Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Two cases of lower abdominal tumors difficult to differentiate from urachal tumors].
Mizusawa, Hiroya; Oguchi, Tomohiko; Domen, Takahisa; Koizumi, Koji; Mimura, Yuji; Saito, Tetsuichi; Kato, Haruaki.
Afiliação
  • Mizusawa H; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center. h.mizusawa@nagano-hosp.go.jp
  • Oguchi T; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center.
  • Domen T; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center.
  • Koizumi K; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center.
  • Mimura Y; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center.
  • Saito T; Department of Urology, Shinshu Ueda Medical Center.
  • Kato H; Department of Urology, Shinshu University, School of Medicine.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi ; 105(1): 17-21, 2014 Jan.
Article em Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24605582
ABSTRACT
CASE 1 A 28-year-old woman visited a local medical doctor, complaining of abdominal pain, urinary frequency and a sense of residual urine. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lower abdominal extraperitoneal tumor, approximately 5 cm in diameter, adjacent to the bladder dome. It was thought to be a urachal tumor, and she was referred to our hospital. A hard hen's egg-sized mass was palpable in the lower abdomen. Urinary analysis was normal. Cytological examination was also negative. Cystoscopy revealed redness in the bladder dome mucosa. Although the preoperative diagnosis was a urachal cancer, the pathological diagnosis on surgery was desmoids, and tumor excision was performed. No recurrence has been seen for 7 years postoperatively. CASE 2 A 71-year-old man complaining of swelling of the lower abdomen was referred to our department because he was suspected to have a urachal tumor, of about 15 cm in diameter, on computed tomography. A hard infant head-sized mass was palpable in the lower abdomen. Urinary analysis was normal. Cystoscopical examination showed a markedly compressed bladder dome, however, no abnormal findings were seen in the mucosa. Although the preoperative diagnosis was a urachal tumor, the intraoperative pathological diagnosis revealed no malignancy. The mass was connected to the bladder dome, and partial cystectomy was conducted. The final pathological diagnosis was a solitary fibrous tumor. No recurrence has been seen for 5 years postoperatively. Because a urachal tumor is highly malignant, radical cystectomy and urinary diversion might be planned preoperatively. However, care should be taken not to be too invasive, considering the possibility of a benign tumor.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Diagnóstico Diferencial / Neoplasias Abdominais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Ja Revista: Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Diagnóstico Diferencial / Neoplasias Abdominais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Ja Revista: Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article