Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Statin Selection in Qatar Based on Multi-indication Pharmacotherapeutic Multi-criteria Scoring Model, and Clinician Preference.
Al-Badriyeh, Daoud; Fahey, Michael; Alabbadi, Ibrahim; Al-Khal, Abdullatif; Zaidan, Manal.
Afiliação
  • Al-Badriyeh D; College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. Electronic address: daoud.a@qu.edu.qa.
  • Fahey M; Operation Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  • Alabbadi I; Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  • Al-Khal A; Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  • Zaidan M; Department of Pharmacy, Heart Hospital and the National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Clin Ther ; 37(12): 2798-810, 2015 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26299479
PURPOSE: Statin selection for the largest hospital formulary in Qatar is not systematic, not comparative, and does not consider the multi-indication nature of statins. There are no reports in the literature of multi-indication-based comparative scoring models of statins or of statin selection criteria weights that are based primarily on local clinicians' preferences and experiences. This study sought to comparatively evaluate statins for first-line therapy in Qatar, and to quantify the economic impact of this. METHODS: An evidence-based, multi-indication, multi-criteria pharmacotherapeutic model was developed for the scoring of statins from the perspective of the main health care provider in Qatar. The literature and an expert panel informed the selection criteria of statins. Relative weighting of selection criteria was based on the input of the relevant local clinician population. Statins were comparatively scored based on literature evidence, with those exceeding a defined scoring threshold being recommended for use. FINDINGS: With 95% CI and 5% margin of error, the scoring model was successfully developed. Selection criteria comprised 28 subcriteria under the following main criteria: clinical efficacy, best publish evidence and experience, adverse effects, drug interaction, dosing time, and fixed dose combination availability. Outcome measures for multiple indications were related to effects on LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and C-reactive protein. Atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin exceeded defined pharmacotherapeutic thresholds. Atorvastatin and pravastatin were recommended as first-line use and rosuvastatin as a nonformulary alternative. It was estimated that this would produce a 17.6% cost savings in statins expenditure. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the evaluation's outcomes against input uncertainties. IMPLICATIONS: Incorporating a comparative evaluation of statins in Qatari practices based on a locally developed, transparent, multi-indication, multi-criteria scoring model has the potential to considerably reduce expenditures on statins. Atorvastatin and pravastatin should be the first-line statin therapies in the main Qatari health care provider, with rosuvastatin as an alternative.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article