Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of survival assessment in European childhood brain tumour trials, for children aged 5 years and over.
Limond, Jennifer A; Bull, Kim S; Calaminus, Gabriele; Kennedy, Colin R; Spoudeas, Helen A; Chevignard, Mathilde P.
Afiliação
  • Limond JA; Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: Jennifer.Limond@glasgow.ac.uk.
  • Bull KS; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Calaminus G; Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Kennedy CR; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Spoudeas HA; Paediatric Endocrinology, University College London Hospital and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
  • Chevignard MP; Rehabilitation Department for children with acquired neurological injury, Saint Maurice Hospitals, Saint Maurice, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7371, UMR_S 1146, LIB, F-75005, Paris, France.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol ; 19(2): 202-10, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25617909
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There is increasing recognition of the long-term sequelae of brain tumours treated in childhood. Five year survival rates now exceed 75% and assessing the quality of survival (QoS) in multiple domains is essential to any comparison of the benefits and harms of treatment regimens.

AIM:

The aim of this position statement is to rationalise assessments and facilitate collection of a common data set across Europe. Sufficient numbers of observations can then be made to enable reliable comparisons between outcomes following different tumour types and treatments.

METHODS:

This paper represents the consensus view of the QoS working group of the Brain Tumour group of the European Society of Paediatric Oncology regarding domains of QoS to prioritise for assessment in clinical trials. This consensus between clinicians and researchers across Europe has been arrived at by discussion and collaboration over the last eight years.

RESULTS:

Areas of assessment discussed include core medical domains (e.g. vision, hearing, mobility, endocrine), emotion, behaviour, adaptive behaviour and cognitive functioning.

CONCLUSIONS:

A 'core plus' approach is suggested in which core assessments (both direct and indirect tests) are recommended for all clinical trials. The core component is a relatively brief screening assessment that, in most countries, is a sub-component of routine clinical provision. The 'plus' components enable the addition of assessments which can be selected by individual countries and/or tumour-, age-, and location-specific groups. The implementation of a QoS protocol common to all European clinical studies of childhood brain tumours is also discussed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Análise de Sobrevida Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Análise de Sobrevida Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article