Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Improved Index of Image Quality for Task-based Performance of CT Iterative Reconstruction across Three Commercial Implementations.
Christianson, Olav; Chen, Joseph J S; Yang, Zhitong; Saiprasad, Ganesh; Dima, Alden; Filliben, James J; Peskin, Adele; Trimble, Christopher; Siegel, Eliot L; Samei, Ehsan.
Afiliação
  • Christianson O; From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705 (O.C., E.S.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md (J.J.S.C., Z.Y., C.T., E.L.S.); and Department of Software and Systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md (G.S., A.D., J.J.F., A.P.).
Radiology ; 275(3): 725-34, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25686365
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop and validate a metric of computed tomographic (CT) image quality that incorporates the noise texture and resolution properties of an image. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Images of the American College of Radiology CT quality assurance phantom were acquired by using three commercial CT systems at seven dose levels with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). Image quality was characterized by the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and a detectability index (d') that incorporated noise texture and spatial resolution. The measured CNR and d' were compared with a corresponding observer study by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to determine how well each metric reflects the ability of an observer to detect subtle lesions. Statistical significance of the correlation between each metric and observer performance was determined by using a Student t distribution; P values less than .05 indicated a significant correlation. Additionally, each metric was used to estimate the dose reduction potential of IR algorithms while maintaining image quality.

RESULTS:

Across all dose levels, scanner models, and reconstruction algorithms, the d' correlated strongly with observer performance in the corresponding observer study (ρ = 0.95; P < .001), whereas the CNR correlated weakly with observer performance (ρ = 0.31; P = .21). Furthermore, the d' showed that the dose-reduction capabilities differed between clinical implementations (range, 12%-35%) and were less than those predicted from the CNR (range, 50%-54%).

CONCLUSION:

The strong correlation between the observer performance and the d' indicates that the d' is superior to the CNR for the evaluation of CT image quality. Moreover, the results of this study indicate that the d' improves less than the CNR with the use of IR, which indicates less potential for IR dose reduction than previously thought.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas / Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas / Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article