Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework.

Rare antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern recognition has been a widely applied technology for routine ANA screening in clinical laboratories. In recent years, the application of deep learning methods in recognizing ANA patterns has witnessed remarkable advancements. However, the majority of studies in this field have primarily focused on the classification of the most common ANA patterns, while another subset has concentrated on the detection of mitotic metaphase cells. To date, no prior research has been specifically dedicated to the identification of rare ANA patterns. In the present paper, we introduce a novel attention-based enhancement framework, which was designed for the recognition of rare ANA patterns in ANA-indirect immunofluorescence images. More specifically, we selected the algorithm with the best performance as our target detection network by conducting comparative experiments. We then further developed and enhanced the chosen algorithm through a series of optimizations. Then, attention mechanism was introduced to facilitate neural networks in expediting the learning process, extracting more essential and distinctive features for the target features that belong to the specific patterns. The proposed approach has helped to obtained high precision rate of 86.40%, 82.75% recall, 84.24% F1 score and 84.64% mean average precision for a 9-category rare ANA pattern detection task on our dataset. Finally, we evaluated the potential of the model as medical technologist assistant and observed that the technologist's performance improved after referring to the results of the model prediction. These promising results highlighted its potential as an efficient and reliable tool to assist medical technologists in their clinical practice.

Adopting the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) classification for reporting: the experience of Italian clinical laboratories.

The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) is still considered the reference method to detect anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) because of its high sensitivity and represents a relevant tool for the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. During the last decade, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative promoted harmonization and understanding of HEp-2 IFA staining pattern nomenclature, as well as promoting their use in patient care by providing interpretation for HEp-2 IFA test results. In conjunction with a nationwide survey on the evolution of autoantibody diagnostics in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, we focused on the adherence of the Italian laboratories to the ICAP nomenclature analyzing its lights and shadows. The recent ICAP-oriented report, largely used today among Italian laboratories, also represents a further step in harmonizing and improving communication with the clinicians, adding value to laboratory findings and helping with critical clinical decisions.

Antinuclear antibody titration and pattern are helpful in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing is among the most common immunological test requested in the diagnostic immunology laboratory. The main purpose of this test is to screen for the underlying systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). The gold standard laboratory method for ANA detection is by the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay. In most laboratories, positive ANA-IIF is reported in terms of titration and pattern. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted with the aim of determining the correlation between ANA-IIF titration and pattern for the diagnosis of SARDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted whereby the positive ANA-IIF samples from 1st July 2018 until 31st December 2019 and 1st January 2021 until 31st March 2021 were included in this study. The duplicate samples were excluded. ANA-IIF titration and pattern were recorded for all patients. The demographic, clinical, and final diagnosis data were retrieved from each patient's clinical note. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included for analysis. The majority of the patients were female (79.9%) and from Malay ethnicity (66.5%). Sixty-five patients (36.3%) had ANA-IIF positive at 1:80 titration followed by 45 patients (25.1%) positive at titration of equal or more than 1:160. Speckled was the predominant pattern visualised in 90 patients (50.3%) followed by homogeneous in 76 patients (42.5%). Forty-five patients (25.1%) were finally diagnosed with SARDs with 41 of them diagnosed as SLE. ANA titration was significantly associated with the final diagnosis of SARDs at all titres (p<0.001) but the best cut-off was noted at a titre of equal or more than 1:320 with the sensitivity and specificity of 86.7% and 77.6% respectively. The homogeneous pattern was also significantly associated with SARDs (p=0.04). The final diagnosis of SARDs were significantly higher in female (p=0.03) and their age was significantly younger (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: ANA-IIF titration of equal or more than 1:320 can be used as the best titration for differentiating between SARDs and non-SARDs in a positive ANA sample. Patients with homogeneous pattern were more likely to be diagnosed with SARDs than other ANA-IIF patterns.

Comparison of ANA testing by indirect immunofluorescence or solid-phase assays in a low pre-test probability population for systemic autoimmune disease: the Camargo Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Autoantibodies and, specifically antinuclear antibodies (ANA), are the hallmark of systemic autoimmune diseases (AID). In the last decades, there has been great technical development to detect these autoantibodies along with an increased request for this test by clinicians, while the overall pre-test probability has decreased. In this study, we compare the diagnostic performance of three different methods for ANA screening (indirect immunofluorescence [IIF], addressable laser bead immunoassay [ALBIA], and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay [FEIA]). METHODS: Serum samples at baseline visit from 2,997 participants from the Camargo Cohort, a population with an overall low pre-test probability for systemic AID, were analyzed with the three methods. Participants have a minimum follow-up of 10 years and the development of autoimmune diseases was collected from clinical records. RESULTS: The highest frequency of positive ANA was observed by IIF assay. However, ALBIA showed high sensitivity for AID. Likewise, solid phase assays (SPA) presented higher specificity than IIF for AID. ANA prevalence with any method was significantly higher in females and overall increased with age. Triple positivity for ANA was significantly related to the presence of anti-dsDNA-SSA/Ro60, Ro52, SSB/La, RNP, Scl-70, and centromere-specificities. No association was found for anti-Sm - RNP68, or ribosomal P - specificities. Noteworthy, triple positivity for ANA screening was associated with diagnosis of systemic AID both at baseline visit and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ANA detection by IIF may be better when the pre-test probability is high, whereas SPA techniques are more useful in populations with an overall low pre-test probability for systemic AID.

Anti-Ki/anti-PA28γ autoantibodies contribute to the HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence nuclear speckled pattern.

OBJECTIVES: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are associated with several autoimmune diseases. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells is the golden standard for ANA detection in the clinic. In case of a positive HEp-2 IIF test result, follow-up tests are done to determine autoantibody specificity. For a fraction of the HEp-2 IIF-positive samples, the nature of the autoantigens remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to characterize autoantigens in such samples. METHODS: To characterize autoantigens in an unbiased way, we combined protein immunoprecipitation with liquid chromatography (LC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) sequencing. RESULTS: Using such approach we detected the Ki antigen, also referred to as PA28γ, in the immunoprecipitate of serum samples of three individuals with an autoimmune disease. The HEp-2 nuclear speckled IIF fluorescent signal of all three serum samples was abolished after pre-absorption of the serum with recombinant Ki antigen, confirming that autoantibodies against Ki underlie the HEp-2 IIF signal. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that anti-Ki autoantibodies can underlie a nuclear speckled HEp-2 IIF pattern.

Detection of antinuclear antibodies: recommendations from EFLM, EASI and ICAP.

OBJECTIVES: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are important for the diagnosis of various autoimmune diseases. ANA are usually detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA). There are many variables influencing HEp-2 IFA results, such as subjective visual reading, serum screening dilution, substrate manufacturing, microscope components and conjugate. Newer developments on ANA testing that offer novel features adopted by some clinical laboratories include automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA). METHODS: A group of experts reviewed current literature and established recommendations on methodological aspects of ANA testing. This process was supported by a two round Delphi exercise. International expert groups that participated in this initiative included (i) the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group "Autoimmunity Testing"; (ii) the European Autoimmune Standardization Initiative (EASI); and (iii) the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP). RESULTS: In total, 35 recommendations/statements related to (i) ANA testing and reporting by HEp-2 IFA; (ii) HEp-2 IFA methodological aspects including substrate/conjugate selection and the application of CAD systems; (iii) quality assurance; (iv) HEp-2 IFA validation/verification approaches and (v) SPA were formulated. Globally, 95% of all submitted scores in the final Delphi round were above 6 (moderately agree, agree or strongly agree) and 85% above 7 (agree and strongly agree), indicating strong international support for the proposed recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are an important step to achieve high quality ANA testing.

Analytical aspects of the antinuclear antibody test by HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence: EFLM report on an international survey.

OBJECTIVES: Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) is used to screen for various autoimmune diseases. HEp-2 IFA suffers from variability, which hampers harmonization. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on HEp-2 IFA methodology, computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems, training, inter-observer variability, quality assessment, reagent lot change control, and method verification. The questionnaire was distributed to laboratories by Sciensano (Belgium), national EASI groups (Italy, Croatia, Portugal, Estonia, Greece) and ICAP (worldwide). Answers were obtained by 414 laboratories. The results were analysed in the framework of the recent EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations (companion paper). RESULTS: Laboratories used either HEp-2, HEp-2000, or HEp-20-10 cells and most laboratories (80%) applied the same screening dilution for children and adults. The conjugate used varied between laboratories [IgG-specific (in 57% of laboratories) vs. polyvalent]. Sixty-nine percent of CAD users reviewed the automatic nuclear pattern and 53% of CAD users did not fully exploit the fluorescence intensity for quality assurance. Internal quality control was performed by 96% of the laboratories, in 52% of the laboratories only with strongly positive samples. Interobserver variation was controlled by 79% of the laboratories. Limited lot-to-lot evaluation was performed by 68% of the laboratories. Method verification was done by 80% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Even though many laboratories embrace high-quality HEp-2 IFA, substantial differences in how HEp-2 IFA is performed and controlled remain. Acting according to the EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations can improve the global performance and quality of HEp-2 IFA and nurture harmonization.

