Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addition of MR imaging features and genetic biomarkers strengthens glioblastoma survival prediction in TCGA patients.
Nicolasjilwan, Manal; Hu, Ying; Yan, Chunhua; Meerzaman, Daoud; Holder, Chad A; Gutman, David; Jain, Rajan; Colen, Rivka; Rubin, Daniel L; Zinn, Pascal O; Hwang, Scott N; Raghavan, Prashant; Hammoud, Dima A; Scarpace, Lisa M; Mikkelsen, Tom; Chen, James; Gevaert, Olivier; Buetow, Kenneth; Freymann, John; Kirby, Justin; Flanders, Adam E; Wintermark, Max.
Afiliação
  • Nicolasjilwan M; Division of Neuroradiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
  • Hu Y; Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Yan C; Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Meerzaman D; Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Holder CA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Division of Neuroradiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Gutman D; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Jain R; Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Colen R; Division of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Rubin DL; Department of Radiology and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Zinn PO; Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Hwang SN; Neuroradiology Section, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Raghavan P; Division of Neuroradiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
  • Hammoud DA; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Scarpace LM; Departments of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Mikkelsen T; Departments of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Chen J; Division of Neuroradiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Gevaert O; Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) & Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Buetow K; Arizona State University Life Science, Tempe, AZ, United States.
  • Freymann J; SAIC-Frederick, Inc., Frederick, MD, United States.
  • Kirby J; SAIC-Frederick, Inc., Frederick, MD, United States.
  • Flanders AE; Division of Neuroradiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Wintermark M; Division of Neuroradiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States; CHU de Vaudois, Department of Radiology, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: max.wintermark@gmail.com.
J Neuroradiol ; 42(4): 212-21, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24997477
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of our study was to assess whether a model combining clinical factors, MR imaging features, and genomics would better predict overall survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) than either individual data type.

METHODS:

The study was conducted leveraging The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) effort supported by the National Institutes of Health. Six neuroradiologists reviewed MRI images from The Cancer Imaging Archive (http//cancerimagingarchive.net) of 102 GBM patients using the VASARI scoring system. The patients' clinical and genetic data were obtained from the TCGA website (http//www.cancergenome.nih.gov/). Patient outcome was measured in terms of overall survival time. The association between different categories of biomarkers and survival was evaluated using Cox analysis.

RESULTS:

The features that were significantly associated with survival were (1) clinical factors chemotherapy; (2) imaging proportion of tumor contrast enhancement on MRI; and (3) genomics HRAS copy number variation. The combination of these three biomarkers resulted in an incremental increase in the strength of prediction of survival, with the model that included clinical, imaging, and genetic variables having the highest predictive accuracy (area under the curve 0.679±0.068, Akaike's information criterion 566.7, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

A combination of clinical factors, imaging features, and HRAS copy number variation best predicts survival of patients with GBM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos