Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of lung density measurements in the diagnosis of emphysema.
Marsh, Suzanne; Aldington, Sarah; Williams, Mathew V; Nowitz, Michael R; Kingzett-Taylor, Andrew; Weatherall, Mark; Shirtcliffe, Philippa M; McNaughton, Amanda A; Pritchard, Alison; Beasley, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Marsh S; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, P.O. Box 10055, Wellington, New Zealand.
Respir Med ; 101(7): 1512-20, 2007 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17307350
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The role of computerised tomography (CT) lung density measurements in objective quantification of emphysema is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine normal reference values for CT lung density measurements and investigate their utility in identifying subjects with clinical emphysema.

METHODS:

Normal subjects (non-smokers, no respiratory disease, n=185) and subjects with clinical emphysema (post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC <70%, > or =10 pack years tobacco smoking, no childhood asthma and, either D(LCO)/VA <80% predicted and/or macroscopic emphysema on CT, n=22) were identified from a random population survey. Subjects underwent CT scanning, with measurement of areas of low attenuation as a percentage of total area (RA%) for three standardised slices and two reconstruction algorithms with a density threshold of -950 HU. Reference values in normal subjects, and ability of the measurements to discriminate between the two groups were determined.

RESULTS:

Reference values for individual subjects showed wide confidence intervals (standard resolution scans, RA% females 0.2-3.9%, males 0.4-8.7%.) Subjects with emphysema had greater RA% values compared with normal subjects, the difference being most marked in apical slices (standard resolution algorithm, apical slice, median RA% 2.9% (95% CI 0.4-11.1%) vs. 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-0.5%), emphysema vs. normal subjects, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed poor discriminant ability to distinguish between the groups, the most favourable cut-off yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 62.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

CT lung density measurements cannot reliably detect the presence of emphysema in an individual. We recommend further investigation into lung density measurements before their widespread use in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enfisema Pulmonar / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enfisema Pulmonar / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia