Religious Dissociation and Economic Appraisal in Brazil.

Research on the association between religion and health often neglects to provide an explicit theoretical mechanism of influence between faith and well-being. This research posits that dissociative behaviors, such as glossolalia, may provide a biological pathway that influences both physiological and psychological health. This paper argues that religious dissociation acts as a moderator between economic stressors and psychobiological appraisal. Brazil, with its economic inequality and preponderance of religious dissociative rituals, provides an ideal context to examine religious dissociation as a moderator of stress. Utilizing data from a cross section of Brazilian faiths, this paper examines: (1) Whether individuals with low socioeconomic status preferentially participate and experience religious dissociative states and (2) whether dissociative states are correlated with greater psychological appraisal of status.

COgnitive behavioural therapy vs standardised medical care for adults with Dissociative non-Epileptic Seizures (CODES): a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for the effectiveness of psychological interventions for patients with dissociative non-epileptic seizures (DS) is currently extremely limited, although data from two small pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including from our group, suggest that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) may be effective in reducing DS occurrence and may improve aspects of psychological status and psychosocial functioning. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a multicentre, pragmatic parallel group RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of specifically-tailored CBT plus standardised medical care (SMC) vs SMC alone in reducing DS frequency and improving psychological and health-related outcomes. In the initial screening phase, patients with DS will receive their diagnosis from a neurologist/epilepsy specialist. If patients are eligible and interested following the provision of study information and a booklet about DS, they will consent to provide demographic information and fortnightly data about their seizures, and agree to see a psychiatrist three months later. We aim to recruit ~500 patients to this screening stage. After a review three months later by a psychiatrist, those patients who have continued to have DS in the previous eight weeks and who meet further eligibility criteria will be told about the trial comparing CBT + SMC vs SMC alone. If they are interested in participating, they will be given a further booklet on DS and study information. A research worker will see them to obtain their informed consent to take part in the RCT. We aim to randomise 298 people (149 to each arm). In addition to a baseline assessment, data will be collected at 6 and 12 months post randomisation. Our primary outcome is monthly seizure frequency in the preceding month. Secondary outcomes include seizure severity, measures of seizure freedom and reduction, psychological distress and psychosocial functioning, quality of life, health service use, cost effectiveness and adverse events. We will include a nested qualitative study to evaluate participants' views of the intervention and factors that acted as facilitators and barriers to participation. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first adequately powered evaluation of CBT for this patient group and offers the potential to provide an evidence base for treating this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN05681227 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02325544.

The economic burden of dissociative disorders: A qualitative systematic review of empirical studies.

OBJECTIVE: Dissociative disorders (DDs) are associated with intensive, long-term treatment, suicidality, recurrent hospitalizations, and high rates of disability. However, little is known about the specifics of the economic burden associated with DDs. This worldwide, systematic review examines the results of studies in adults on direct and indirect costs associated with DDs. METHOD: We searched 6 databases and the reference lists of articles. We also approached researchers to identify unpublished studies. No language restrictions were imposed. RESULTS: A total of 1,002 records met the search criteria, of which 29 papers were selected for full-text inspection. Ultimately, of these, we reviewed four empirical studies. We provide a narrative discussion of study findings. Our findings suggest that DDs are costly to society, and that there is a reduction in service utilization and associated costs over time with diagnosing of and specialized treatment for DDs. However, the overall quality of the economic evaluations was low; several types of DDs, comorbid conditions, and costs were not included; and men were underrepresented. Due to the heterogeneity among studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the identified economic evaluations, no firm conclusions about the economic burden of DDs alone can be drawn. Higher quality research, including a detailed description of the study design, population, and primary outcome measures used, utilizing appropriate clinical alternatives and including major comorbidities, is urgently needed to more rigorously assess the economic impact of DDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Tailored psychotherapy for patients with functional neurological symptoms: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether individually tailored psychotherapy for patients with functional neurological symptoms is associated with improvements in patient-centered measures of emotional well-being, quality of life, as well as somatic symptoms and whether this treatment modality is likely to be cost-effective. METHODS: We conducted an uncontrolled prospective pilot study of consecutive patients with functional symptoms referred from neurology outpatient clinics to a single psychotherapist using validated questionnaires [Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Short Function (SF)-36 Health Survey, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-15]. Patients had a median of 6 treatment sessions (range=1-24). Ninety-one patients completed questionnaires at referral, 63 did at the end of treatment, and 34 did at follow-up after 6 months. Significant improvements were seen on all measures and were maintained at follow-up (CORE-OM, P=.003; SF-36, P<.001; PHQ-15, P=.001). Significance was not lost in an intention-to-treat analysis. Of all the patients, 49.2% improved by at least 1 S.D. in at least one of the measures. The number of patients needed to be treated to see an improvement of at least 1 S.D. in one of the three outcome measures was 2; that in two measures, 3.9; and that in all measures, 7. The mean cost of the intervention was pound231; the cost per quality-adjusted life year was estimated as pound5,328. RESULTS: Psychotherapy was associated with significant improvements in patient-centered measures, which seemed to be achieved at a comparatively low cost. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that psychotherapy may be a cost-effective intervention for patients presenting with functional neurological symptoms. The findings warrant further assessment of this treatment with a randomized and controlled trial.

An ethical dilemma: risk versus responsibility.

1. In the psychiatric community, two highly profitable diagnoses currently are filling psychiatric hospitals: dissociative disorder and multiple personality disorder. Certainly these patients need help, and psychiatric nurses are well-qualified to plan their scope of care. However, when the hospital reported on in this article exploited these diagnoses by encouraging practices that extended lengths of stay and restricted patient's rights, the nurses were forced to speak out as advocates for the patients. 2. The dissociative disorder unit housed 10 patients billed at an intensive care unit rate of $1,200 per day. One patient's average fee per day was $1,560; multiply this by 10 patients, and the hospital received $15,600 per day from this unit alone. 3. Financial calculation is not what nurses are used to thinking about; indeed, it somehow seems unbefitting to link nursing care with any mention of monetary gain. Yet, this is exactly the sort of information that nurses must have in order to understand how hospital politics may influence their situation.