Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Salem, Hosni Khairy; Fathy, Hesham; Elfayoumy, Hanny; Aly, Hussein; Ghonium, Ahmed; Mohsen, Mostafa A; Hegazy, Abd El Rahim.
Afiliação
  • Salem HK; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. Electronic address: dr_hosni@yahoo.com.
  • Fathy H; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Elfayoumy H; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Aly H; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Ghonium A; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Mohsen MA; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Hegazy Ael R; Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
J Urol ; 191(5): 1370-4, 2014 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24262496
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We compared slow vs fast shock wave frequency rates in disintegration of pediatric renal stones less than 20 mm. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Our study included 60 children with solitary 10 to 20 mm radiopaque renal stones treated with shock wave lithotripsy. Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups, ie those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 80 shock waves per minute (group 1, 30 patients) and those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 120 shock waves per minute (group 2, 30 patients). The 2 groups were compared in terms of treatment success, anesthesia time, secondary procedures and efficiency quotient.

RESULTS:

Stone clearance rate was significantly higher in group 1 (90%) than in group 2 (73.3%, p = 0.025). A total of 18 patients in group 1 (60%) were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 8 required 2 sessions and 1 needed 3 sessions, while shock wave lithotripsy failed in 3 patients. By comparison, 8 patients (26.6%) in group 2 were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 10 (33.3%) required 2 sessions and 4 (13.3%) needed 3 sessions to become stone-free. Mean general anesthesia time was significantly longer in group 1 (p = 0.041). Postoperatively 2 patients in group 1 and 4 in group 2 suffered low grade fever (Clavien grade II). Significantly more secondary procedures (percutaneous nephrolithotomy, repeat shock wave lithotripsy) were required in group 2 (p = 0.005). The predominant stone analysis was calcium oxalate dihydrate in both groups. Efficiency quotient was 0.5869 and 0.3437 for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0.0247).

CONCLUSIONS:

In children with renal stones slow delivery rates of shock wave lithotripsy have better results regarding stone clearance than fast delivery rates.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Renais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Renais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article