Comparative analysis of three methods in anti-dsDNA antibodies detection: implications for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus diagnosis.

The evaluation of anti-dsDNA antibodies represents one of the essential diagnostic and prognostic marker features in patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we have compared immunoblotting (IB) with Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in 91 patients referred to our hospital for anti-dsDNA antibodies detection. The concordance and correlation measured by Cohen's kappa and Spearman's coefficient respectively was significant between CLIFT and CLIA (0.70; 0,7404, P < .0001) and among CLIA and IB (0.79; 0,5377, P < 0,0001) and lower between CLIFT and IB (0.55; 0,4373, P  <0,0001). Among the 46 IB-positive samples, 14 were positive for either CLIA or CLIFT. It is noteworthy that 11 out of these 14 samples had the final diagnosis of SLE. Thirteen out of fourteen samples were also positive for anti-nucleosome antibodies as measured concomitantly in immunoblotting. While our observations are based on a limited number of samples and will have to be confirmed in a bigger cohort, they underline the contribution of immunoblotting as an additional assay in defining the anti-dsDNA antibody profile in association with other well-established methods such as CLIA and CLIFT.

Development of a Novel Multiplex Bead-based Assay for Measuring Autoantibodies on Flow Cytometric Platform.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies (AAbs) are important biomarkers for the diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases (ADs). The detection of AAbs performed by current methods (indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT)/Immunoblot (dot/line)/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA) which have limitations in terms of performing multiple assays to arrive at laboratory diagnosis. We validated a novel multiplex bead-based assay (NMBA) that could quantify five common antibodies, simultaneously, on a flow-cytometry platform. METHODS: A total of five recombinant antigens (SS-A Ro60, CENP B, RNP 70, Scl 70 and Histones) were covalently coupled onto beads and tested using known positive sera (positive for AAbs) and analyzed using flow cytometer. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were obtained for each antigen, analyzed by both assays (NMBA and IIFT). It showed comparable or higher values for the NMBA. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Rho) were ≥ 0.97, (P < .05), indicating that multiplexing of the five autoantigens did not alter the results obtained when antigens were tested individually. The mean intra-assay precision measured by coefficient of variation (CV) was7.56 ± 1.6% and the mean inter-assay CV was 10.03 ± 1.34%. The time taken from sample receipt to reporting of results was 90 minutes in NMBA as compared to 150 minutes of IIFT. CONCLUSION: The NMBA could quantitatively measure antibodies against five autoantigens, simultaneously in patient's sera. The assay is faster, objective, reproducible, requires low sample volume, and stable. Moreover, the flow cytometer in diagnostic laboratory settings for hematological and transplant immunology tests, can also be used for testing AAbs.

Analytical and clinical performance of different platforms simultaneously detecting 15 antinuclear antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are invaluable biomarkers for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases (AIDs). This study aims to compare the performances of line immunoassay (LIA), multiplex bead-based flow fluorescent immunoassay (MBFFI), and magnetic bar code immunofluorescence assay (MBC-IF) to detect ANA-Profile-15S. METHODS: In total, 184 samples from AID patients and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were collected. Fifteen ANAs (anti-dsDNA, nucleosome, histone, Sm, PCNA, ribosomal-P, SS-A/Ro52, SS-A/Ro60, SS-B/La, centromere B [CENP-B], Scl-70, U1-snRNP, AMA-M2, Jo-1, and Pm/Scl) were subjected to parallel detection by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC-IF. The consistency between assays was analyzed. The discrepant results were further examined by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). RESULTS: Anti-SS-A/Ro52 and SS-A/Ro60 autoantibodies were the most common autoantibodies in ANA positive-profiles, and were detected with equal efficiency by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC-IF (p = 0.101 and p = 0.732, respectively). The three assays showed excellent agreement (consistency range: 66.5%-97.5%), and total consistency was 85.8%. The MBFFI and MBC-IF assays were in good agreement in terms of ANA-Profile-15S determination; the kappa coefficient ranged from 0.59 to 0.95, except for the PCNA and PM-Scl. Of the 262 re-assessed divergent results, 124 (47.33%) were positive on CLIA; the various autoantibodies exhibited variable patterns. More importantly, the ANA-Profile-15S results of the MBFFI and MBC-IF accurately identified patients with AID; the area under the curves ranged from 0.642 to 0.919. CONCLUSIONS: The novel MBFFI and MBC-IF assay performed well in detecting ANA-Profile-15S. The application of MBFFI and MBC-IF play important roles in laboratory diagnosis of AIDs.

[The clinical characteristics of nuclear dense fine speckled pattern in 95 289 patients].

To investigate the distribution and clinical significance of nuclear dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern in various diseases. A total of 95 289 patients who received DFS tests at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were included in this study. The results of indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) for detection of antinuclear antibody (ANA) were evaluated. The positive rates of ANA and DFS were 39.60% (37 733/95 289) and 1.19% (1 139/95 289) respectively. The positive rate of DFS in ANA-positive patients was 3.02% (1 139/37 733). DFS and ANA positivity were significantly different among different age groups rather than gender. The positivity rate of DFS reached the peak (55.57%, 633/1 139) in young patients between 21-40 years, while positive ANA with negative DFS was mainly observed in patients between 41-60 years (37.26%, 13 636/36 594). Additionally, single ANA-positivity were mainly detected in rheumatology department (59.23%, 18 402/31 066), whereas positive DFS was more common in obstetrics and gynecology department (3.08%, 49/1 593). There were 82.88% (944/1 139) patients with positive DFS diagnosed with non-autoimmune disease (non-AID), and 19.49%(222/1 139) with dermatosis. Positive DFS with higher titer (≥1∶320) was detected more frequently in autoimmune disease (AID) patients (5.13%, 10/195) than in non-AID patients (1.69%, 16/944) (P<0.05). The DFS pattern is rare in ANA positive patients, which is mainly observed in women between 21-49 years. High titer of DFS is prevalent in AID patients, but positive DFS is detected more in non-AID patients, especially those with dermatosis.

Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a "useful" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and "useful" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less "useful" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.

Combining multi-antigenic immunodot with indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells improves the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated, in nearly all patients, with autoantibodies (Ab). Accordingly, and in order to identify major (anti-CEN A/B and anti-Topo I) but also minor Abs, the usefulness of combining indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells with an 11 multi-antigenic SSc immunodot was explored. 1689 samples tested at the request of clinicians, were evaluated retrospectively. The positivity rate was 28.8% and the diagnosis of SSc was supported for 232 samples. Two groups of Abs were considered: group 1, Abs (anti-CENP A/B, anti-Topo I) present at elevated levels in SSc patients; group 2, Abs for which the Ab specificity (odds ratio and/or positive predictive value) was improved by using IIF on HEp-2 cells (RNA-Polymerase III, fibrillarin, Th/T0, PM-Scl). Altogether, this study highlights the utility of combining IIF on HEp-2 cells with the SSc immunodot as the first line of an SSc Abs detection/SSc diagnostic strategy.

Comparison of 3 anti-PLA2R inmmunoassaysfor the diagnosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy in an european population. A pilot study.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome. Renal biopsy is nowadays the gold standard for the diagnosis of MN. The presence of circulating PLA2R antibody is a very specific tool for the diagnosis of this disease, especially associated with primary or idiopathic MN (IMN), even though it can be also found in a small proportion of patients with secondary MN (SMN). This pilot study compares three different techniques for the detection of anti-PLA2R autoantibodies (immunofluorescence, ELISA immunoassay, and multiplex laser bead technology). Serum of 12 IMN and 9 SMN patients was obtained at diagnosis. Additionally, we employed serum samples of 15 healthy volunteers. From our patient cohort, we obtained a 7.75 RU/ml cut-off for the ELISA and 3104 MFI for the Luminex assays. The agreement between the three techniques improved considerably when applying the new cut-off points. As several authors have suggested, cut-offs may be calculated for each specific population instead of establishing global cut-off points. Patients with IMN showed significantly lower serum albumin levels and higher 24 h proteinuria compared to those with SMN. Analysis of ROC curves suggests that ELISA and LUMINEX assays are more useful than biochemical variables to differentiate patients with IMN and SMN. This pilot study contributes to confirming that the combination of ELISA and Luminex assays provide excellent sensitivity and specificity for the identification of IMN.

Evaluating the serological status of COVID-19 patients using an indirect immunofluorescent assay, France.

An indirect in-house immunofluorescent assay was developed in order to assess the serological status of COVID-19 patients in Marseille, France. Performance of IFA was compared to a commercial ELISA IgG kit. We tested 888 RT-qPCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (1302 serum samples) and 350 controls including 200 sera collected before the pandemic, 64 sera known to be associated with nonspecific serological interference, 36 sera from non-coronavirus pneumonia and 50 sera from patient with other common coronavirus to elicit false-positive serology. Incorporating an inactivated clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate as the antigen, the specificity of the assay was measured as 100% for IgA titre ≥ 1:200, 98.6% for IgM titre ≥ 1:200 and 96.3% for IgG titre ≥ 1:100 after testing a series of negative controls. IFA presented substantial agreement (86%) with ELISA EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 IgG kit (Cohen's Kappa = 0.61). The presence of antibodies was then measured at 3% before a 5-day evolution up to 47% after more than 15 days of evolution. We observed that the rates of seropositivity as well as the titre of specific antibodies were both significantly higher in patients with a poor clinical outcome than in patients with a favourable evolution. These data, which have to be integrated into the ongoing understanding of the immunological phase of the infection, suggest that detection anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is useful as a marker associated with COVID-19 severity. The IFA assay reported here is useful for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 exposure at the individual and population levels.

Follow-up investigation of antibody titers and diagnostic antibody cutoff values in patients with scrub typhus in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is a mite-borne infectious disease caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi. Few follow-up studies have assessed antibody titers using serologic tests from various commercial laboratories and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). METHODS: A prospective study to assess the antibody titers in patients with scrub typhus and seroprevalence in individuals undergoing health checkups was conducted using results of immunofluorescence antibody assays (IFAs) and serologic tests, used by the KCDC and commercial laboratories, respectively. The following tests were performed simultaneously: (i) indirect IFA used by the KCDC to detect immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG, (ii) IFA used by a commercial laboratory to detect total Ig, and (iii) antibody tests using two commercially available kits. RESULTS: When the IgM and IgG cutoff values (≥1:16 and ≥1:256, respectively) used in the IFA and the total IgG cutoff values (≥1:40) were used in prospective follow-up investigations, the antibody positivity rates of 102 patients with scrub typhus were 44.1, 35.3, and 57.6%, respectively, within 5 days of symptom onset. Among 91 individuals who recovered from scrub typhus, the follow-up IgM, IgG, and total Ig positivity rates for 13 years were 37.4% (34/91), 22.0% (20/91), and 76.9% (70/91), respectively. Among 216 individuals undergoing health checkups, the seroprevalence of IgM was 4.2% (9/216); no seroprevalence of IgG was observed. CONCLUSIONS: IFAs used by the KCDC and the commercial laboratory and rapid commercial kits could not distinguish between patients who had recovered from scrub typhus and those who are currently infected with O. tsutsugamushi. In South Korea and other countries, where low antibody cutoff values are used, upward adjustments of cutoff values may be necessary.

Comparison of the analytical and clinical performances of two different routine testing protocols for antinuclear antibody screening.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) is based on the detection of serum antinuclear antibodies (ANA) for which indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is the golden standard. New solid-phase immunoassays have been developed to be used alone or in combination with the detection of extractable antinuclear antibodies (ENA) to improve SARD diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performances of different ANA screening methods alone or in combination with ENA screening methods for SARD diagnosis. METHODS: A total of 323 patients were screened for ANA by IIF, EliA™ CTD Screen, and ELISA methods. Agreements were calculated between the methods. Then, EliA™ CTD Screen positive samples were screened for ENA by line immunoassay (LIA) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA). RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of EliA™ CTD Screen (79% sensitivity and 91% specificity) was better than that of ELISA or IIF. The combination of EliA™ CTD plus IIF had the highest sensitivity (93%). ENA determination revealed that Ro52 and Ro60 were the most prevalent specificities. The use of IIF alone was not able of detecting up to 36% of samples positive for Ro52, and 41% for Ro60. CONCLUSIONS: EliA™ CTD Screen has a better diagnostic performance when compared to IIF and ELISA. The combined use of EliA™ CTD Screen and IIF clearly improves the rate and accuracy of SARD diagnosis. The use of EliA™ CTD Screen as first-line screening technique allows the detection of antibodies, which could not be detected by IIF alone.

Subunits of the PBAP Chromatin Remodeler Are Capable of Mediating Enhancer-Driven Transcription in Drosophila.

The chromatin remodeler SWI/SNF is an important participant in gene activation, functioning predominantly by opening the chromatin structure on promoters and enhancers. Here, we describe its novel mode of action in which SWI/SNF factors mediate the targeted action of an enhancer. We studied the functions of two signature subunits of PBAP subfamily, BAP170 and SAYP, in Drosophila. These subunits were stably tethered to a transgene reporter carrying the hsp70 core promoter. The tethered subunits mediate transcription of the reporter in a pattern that is generated by enhancers close to the insertion site in multiple loci throughout the genome. Both tethered SAYP and BAP170 recruit the whole PBAP complex to the reporter promoter. However, we found that BAP170-dependent transcription is more resistant to the depletion of other PBAP subunits, suggesting that BAP170 may play a more critical role in establishing enhancer-dependent transcription.

USE OF A HUMAN INDIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE ANTIBODY ASSAY FOR BALAMUTHIA MANDRILLARIS IN A GROUP OF CAPTIVE NORTHWEST BORNEAN ORANGUTANS (PONGO PYGMAEUS PYGMAEUS).

Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis caused by the free-living amoeba Balamuthia mandrillaris is a highly fatal disease that was first isolated from a mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx), and has since been diagnosed in several nonhuman primates including orangutans. Indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) techniques for Balamuthia have been used in the fields of human medicine and epidemiology both for exposure assessment and screening of clinical patients for antemortem diagnosis. Stored serum samples from five captive Northwest Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus), including one who had died from B. mandrillaris infection, housed at a single facility were screened with a human IFA assay for B. mandrillaris. Only the single, clinically affected individual was seropositive, and the results suggest that the use of the available human B. mandrillaris IFA assay is a novel diagnostic option for detection of Balamuthia antibodies in this species. A validated screening serological test could be used in individuals exhibiting signs consistent with granulomatous amoebic encephalitis to facilitate earlier antemortem diagnosis of Balamuthia infection, which is critical if treatment is to be pursued. This pilot study presents the use of serological detection methods for B. mandrillaris screening in a nonhuman primate. Subsequent use of the B. mandrillaris IFA assay in the larger captive population should be pursued for validation of the test and to provide further information on seroprevalence and evaluation of risk factors for exposure to Balamuthia and subsequent development of disease.

qRT-PCR versus IFA-based Quantification of Male and Female Gametocytes in Low-Density Plasmodium falciparum Infections and Their Relevance for Transmission.

BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of female and male gametocytes and sex ratios in asymptomatic low-density malaria infections are important for assessing their transmission potential. Gametocytes often escape detection even by molecular methods, therefore ultralow gametocyte densities were quantified in large blood volumes. METHODS: Female and male gametocytes were quantified in 161 PCR-positive Plasmodium falciparum infections from a cross-sectional survey in Papua New Guinea. Ten-fold concentrated RNA from 800 µL blood was analyzed using female-specific pfs25 and male-specific pfmget or mssp qRT-PCR. Gametocyte sex ratios from qRT-PCR were compared with those from immunofluorescence assays (IFA). RESULTS: Gametocytes were identified in 58% (93/161) P. falciparum-positive individuals. Mean gametocyte densities were frequently below 1 female and 1 male gametocyte/µL by qRT-PCR. The mean proportion of males was 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.44) by pfs25/pfmget qRT-PCR; this correlated well with IFA results (Pearsons r2 = 0.91; P < .001). A Poisson model fitted to our data predicted 16% P. falciparum-positive individuals that are likely to transmit, assuming at least 1 female and 1 male gametocyte per 2.5 µL mosquito bloodmeal. CONCLUSIONS: Based on model estimates of female and male gametocytes per 2.5 µL blood, P. falciparum-positive individuals detected exclusively by ultrasensitive diagnostics are negligible for human-to-mosquito transmission.Estimating the transmission potential of ultralow-density malaria infections informs interventions. Almost all infections with ≥1 female and male gametocyte per 2.5 µL mosquito bloodmeal, and thus with highest likelihood of contributing to human-to-mosquito transmission, were detectable by standard molecular diagnostics.