Comparison between spontaneous sedimentation method and Paratest® for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
; 105(10): 604-6, 2011 Oct.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21742360
Correct diagnosis of parasitic infections is essential for the treatment of individuals avoiding indiscriminate use of anthelmintics which increases drug resistance. In a comparative study between the spontaneous sedimentation technique and Paratest(®), 140 stool samples were analyzed for the detection of parasites. The prevalence was 12.7% obtained by the spontaneous sedimentation method but only 5.7% using Paratest(®). Paratest(®) has shown a high proportion of false-negative results, lower sensitivity and negative predictive values compared with the spontaneous sedimentation method. Further optimization and studies of the Paratest(®) method are necessary for wider use in clinical diagnosis.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Parasitologia
/
Fezes
/
Enteropatias Parasitárias
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Animals
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
País/Região como assunto:
America do sul
/
Brasil
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Brasil