Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phenotypic responses to social defeat are associated with differences in cued and contextual fear discrimination.
Dulka, Brooke N; Lynch, Joseph F; Latsko, Maeson S; Mulvany, Jessica L; Jasnow, Aaron M.
Afiliação
  • Dulka BN; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
  • Lynch JF; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
  • Latsko MS; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
  • Mulvany JL; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States.
  • Jasnow AM; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States. Electronic address: ajasnow@kent.edu.
Behav Processes ; 118: 115-22, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26102254
ABSTRACT
Conflict among individuals is one of the most common forms of stressors experienced across a variety of species, including humans. Social defeat models in mice produce two phenotypic behavioral responses characterized by prolonged social avoidance (susceptibility) or continued social interaction (resistance). The resistant phenotype has been proposed as a model of resilience to chronic stress-induced depression in humans. Previously, we have found that mice that are resistant to social defeat stress display significant impairments in extinction learning and retention, suggesting that continued social interaction following the experience of social defeat may be associated with maladaptive fear responses. Here, we examined how individual differences in response to social defeat may be related to differences in cued and context fear discrimination. Following defeat, resistant mice showed increased fear to a neutral cued stimulus (CS-) compared to control and susceptible mice, but were still able to significantly discriminate between the CS+ and CS-. Likewise, both phenotypes were generally able to discriminate between the training context and neutral context at all retention intervals tested (1, 5, 14 days). However, susceptible mice displayed significantly better discrimination compared to resistant and non-defeated control mice when assessing the discrimination ratio. Thus, at a time when most animals begin exhibiting generalization to contextual cues, susceptible mice retain the ability to discriminate between fearful and neutral contexts. These data suggest that the differences observed in context and cued discrimination between susceptible and resistant mice may be related to differences in their coping strategies in response to social defeat. In particular, resistance or resilience to social defeat as traditionally characterized may be associated with altered inhibitory learning. Understanding why individual differences arise in response to stress, including social confrontation is important in understanding the development and treatment of stress related pathologies such as PTSD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Social / Comportamento Animal / Medo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Behav Processes Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Social / Comportamento Animal / Medo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Behav Processes Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos