Comparison of 3-drug versus 4-drug and PI versus non-PI combinations as initial HAART: experience from 1998 to 2007.
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic)
; 8(5): 299-307, 2009.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-19759256
Although established in controlled studies that there is no advantage to 4-drug highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) or regimens with or without protease inhibitors (PIs), we questioned this finding in a clinical setting (ie, no inclusion criteria). Ours is a single clinic retrospective study including all participants >18 years of age during their first year of HAART. A total of 190 participants were reviewed, with 168 (88%) attaining a viral load <400 copies/mL at the end of a year of HAART; 144 of 164 (88%) succeeded with 3 drugs and 24 of 26 (92%) with 4 drugs (P = .51). In all, 59 of 71 (83%) succeeded using a PI versus 109 of 119 (92%) without a PI (P = .08). Male gender and exposure time to HAART were significant variables for a successful outcome. Failures were due to side effects (50%), nonadherence (45%), and drug allergy (5%). Our results support current guidelines recommending 3-drug HAART.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Inibidores de Proteases
/
Infecções por HIV
/
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Guideline
/
Incidence_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic)
Assunto da revista:
SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS)
Ano de publicação:
2009
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos