature of the training, and the presentation materials. CONCLUSION: A hands-on naloxone training is beneficial for training rural clinicians and staff to respond to opioid overdose. This training may be a promising solution to reduce response time between recognition of opioid symptoms and administration of the life-saving medication, naloxone. Future studies should examine the efficacy of this training in larger samples with the inclusion of rural interdisciplinary teams, trusted community leaders, and family and friends of those impacted by opioid use disorder. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This innovative hands-on naloxone training is designed for rural clinicians and residents who are most likely to witness individuals experiencing opioid toxicity. The primary goal is to reduce response time between recognition of signs and symptoms and administration of the life-saving medication, Naloxone.

Associations between Circumstances Surrounding Overdose and Underlying Classes of Polysubstance Overdose Deaths.

BACKGROUND: The overdose crisis is worsening, with polysubstance overdose deaths involving psychostimulants increasing in the U.S. Substance-specific prevention and intervention activities may not be as effective for polysubstance use, so we sought to classify substances used among overdose decedents to identify unique factors related to these classes. METHODS: We used data from the Nevada State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System, Jan 2019-Jun 2021, which comes from death certificates, coroner/medical examiner reports, and postmortem toxicology. Latent class analysis, multinomial logistic regression, and Chi-squared tests determined underlying drug use classes, differences in characteristics and circumstances surrounding overdose, and assessed relationships between circumstances and drug use classes. RESULTS: We identified four latent classes: (1) prescription drugs (19.1%), (2) predominately methamphetamine (31.4%), (3) multi-drug (28.9%), and (4) opioid and stimulant (20.6%). Compared to other classes, the prescription drug class had a higher percentage of female decedents, from rural counties, with mental health diagnoses, who died at home. The predominately methamphetamine class had a higher percentage of decedents experiencing homelessness. The multi-drug use class had higher percentage of younger and Hispanic decedents. Those in the opioid and stimulant class had higher odds of being recently released from an institutional setting, compared to the multi drug class. CONCLUSIONS: These underlying classes were associated with several characteristics and circumstances that can prove useful for prevention, treatment, and harm reduction agencies when designing programs and interventions to target specific groups of people at-risk for drug overdose.

The Role of the Nephrologist in Management of Poisoning and Intoxication: Core Curriculum 2022.

Poisoning is a common problem in the United States. Acid-base disturbances, electrolyte derangements, or acute kidney injury result from severe poisoning from toxic alcohols, salicylates, metformin, and acetaminophen. Lithium is highly sensitive to small changes in kidney function. These poisonings and drug overdoses often require the nephrologist's expertise in diagnosis and treatment, which may require correction of acidosis, administration of selective enzyme inhibitors, or timely hemodialysis. The clinical and laboratory abnormalities associated with the poisonings and drug overdoses can develop rapidly and lead to severe cellular dysfunction and death. Understanding the pathophysiology of the disturbances and their clinical and laboratory findings is essential for the nephrologist to rapidly recognize the poisonings and establish an effective treatment plan. This installment of AJKD's Core Curriculum in Nephrology presents illustrative cases of individual poisonings and drug overdoses and summarizes up to date information on their prevalence, clinical and laboratory findings, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

A Chronic Condition Disguised as an Acute Event: the Case for Re-thinking Stimulant Overdose Death.

Recent reports indicate that stimulant-related deaths are increasing dramatically. People who die from acute stimulant toxicity have high rates of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), much of which is undiagnosed. Moreover, people who use stimulants with CVD often remain asymptomatic until presenting to an emergency department with an acute event. Prior research shows that symptoms of stimulant toxicity may occur on a regular basis, and that people who die from stimulant toxicity are older than those who die of opioid toxicity. Taken collectively, the existing evidence suggests that death from acute stimulant toxicity is often an outcome of long-term, cumulative exposure leading to cardiovascular dysfunction rather than acute intoxication. Strategies tailored to the distinct etiology of stimulant overdose are needed. We propose a three-part approach including (1) implementing stimulant use interventions that promote not only abstinence, but also use reduction, (2) treating ongoing stimulant use as a chronic cardiovascular condition, and (3) making stimulant toxicity interventions relevant to the populations most affected, which includes people outside of the traditional health-care system. In short, to reduce stimulant-related fatality, we need to transform our approach in ways that are tailored to address its natural history.

Assessment of a Naloxone Coprescribing Alert for Patients at Risk of Opioid Overdose: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Patients taking high doses of opioids, or taking opioids in combination with other central nervous system depressants, are at increased risk of opioid overdose. Coprescribing the opioid-reversal agent naloxone is an essential safety measure, recommended by the surgeon general, but the rate of naloxone coprescribing is low. Therefore, we set out to determine whether a targeted clinical decision support alert could increase the rate of naloxone coprescribing. METHODS: We conducted a before-after study from January 2019 to April 2021 at a large academic health system in the Southeast. We developed a targeted point of care decision support notification in the electronic health record to suggest ordering naloxone for patients who have a high risk of opioid overdose based on a high morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) ≥90 mg, concomitant benzodiazepine prescription, or a history of opioid use disorder or opioid overdose. We measured the rate of outpatient naloxone prescribing as our primary measure. A multivariable logistic regression model with robust variance to adjust for prescriptions within the same prescriber was implemented to estimate the association between alerts and naloxone coprescribing. RESULTS: The baseline naloxone coprescribing rate in 2019 was 0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.31) naloxone prescriptions per 100 opioid prescriptions. After alert implementation, the naloxone coprescribing rate increased to 4.51 (95% CI, 4.33-4.68) naloxone prescriptions per 100 opioid prescriptions (P < .001). The adjusted odds of naloxone coprescribing after alert implementation were approximately 28 times those during the baseline period (95% CI, 15-52). CONCLUSIONS: A targeted decision support alert for patients at risk for opioid overdose significantly increased the rate of naloxone coprescribing and was relatively easy to build.

Securing a diagnosis in patients presenting with suspected paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is the most commonly ingested drug in self-poisoning. The correlation between an ingested self-reported dose of paracetamol and plasma paracetamol concentration is moderate. The usefulness of this correlation to rule out paracetamol ingestion has to be investigated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of medical history in diagnosis of paracetamol ingestion in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) for deliberate self-poisoning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in two EDs at an urban university hospital in Toulouse, France, from January 1 to June 30, 2018. All patients older than 15 years of age attending the ED for suspected deliberate self-poisonings who underwent blood testing were included. Medical history was considered positive for paracetamol intoxication if patients directly reported the use of paracetamol for deliberate self-poisoning during their ED admission or if paramedics reported the presence of paracetamol packages at the patient's home. We defined paracetamol ingestion as any concentration of paracetamol > 5 mg/L measured on presentation. RESULTS: We included 709 patients. 151 (21%) patients had a positive plasma paracetamol concentration. 165 (23%) patients revealed a positive medical history in terms of paracetamol ingestion. 29 (4%) patients had a false-negative medical history, and 45 (6%) patients had a false-positive history. The sensitivity of the medical history (95% confidence interval) was 79% (72 - 87), and its specificity was 92% (89 - 94). CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of self-poisoning involving paracetamol cannot be made using patient's medical history alone. Screening for paracetamol intoxication is proposed.

Validity of Incident Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Diagnoses in Administrative Data: a Chart Verification Study.

BACKGROUND: An important strategy to address the opioid overdose epidemic involves identifying people at elevated risk of overdose, particularly those with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, it is unclear to what degree OUD diagnoses in administrative data are inaccurate. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of inaccurate diagnoses of OUD among patients with incident OUD diagnoses. SUBJECTS: A random sample of 90 patients with incident OUD diagnoses associated with an index in-person encounter between October 1, 2016, and June 1, 2018, in three Veterans Health Administration medical centers. DESIGN: Direct chart review of all encounter notes, referrals, prescriptions, and laboratory values within a 120-day window before and after the index encounter. Using all available chart data, we determined whether the diagnosis of OUD was likely accurate, likely inaccurate, or of indeterminate accuracy. We then performed a bivariate analysis to assess demographic or clinical characteristics associated with likely inaccurate diagnoses. KEY RESULTS: We identified 1337 veterans with incident OUD diagnoses. In the chart verification subsample, we assessed 26 (29%) OUD diagnoses as likely inaccurate; 20 due to systems error and 6 due to clinical error; additionally, 8 had insufficient information to determine accuracy. Veterans with likely inaccurate diagnoses were more likely to be younger and prescribed opioids for pain. Clinical settings associated with likely inaccurate diagnoses were non-mental health clinical settings, group visits, and non-patient care settings. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified significant levels of likely inaccurate OUD diagnoses among veterans with incident OUD diagnoses. The majority of these cases reflected readily addressable systems errors. The smaller proportion due to clinical errors and those with insufficient documentation may be addressed by increased training for clinicians. If these inaccuracies are prevalent throughout the VHA, they could complicate health services research and health systems responses.

Relatively mild symptoms after chronic overdose with a double-dose encorafenib: a case report.

Encorafenib (Braftovi) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation, in combination with binimetinib (Mektovi). According to the product label of encorafenib, there are no specific treatment recommendations in case of an overdose. We report on a 63-year-old man who ingested a double dose (900 mg) of encorafenib for 16 days. He developed overall minor chronic overdose symptoms such as nausea and vomiting grade 1 and muscle pain. Based on the most occurring adverse events of encorafenib, liver values, kidney function parameters and QTc interval were measured. Kidney function parameters were normal, whereas liver values were slightly increased (grade 1) and QTc slightly prolonged. The plasma concentration 3 h after the last dose was 2110 ng/mL. We describe the course of a case with a chronic overdose during 16 days of the double dose of encorafenib as well as the followed approach, which could be taken into account when observing an encorafenib overdose. Providing information in times of Covid-19 is challenging, but remains necessary for good clinical care.

Time to Peak International Normalized Ratio Rise in Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Warfarin Overdoses.

ABSTRACT: Guidelines exist on the management of supratherapeutic/subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) values for patients on warfarin. However, there is a paucity of the literature relating to an acute overdose of warfarin. This is a retrospective cohort study for all acute and acute-on-chronic (AOC) warfarin overdoses reported to the Maryland Poison Center in patients ≥12 years between January 1st, 2000, until October 31st, 2019, managed in a health care facility. The primary outcome was to determine the time after presentation to peak INR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors associated with INR >10 and describing patient characteristics. A total of 163 overdoses were included, 68 acute and 95 AOC. In patients who did not receive reversal therapies, INR peaked at a median value of 3.8 (interquartile range 2.6-5.5) between 24 and 36 hours. The median time to phytonadione was 22.0 hours. Most patients received phytonadione (62.0%), with fewer receiving blood products (16.6%). The median warfarin dose ingested was 75 mg. The AOC group had a greater mean age (56 vs. 43 years), median INR value (2.4 vs. 1.4), and men (62.1% vs. 41.2%). Factors associated with an INR > 10 included initial INR and reported quantity ingested. Peak INR was greater in the AOC than the acute overdose group (6.1 vs. 3.4), although the bleeding rate was similar. Peak INR values after warfarin overdose occur between 24 and 36 hours after presentation. Initial INRs and reported quantity ingested may be useful to predict those needing treatment.

Pharmacobezoar After Venlafaxine and Oxazepam Overdose: How Pharmacokinetics Could Help?-A Grand Round.

ABSTRACT: The authors present here a case of a pharmacobezoar after drug overdose, diagnosed using multiple blood samples for TDM. This grand round highlights the importance of a dialog between a clinician and a TDM consultant for the optimal care of a patient.

Routine Laboratory Screening for Acetaminophen and Salicylate Ingestion in Preadmission Psychiatric Patients Is Unnecessary.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Screening preadmission psychiatric patients for acetaminophen or salicylate overdose is unnecessary in the absence of specific clinical concern for medication ingestion. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 3 Veteran's Administration emergency departments that medically evaluate patients prior to psychiatric admission. During the 10-year study period, these departments followed screening protocols that required the measurement of acetaminophen and salicylate levels on every patient prior to psychiatric admission. We examined all the acetaminophen and salicylate assays performed to see if any that were sent for screening led to a diagnosis of overdose and/or the administration of antidotal therapy. RESULTS: A total of 33,439 combined acetaminophen and salicylate assays were sent on 10,482 unique patients over approximately 17,000 patient encounters. An estimated 29,000 assays were sent for screening purposes only-87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85% to 89%) of salicylate assays and 85% (95% CI 83% to 87%) of acetaminophen assays. We identified 43 patients with elevated acetaminophen levels and 11 with elevated salicylate levels. Among these patients, only 6 in total had their levels drawn for screening purposes only, with no history of suspected ingestion; in all but 1 patient, the levels were only slightly above the reference range. None of the patients with elevated levels identified by screening had clinical toxicity or received antidotal therapy. CONCLUSION: Over a 10-year period, 3 Veteran's Administration emergency departments performed psychiatric preadmission screening protocols with acetaminophen and salicylate assays approximately 17,000 times without diagnosing a single case of toxicity. Our results suggest that this practice is unnecessary and wasteful.