Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of dual flow counter-current chromatography and intermittent counter-current extraction.
Ignatova, Svetlana; Hewitson, Peter; Mathews, Ben; Sutherland, Ian.
Afiliação
  • Ignatova S; Advanced Bioprocessing Centre, Brunel Institute for Bioengineering, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB83PH, UK. svetlana.ignatova@brunel.ac.uk
J Chromatogr A ; 1218(36): 6102-6, 2011 Sep 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21397905
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research is to compare two continuous extraction technologies, intermittent counter-current extraction (ICcE) and dual flow counter-current chromatography (DFCCC), in terms of loading and throughput using the GUESSmix, and show the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. A model sample containing caffeine, vanillin, naringenin and carvone, with a total load of 11.2 g, was employed with a hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (2323) phase system to evaluate an ICcE method on a preparative (912 ml coil volume) DE-Midi instrument. While DFCCC was carried out on a specially designed preparative (561 ml coil volume) bobbin installed in a similar Midi instrument case. While similar throughputs of 7.8 g/h and 6.9 g/h were achieved for the ICcE and DFCCC methods respectively, ICcE was demonstrated to have a number of advantages over DFCCC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Benzaldeídos / Cafeína / Distribuição Contracorrente / Monoterpenos / Flavanonas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chromatogr A Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Benzaldeídos / Cafeína / Distribuição Contracorrente / Monoterpenos / Flavanonas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chromatogr A Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido