Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two different S-1 plus cisplatin dosing schedules as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic and/or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase III trial (SOS).
Ryu, M-H; Baba, E; Lee, K H; Park, Y I; Boku, N; Hyodo, I; Nam, B-H; Esaki, T; Yoo, C; Ryoo, B-Y; Song, E-K; Cho, S-H; Kang, W K; Yang, S H; Zang, D Y; Shin, D B; Park, S R; Shinozaki, K; Takano, T; Kang, Y-K.
Afiliação
  • Ryu MH; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Baba E; Department of Comprehensive Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Lee KH; Department of Hemato-oncology, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu.
  • Park YI; Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea.
  • Boku N; Department of Clinical Oncology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki.
  • Hyodo I; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Nam BH; Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea.
  • Esaki T; Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Yoo C; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ryoo BY; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Song EK; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju.
  • Cho SH; Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Gwangju.
  • Kang WK; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School Medicine, Seoul.
  • Yang SH; Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul.
  • Zang DY; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang.
  • Shin DB; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
  • Park SR; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Shinozaki K; Division of Clinical Oncology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima.
  • Takano T; Department of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Minato-ku, Japan.
  • Kang YK; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ykkang@amc.seoul.kr.
Ann Oncol ; 26(10): 2097-101, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26216386
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP5) is one of the standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (GC), proven in a Japanese phase III study. To enhance the dose intensity of cisplatin, 3-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP3) was developed. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study evaluated whether SP3 (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1) was noninferior/superior to SP5 (S-1 80-120 mg/day on days 1-21 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic, recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized 1 1 to receive either SP3 or SP5. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00915382).

RESULTS:

Between February 2009 and January 2012, 625 patients were randomized at 42 sites in Korea and Japan. With a median follow-up duration of 32.4 months (range, 13.3-48.6 months) in surviving patients, SP3 was not only noninferior but also superior to SP5 in terms of PFS [median 5.5 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.99; P = 0.0418 for superiority). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (median 14.1 versus 13.9 months; HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.81-1.21; P = 0.9068). In patients with measurable disease, the response rates were 60% in the SP3 arm and 50% in the SP5 arm (P = 0.065). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, but grade 3 or higher anemia (19% versus 9%) and neutropenia (39% versus 9%) were more frequent in SP3.

CONCLUSIONS:

SP3 is superior to SP5 in terms of PFS. However, since the improvement in PFS was only slight and there was no difference in OS, both SP3 and SP5 can be recommended as first-line treatments for patients with advanced GC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article