Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Correlation of sensitizing capacity and T-cell recognition within the Bet v 1 family.
Kitzmüller, Claudia; Zulehner, Nora; Roulias, Anargyros; Briza, Peter; Ferreira, Fatima; Faé, Ingrid; Fischer, Gottfried F; Bohle, Barbara.
Afiliação
  • Kitzmüller C; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Immunomodulation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zulehner N; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Roulias A; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Briza P; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Ferreira F; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Allergy Diagnosis and Therapy, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Faé I; Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Fischer GF; Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Bohle B; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Immunomodulation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: barbara.bohle@meduniwien.ac.at.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 136(1): 151-8, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25670010
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Bet v 1 is the main sensitizing allergen in birch pollen. Like many other major allergens, it contains an immunodominant T cell-activating region (Bet v 1142-156). Api g 1, the Bet v 1 homolog in celery, lacks the ability to sensitize and is devoid of major T-cell epitopes.

OBJECTIVE:

We analyzed the T-cell epitopes of Mal d 1, the nonsensitizing Bet v 1 homolog in apple, and assessed possible differences in uptake and antigen processing of Bet v 1, Api g 1, and Mal d 1.

METHODS:

For epitope mapping, Mal d 1-specific T-cell lines were stimulated with overlapping synthetic 12-mer peptides. The surface binding, internalization, and intracellular degradation of Bet v 1, Api g 1, and Mal d 1 by antigen-presenting cells were compared by using flow cytometry. All proteins were digested with endolysosomal extracts, and the resulting peptides were identified by means of mass spectrometry. The binding of Bet v 1142-156 and the homologous region in Mal d 1 by HLA class II molecules was analyzed in silico.

RESULTS:

Like Api g 1, Mal d 1 lacked dominant T-cell epitopes. The degree of surface binding and the kinetics of uptake and endolysosomal degradation of Bet v 1, Api g 1, and Mal d 1 were comparable. Endolysosomal degradation of Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 resulted in very similar fragments. The Bet v 1142-156 and Mal d 1141-155 regions showed no striking difference in their binding affinities to the most frequent HLA-DR alleles.

CONCLUSION:

The sensitizing activity of different Bet v 1 homologs correlates with the presence of immunodominant T-cell epitopes. However, the presence of Bet v 1142-156 is not conferred by differential antigen processing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfócitos T / Epitopos de Linfócito T / Antígenos de Plantas / Hipersensibilidade Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfócitos T / Epitopos de Linfócito T / Antígenos de Plantas / Hipersensibilidade Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria