Interleukin-1 beta-induced up-regulation of opioid receptors in the untreated and morphine-desensitized U87 MG human astrocytoma cells.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that can be produced in the central nervous system during inflammatory conditions. We have previously shown that IL-1ß expression is altered in the rat brain during a morphine tolerant state, indicating that this cytokine may serve as a convergent point between the immune challenge and opiate mediated biological pathways. We hypothesized that IL-1ß up-regulates opioid receptors in human astrocytes in both untreated and morphine-desensitized states. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we compared the basal expression of the mu (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR) opioid receptors in the human U87 MG astrocytic cell line to SH-SY5Y neuronal and HL-60 immune cells using absolute quantitative real time RT-PCR (AQ-rt-RT-PCR). To demonstrate that IL-1ß induced up-regulation of the MOR, DOR and KOR, U87 MG cells (2 x 105 cells/well) were treated with IL-1ß (20 ng/mL or 40 ng/mL), followed by co-treatment with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IL-1RAP) (400 ng/mL or 400 ng/mL). The above experiment was repeated in the cells desensitized with morphine, where U87 MG cells were pre-treated with 100 nM morphine. The functionality of the MOR in U87 MG cells was then demonstrated using morphine inhibition of forksolin-induced intracellular cAMP, as determined by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: U87 MG cells treated with IL-1ß for 12 h showed a significant up-regulation of MOR and KOR. DOR expression was also elevated, although not significantly. Treatment with IL-1ß also showed a significant up-regulation of the MOR in U87 MG cells desensitized with morphine. Co-treatment with IL-1ß and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IL-1RAP) resulted in a significant decrease in IL-1ß-mediated MOR up-regulation. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-1ß, affects opiate-dependent pathways by up-regulating the expression of the MOR in both untreated and morphine-desensitized U87 MG.

Study on the activation of the opioid receptors by a set of morphine derivatives in a well-defined assay system.

As a first step in our search for new opiates, we have established cellular assays to monitor opioid receptor activation and study the activities of a set of morphine derivatives. Intracellular calcium changes were monitored in human embryonic kidney-293 T cells expressing individual opioid receptors upon cotransfection with a chimeric G protein. This assay was validated by comparing the potencies of the endogenous peptides to reported values. All of the opiates were found to interact with the three opioid receptor subtypes but with a range of differences in efficacies and potencies. Most of the opiates preferentially acted at the µ receptor. None of the opiates showed a preference for the δ receptor. Only oripavine and its precursor thebaine showed a preference for the κ over the µ receptor. The results indicate that the opiates with a C-3 hydroxyl group or C-6 ketone group but in the presence of a 7, 8-single bond exhibit higher activity. It is noteworthy that the 6-O-methyl group seems to improve the selectivity for κ receptor. This is the first comparative and comprehensive report on the activation of the three different opioid receptors by a set of morphine derivatives in a well-defined assay system. These data can serve as a basis for the characterization of novel opiates.

Opioid receptor subtypes: fact or artifact?

There is a vast amount of pharmacological evidence favouring the existence of multiple subtypes of opioid receptors. In addition to the primary classification of µ (mu: MOP), δ (delta: DOP), κ (kappa: KOP) receptors, and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor (NOP), various groups have further classified the pharmacological µ into µ(1-3), the δ into δ(1-2)/δ(complexed/non-complexed), and the κ into κ(1-3). From an anaesthetic perspective, the suggestions that µ(1) produced analgesia and µ(2) produced respiratory depression are particularly important. However, subsequent to the formal identification of the primary opioid receptors (MOP/DOP/KOP/NOP) by cloning and the use of this information to produce knockout animals, evidence for these additional subtypes is lacking. Indeed, knockout of a single gene (and hence receptor) results in a loss of all function associated with that receptor. In the case of MOP knockout, analgesia and respiratory depression is lost. This suggests that further sub-classification of the primary types is unwise. So how can the wealth of pharmacological data be reconciled with new molecular information? In addition to some simple misclassification (κ(3) is probably NOP), there are several possibilities which include: (i) alternate splicing of a common gene product, (ii) receptor dimerization, (iii) interaction of a common gene product with other receptors/signalling molecules, or (iv) a combination of (i)-(iii). Assigning variations in ligand activity (pharmacological subtypes) to one or more of these molecular suggestions represents an interesting challenge for future opioid research.

Multiple opiate receptors: alcohol selectively inhibits binding to delta receptors.

The addition of ethanol or other aliphatic alcohols to rat brain membranes strongly inhibits binding of enkephalins at concentrations at which little inhibition of opiate alkaloids is seen. Inhibition is reversible, and potency increases with chain length of the alcohol. The results suggest that delta receptors are considerably more sensitive to alcohols than mu receptors. This is the first demonstration of selective inhibition of one of the postulated classes of opiate receptors by a reagent that is not a ligand for the receptor.

Opiate analgesia: evidence for mediation by a subpopulation of opiate receptors.

Naloxazone, a hydrazone derivative of the opiate antagonist naloxone, has a high affinity for opiate receptor binding sites. Naloxazone injections reduce opiate receptor binding to extensively washed mouse brain membranes for more than 24 hours, suggesting that the effect is irreversible. High-affinity binding sites are abolished by this treatment, whereas low-affinity sites are unaffected. Naloxazone treatment blocks the analgesic effects of morphine for at least 24 hours but does not prevent death from high doses of morphine. Thus analgesic but nonlethal opiate effects may be mediated by the high-affinity subpopulation of opiate receptors.

Decreased spinal cord opioid receptor mRNA expression and antinociception in a Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus model of multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis patients typically experience increased pain that is relatively insensitive to opiate treatment. The mechanistic basis for this increased nociception is currently poorly understood. In the present study, we utilized the Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) model of MS to examine possible changes in spinal cord opioid receptor mRNA over the course of disease progression. TMEV infection led to significantly decreased mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression as analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in both male and female mice at days 90, 150 and 180 post-infection (PI). Since opioid receptor mRNA expression decreased in TMEV mice, we examined whether opiate analgesia is also altered. TMEV infected female mice had significantly decreased opiate analgesia in thermal nociceptive tests beginning at day 90 PI, while TMEV-infected male mice did not display significantly decreased opiate analgesia until day 120 PI. The novel finding that opioid receptor expression is significantly decreased in the spinal cord of TMEV mice could explain the increased nociception and loss of opiate analgesia observed in both TMEV mice and multiple sclerosis patients.

Roles of opioid receptor subtypes on the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal sildenafil in the formalin test of rats.

Recently, it has been known that the antinociception of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, is mediated through the opioid receptors. There are common three types of opioid receptors mu, delta, and kappa. We characterized the role of subtypes of opioid receptor for the antinociception of sildenafil at the spinal level. Intrathecal catheters were placed for drug delivery and formalin solution (5%, 50 microl) was injected for induction of nociception within male SD rats. The effect of mu opioid receptor antagonist (CTOP), delta opioid receptor antagonist (naltrindole), and kappa opioid receptor antagonist (GNTI) on the activity of sildenafil was examined. Intrathecal sildenafil decreased the flinching responses during phases 1 and 2 in the formalin test. Intrathecal CTOP and naltrindole reversed the antinociception of sildenafil during both phases in the formalin test. Intrathecal GNTI reversed the effect of sildenafil during phase 2, but not phase 1. These results suggest that sildenafil is effective to acute pain and the facilitated pain state at the spinal level. Both mu and delta opioid receptors are involved. However, it seems that kappa opioid receptors play in the effect of sildenafil.

Multiple ligands in opioid research.

The observation in 1979 that opioid receptors interact, led to the design of bivalent ligands in an attempt to improve selectivity and affinity towards the different subtypes( i.e. mu, delta, and kappa). Dimers of monovalent 'parent' opioid structures have been evaluated and include: (a) endogenous (e.g enkephalins) or exogenous (e.g dermorphin) peptide dimer analogues (b) mixed peptidic -non-peptidic bivalent ligands and (c) dual non-peptidic dimers. Chimeric structures, using an opioid pharmacophore in combination with a a non-opioid pharmacophore, have also been prepared. The common aim in all these studies is to improve the pharmacological profile of potential analgesics to minimize common opioid-induced side effects, such as physical dependence and tolerance. Here we present a brief overview efforts to develop bivalent opioid ligands for use in pain-related research.

Opioid systems in the dentate gyrus.

Opiate drugs alter cognitive performance and influence hippocampal excitability, including long-term potentiation (LTP) and seizure activity. The dentate gyrus (DG) contains two major opioid peptides, enkephalins and dynorphins, which have opposing effects on excitability. Enkephalins preferentially bind to delta- and mu-opioid receptors (DORs and MORs) while dynorphins preferentially bind to kappa-opioid receptors (KORs). Opioid receptors can also be activated by exogenous opiate drugs such as the MOR agonist morphine. Enkephalins are contained in the mossy fiber pathway, in the lateral perforant path (PP) and in scattered GABAergic interneurons. MORs and DORs are predominantly in distinct subpopulations of GABAergic interneurons known to inhibit granule cells, and are present at low levels within granule cells. MOR and DOR agonists increase excitability and facilitate LTP in the molecular layer. Anatomical and physiological evidence is consistent with somatodendritic and axon terminal targeting of both MORs and DORs. Dynorphins are in the granule cells, most abundantly in mossy fibers but also in dendrites. KORs have been localized to granule cell mossy fibers, supramammillary afferents to granule cells, and PP terminals. KOR agonists, including endogenous dynorphins, diminish the induction of LTP. Recent evidence indicates that opiates and opioids also modulate other processes in the hippocampal formation, including adult neurogenesis, the actions of gonadal hormones, and development of neonatal transmitter systems.

Relative contribution of peripheral versus central opioid receptors to antinociception.

Opioid effects are mediated by central and peripheral opioid receptors. Here we examine the relative contribution of each receptor population to antinociception elicited by systemically administered centrally penetrating opioids, and by loperamide (a peripherally restricted opioid). Nociception (abdominal writhes) was induced by intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected 0.6% acetic acid in mice. We analyzed opioid receptor expression in peritoneum by immunohistochemistry, antinociception after i.p. injected agonists at mu (morphine, loperamide)-, delta (SNC80)- and kappa (U50488)-receptors, and its reversibility by subcutaneously (s.c.) administered centrally penetrating antagonists beta-funaltrexamine (mu), naltrindole (delta) and nor-binaltorphimine (kappa), and by the peripherally restricted antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM). NLXM was also injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) before i.p. loperamide. Mu-, kappa- and, to a lesser degree, delta-receptors were expressed on peripheral nerve terminals in the peritoneum. The anatomical distribution of the opioid receptor staining was very similar to the staining for calcitonin gene-related peptide, a marker of sensory neurons. Morphine, U50488 and, to a lesser degree, SNC80 blocked acetic and acid induced writhes. These effects were reversed by beta-funaltrexamine, nor-binaltorphimine and naltrindole, respectively. NLXM (s.c.) reversed antinociceptive effects of morphine, SNC80 and U50488 by 57%, 80% and 47%, respectively. Loperamide (0.05 mg/kg)-induced antinociception was reversed by s.c. beta-funaltrexamine and NLXM. Loperamide (0.1 mg/kg)-induced antinociception was completely blocked by s.c. beta-funaltrexamine but was only attenuated (by 50%) by s.c. or i.c.v. NLXM. In conclusion, systemically administered centrally penetrating mu-, delta- and kappa-agonists produced a substantial part of antinociception through peripheral opioid receptors. Higher dose loperamide-induced antinociception involved also central opioid receptors.

Atypical anxiolytic-like response to naloxone in benzodiazepine-resistant 129S2/SvHsd mice: role of opioid receptor subtypes.

RATIONALE: Mice of many 129 substrains respond to environmental novelty with behavioural suppression and high levels of anxiety-like behaviour. Although resistant to conventional anxiolytics, this behavioural phenotype may involve stress-induced release of endogenous opioids. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of opioid receptor blockade on behavioural reactions to novelty stress in a chlordiazepoxide-resistant 129 substrain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiment 1 contrasted the effects of the broad-spectrum opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) in C57BL/6JOlaHsd and 129S2/SvHsd mice exposed to the elevated plus-maze. Experiments 2-4 examined the responses of 129S2/SvHsd mice to the mu-selective opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (2.5-10.0 mg/kg), the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole (2.5-10.0 mg/kg) and the kappa-selective antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (2.5-5.0 mg/kg). RESULTS: 129 mice displayed higher levels of anxiety-like behaviour and lower levels of general exploration relative to their C57 counterparts. Although naloxone failed to alter the behaviour of C57 mice, both doses of this antagonist produced behaviourally selective reductions in open-arm avoidance in 129 mice. Surprisingly, none of the more selective opioid receptor antagonists replicated this effect of naloxone: beta-funaltrexamine was devoid of behavioural activity, naltrindole suppressed rearing (all doses) and increased immobility (10 mg/kg), while nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg) nonspecifically increased percent open arm entries. CONCLUSIONS: Recent evidence suggests differential involvement of opioid receptor subtypes in the anxiolytic efficacy of diverse compounds including conventional benzodiazepines. The insensitivity of 129 mice to the anxiolytic action of chlordiazepoxide, coupled with their atypical anxiolytic response to naloxone (but not more selective opioid receptor antagonists), suggests an abnormality in anxiety-related neurocircuitry involving opioid-GABA interactions.

[Opioid receptors and their selective ligands]. / Receptory opioidowe i ich selektywne ligandy peptydowe.

Opioid receptors (micro, delta, and kappa) belong to a large family of G protein-coupled receptors and play an important physiological role. Stimulation of these receptors triggers analgesic effects and affects the function of gastrointestinal tract. The discovery of opioid peptides, which are endogenous ligands of opioid receptors, including delta-selective enkephalins, kappa-selective dynorphins, and micro-selective endomorphins, initiated their structure-activity relationship studies. For the last 30 years, hundreds of analogs of opioid peptides have been synthesized in an effort to obtain the compounds more active, selective, and resistant to biodegradation than the endogenous ligands. Different unnatural amino acids, as well as cyclisation procedures, leading to conformationaly restricted analogs, were employed. All these modifications resulted in obtaining very selective agonists and antagonists with high affinity at micro-, dlta-, and kappa-opioid receptors, which are extremely useful tools in further studies on the pharmacology of opioid receptors in a mammalian organism.

G proteins and opioid receptor-mediated signalling.

Most opioid receptor-mediated functions appear to be mediated through G protein interactions, therefore an understanding of opioid signalling requires knowledge of those interactions. This review chronicles the studies examining these interactions for all the opioid receptor subtypes, both in vivo and in vitro.

Melatonin exerts its analgesic actions not by binding to opioid receptor subtypes but by increasing the release of beta-endorphin an endogenous opioid.

The occurrence of systematic diurnal variations in pain thresholds has been demonstrated in human. Salivary melatonin levels change following acute pain when other factors that could explain the change have been removed or controlled. Melatonin-induced analgesia is blocked by naloxone or pinealectomy. By using selective radioligands [3H]-DAMGO, [3H]-DPDPE, [3-U69593, and 3H]-nociceptin, we have shown that the bovine pinealocytes contain delta and mu, but not kappa or ORL1 opioid receptor subtypes. In the present study, by using melatonin receptor agonists (6-chloromelatonin or 2-iodo-N-butanoyl-5-methoxytryptamine) or melatonin receptor antagonist (2-phenylmelatonin), we have shown that these agents do not compete with opioid receptor subtypes. However, we observed a time-dependent release of beta-endorphin an endogenous opioid peptide, by melatonin from mouse pituitary cells in culture. Hence, it is suggested that melatonin exerts its analgesic actions not by binding to opioid receptor subtypes but by binding to its own receptors and increasing the release of beta-endorphin.

Challenges for opioid receptor nomenclature: IUPHAR Review 9.

UNLABELLED: Recent developments in the study of the structure and function of opioid receptors raise significant challenges for the definition of individual receptor types and the development of a nomenclature that precisely describes isoforms that may subserve different functions in vivo. Presentations at the 2013 meeting of the International Narcotics Research Conference in Cairns, Australia, considered some of the new discoveries that are now unravelling the complexities of opioid receptor signalling. Variable processing of opioid receptor messenger RNAs may lead to the presence of several isoforms of the µ receptor. Each opioid receptor type can function either as a monomer or as part of a homo- or heterodimer or higher multimer. Additionally, recent evidence points to the existence of agonist bias in the signal transduction pathways activated through µ receptors, and to the presence of regulatory allosteric sites on the receptors. This brief review summarizes the recent discoveries that raise challenges for receptor definition and the characterization of signal transduction pathways activated by specific receptor forms. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

cDNA cloning and regional distribution of a novel member of the opioid receptor family.

We have cloned a cDNA for a novel member of the opioid receptor family, designated as ROR-C, from the rat cerebrum cDNA library using the probe derived from the delta-opioid receptor subtype cDNA. The deduced amino acid sequence of ROR-C shows high homology with those of ROR-A (rat delta-opioid receptor subtype), ROR-B (rat mu-subtype) and ROR-D (rat kappa-subtype). RNA blot hybridization and in situ hybridization analysis revealed that ROR-C mRNA is expressed in discrete regions of the rat central nervous system.

DAMGO, a mu-opioid receptor selective ligand, distinguishes between mu-and kappa-opioid receptors at a different region from that for the distinction between mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

The structural basis of opioid receptors (OPRs) for the subtype-selective binding of DAMGO, a mu-opioid receptor selective ligand, was investigated using chimeric mu/kappa-OPRs. Replacement of the region from the middle of the fifth transmembrane domain to the C-terminal of mu-OPR with the corresponding region of mu-OPR remarkably decreased the binding affinity to DAMGO, while the reciprocal chimera revealed the high affinity to DAMGO. These results indicate that DAMGO distinguishes between mu- and mu-OPRs at the region around the third extracellular loop, different from the case of the distinction between mu-and delta-OPRs in which the region around the first extracellular loop is important. Furthermore, displacement studies revealed that the region around the third extracellular loop is involved in the discrimination between mu- and kappa-OPRs not only by peptidic mu- selective ligands but also by non-peptidic ligands, such as morphine and naloxone.

Distribution of opiate receptor subtypes and enkephalin and dynorphin immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of squirrel, guinea pig, rat, and hamster.

The distribution of enkephalin and dynorphin immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of four rodent species (gray squirrel, guinea pig, rat, and hamster) is compared with the pattern of opiate receptor subtypes (mu, delta, and kappa). The distribution of opioid peptides is fairly consistent in the anterior hippocampus of these four species. Intense immunoreactivity for dynorphin and enkephalin is found in the hilus of the dentate gyrus and in the mossy fiber system. Occasional immunoreactive processes are seen in the dentate molecular layer and scattered throughout the CA1 and CA3 fields. In the rat and hamster, an additional plexus of enkephalinergic fibers straddles both sides of the hippocampal fissure. Cells immunoreactive for both opioid peptides are located in and just superficial to the dentate granule cell layer. Opiate receptors are variably distributed in these rodent species. In the squirrel, guinea pig, and hamster, mu and kappa binding is dense in the stratum lucidum of CA3 and the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. In the rat, dense mu and kappa binding is localized within and adjacent to the pyramidal and granule cell layers. Delta receptor patterns show additional species differences. In the rat, the delta distribution is similar to the mu and kappa patterns. In the other species, the delta binding pattern is generally the inverse of the mu/kappa pattern: most areas of the hippocampus are enriched in delta sites, whereas the stratum lucidum and the pyramidal cell layer are receptor-sparse. Thus, the stratum lucidum--site of dense terminations of mossy fibers containing opioid peptides--is characterized by selectively sparse delta receptors in four species and by selectively dense kappa receptors in three species. The three receptor subtypes, taken either individually or together and compared to the peptides, are more variably and more widely distributed throughout the hippocampus and fail to show a correspondence with opioid-peptide-containing terminals. The mismatches suggest that receptor locations and densities are organized without relation to the sites of relevant transmitter release.

Non-peptide opioid receptor ligands - recent advances. Part I - agonists.

Developments in the domain of non-peptide opioid receptor agonists, beginning from the first evidence of opiate binding to definite receptors, are briefly summarized. The recent achievements are in a more detailed way depicted and discussed. Novel agonists for each of three opioid receptor basic types (delta, kappa and micro) are presented with the special emphasis on one-type-selective ligands. Such selective or even specific agonists have been synthesized with a moderate success. Considerably more serious difficulties concern searching for selective ligands for opioid receptor subtypes (micro(1), micro(2), delta(1), delta(2, kappasub>1), kappasub>2, kappasub>3) which may be connected with the fact that dissimiliarities observed in vivo result from postbinding processes (signaling). For the large number of opioid receptor ligands, their structural diversity and relative easiness of generating them from combinatorial libraries (not comparable even with that of orphanine receptors) it is justified to consider the plasticity of opioid receptors (micro-receptor especially). This remark, in conjunction with the existence of opioid receptor types and subtypes, may enable to create new drugs with significantly reduced side-effects. The above facts and brand new reports about highly-active opioid agonists possessing no moieties thought to be essential for agonist activity make the need of reevaluation of classical opioid receptor pharmacophore model extremely important. In general, research results suggest that selective agonists of opioid receptors can be found both in morphine type of ligands and new structures like pyrido-acridine derivatives (COMP1) or diphenylmethylpiperazine derivatives (SNC 80). Better understanding of the structural prerequisites of the opioid receptors binding domains will certainly lead to even more potent and more selective ligands in a near future.

Non-peptide opioid receptor ligands - recent advances. Part II - antagonists.

This paper is the second part of the review on opioid receptor ligands and deals with the progress in the field of non-peptide opioid receptor antagonists (starting from the pioneering opiate studies in the early seventies) with particular stress on the last decade accomplishments. As X-ray high resolution structure determination of the ligand-receptor systems for G protein-coupled receptors meets with considerable experimental obstacles, the knowledge about ligand interactions with the membrane-bound receptors traditionally derives from structure-activity studies. Hence, such a concise summary, collecting chemically distinct but pharmalogically relative compounds, may be a convenient information source for any research concerning ligand-opioid receptor binding or rational drug design.