Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients.
Koch, Cameron J; Lustig, Robert A; Yang, Xiang-Yang; Jenkins, Walter T; Wolf, Ronald L; Martinez-Lage, Maria; Desai, Arati; Williams, Dewight; Evans, Sydney M.
Afiliação
  • Koch CJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lustig RA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Yang XY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Jenkins WT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Wolf RL; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Martinez-Lage M; Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Desai A; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Williams D; Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Evans SM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: sydevans@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Transl Oncol ; 7(6): 752-8, 2014 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25500085
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED The standard of care for glioblastoma (GB) is surgery followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) and then adjuvant TMZ. This regime is associated with increased survival but also increased occurrence of equivocal imaging findings, e.g., tumor progression (TP) versus treatment effect (TE), which is also referred to as pseudoprogression (PsP). Equivocal findings make decisions regarding further treatment difficult and often delayed. Because none of the current imaging assays have proven sensitive and specific for differentiation of TP versus TE/PsP, we investigated whether blood-derived microvesicles (MVs) would be a relevant assay.

METHODS:

2.8 ml of citrated blood was collected from patients with GB at the time of their RT simulation, at the end of chemoradiation therapy (CRT), and multiple times following treatment. MVs were collected following multiple centrifugations (300g, 2500g, and 15,000g). The pellet from the final spin was analyzed using flow cytometry. A diameter of approximately 300 nm or greater and Pacific Blue-labeled Annexin V positivity were used to identify the MVs reported herein.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 19 blood samples from 11 patients with GB. MV counts in the patients with stable disease or TE/PsP were significantly lower than patients who developed TP (P = .014).

CONCLUSION:

These preliminary data suggest that blood analysis for MVs from GB patients receiving CRT may be useful to distinguish TE/PsP from TP. MVs may add clarity to standard imaging for decision making in patients with equivocal imaging findings.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos