Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of ultrasound-assisted extract of the endemic plant Haberlea rhodopensis Friv.
Mihaylova, Dasha; Ivanova, Mirena; Bahchevanska, Slava; Krastanov, Albert.
Afiliação
  • Mihaylova D; Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, 4002 Bulgaria.
  • Ivanova M; Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, 4002 Bulgaria.
  • Bahchevanska S; Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, 4002 Bulgaria.
  • Krastanov A; Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, 4002 Bulgaria.
J Food Sci Technol ; 52(4): 2469-73, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25829635
ABSTRACT
The antioxidant capacity of extracts from leaves of Haberlea rhodopensis Friv. obtained by a highly efficient and simple method of the ultrasound-assisted extraction was investigated. The total polyphenolic content was determined spectrophotometrically using the Folin - Ciocalteu's phenol reagent and the polyphenols composition was analyzed by HPLC method. Antioxidant activity of the extract was evaluated as 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, 2,2-azinobis-3 ethyl benxothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) cation decolorization activity assays and the ferric reducing/antioxidant power method (FRAP). The total phenolics of the extract were determined to be 148.71 ± 5.33 mg GAE on a dry weight basis. The HPLC analysis showed a large number of flavonoids and phenolic acids present in the ultrasound ethanol extract of H. rhodopensis. Results also revealed that the major flavonoids were luteolin (2730.18 µg/g DW), hesperidin (928.56 µg/g DW) and kaempferol (578.52 µg/g DW), whereas the most abundant phenolic acids identified in the extract were ferulic acid (630.48 µg/g DW) and sinapic acid (580.80 µg/g DW). DPPH(•) and ABTS(•+) values were 0.803 ± 0.007 and 0.769 ± 0.040 mmol TE/g DW, respectively and FRAP values were 1.362 ± 0.05 mmol TE/g DW.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Food Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Food Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article