Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Strategies, actions, and outcomes of pilot state programs in public health genomics, 2003-2008.
St Pierre, Jeanette; Bach, Janice; Duquette, Debra; Oehlke, Kristen; Nystrom, Robert; Silvey, Kerry; Zlot, Amy; Giles, Rebecca; Johnson, Jenny; Anders, H Mack; Gwinn, Marta; Bowen, Scott; Khoury, Muin J.
Afiliação
  • St Pierre J; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Bach J; Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan.
  • Duquette D; Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan.
  • Oehlke K; Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota.
  • Nystrom R; Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.
  • Silvey K; Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.
  • Zlot A; Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.
  • Giles R; Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Johnson J; Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Anders HM; McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Gwinn M; McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Bowen S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail: msb4@cdc.gov.
  • Khoury MJ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 11: E97, 2014 Jun 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24921900
ABSTRACT
State health departments in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, and Utah explored the use of genomic information, including family health history, in chronic disease prevention programs. To support these explorations, the Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided cooperative agreement funds from 2003 through 2008. The 4 states' chronic disease programs identified advocates, formed partnerships, and assessed public data; they integrated genomics into existing state plans for genetics and chronic disease prevention; they developed projects focused on prevention of asthma, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions; and they created educational curricula and materials for health workers, policymakers, and the public. Each state's program was different because of the need to adapt to existing culture, infrastructure, and resources, yet all were able to enhance their chronic disease prevention programs with the use of family health history, a low-tech "genomic tool." Additional states are drawing on the experience of these 4 states to develop their own approaches.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Governo Estadual / Saúde Pública / Doença Crônica / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária / Genômica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Chronic Dis Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Geórgia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Governo Estadual / Saúde Pública / Doença Crônica / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária / Genômica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Chronic Dis Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Geórgia