Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Roth, Joshua A; Ramsey, Scott D; Carlson, Josh J.
Afiliação
  • Roth JA; Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Ramsey SD; Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Carlson JJ; Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA carlsojj@u.washington.edu.
Oncologist ; 20(12): 1355-64, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26482553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many patients with Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer receive invasive treatment but likely derive little or no benefit. A novel 8-protein prognostic assay generates a risk score at time of biopsy that is predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness and can inform treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using the assay to inform treatment decisions compared with usual care. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We developed a simulation model to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and cost outcomes for the 8-protein assay and usual care strategies. Risk classification outcomes, treatment distributions, costs, health state utilities, and mortality rates were derived from the assay's validation study and the peer-reviewed literature. Outcomes included incremental QALYs, costs, and cost-effectiveness ratios. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate the most influential inputs and to explore joint uncertainty in outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS:

The 8-protein assay strategy resulted in 0.04 more QALY and $700 less in costs compared with usual care (and thus was "dominant"). The cost-effectiveness of the assay strategy was most sensitive to the assay cost, the active surveillance health state utility, and the proportion of low-risk patients receiving active surveillance (vs. treatment) in usual care. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the assay strategy decreased cost and increased QALYs in 86.9% and 58.3% of simulations, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Assuming that ongoing prospective studies support the results of retrospective validation studies, the 8-protein prognostic assay strategy for prostate cancer is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to usual guideline-based care in biopsy Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Biópsia / Proteínas / Biomarcadores Tumorais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Biópsia / Proteínas / Biomarcadores Tumorais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos