Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Pellegrini, Cinzia; Argnani, Lisa; Broccoli, Alessandro; Stefoni, Vittorio; Derenzini, Enrico; Gandolfi, Letizia; Casadei, Beatrice; Maglie, Roberto; Pileri, Stefano; Zinzani, Pier Luigi.
Afiliação
  • Pellegrini C; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Argnani L; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Broccoli A; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Stefoni V; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Derenzini E; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Gandolfi L; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Casadei B; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Maglie R; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Pileri S; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
  • Zinzani PL; Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy pierluigi.zinzani@unibo.it.
Oncologist ; 19(7): 746-50, 2014 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24869930
The definition of the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) is still under investigation. The purpose of the present observational retrospective study was to assess the early prognostic value of PET after the first three cycles of therapy (PET+3), evaluating visual data in de novo PTCL patients treated in first line with standard chemotherapy and followed by both PET and computed tomography scan. Of 27 PET+3-negative patients, 19 also had a negative PET at the end of treatment (PET+6), whereas 8 of 27 had a positive final one; 6 of 7 PET+3-positive patients had a positive PET+6, whereas only 1 patient had a negative PET+6. Estimated overall survival plotted according to PET+3 results showed 78.6% for negative patients and 21.4% for positive patients at 88.7 months with a significant difference. Patients with negative PET+3 had superior progression-free survival of 72.6% compared with 16.7% of PET+3-positive patients. At the time of this analysis, 17 of 19 (89.5%) patients with negative PET+3 are in continuous complete response (CCR) and only 1 of 7 (14.2%) patients with positive PET+3 is still in CCR. In conclusion, our results indicate that positive PET+3 is predictive of a worse outcome in PTCL, and this significant statistical difference between the two curves could be clinically informative. Larger and prospective studies and harmonization of PET reading criteria are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Linfoma de Células T Periférico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Linfoma de Células T Periférico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália